Slashdot Mirror


A Reporter Built a Bot To Find Nazi Sock Puppet Accounts. Twitter Banned the Bot and Kept the Nazis (nytimes.com)

Yair Rosenberg, writing for the New York Times: I asked my own Twitter followers whether it might be possible to create a bot that would reply to these impostors and expose their true nature to any users they tried to fool. Neal Chandra, a talented developer in San Francisco whom I've never met, replied, "I can try to throw something together this evening." And so, after a week of testing, Impostor Buster was born. Using a crowdsourced database of impersonator accounts, carefully curated by us to avoid any false positives, the bot patrolled Twitter and interjected whenever impostors tried to insinuate themselves into a discussion (Editor's note: the link may be paywalled). Within days, our golem for the digital age had become a runaway success, garnering thousands of followers and numerous press write-ups. Most important, we received countless thank-yous from alerted would-be victims. The impersonator trolls seethed. Some tried changing their user names to evade the bot (it didn't work). Others simply reverted to their openly neo-Nazi personas. A few even tried to impersonate the bot, which was vastly preferable from our perspective and rather amusing. Twitter sided with the Nazis. In April, the service suspended Impostor Buster without explanation and reinstated it only after being contacted by the ADL's cyber-hate team. Over the next few months, we fine-tuned the bot to reduce its tweets and avoid tripping any of Twitter's alarms. As the trolls continued to report the bot to no avail, we thought the problem was resolved. But we were wrong. This month, Twitter suspended the bot again, and this time refused to revive it.

9 of 648 comments (clear)

  1. Bots by zoid.com · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yeah, Twitter has a bot policy.

    https://help.twitter.com/en/ru...

    1. Re:Bots by Freischutz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, Twitter has a bot policy.

      https://help.twitter.com/en/ru...

      Yeah but Twitter's biggest problem is also how to clamp down on abusive trolls. A former Twitter employee called the platform: "a honeypot for a**holes”, even Twitter's CEO started worrying about the a**hole factor when celebrities got fed up with the trolls and started abandoning Twitter. It seems to me this bot might be the answer to Twitter's problems rather than one of their problems even if they only used it to monitor the abusers more effectively. They should be sending these people joboffers instead of ban notices.

    2. Re: Bots by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you want me to pick between bot spam and Nazis, I'll take the bots thanks.

      why not have both, like Microsoft's Tay, for example!

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  2. Re:Censorship through spam. by Calydor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And how would you feel if within seconds of you posting anything (and I DO notice I'm replying to an AC, so I mean the collective 'you' here) a reply would appear essentially yelling, "THIS GUY IS A CONFIRMED NAZI! DON'T ASSOCIATE WITH HIM EVER!"?

    Doesn't matter if it's true. There's no way of proving innocence or guilt. There's just this bot hounding you, following you through username and account changes. Isn't that the very DEFINITION of harassment and stalking?

    Is it okay to do that because some of the targets, hell even if they have 100% accuracy, agree with Nazi ideology? Do we REALLY need to start saying "First they came for the Nazis, and I said nothing because I wasn't a Nazi ..."?

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  3. Re: Wrong approach, kill the nazi faggots by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Informative

    The party was dismantled generations ago, there are no more Nazis.

    So those chaps making Nazi saultes, chanting "blood and soil", wearing swastikas and so on---what would you call them exactly?

    If you want a good argument about it, I suggest you try arguing with this chap:

    https://mobile.twitter.com/Har...

    His take on it:

    I guess I got confused when they gave the #Hitler salute and chanted "blood and soil" b/c it reminded me of who I fought in my youth.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  4. Re: Wrong approach, kill the nazi faggots by cyber-vandal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Homophobia and death threats. What makes you any better than them?

  5. Re: Wrong approach, kill the nazi faggots by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wouldn't call them Nazis because they aren't a member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party.

    If they look like a Nazi, quack like a Nazi, make heavy use of Nazy symbology and espouse the same values, it's reasonablt to call them Nazis.

    If you want to engage in a game of mindless semantics where only you control the definitions, feel free, but don't expect anyone else to think you're being sensible.

    you seem to think being called out for bad grammar, bad terminology etc. is some how unacceptable

    Ah, I see you've entered the "just make shit up" part of the debate. That didn't take you very long I must say.

    Where do you think you are? This isn't Twitter

    On Twitter, you might have a chance of trying your arguments out with someone who has more than an armchair perspective, you know, someone who actually fought the Nazis.

    I see you simply ignored that.

    By the way, quoting the names of inapplicable logical fallacies, especially those you don't understand does not make an argument, and it does not make you sound clever.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  6. Re: Wrong approach, kill the nazi faggots by alexgieg · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Nazis were left wing as well.

    No, they weren't. They defined themselves as a "third position" distinct from both right and left, adopting a few elements from one side, a few from the other, and adding stuff of their own to the mix. This is why the right calls them left, the left calls them right, the center considers them extremists in one direction or the other, and also why all three are wrong. The center is correct only insofar as nazis are extremists, but they're extremists in a direction that doesn't fit within the left-right spectrum.

    Also, internally the Nazi Party had several subgroups, including a left wing, a right wing, a monarchist wing etc. At some point the right wing of the party decided the left wing was being too troublesome and killed them all. Afterwards the economic policies of the party, that were somewhat "balanced" from the perspective of the left-right axis of the time, turned markedly to the right. But contrary to what the current left wants to believe on the matter, that still didn't turn Nazism itself into a right wing movement.

    Nazism was and remained first and foremost nazi-wing. Any attempt at reducing that wing so as to fit the left-right spectrum, be it into the left side of the spectrum, as conservatives and libertarians want to do, be it into the right side of the spectrum, as liberals and socialists want to do, is and will continue being incorrect and doomed to failure.

    --
    Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
  7. Re: Wrong approach, kill the nazi faggots by Jason+Levine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Many of the "white nationalists" who marched in Charlotte were wearing swastikas, carrying Nazi flags, and shouting anti-Jewish sayings. The other white nationalists there didn't seem to mind the presence of these folks. As a friendly tip: If you are waving a Nazi flag and shouting anti-Jewish sayings while protesting, chances are you're a Nazi. If the people you're protesting with are carrying a Nazi flag and you don't see anything wrong with that, chances are you're a Nazi.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.