Slashdot Mirror


Hardly Anyone Wants to Ride the Las Vegas Monorail (vice.com)

Motherboard describes riding the Las Vegas monorail in 2008. "I was literally the only person on a train built to carry 222 people," arguing that "the tale of the Las Vegas monorail is an allegory for almost every other monorail that exists on this planet." An anonymous reader quotes their new report: Las Vegas has struggled to deliver on its monorail promise since the 3.9-mile track opened in 2004. The track runs parallel to the Strip -- behind all the massive, block-wide hotels. When the project was first proposed, promoters hoped to bring upwards of 20 million riders a year. In 2016, just 4.9 million monorail rides were taken. For reference, nearly 43 million people visited Las Vegas last year, according to the city's visitor bureau, and the city has a population of about 632,000.

In 2010, the not-for-profit company in charge, named Las Vegas Monorail, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy after failing to repay $650 million in construction loans. (It exited bankruptcy proceedings two years later.) But in true Las Vegas style, instead of taking the loss and heading home with its tail tucked between its legs, the company is doubling down. Now it's anticipating spending an additional $100 million in private financing to extend the monorail from the MGM Grand to Mandalay Bay -- a distance of less than a mile by foot. The company also asked the county to give it $4.5 million of public funds a year for 30 years to support the extension.

A Las Vegas newspaper got a succinct appraisal of the extended monorail's prospects from the director of USC's Transportation Engineering program: "I'm glad it's not my money." Next year ticket sales are expected to bring in just $21.4 million -- "the lowest amount since 2014" -- with the Monorail Co. blaming "additional competition" from Uber and Lyft.

But Motherboard argues that it's not just a Las Vegas problem. "In most cities where monorails exist, most people can't figure out what they're good for. In Mumbai, India, a three-year-old monorail does just 17,000 daily rides -- significantly short of the 125,000 to 300,000 passengers per day planners and backers anticipated."

10 of 294 comments (clear)

  1. easy solution, run it to the airport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People have no trouble figuring out "what monorails are good for." Since they refused to run it to the airport, which would be easier than running it to Mandalay Bay, the project was doomed from the start. What people can't figure out is what the people who design these billion dollar projects are good for.

    1. Re:easy solution, run it to the airport by careysub · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It did have much higher ridership a decade ago, 7.9 million in 2007, sure the Great Recession made a huge impact in 2008, but why did ridership not come back? What happened in the intervening years?

      Too late to reroute it now, but bringing it in close to the strip so that it was easy to board as a taxi would have been a really, really good idea. Have a people-mover in the casino take you right to the boarding platform. It should have been integrated into the entertainment spectacle environment, becoming part of the attractions.

      And go to the dam airport! Geeze, how stupid can you get? Same with the LA Metro Green Line, that reaches the perimeter fence of LAX then veers away. Being able to use an urban rail system from the airport where you arrive and depart, to your hotel and destination sites, is an enormous advantage. The Washington Metro does this, and it greatly magnified its value and ridership. Adding an extension to McCarran is at least a possibility for the Las Vegas system.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    2. Re:easy solution, run it to the airport by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everyone coming off the plane heads for rentals and shuttle usually. Even in San Francisco where I know there's Bart service, I don't necessarily know if it's running that day or how many hours to wait or where to get the tickets and so forth. In that sense, the locals are still more likely to use the transit but it's not a common thing.

      I've travelled to SFO a few times, and from the perspective of a foreigner:

      Buying a ticket for the BART is easy at the airport - there are machines and ticket counters. You really want to get a Clipper Card though. I didn't think you could get one at the airport (I flew into San Jose when on the trip where I got mine, so I've never tried), but a quick check on the clipper card web site shows four locations inside SFO where you can get one.

      Once you have a clipper card with some credit, just tap it to use BART, MUNI, or CalTrain.

      The BART runs every day. The only slightly confusing thing is that after 9pm or all day at weekends there's a direct connection to Millbrae, but during the week before 9pm you have to go to San Bruno and then change to the red line if you want to go back to Milbrae. Although both BART and CalTrain have stops in San Bruno, they're about 10-15 minutes walk apart (as I discovered, when I got off the CalTrain at San Bruno expecting to get on the BART, on my way to the airport, on a very hot day) and the only place where the two join up is Millbrae. This only matters if you're heading south, if you're heading into San Francisco then just take the other direction.

      There are a lot of hotels near BART stops, but there's also a lot of the city that's nowhere near the BART. These are mostly accessible by bus / tram (clipper card works on all of these), but the routing can be confusing.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  2. Killer is that terminals generally not on street by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I used the monorail once when I was at CES. Happily there is a monorail stop right outside the convention, that part works pretty well.

    But the other stops are all nuts. You have to long a long ways out of the terminals and THEN you are dumped right into the casino of whichever hotel you stopped at. It makes for a super horrible walking experience and really makes you think twice about ever taking the thing, when you could just walk along the road and almost be there quicker for most stops.

    Perhaps it could still be a good idea if they provided quicker egress (I seem to remember a few places you could get on without going through a casino, just not off).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  3. Un. Fucking. Believable. by sycodon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The monorail in Vegas does NOT go to the airport.

    What the fuck is wrong with those people? Austin did the same God Damned stupid thing with their stupid fucking train. It goes from waay north to downtown but not to the airport.

    What were those morons thinking?

    "Hmm...we have people at the airport who want to go to the Strip/Downtown and we have people who are on the Strip/Downtown and they want to go to the Airport.

    So let's fucking build a monorail/train that doesn't go to the airport!"

    What.
    The.
    Fuck?

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Un. Fucking. Believable. by Brett+Buck · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Taxi Drivers would like to have a word with you.

    2. Re:Un. Fucking. Believable. by demonlapin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Taxis and airport shuttles would kill that idea. Ever notice how rare it is for major airports to be accessible by good public transit? Now you know why.

  4. Re:Predicted by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't understand why monorails are so slow-- that seems to be the attribute that kills them..

    No. This is wrong. The attribute that kills monorail is that the rails go where the designers wanted people to go, rather than were people actually want to go.

    Where people want to go:
    1. From the airport to the strip.
    2. From outlying hotels to the strip.

    Where the rails actually go:
    1. From one casino on the strip to other nearby nearly identical casinos.

  5. Re:Predicted by NormalVisual · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't understand why monorails are so slow-- that seems to be the attribute that kills them.

    Safety issues, mostly, at least for Alweg-style trains like those run by Las Vegas and Disneyland/Disney World. The trains run on rubber tires, and are kept stable on the beam by tires that run along the sides. If you have a tire that's underinflated, or if a bearing on a side tire seizes and the tire starts getting dragged along the concrete, there's a non-trivial danger of fire - Disney suffered a really bad monorail fire in 1985 that was caused by this.

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  6. Re:It's too far from the strip by swb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We rode it a bunch one visit because we stayed at the Hilton way at one end of the strip and wanted to get to a bunch of different places. But it was a hellacious walk from the monorail to the strip, usually a maze-like walk through a casino.

    I always thought it should have been built as a streetcar type system right on Los Vegas Boulevard in its own dedicated lane. Right at street level where people walk, and easy on/off for stopping up and down the strip.

    The strip is an awful crush of traffic 24 hours a day. I've taken cab rides that took longer than walking would have because traffic was so bad. They really ought to consider closing it to only cabs and some kind of street car.