Slashdot Mirror


Analysts Expect Tesla To Miss Its First 2018 Model 3 Production Target (usnews.com)

schwit1 shares a report from U.S. News & World Report: In October, Tesla reported that it produced 220 Model 3 vehicles in the third quarter. CEO Elon Musk had previously said the company would produce more than 1,600 Model 3s by September. Loup Ventures analyst Gene Munster isn't the only analyst to doubt Tesla's fourth-quarter Model 3 production. KeyBanc analyst Brad Erickson reduced his fourth-quarter Model 3 production target by two-thirds, cutting it from 15,000 to only 5,000. According to Munster, Tesla investors may need to wait several more quarters for the Model 3 story to play out. "We predict a breakout year for the Model 3 in 2019 which means, until then, other elements like solid Model S and X production numbers, increasing energy deployments like the South Australia installation, and future vehicles (Roadster, Semi, Model Y, and pickup truck) will stoke investor optimism," he says. schwit1 adds: "Elon Musk promised Tesla would produce 500,000 Model 3 sedans in 2018 and has accepted refundable $1,000 deposits on nearly that many. At current production rates, it will be years before pre-orders are filled. The Model 3's good will and good reviews won't matter much if Tesla can't ramp up production, which even bulls like Munster believes is running at least a year late."

120 comments

  1. "At current production rates" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I guess if we don't expect production rates to improve, then Elon is up Musk creek without a paddle.

    But I think it's a little early to be basing the whole year's production on "current production rates".

  2. Of Course by segedunum · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ramping up production like this to the required volume is hugely capital intensive, even when you are just producing a single model, which is what they should be concentrating completely on. They will likely have to cut many corners, and given the build quality of many Model S and X cars they have already been doing so.

    The trouble is, the Model 3 is a mass market car that will need to work and need to be spot on in every respect. Those who would be looking to buy a Model 3 in the heavily competitive market it operates in are not Tesla fanboys who will cut them slack. It's a completely different ballgame.

    1. Re:Of Course by b0bby · · Score: 1

      The trouble is, the Model 3 is a mass market car that will need to work and need to be spot on in every respect. Those who would be looking to buy a Model 3 in the heavily competitive market it operates in are not Tesla fanboys who will cut them slack. It's a completely different ballgame.

      I think that the market the Model 3 is in isn't really that competitive. Very few people are looking at a Model 3 or a Camry. They are either Tesla fanboys, who don't care, or people who want an EV with a 200+ mile range. In that market, their main competition is the Bolt, with most everything else compromised in some way. As long as the demand for EVs keeps growing they should be able to move the Model 3 as fast as they can build them.

    2. Re: Of Course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem, however, is that there will be lots of competition by the time the Model 3 arrives in numbers, even if that ever actually happens.

    3. Re:Of Course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that the market the Model 3 is in isn't really that competitive.

      There wasn't a lot of competition in 2017. But by the Model 3 is in in full production consumers will have plenty of choices.

    4. Re:Of Course by green1 · · Score: 1

      This is exactly why Tesla even still exists. They lie through their teeth in every single marketing presentation, they actively steal features from customers after purchase, they haven't met a timeline or target in their entire existence, in short, they're the scummiest company I've ever dealt with.

      So why did I deal with them? Two reasons, fist of all I didn't realize they could really be as bad as they are until after I'd bought the car, but more importantly because despite all of that, and despite about ten years to catch up, there still isn't a single viable competitor on the market.

      Their current generation of driver assistance features, while light years behind what they promised in 2014, and significantly worse than what they delivered in 2015 (and later stole from the customers who had it) is still way ahead of the next best competitor.

      Their electric range is still the highest, and they're the only electric car with a viable long distance charging network in North America. A Bolt may go nearly as far on a charge, but if there's nowhere to charge it, and it charges at less than half the speed, it's not going to replace the tesla that can quite viably do a cross country road trip.

      The only way Tesla will ever be in the kind of trouble that is so often predicted for them is if a competitor actually emerges, and despite years of announcements from many other companies, I have yet to see any indication that an actual competitor will exist in the near future. The sad truth of the matter is that none of the existing companies even grasp the basic concept of what's going on here, and none of the other startups have managed to attract enough funding/figure out their own strategy/just get cars built.

      For now your choice is Tesla, or a car that feels (and effectively is) a decade behind in almost every respect.

    5. Re:Of Course by segedunum · · Score: 1

      I think that the market the Model 3 is in isn't really that competitive. Very few people are looking at a Model 3 or a Camry.

