Slashdot Mirror


Where Did WikiLeaks' $25 Million Bitcoin Fortune Go? (thedailybeast.com)

Everyone from early investors to cybercriminals has benefited from the huge spike in the value of bitcoin in the past few weeks. It's a boon for one other outfit that has likely racked up tens of millions of dollars' worth of the cryptocurrency: WikiLeaks. Joseph Cox, reporting for The Daily Beast: The transparency organization may be sitting on a stockpile of bitcoin valued at around $25 million, and has likely exchanged several other large cryptocurrency caches for fiat cash, according to two sources who independently analyzed WikiLeaks's bitcoin transactions. "Last wallet looks like his piggy bank," John Bambenek, a security expert who has previously tracked Neo-Nazis' use of bitcoin, told The Daily Beast, pointing to a specific bitcoin address believed to be linked to WikiLeaks. Since at least 2011, WikiLeaks has allowed supporters to send bitcoin donations. As noted by James Ball, a journalist and former WikiLeaks staffer, whoever is in control of this address -- presumably WikiLeaks -- moved around 3,000 bitcoin, worth $800 each, into a series of other accounts on one day in December 2013.

85 comments

  1. It's probably in the blockchain. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's probably in the blockchain.

    1. Re:It's probably in the blockchain. by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 2

      It's probably in the blockchain.

      Any day now. Unless someone is willing to pay a higher transaction fee, then a couple more days.

  2. What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Between this submission and this other submission that's currently on the front page, the word "nazi" appears 8 times!

    Do you know how many times "linux" appears on the front page right now? Zero!

    Do you know how many times "programming" appears on the front page right now? Zero!

    "internet" only appears twice.

    Are Slashdot's editors just imitating the mainstream media and leftists, who have been falsely accusing all sorts of people of being "nazis" lately?

    Frankly, this kind of misuse of the term "nazi" only serves to dilute the meaning of that term.

    It's getting to the point where when people hear the term "nazi" and they just figure it's yet another false accusation made to attack a political opponent, the shrug their shoulders, and ignore it.

    1. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, Nazi.

    2. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      So 8 Nazi can't use Linux because of a division by zero exception?

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    3. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Are Slashdot's editors just imitating the mainstream media and leftists, who have been falsely accusing all sorts of people of being "nazis" lately?

      Yes.

    4. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by kaizendojo · · Score: 1

      Stop being such a Linux Programming Nazi.

    5. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Between this submission and this other submission [slashdot.org] that's currently on the front page, the word "nazi" appears 8 times!

      Do you know how many times "linux" appears on the front page right now? Zero!

      That's because linux users aren't as likely to kill anyone, and they're much less fun to punch.

      Also, Windows Vista is the nazi's OS of choice.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Stop being such a Linux Programming Nazi.

      Stop being such a Linux Programming Nazi, Nazi and I'll stop being such a Linux Programming Nazi Nazi, Nazi!

      It's Nazis all the way down.

      https://youtu.be/HPXHRX8Q2hs

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    7. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by ScentCone · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's because linux users aren't as likely to kill anyone, and they're much less fun to punch.

      The good news is that the imaginary armies of killer Nazis roaming your neighborhoods don't actually exist. The bad news is that violent leftist thugs actually do form groups specifically to go out and hurt people and destroy things, and then actually do it, and get applauded by their sponsors for doing it.

      The other good news is that people are waking up to the reality of the situation's phony narratives. The bad news is that you approve of preemptive violent assault as a form of political expression.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    8. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      The good news is that the imaginary armies of killer Nazis roaming your neighborhoods don't actually exist. The bad news is that violent leftist thugs actually do form groups specifically to go out and hurt people

      Americans killed by Nazis in 2017:

      Heather Heyer
      Taliesin Namkai Meche
      Ricky Best
      Richard Collins III
      Timothy Caughman
      Srinivas Kuchibhotla
      Buckley Kuhn-Fricker
      Scott Fricker

      Americans killed by anti-fascists: 0

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Frankly, this kind of misuse of the term "nazi" only serves to dilute the meaning of that term.

      "More than you like" is not tantamount to mis-use. Someone who is inspired by Nazi ideology or imagery is at least a "neo-nazi" by any reasonable standard. And in the context of this article, it's entirely appropriate: Neo-nazi groups are groups that the researcher in question has tracked. If this were the 1960s the flavor of the decade would have been "Maoist", but we live in an era where Naziism is making a comeback, and people are tracking it.

