You could argue that it was the right thing to do.
If operations is losing money, but its being masked by some rental thing maybe economically would be better to lose the operational bit of the company.
(I know nothing about your particular case though)
I agree that the lead contractor needs to know that plastering needs to be done, and that the foundations needs to be x meters dee;.
I don't care if the architect doesn't know exactly how to do it.
The problem with bitcoins is that they are too volatile. That $5.00 Coffee you bought today could have a opportunity cost of $15.00 next year. Vs using the Dollar where that $5.00 would have an opportunity cost of $5.15 the next year.
Well, as you can buy bitcoins with the $5.00 it makes no difference.
Unless you're a gang member, of course. Funny how people tend to ignore that one detail. The vast majority of murder victims (and murderers) are gangbangers. Gangs kill gangs, and everyone else whines about "how violent Americans are". Tell me, how's Sweden these days? How many grenade attacks have there been this year? 8? 10?
How many grenade attacks have there been in the US?
Don't know about Sweden. Maybe you could help Wikipedia who obviously have not been told about these attacks.
This is nonsense. it says that because CO2 density in the atmosphere is 1/2500, to raise the average temperature of the atmosphere by 1 degree due to C02, the C02 molecules need to be heated by 2500 degrees.
This would be logical, if C02 molecules NEVER transferred heat to other molecules.
Or global warming happened over a period of a microsecond.
Or some other thing that stops that page being obvious rubbish from the outset.
Historians, economists, and traders use the term 'fiat' all the time
Bet they don't in everyday life.
e.g. 'hey Jimmy, do you have your lunch fiat-currency?'
'honey - do we have any fiat currency to pay the cleaner?'
'Sorry mate, I'm low on fiat currency, could you get this round in?'
It would indeed be nice to get some kind of heuristic for a page on how accurate it is likely to be.
Factors that might make a page judged to be more/less accurate would be: Number of viewers versus number of updates. A moderated page. How frequently/recently its been updated. The trustworthiness of an updater (how often are their contributions corrected).
The last one would probably be tricky to implement - but would effectively take the benefits of peer-review into Wikipedia.
Slashdot Mirror
The speed of light though glass (fiber) vrs a vacuum is almost a rounding error, you don't see it until you get to 3 significant digits.
How does refraction work then?
I also tried it - bing was different to google. but had less advertising. nice!
Then those boxes are taped up and sent to counting station. Lots of paid folk count them out.
A process which is open to scrutiny as the votes are counted.
I've actually had the EU explained to me BY AN MEP. I get it. Which is why I'm opposed to the EU in principle as well as in actuality.
Nigel Farage does not have an impartial opinion
In Britain, tits are birds
Hence:
Tits like coconuts.
Blackbirds like bread crumbs on the lawn
You could argue that it was the right thing to do. If operations is losing money, but its being masked by some rental thing maybe economically would be better to lose the operational bit of the company. (I know nothing about your particular case though)
Correct - the number of vulnerabilities will be constant. Unless one of the fake bugs has a bug in it - making it a real one.
I agree that the lead contractor needs to know that plastering needs to be done, and that the foundations needs to be x meters dee;. I don't care if the architect doesn't know exactly how to do it.
The problem with bitcoins is that they are too volatile. That $5.00 Coffee you bought today could have a opportunity cost of $15.00 next year. Vs using the Dollar where that $5.00 would have an opportunity cost of $5.15 the next year.
Well, as you can buy bitcoins with the $5.00 it makes no difference.
OMG! Will I be able to use cut-and-paste! Its like a dream come true. Good things come to those that wait. 20 years or so.
Presumably the telecoms could therefore levy any necessary fines, as they already have some kind of credit line to callers.
TV licence is per house. You pay that whether you watch channels with ads on, or channels without.
Except, they aren't?
Unless you're a gang member, of course. Funny how people tend to ignore that one detail. The vast majority of murder victims (and murderers) are gangbangers. Gangs kill gangs, and everyone else whines about "how violent Americans are". Tell me, how's Sweden these days? How many grenade attacks have there been this year? 8? 10? How many grenade attacks have there been in the US?
Don't know about Sweden. Maybe you could help Wikipedia who obviously have not been told about these attacks.
Over here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
There have been a few school shootings in US. Maybe these are all gangs? https://edition.cnn.com/2018/0...
Public health measures used to be debatable without crazy lies diverting attention.
Go ahead and show us one lie - just one - in what he wrote. Should be easy.
Yes it is. First sentence:
Terrorism? "Oh. We'll just have to GET USED TO IT!" You know, like they do in 3rd world hell-holes where terror attacks are a daily thing.
Don't think he said that.
murder rate in London is higher than NYC and this is considering that London is the socialist utopia with free mental health & no guns.
For 2 months, it is higher. Don't think its yet something to draw conclusions from. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-4...
This is nonsense. it says that because CO2 density in the atmosphere is 1/2500, to raise the average temperature of the atmosphere by 1 degree due to C02, the C02 molecules need to be heated by 2500 degrees. This would be logical, if C02 molecules NEVER transferred heat to other molecules. Or global warming happened over a period of a microsecond. Or some other thing that stops that page being obvious rubbish from the outset.
Surely that's why you want loads of Wall Street traders to arrive loaded with investment cash?
Let's investigate that strange claim. Which of the following statements is true?
"I will wait with buying food, because next year it is cheaper." "I will wait with paying my mortgage, because next year it is cheaper."
How about - I won't build a factory this year, or make other investments....it will be cheaper next year.
Historians, economists, and traders use the term 'fiat' all the time
Bet they don't in everyday life. e.g. 'hey Jimmy, do you have your lunch fiat-currency?' 'honey - do we have any fiat currency to pay the cleaner?' 'Sorry mate, I'm low on fiat currency, could you get this round in?'
It would indeed be nice to get some kind of heuristic for a page on how accurate it is likely to be. Factors that might make a page judged to be more/less accurate would be: Number of viewers versus number of updates. A moderated page. How frequently/recently its been updated. The trustworthiness of an updater (how often are their contributions corrected). The last one would probably be tricky to implement - but would effectively take the benefits of peer-review into Wikipedia.