      This is an average sized, family car that most people in the world are driving to work. It's the Volkswagen Golf segment, and I mention the Golf because this is a worldwide market Tesla is in. This is not just a US car they are making. To describe that as not really competitive is one of the most laughable things I've heard frankly.

      They are either Tesla fanboys, who don't care, or people who want an EV with a 200+ mile range.

      No, they are not Tesla fanboys and they are not going to be appeased by a downloadable Easter egg. Far from it, as I said in my original comment. Those who buy these cars in this segment, and those Tesla need to buy in massive volume, are not fans emotionally invested electric vehicles, not Tesla fanboys, they are used to the build quality of established auto makers and they will cut Tesla no slack whatsoever. Tesla need to make a vehicle that competes way beyond being a novelty electric vehicle. They're competing in the biggest car segment in the world with a lot of established manufacturers and brands and against existing combustion engine powered vehicles.

      Range even when using air con and heating, charging stations, the time it takes to charge versus filling up (whatever did happen to those quick replace batteries?), build quality, everything has to be spot on perfect.

    6. Re: Of Course by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I suspect from the current manufacturing pains that Model 3's manufacturing has a lot of potential for improvement (and driving costs down), whereas, e.g., Bolt, made by an already established manufacturer, is probably significantly closer to its asymptotic costs and manufacturing volumes. So perhaps it's a little bit too early to say how much (un)competitive Model 3 will be years from now. Especially if the Gigafactory's advanced automation ultimately succeeds, which could result in Tesla having massive advantage in battery pack costs.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    7. Re: Of Course by green1 · · Score: 1

      Really? Competition from who? I haven't heard of any competition coming anytime soon, and I follow these things very closely. I've heard of several vehicles that are expected to have a similar range to the model 3, however none of them are expected to have any form of charging network, which is somewhat important. Additionally I've only heard of one vehicle that might have a roughly similar driver assistance suite and that's a top of the line Cadillac, and even that's expected to be even more limited than Tesla's solution (which already can't match what Tesla themselves released in 2015)

      It's a bit like taking a Rolls Royce and saying there's competition because Lexus put out a luxury sedan, or telling Lamborghini that the newest Toyota sports car is going to eat their lunch. Until you grasp what makes a specific vehicle successful you can't make a competing product, and trust me, the legacy car makes don't grasp anything about why Tesla has been successful.

      Now don't take this as the rantings of a Tesla Fanboy, I am actually the complete opposite I absolutely abhor Tesla, and that's as someone who drives one every day. I think therapy scummiest company that has ever existed on this planet but as they don't have any competition, and there doesn't seem to be any coming anytime soon, I'm unlikely to sell my car just yet.

    8. Re:Of Course by green1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Range even when using air con and heating, charging stations, the time it takes to charge versus filling up (whatever did happen to those quick replace batteries?), build quality, everything has to be spot on perfect.

      And here's one of the reasons Tesla is in a segment with zero competition, they're the only automaker that has actually figured that part out. And until another company comes along with an actual long-distance charging network of fast-chargers we're not going to see any actual competition to Tesla.

      As for what happened to quick replace batteries, the Tesla model S has them, and they ran a trial, nobody cared. Quick replace batteries have never been a good idea, they simply don't provide any benefit at all over a reasonable fast-charge Network, and add an awful lot of complications and expense. In fact the only reason Tesla did them at all was because California gave extra CARB credits for them at the time. Not because they were a good idea.

    9. Re:Of Course by mede · · Score: 1

      You're missing the magic.. By asking for preorders and setting a high bar:
              "1,000 USD gets you a place in line for a car sometime in the short term"
      they're getting rid of early and late majority markets and of course laggards, and focusing on visionaries and innovators(*) who WILL cut them a bit of slack.. They will be the first ones to have Tesla 3's.. That's what they're after.. That's why the formed a line outside of the dealerships..
      (can you imagine someone who trusts his Camry to fork 1,000 bucks for a car that's maybe going to happen sometime and maybe be delivered in a bit over a year? - not)

      That's something not talked about anywhere.. Market penetration strategy.. Loved it..

      Mede

      * - Checkout Geoffrey Moore's "chrossing the chasm"..

    10. Re:Of Course by Gorobei · · Score: 1

      Numbers like 220 actual versus 1600 predicted on a new automobile production line implies they having to rework a lot of defects by hand. Some rework is expected, but this implies that hugely capital-intensive line is running at a fraction of its capacity. That's also expected at first, in fact that why most manufacturers start with soft-tooling until they work the bugs out, then buy the most expensive hard-tools. News reports say Tesla went with hard tooling up-front, and that makes this a hellish expensive production line to be running at 15% or less.