      As for your keyword count, it's almost laughably naive. Most software articles don't have "programming" in the title, nor do many linux-related articles invoke "linux".

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    10. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because linux users aren't as likely to kill anyone...

      Tell that to Nina Reiser.

    11. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [linux users are] much less fun to punch.

      That's where you're wrong, Ratzo!

    12. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "Nazi" is somebody who was a member of the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, which existed from 1920 until 1945. It was officially abolished on October 10, 1945. Let's look at the case of the youngest members. We'll assume they were 18 in 1945. That means they were born in 1927. So that makes them 90 years old in 2017.

      If we really, really, really, really want to stretch the definition of "Nazi", we could include people who were members of the Hitler-Jugend, Bund deutscher Arbeiterjugend. It, too, was abolished on October 10, 1945. Let's assume the youngest members were 10 in 1945. That means they were born in 1935. So that makes them 82 in 2017.

      I very much doubt that any of those people you listed were killed by somebody who was 80 years old, or more correctly, much older than that. Even if they were killed by an elderly person, it's very doubtful that the alleged perpetrator was a member of the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei or the Hitler-Jugend during the 1920-1945 period.

      It looks like you're misusing the term "Nazi" and incorrectly applying it to people who were not members of the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei or the Hitler-Jugend, and who thus cannot be considered to be "Nazis".

    13. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since slashdot was sold it's turned into another place spouting the establishment narrative.

    14. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Somebody who is inspired by Nazi imagery is an idiot-fanboy. Or somebody into cosplay.

      Anybody who is inspired by Nazi ideology is just a plain idiot. It's fun in your adolescence to latch onto crap that explains why all the older people are dumb, why history is over and that there's a simple 'plan' that can just be adopted by force to fix everything. That's how 'neo-liberals' and 'neo-cons' are born. The Democratic and Republican party are full of those fools. We have a lot of them here on Slashdot, too. It's simply a matter of waving the proper flag and namecalling the people with 'different' opinions.

    15. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      Is it the mainstream media and leftists - or the alt-right folks that apply the term to themselves, and then get reported about. I mean there were those Hitler salutes in Charlottesville, weren't there? Of course, a few noisy neo-nazis in your organization may get the whole thing (unfairly?) branded as a nazi enterprise - but you're not denying that neo-nazis exist and are becoming more visible and vocal around the world are you?

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    16. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

      How are we supposed to solve this violently if nobody uses preemptive violence?

    17. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by hey! · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't underestimate the power of idiot-fanboyism. This is basically a somewhat less sterile term for authoritarianism.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    18. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL.... yeah, because you guys are a bunch of fucks amplifying them.

      That's why.

      Fucking idiots.

    19. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Godwin's Law implemented in a non-internet setting.

    20. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by slshdtisctrldbysjws · · Score: 0

      In case you're completely retarded, almost all of the media, education system, political system, and market are controlled directly by a centralized entity - the banking system.

      BUT IT'S SO SURPRISING THE SAME SPECIFIC NARRATIVE APPEARS UNIFORMLY WITH LITTLE COSMETIC CHANGE IN JUST ABOUT EVERY SINGLE MAINSTREAM NEWS OUTLET

      LOL THAT'S FUNNY, I GUESS EVERYONE SUDDENLY IS TERRIFIED OF NAZIS EVEN AFTER 75 YEARS OF WW2 VICTORY

      I BET THERE'S NO CONSPIRACY, CONSPIRACY IS A SILLY WORD FOR THE BAD BOYS WHO DO BAD STUFF AND AREN'T SMART LIKE ME

      --
      My karma was manually wiped by site staff https://slashdot.org/~slshdtisctrldbysjws 18 mod up, 10 mod down = bad karma
    21. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      Perhaps. But they're already getting amplified plenty on talk radio, etc. So, I guess the mainstream media has to decide between ignoring them as nut jobs - or alerting the rest of us that they're out there. Ignoring them doesn't seem to have worked very well. Most of 'us guys' had no idea how many White Supremacist / Neo-Nazis there were until we started seeing televised Trump rallies - which were truly scary spectacles. And then he won...

      So perhaps a bit of alarmism is called for at this point.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    22. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Anybody who is inspired by Nazi ideology is just a plain idiot.