    11. Re:Of Course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like... who?

    12. Re: Of Course by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Really? Competition from who? I haven't heard of any competition coming anytime soon, and I follow these things very closely. I've heard of several vehicles that are expected to have a similar range to the model 3, however none of them are expected to have any form of charging network, which is somewhat important. Additionally I've only heard of one vehicle that might have a roughly similar driver assistance suite and that's a top of the line Cadillac, and even that's expected to be even more limited than Tesla's solution (which already can't match what Tesla themselves released in 2015)

      It's a bit like taking a Rolls Royce and saying there's competition because Lexus put out a luxury sedan, or telling Lamborghini that the newest Toyota sports car is going to eat their lunch. Until you grasp what makes a specific vehicle successful you can't make a competing product, and trust me, the legacy car makes don't grasp anything about why Tesla has been successful.

      Now don't take this as the rantings of a Tesla Fanboy, I am actually the complete opposite I absolutely abhor Tesla, and that's as someone who drives one every day. I think therapy scummiest company that has ever existed on this planet but as they don't have any competition, and there doesn't seem to be any coming anytime soon, I'm unlikely to sell my car just yet.

      The rantings of a Tesla Fanboy.

    13. Re:Of Course by Ranbot · · Score: 1

      Even if I accept your statement that all other cars are "a decade behind" Tesla [which I disagree with], it's really difficult to argue that an EV you can buy and drive home right now is not competitive with a Tesla Model 3 that you have pay $1,000 to reserve the opportunity to buy the entire car in 1-2 years (or longer). You don't seem like a total Tesla fanboy, but I think you're still making a massive excuse for them. FWIW, I have no ill will towards Tesla, I think they are doing some amazing things, I sincerely hope the company survives, and I wish I could afford a Model S, but I'll keep driving my Nissan Leaf for the foreseeable future.

    14. Re:Of Course by green1 · · Score: 1

      it's really difficult to argue that an EV you can buy and drive home right now is not competitive with a Tesla Model 3

      That depends. Does the EV you can drive home right now do what you need it to do? The answer for the vast majority of people is obviously "no" otherwise there'd be more Bolt purchases, and fewer 3 reservation holders.

      The Bolt is a nice city car. The 3 is an everything car. Without a fastcharging network the Bolt won't work for a huge percentage of the population, this is obvious when you look at the sales figures.

      Just because you can't get the vehicle you want, doesn't make the other cars somehow competitive with it, it just means that it's inaccessible.

      Someone buying a Bolt "because they can't get a 3" is an admission that the Bolt is not as good, not proof that the Bolt is competition.

    15. Re:Of Course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bolt has sold 3 times more units than the Model 3.

    16. Re: Of Course by green1 · · Score: 1

      Ok, list me a single competitor that's "coming" that has the following minimum feature set:
      - Fast-Charging network already existing that spans the entire continent and can recharge the car fully in the time that you'd stop for lunch at a fast food joint.
      - Driver assistance features that are at least somewhat close to what Tesla has

      Just with those 2 features (which are probably the 2 most important ones) I'm not aware of any, and we're ignoring all the other things that Tesla tends to have on their competitors (the phone app, the large touch screen, styling that doesn't look like a punishment)

      Look, I want competition in this space more than most people, I'm dying to sell my Tesla and jump ship to a more ethical company (and trust me, EVERY company is more ethical than Tesla, and considering how unethical most big corps are that says a lot) But I'm just not seeing anything that can compete with my 2014 Model S coming any time soon. And until at least one of the other car makers understands what makes Tesla successful, this won't change.

    17. Re:Of Course by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      As for what happened to quick replace batteries, the Tesla model S has them, and they ran a trial, nobody cared.

      There is still no evidence that a single customer car was ever battery-swapped. The batteries of the Model S at the time were installed partly with adhesives.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:Of Course by Ranbot · · Score: 1

      it's really difficult to argue that an EV you can buy and drive home right now is not competitive with a Tesla Model 3

      That depends. Does the EV you can drive home right now do what you need it to do?

      Any car, EV or ICE, sitting in my driveway is filling more of my vehicle needs than a $1,000 promise note from Tesla.