      Not a plain idiot, a Nazi idiot. There's plenty of idiots who aren't Nazis, so we need to distinguish.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    23. Re:What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately? by kaizendojo · · Score: 1

      Thanks for starting off my Friday with a LOL.

  3. Bitcoin Addresses != Unique Individuals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wikileaks understands keeping 3000 Bitcoin in one wallet address is stupid.

    When will journalists actually bother to learn how cryptocurrency works?

    1. Re:Bitcoin Addresses != Unique Individuals by BabyAndTheButterfly · · Score: 1

      Why exactly? With hardware wallets it should be 100% secure.

    2. Re:Bitcoin Addresses != Unique Individuals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You paint a target on yourself and you make your transactions easier to monitor. Hardware wallets are only as secure as the precautions you take while using it, it can be compromised if you somehow run an infected application to interface with it and fail to notice a discrepancy in the recipient wallet address while executing a transaction.

    3. Re:Bitcoin Addresses != Unique Individuals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if the chance is astronomically small someone could guess the key to a wallet in 1 guess. Always best to spread out your fortune. Also helps to create some anti-tracking measures.

    4. Re:Bitcoin Addresses != Unique Individuals by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      Wikileaks understands keeping 3000 Bitcoin in one wallet address is stupid.

      When will journalists actually bother to learn how cryptocurrency works?

      WHY is it stupid? Perhaps because it's too easy to steal and there isn't any FDIC for Bitcoin?

    5. Re: Bitcoin Addresses != Unique Individuals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right and there's no chance the NSA or CIA could hack or otherwise destroy the wallet. These people are actually after wikileaks. You're only thinking of the 'steal' scenario.

    6. Re:Bitcoin Addresses != Unique Individuals by mysidia · · Score: 3, Informative

      WHY is it stupid? Perhaps because it's too easy to steal

      It's HARD to steal, unless they are amateurish in their key management practices.

      Use dedicated hardware-wallets with optional BIP39 Passphrase + Strong PIN + Strong physical security.

      If they're concerned about insider attacks, then they can use a special procedure to generate credentials where No one person ever gains access to sufficient credentials to authorize a transaction.

      For example: Suppose the wallet is a Trezor.
      You need two items to operate the device: BIP39 Passphrase to open the wallet, and PIN number to authorize each transaction.

      You would need two items to recover or clone the device: 24 Recovery words and BIP39 Passphrase

      Person 1 will make up and personally secure the 48-character random passphrase, and give the first 16 characters to Person 2 and Person 3, AND give the next 16 characters to Person 4 and Person 5, and finally Person 8 and Person 9 will receive the rest of the passphrase.

      Person 2, Person 3, Person 4, and Person 5 begin the initialization process for the wallet and begin selecting an 8-digit PIN number.
      Person 2 and Person 3 handle choosing and entering the first 4 digits of the PIN and their share of the passphrase, then Person 4 and Person 5 handle entering the next 4 digits of the PIN and their share of the passphrase, then Person 8 and 9.

      For wallet recovery: The 24 seed words will be divided into 3 shares.
      Person 1, Person 2, and Person 3, Person 8 will write down and personally secure the first 8 words

      Person 4, Person 5, and Person 6, Person 9 will write down and personally secure the next 8 words

      Person 7, Person 8, and Person 9, Person 10 will write down and personally secure the last 8 words

    7. Re:Bitcoin Addresses != Unique Individuals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wikileaks are nazis and they must be stopped.

    8. Re:Bitcoin Addresses != Unique Individuals by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It's HARD to steal, unless they are amateurish in their key management practices.

      So, for most people, it's not hard to steal. Got it.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    9. Re:Bitcoin Addresses != Unique Individuals by mysidia · · Score: 1

      So, for most people, it's not hard to steal. Got it.

      No way did I say not hard to steal for most people.... difficulty varies. First of all, because it's a company, you have to distinguish between an INSIDER and an OUTSIDER stealing coins. WikiLeaks has some apparently intelligent people who know enough something about IT, GPG,
      and keeping secrets (Until they leak them), so I think they should have the abilities required to EASILY prevent outsider theft.

      Insider theft is also easy to prevent if they set it up so only Julian Assange and perhaps a 2nd in command can unlock the keys, BUT
      if one of those two people proves untrustworhy, then they can steal the coins just like they could drain the bank.

      For the General Public --- their coins might be at risk because they left them on an exchange in the first place.

      Those who learned a little more --- like how to use a wallet such as Electrum: their coins are going to be hard to steal,
      BUT it is still feasible by malware.