      Without a fastcharging network the Bolt won't work for a huge percentage of the population

      As someone who has owned a Nissan Leaf for two years I can confidently say that for most people you are overstating the importance of Tesla's charging station networks. I've never taken my Leaf to charging station. All of my charging has been in my garage on a standard 120V trickle charge overnight. In a pinch I could get a charge at any Nissan dealership, or a Tesla station, but I've never needed it. The mentality of "filling up" at a station disappears shortly after one gets used to having an EV. In full disclosure, my wife has an ICE and we swap cars when I need to go further than the Leaf's 80 mile range or use hers for road trips together, so the Leaf alone doesn't meet all of our household needs, but our 2-car household is pretty typical example of middle class America targeted by EV car makers.

    19. Re:Of Course by green1 · · Score: 1

      Any car, EV or ICE, sitting in my driveway is filling more of my vehicle needs than a $1,000 promise note from Tesla.

      So if there was a waiting list for your preferred car, a bicycle would suddenly become even better than the vehicle you're waiting on? That's delusional.
      Sure you can't get a Tesla because of the wait, but the fact that so many people are waiting instead of buying the already available Bolt just goes to prove that the Bolt isn't competing with the Tesla. If it were there would be ZERO reservations for the Tesla, and about half a million Bolts on the road right now. But that's not the case, Bolts seem to be sitting on dealer lots while people wait for their 3 to arrive. That's because the Bolt isn't competing with the 3, it's not even close.

      I drive a Model S.
      I could not drive a car without a fast charging network. Sure most of my charging is done over night at home, but I also do a lot of road trips, none of those are even possible in a Leaf or a Bolt.

      As for you being "a huge percentage of the population". Sorry, you're not. And the number of reservation holders for the Tesla vs the sales for the Bolt prove that point.

    20. Re:Of Course by green1 · · Score: 1

      delivered, yes. But there are a lot of reservations for the 3 that for some reason aren't changing in to sales for the Bolt. That proves that the 3 is not competing with the Bolt, if it was, most of those reservations would have bought a Bolt by now, but instead Bolts sit on dealer lots while the wait for a 3 just keeps growing.

      As soon as some company decides to compete with Tesla, we may see some interesting things happen, but for now there isn't a single competitor on the market.

    21. Re:Of Course by green1 · · Score: 2

      There were no adhesives, it was simply nut and bolt. the real problem was that the battery shield had to come off (it was added to the car after the fast charge system was developed) which turned it in to a more manual process which took about 2-3 times as long as originally promised (of course it was still about the same speed as a gas fill-up)
      A few customer cars were battery swapped, but very few. The reason? not because it was slow or hard to do, but because the swap station was across the street from a fast-charger, and the fast charger was a better way to travel. Still is.

      Fast-charging beats battery swaps every single time. There's never a good reason to do battery swaps, and nobody who's ever driven an EV with a true fast charging option has ever actually wished for it. It was included simply because government bureaucrats who didn't even understand EVs let alone drive them on a regular basis thought it would be a neat idea and increased the CARB credits if a car could do it.

      Use the Tesla Supercharger network and I can guarantee you that you'll have no interest in battery swaps ever again. The logistics and expense just don't make any sense when your car can charge faster than you can eat your lunch, and get you far enough to make it to your next meal.

    22. Re:Of Course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The vast majority of reservations have been canceled.

    23. Re:Of Course by green1 · · Score: 1

      source?

      Show me a reputable source that indicates that there are fewer remaining reservations for the Model 3 than there are sales of the Bolt.

    24. Re:Of Course by Tom · · Score: 1

      it's really difficult to argue that an EV you can buy and drive home right now is not competitive with a Tesla Model 3 that you have pay $1,000 to reserve the opportunity to buy the entire car in 1-2 years (or longer).

      That is true, but here's the thing: I bought a new car late last year. I so much wanted an electric car. So much that I already had a company over to check for installing solar panels on the garage and give me a quote.

      I checked the entire market, and in the end bought a BMW again, combustion engine. Yes, there are EVs which I can buy and drive home in 3 months ("right now" is only if you take the exact car that is standing, if you so much as want another color, 2-3 months is the typical wait). But none of them was the car I wanted to buy. The main reason was range, the second reason was that many of them felt like not serious cars, like someone tried and is checking if it falls apart in a road test.

      The Model S came the closest to what I wanted in an EV, but honestly speaking my BMW gives me a lot more comfort and better designed small details for half the price. Whenever BMW makes a 5-series EV or Tesla hires someone with car design experience and stops doing the everything-through-the-touchscreen thing (there are reasons for haptics, Tesla!), label me interested. But the next Bolt or Leaf or whatever model? I don't even care.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    25. Re:Of Course by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      TSLA runs out of cash about May of this year. Unless they raise a lot more capital, or suddenly figure out how to ship 10X the number of cars they are shipping - they will go bankrupt.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    26. Re: Of Course by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      > Until you grasp what makes a specific vehicle successful you
      > can't make a competing product, and trust me, the legacy car
      > makes don't grasp anything about why Tesla has been successful.