  4. Re: What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    news for clicks
    stuff thatâ(TM)s polarizing

  5. Re: What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are literally Hitler!

  6. Someone's got to pay for JA's room and board by darthsilun · · Score: 1

    I'd bet the nightly rate at the Ecuador Embassy isn't cheap.

    1. Re: Someone's got to pay for JA's room and board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fascinating

    2. Re:Someone's got to pay for JA's room and board by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      It's certainly risen to more than Hillary can afford.

      Which is a lot, mind you.

  7. Re: What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And still no UTF-8 support.

  8. I know where it went... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right into George W. Bush's pocket.

    1. Re:I know where it went... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does this even mean? Is this a new meme?

  9. Fiat cash? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    exchanged several other large cryptocurrency caches for fiat cash

    The term is real money. Using the term "fiat cash" makes the author sound like a pretentious ass who's trying to be oh so leet.

    No one in normal, every day usage uses the term, "fiat cash". If we're going down that route, we should use a term such as electronic markers to describe bitcoin and the like.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Fiat cash? by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fiat cash?

      That is money used to buy an Italian car.

    2. Re:Fiat cash? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In the US, real money is defined as gold or silver, as is similar in the Constitutions of several states and the Bretton Woods Agreement.

      Historians, economists, and traders use the term 'fiat' all the time, but this may be the first time any of them were accused of being 'leet' rather than 'nerds'.

      Why do you have a burr up your ass about a particular economic term?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:Fiat cash? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1
      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:Fiat cash? by DerekLyons · · Score: 0

      In the US, real money is defined as gold or silver, as is similar in the Constitutions of several states and the Bretton Woods Agreement.

      [[Citation Needed]] - and no weasel words or using gold bugs, bitcoin zealots, or other nut jobs as references either.
       

      Historians, economists, and traders use the term 'fiat' all the time, but this may be the first time any of them were accused of being 'leet' rather than 'nerds'.

      That's because you're confusing academic and professional usage (the 'nerds') with colloquial usage specifically intended as denigration.
       

      Why do you have a burr up your ass about a particular economic term?

      Because it's being misused to imply that Bitcoin is something it isn't.

    5. Re:Fiat cash? by religionofpeas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No one in normal, every day usage uses the term, "fiat cash"

      Because in normal every day usage, that's implied.

      But in a discussion where you talk about non-fiat money, it becomes useful to make the distinction explicit.

    6. Re:Fiat cash? by hey! · · Score: 1

      No one in normal, every day usage uses the term, "fiat cash".

      s/in normal,/normal in/

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    7. Re:Fiat cash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The term is real money. Using the term "fiat cash" makes the author sound like a pretentious ass who's trying to be oh so leet. "

      Bitcoin is real money. Fiat currency is just traded notes of debt originating with a private party who pulls them out of the air and creates them at will. They are easily and frequently counterfeited. Granted more vendors will accept them directly than bitcoin or gold but they really shouldn't.

    8. Re:Fiat cash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, real money is defined as gold or silver,

      Bwahahahaha. So, u define cash as ................? The usd hasn't been backed by anything other than idiots with a lot of fire power since 1971.

    9. Re:Fiat cash? by jimbobxxx · · Score: 1

      Historians, economists, and traders use the term 'fiat' all the time

      Bet they don't in everyday life. e.g. 'hey Jimmy, do you have your lunch fiat-currency?' 'honey - do we have any fiat currency to pay the cleaner?' 'Sorry mate, I'm low on fiat currency, could you get this round in?'

    10. Re:Fiat cash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlei

      Article 1, Section 10:

      No state shall enter into any treaty, alliance, or confederation; grant letters of marque and reprisal; coin money; emit bills of credit; make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts; pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts, or grant any title of nobility.

      Lazy fuckwit.

    11. Re:Fiat cash? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      It's a pointless distinction... Because everyone but Bitcoin zealots know that Bitcoin isn't actually money. There's no inherent store of value, such as being backed by gold, nor is it backed by the economy of a nation. It's sole value lies in the Faith of the Believers - other than that, it's not conceptually really any different from an arcade or casino token.

      The submitter uses that term for one reason only; to inflate Bitcoin into something it's patently not. It's an appeal to emotion, not academic or economic usage.

  10. Re: What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even though the media likes to call them right-extremists, the 1930s National Socialists were actually leftists who pitted the "unfairly" successful German Jews (the 1% of their time) against the post-WW1 German commoner, in much the same way that Democrats use class envy to keep themselves in power today.

  11. Fiat cash? by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the US, real money is defined as gold or silver, as is similar in the Constitutions of several states and the Bretton Woods Agreement.

    Historians, economists, and traders use the term 'fiat' all the time, but this may be the first time any of them were accused of being 'leet' rather than 'nerds'.

    Why do you have a burr up your ass about a particular economic term?

    In addition, he's attacking the author (he sounds pretentious!) and not the substance of the article, or even the reliability of the information given.

  12. Re: What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    "You are literally Hitler!"

      'literally' ?

    You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means.

  13. What nobody is addressing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it wrong for an organization that used information stolen from Hillary Clinton by Russian hackers to hack the United States presidential erections for profit?

    I think Julian Assange should be executed for betraying Hillary. I voted for Hillary, and I think anyone that opposed her is a right wing neo nazi racist fucktard. Socialism is for fucking RETURDS, and anyone that thinks that the government should have any say on what private organizations, companies, and people do is a fucking piece of shit.

  14. Re: What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately by umghhh · · Score: 1

    Why has this been marked as troll? It is an innocent joke. Are we this far in lack of humour that in all that nazi/metoo/ecological collapse/Trump deception/what else we have no time for a normal conversation? I guess yes.

  15. Re: What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux users are motherfuckers, asshole, faggots, and grade A dipshits. But, Nazis are still worse and still exist even in 2017. I envision a world without Nazis and Linux zealots. But that world if far, far away.

  16. Re: What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as you don't count the Las Vegas shooting. Paddock had antifa related material in his room.

  17. Re: What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    As long as you don't count the Las Vegas shooting. Paddock had antifa related material in his room.

    His bump stocks all had Pepe stickers on them.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  18. Re: What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess you think the Berkeley professor who went around striking people in the head with a bike lock was trying to help his victims with their hairstyle?

    As a former EMT in the 9-1-1 system, I've seen more than my fair share of single-strike head injuries that caused significant damage.

    As such, there is only one reason for striking someone in the head with a weighted metal obeject: to cause serious bodily harm to them, up to, and including death. Just because the noodly-arm professor was not successful doesn't mean he didn't attempt to do what you claim hasn't happened.

  19. A fashion industry for words. by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The term of choice used to be "racist", but that's been so overused in the past year and a half that they have to switch to using another word.

    I've been following the zeitgeist of this. Until around December of last year, people would flee from the word, conceding the argument to whoever first uses the word to describe the other side. Then in December people started ignoring the word a little, then Jan/Feb people were like "meh" about it, and around March people started (note: started, not widely) embracing the word.

    Then "OK, I'm racist" started popping up, but it wasn't really attached to the *person*, it was attached to the position. One could say "OK, I'm racist" for posting an opinion about strong immigration control. Or "OK, I'm racist" for posting an opinion about limiting visas or voter ID.

    Through the summer, "racist" started to be applied to just about everything. Tigers are racist. Perfectionism is a form of racism. Two white parents having a white child is racist. I'm not making that last one up, it's "[...] one of the most powerful forces supporting white supremacy" - don't you know?

    Now racist has completely lost its meaning. No one online seems to pay any attention to it at all.

    Sexual assault is pretty big right now, but it's fading fast. It was a flash in the pan with people like Harvey Weinstein, but quickly got more ridiculous. You can tell it's on it's way out because Fart rape is a thing.

    (Side note: "Trump is literally Hitler" is pretty-much dead, the last nail in that coffin was recognizing Jerusalem as the capitol of Israel.)

    So now they need a new word, and it's probably going to be nazis for awhile. Expect this to go on for a couple of months and get progressively more ridiculous, probably though the primaries of next year.

    Then Ramadan comes up (May 15 to June15), many terrorist actions will make the news cycle(*), and it's likely that "Islamaphobe" will be the word of the day.

    It's basically the fashion industry for words.

    (*) Just extrapolating from past years, such as last year viz. London. OK, I'm racist.

    1. Re:A fashion industry for words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't agree with your opinion.

      The term racist still has a lot of meaning, except to people who pretty much acknowledge their racism. There was a time when being racist was seen as a social stigma, something people didn't want to be. Over the past couple of years an active online propaganda campaign has transformed terms such as that into badges of honor. This was done in part by the US neonazi movement along with support from anti-US state actors that embraced that movement to push further divisions in the US.