      Successful... BWAAAHAAAHAAA

      * 2014 loss $294 million
      * 2015 loss $889 million
      * 2016 loss $675 million
      * 2017 loss $1.790 *BILLION* (estimated)
      Data from http://www.4-traders.com/TESLA...

      The last time GM and Chrysler were that "successful", they went bankrupt! Tesla forecasts a profit in 2019. But that assumes

      1) They can ramp up production as forecast, which they haven't done too well so far

      2) They'll still be around in 2019. The federal subsidies are ending as they approach 200,000 units sold.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    27. Re: Of Course by Rei · · Score: 1

      Add to the list "has Motor Trend drooling about how much better it handles than a BMW 3-series". And the ability to get AWD + air suspension. And I can't wait to see the specs on that performance package ;) The SR is already as fast as a 330i and the LR as fast as a 340i (but $5k cheaper than each, before incentives and operating cost savings) - and adding power on EVs is a lot cheaper than with gasoline.

      I'd also stress the "efficient without being a weirdmobile" aspect. Tesla has really honed in on the optimization point here, how efficient you can make a vehicle be without having it start to look either unusual or dorky. So just ignoring the economies of scale that come from having invested far more in EV tech than all other manufacturers, all others start out at a disadvantage, in that if they try to make something look "sportier" or "more aggressive" to take market share away, they increase drag (thus cutting range, or increasing battery costs and vehicle mass, both while simultaneously reducing charging-miles-per-hour). They could go the other way and try to eke out some extra efficiency by, say, going down to 16" or less wheels (but people already complain about aero wheels, let alone little ones), or adding wheel skirts (most people don't want them), or tapering the trunk more (but then you lose trunk space), or going with a more aggressive roof taper (cutting rear passenger space), or swapping out aluminum panels for composite or magnesium (but then you seriously increase the cost), etc.

      Yes, there's a ton of fancy "concept vehicles" out there, but concept vehicles are just glorified art pieces. Look at what happened to, say, the Mission E - now that we're seeing the actual vehicle, it's turned into just a glorified Panamera. Doesn't even look as nice as a Panamera. But this sort of stuff always happens. Concept cars act simply as ads, to get you interested in what a company is doing in hopes that you'll later get over your disappointment and buy the final product anyway.

      --
      The chloride owes the sodium money.
    28. Re:Of Course by Rei · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the Internet, where people can make up whatever nonsense they want.

      --
      The chloride owes the sodium money.
    29. Re:Of Course by Rei · · Score: 1

      It amazes me how much the other manufacturers completely missed the boat on fast charging networks. It seems that they simply stereotyped EVs as niche products for niche dirtie hippie buyers, and that anyone who wanted a "real car" that could go on road trips without excessive hassle would just buy an ICE.

      Tesla's bet that EV buyers would, in fact, strongly want to road trip, and a "charge while you take a meal break" rate of charge would allow for that (~120kW max rather than ~50kW max for CHAdeMO and most CCS) is probably the single most fateful decision they've made in terms of their success so far - selling about as many nearly-six-figure and over-six-figure EVs in the US as their competitors sold mid-to-low-5-figure EVs.

      --
      The chloride owes the sodium money.
    30. Re:Of Course by Rei · · Score: 1

      BMW makes an EV (i3), but it's way overpriced for what you get. Model 3 gives you a far, far better buy in every regard. The only thing the i3 wins on is that you can get it today.

      --
      The chloride owes the sodium money.
    31. Re:Of Course by Rei · · Score: 1

      The fact alone that they're now up to over 1000 Model 3s per week is in and of itself ~$8m per day in extra revenue. Even if the production rate inexplicably ceases to rise (not going to happen) that'd be ~$1B by May that wasn't there when the "Seeking Alpha" crowd was making their "bankrupt in May at current burn rates" claims. More realistically, around $2B. One should also note that Tesla also had a disguised capital raise in the form of Roadster and Semi deposits (mainly Roadster).

      Furthermore, one of the most valuable automakers in the world, with half a million preorders sitting on wait, is not just going to close its doors if it ran out of cash. They'll be forced to dilute stock, which no stockholders want, but they absolutely can get more cash as needed. I seriously, seriously doubt it will get that far, however.

      --
      The chloride owes the sodium money.
    32. Re: Of Course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      scummiest company that has ever existed on this planet

      I see you're taking a calm and rational view on this whole thing. I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    33. Re:Of Course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bolt has sold 3 times more units than the Model 3.

      Four times as many? Wow!

    34. Re:Of Course by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I smell corporate shoppers, they are attacking Tesla to drive down the price, desperate for a cheap pick up, very, very unlikely to get it. Look for a few existing automotive corporations to get into a bidding war. I doubt that Tesla will make it to 2020, bought by one the existing manufacturers slow to catch on or even a major tech company looking for a major expansion. Apple Tesla, hmm, similar market, similar price premium, Apple has lots of money it needs to covert into capital growth and tax mitigation. The whole consumer product market is in for some more major shake ups.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    35. Re:Of Course by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      So if there was a waiting list for your preferred car, a bicycle would suddenly become even better than the vehicle you're waiting on?

      Well if I want to go somewhere now, it's the bike or walk. You can't drive vapourware.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    36. Re: Of Course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Competition from who?

      Volkswagen, Audi, Mercedes-Benz, Renault, BMW, Nissan, Volvo, Jaguar, Aston Martin and probably a few others.

      I haven't heard of any competition coming anytime soon, and I follow these things very closely.

      Well, not that closely apparently. There have been lots of announcements you seem to have missed.

      I've heard of several vehicles that are expected to have a similar range to the model 3, however none of them are expected to have any form of charging network, which is somewhat important.

      Why? I've always driven ICE cars from car makers that do not have their own chain of petrol stations and to be honest, I've never really missed that in any way. I am more than happy to charge my electric car at a generic charging station not operated by the manufacturer of my car.

      Additionally I've only heard of one vehicle that might have a roughly similar driver assistance suite and that's a top of the line Cadillac, and even that's expected to be even more limited than Tesla's solution (which already can't match what Tesla themselves released in 2015)

      Most current premium and luxury cars, as well as many more basic models offer driving assistance systems far superior to Tesla's. And unlike in a Tesla, they are actually tested properly and you do not run the risk of the system being disabled in an update.

      It's a bit like taking a Rolls Royce and saying there's competition because Lexus put out a luxury sedan, or telling Lamborghini that the newest Toyota sports car is going to eat their lunch.

      It's more like taking a Trabant in the Eastern Bloc in 1990 and saying there's competition because people can suddenly buy dozens of car brands. Companies that actually know how to build cars will eat Tesla's lunch completely the moment they think it is profitable to mass produce electric cars.

      Until you grasp what makes a specific vehicle successful you can't make a competing product, and trust me, the legacy car makes don't grasp anything about why Tesla has been successful.

      I think the 'legacy' car makers grasp fullly that Tesla's success (if you can call it that) is mostly due to hype and fanboyism, and partly due to large incentives in a market with little competition. However, there is only a small number of Tesla fanboys and electric cars have the potential to replace the internal combustion engine car completely in the future, so the eventual target market is everyone. Tesla's current appeal to a very limited audience is completely irrelevant in the long term.

      Now don't take this as the rantings of a Tesla Fanboy, I am actually the complete opposite I absolutely abhor Tesla, and that's as someone who drives one every day. I think therapy scummiest company that has ever existed on this planet but as they don't have any competition, and there doesn't seem to be any coming anytime soon, I'm unlikely to sell my car just yet.

      Ah, the old 'love the product, hate the company'. Very popular among Apple fanboys. There is indeed little competition at the moment for long-range EVs, but this will change very soon. Several large car makers are putting their weight behind large-scale electrification and the first string of models is expected in the next two years or so. And unlike Tesla, 'legacy' car makers tend to stick to their schedules.

    37. Re: Of Course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the reason tesla is running a loss is because they
      a) they're investing heavily in infrastructure namely their charging network and their factories and
      b) they can currently borrow the money to allow them to run a deficit

      they can run a massive profit to morrow if they want to,
      strategically it's just better to do the infrastructure buildup earlier

    38. Re: Of Course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with logic like that, not sure I understand how you made enough money to buy a tesla, you must work in some weird business that pays idiots. (yes, I know most businesses are like that, the number of well paid idiots I have to deal with is stunning, most of them make you wonder how they manage to get out of bed without injuring themselves.)

    39. Re:Of Course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show me a reputable source the number of reservations. Elon’s mouth is not a reputable source.

    40. Re: Of Course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Motor trend is paid by Tesla to give it a good review. Nobody that knows anything about cars listens to motor trend.

    41. Re:Of Course by ranton · · Score: 1

      I think that the market the Model 3 is in isn't really that competitive. Very few people are looking at a Model 3 or a Camry.