  20. Re: What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    The encoding clearly identifies AppleDevice users who don't know how to configure them. That's a plus, actually. It flags those individuals to "the rest of us."

  21. Re: What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    The back side of Antifa flags always have Pepe logos on them. When they flap in the wind is when the riot starts.

  22. Re: What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux users are motherfuckers, asshole, faggots, and grade A dipshits. But, Nazis are still worse and still exist even in 2017. I envision a world without Nazis and Linux zealots. But that world if far, far away.

    If it weren't for linux, u couldn't login here and post idiot drivel.....

  23. Assange Lives! by cstacy · · Score: 1

    Based on most of the comments here, I would imagine that the Bitcoins were used to fund the technology that keeps Julian Assange's head alive in a jar in a South American embassy.

  24. Re: What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it's hilarious when Russian shitposters out themselves with encoding.

  25. Same story in every publication. Sure, why not. by slashdotiscompromisd · · Score: 1

    "Bitcoin is for nazis"
    This same story is being pushed in every mainstream news outlet.
    What a coincidence. I guess they all detected at the same exact time that this is what all their readers really want to read and that they have to run this story to make money. "Conspiracy theories" are clearly of no use here.

    Bonus points: casually imply that Wikileaks are neo nazis.

    Literally everything - media, education, politics - is being taken over by psychotic brainless drones trained on leftism. It's far, far past the point that this can be sorted out peacefully. Civil War is inevitable at this point. Every day we put it off makes it worse.

    --
    My karma was manually wiped by site staff https://slashdot.org/~slshdtisctrldbysjws 18 mod up, 10 mod down = bad karma
  26. Re: What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would love too, but sheâ(TM)s u responsive at the moment.

  27. NOT "leftists" EITHER. Fascists rather. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are two factions in the world right now.
    Nationalists, like in Britain, like in Hungary, and more and more of Europe, slowly but surely dismantling the EU, probably in Russia too (unless Putin really is the US "evil in the closet" puppet), and everywhere a bit.
    And fascists, which you might know by the names "neocons" (in the US), "neoliberals" (in Europe), etc, but really perfectly fit the Mussolini's original definition of fascism. Who basically rule the US, the EU, and are mostly under the umbrella of the 500-think-tank strong fascist lobbyist Mont Perelin Society. (Source:

    They are both cancer. They are both your and my literal sworn enemies. I don't care if you are "left" or "right". Don’t let them divide us. You are a citizen, with wishes, and right. And I am a citizen, with wishes and rights. Let's respect each other's wishes and not hate or oppress one another. "Leftists" can have their own (totalitarian|safe space) SJW (dis|u)topia. "Rightists" can have their own (totalitarian|libertarian) lawless theocracy or whatever. As long as they do it among themselves, what do we care? I can still be happy for you, no matter how much I might disagree with you. Can you do the same? :)

  28. Wait, but Jerusalem leaders are "literally Hitler" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Proving once again, that any former victim will become that which he hates one day.
    Like people having no qualms wishing murder upon a murderer.
    Israel's leadership has no qualms doing genocide against the Palestinians.
    Yes, Palestinian leaders also do their own bit of terrorism (as much as they can, not having basically half the world behind them), so they are not really better.
    But that does not make the genocide OK. That's my point! Murder does not make murder OK.
    And really truly, of ALL people, Israelis are the ones who should know better.
    But go tell to the father of the murdered daughter, that murdering the murderer will make him the same as his daughter's murderer. ... This is the thing that I still fail to get across. Jesus' story specifically is about teaching this simple lesson. Look how that went. So what chances do I have. This comment would probably marked (-2, Troll) if possible. :/

    CAN NOBODY SEE THAT THIS IS MADNESS? :(

  29. Re: What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Fortunately, the German for National Socialist German Worker's Party doesn't require an umlaut or eszet or anything that Slashdot can't display easily.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  30. Re: What's with Slashdot's "nazi" obsession lately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are literally Hitler! (for pointing that out)

  31. DIY Cryptocurrency Mining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want mine your own crypto currency, you need a motherboard with 19 PCIe 1X slots to plug in 19 GPUs and a couple of 1200W PSUs.

  32. Mozilla funds AntiFa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You want Nazis?

    You want Fascists?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPgyTzqDJhM

    https://linustechtips.com/main/topic/844773-mozilla-funding-antifa/