      No, they are looking at Model 3 or Lexus / BMW / Mercedes / Cadillac / etc. The Model 3 is joining a very large and competitive market. It will still compete with ICE cars, not just other electrics. I for one ended up buying a three year old BMW for $30k when I found the Model 3 I pre-ordered would likely cost closer to $60k (at least the model I wanted). The Model 3 was still very competitive, but not enough for me to weather the depreciation of a new car.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    42. Re:Of Course by ranton · · Score: 1

      Any car, EV or ICE, sitting in my driveway is filling more of my vehicle needs than a $1,000 promise note from Tesla.

      That may be true, but rarely is it a choice between no car and waiting. The choice here is generally between keeping your old car, getting a new car which doesn't fully fulfill your needs / desires, or waiting for a car that does.

      In that context, waiting is probably the better option nearly every time.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    43. Re:Of Course by ranton · · Score: 1

      And here's one of the reasons Tesla is in a segment with zero competition

      Tesla still competes with ICE cars, so you cannot say it has zero competition. There are a dozen car manufacturers competing with the Tesla S/3/X right now.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    44. Re: Of Course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they cannot run a massive profit tomorrow. They are still losing billions per quarter not including capex.

    45. Re:Of Course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are not up to 1000 model threes per week. They barely made that many this quarter dumbass.

    46. Re:Of Course by Ranbot · · Score: 1

      Any car, EV or ICE, sitting in my driveway is filling more of my vehicle needs than a $1,000 promise note from Tesla.

      So if there was a waiting list for your preferred car, a bicycle would suddenly become even better than the vehicle you're waiting on? That's delusional.

      Or there are a bunch of delusional Tesla fans with more disposable income to spend on a car.... just maybe?

      I drive a Model S.

      Then you are clearly NOT an average example of the US population, and you are delusional if you think your personal car finances are reflective of middle america. The Model S is a fantastic car IF one is in the luxury $80K+ car market. I would love to own one, but I can't afford it and neither can most of America. Even the Model 3 price is questionable for middle class Americans if one adds anything beyond the base model.

      Just for some perspective, the average new car price Americans pay is ~$33,500 (https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2015/05/04/new-car-transaction-price-3-kbb-kelley-blue-book/26690191/ ). That average includes typically more expensive trucks and SUVs, so it would be less if restricted to just sedans, and ignores the massive used car market.

      I could not drive a car without a fast charging network.

      Sure you could, you just wouldn't be driving an $80K+ EV... you would probably drive a conventional ICE/hybrid or a cheaper EV and deal with the range. You choose the Model S option because you have the financial means. Don't presume your situation is typical.

    47. Re:Of Course by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      3000 Model 3s built so far. Discounting the 260 built in Q3, that would be ~2750 in Q4. So that's about 210 units per week - not 1000. Assuming that extra revenue, they will last until mid-June, rather than mid May. Given that TSLA is losing about $16MM per week, they would need to go way beyond your estimates to be profitable. If you're not profitable, you are losing money - and you end up going bankrupt.

      As far as Roadster and Semi deposits go, those are liabilities on the books, and need to be accounted as such. Just because someone gives you money as a deposit does not mean you can use it for whatever you like, and if you go belly up you say "sorry".

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    48. Re:Of Course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please try to keep up. The ElecTrek article you link to is old, where they were predicting/guessing what Tesla's delivery numbers for Q4 would be. However, the next day Tesla released their actual numbers and said "in the last few days, we hit a production rate on each of our manufacturing lines that extrapolates to over 1,000 Model 3’s per week. “

      https://electrek.co/2018/01/03/tesla-model-3-delivery-record/

      So, if Tesla does not go bankrupt by May, will you come back here and admit you were wrong?

    49. Re:Of Course by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Really? An extrapolated production rate of 1000 units per week? When does that extrapolation become reality? I can extrapolate that I will make $1 trillion dollars, but without stating a timeline it's kind of worthless, right?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    50. Re:Of Course by Tom · · Score: 1

      I have driven the i3 and it is the shame of the BMW brand.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  3. Underpromise, overdeliver by darthsilun · · Score: 1

    Elon must have missed that lecture in Marketing 101

    1. Re:Underpromise, overdeliver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you haven't noticed, alot of companies don't follow that lesson. On top of that Elon seems to understand the trump-effect, Keep the attention moving on to another project(space, digging holes in the ground, or making batteries) and most people wont remember the problem by the next month.

      Clearly you missed Marketing 304 - Advanced audience manipulation.

    2. Re:Underpromise, overdeliver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Elon must have missed that lecture in Marketing 101

      And you must have missed his last major presentation.

      You know, the one where he pulled the quickest production car in the world out of the ass-end of an EV semi-truck.

      What an underachiever...

    3. Re: Underpromise, overdeliver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla has survived until this day by missing just about every target they ever set and making pie-in-the-sky announcements to divert attention every time that happens. Sure, one day they will run out of gullible investors for new funding rounds and fanboys who make deposits for products that will never be made, but Elon Musk reckons he will be out in time.

    4. Re:Underpromise, overdeliver by green1 · · Score: 2

      In the new world it's over promise, and rake in capital from investors. Delivery at all is an afterthought, and not really required if you can talk a good game.

    5. Re:Underpromise, overdeliver by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      Elon must have missed that lecture in Marketing 101

      I think Elon also missed the entire series of lectures on logistics as well. I know of two car dealers in my neck of the woods who placed fairly large orders with Tesla for (a combined total) about a hundred Teslas but Tesla was completely unable to keep their delivery schedule. After pouring a sizeable amount to money into infrastructure, marketing and sales to sign up customers for those cars they went bankrupt when the customers lost their patience cancelled their orders due to the excessive delivery delays. The Tesla brand now has a very bad reputation around here, and not for making bad cars mind you, but rather for making promises they can't keep (the cars are pretty nice, if you can afford them).

    6. Re:Underpromise, overdeliver by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      Elon must have missed that lecture in Marketing 101

      And you must have missed his last major presentation. You know, the one where he pulled the quickest production car in the world out of the ass-end of an EV semi-truck.

      I must have missed it. How many of those have been produced? Back in the 1960's with GT40's and Cobra's you had to have built (or had frames) for at least 100 cars to qualify as "production" for racing purposes. How many have been delivered to actual paying customers?

    7. Re:Underpromise, overdeliver by haruchai · · Score: 1

      "I know of two car dealers in my neck of the woods who placed fairly large orders with Tesla for (a combined total) about a hundred Teslas but Tesla was completely unable to keep their delivery schedule"

      Say what? Tesla is a build-to-order, direct-to-customer automaker. They ARE the car dealer.
      Where exactly is your "neck of the woods"?

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    8. Re:Underpromise, overdeliver by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Until a few days ago the only way to turn the wipers on was to go through the touch screen.

      Tesla has been selling a full self driving option for over a year. Here's Musk's estimate of when the feature will be delivered to people who already paid and who are on 2-5 year leases:

      2015: in 2 years
      2016: in 2 years
      2017: in 3 years

      They make great cars, but really over-promise.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Underpromise, overdeliver by green1 · · Score: 2

      You are WAY too charitable towards Tesla here..

      Tesla has been selling a full self driving option for over a year. Here's Musk's estimate of when the feature will be delivered to people who already paid and who are on 2-5 year leases:

      2015: in 2 years
      2016: in 2 years
      2017: in 3 years

      Why start in 2015? the 2014 and 2015 models were promised to have all sorts of driver assist features that not only do they not have, they will obviously never have, and Tesla refuses to even admit they promised despite images of their website and video recordings of the media event where they announced them. Full self driving on the 3 isn't "2-3 years away" even accounting for "Tesla time", it's NEVER on these cars. There is absolutely ZERO chance that these cars will ever have full self driving capability with the current hardware. It's simply not possible, they have no corner or rear radar or lidar, and rely 100% on cameras, only one of which has a method of clearing debris (an ineffective method at that) Full self driving needs the ability to see around a dirt spec on your windshield, the cameras on Tesla vehicles can't do that.

      The absolute best case scenario for Tesla is that the "full self driving" feature manages to do what they promised at the "D" event for cars sold in 2014 with the original Autopilot, promises they have since tried to pretend they never even made.

      They make great cars, but really over-promise.

      That's the understatement of the century. I say "they make the best car available, but lie through their teeth about it and are the slimiest company I have ever done business with"

    10. Re:Underpromise, overdeliver by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I agree, I think the current hardware will never do FSD. They promised free upgrades to people who already bought FSD, which could get expensive.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Underpromise, overdeliver by green1 · · Score: 1

      They promised all sorts of things, most of them were lies, the free upgrades are too.

      What will most likely happen is that they will eventually re-define "full self driving" to be no more than they originally promised the basic auto-pilot tech could do back in 2014. "hands free on-ramp to off-ramp driving with an attentive driver behind the wheel"... see, that's "full self driving"... right?

      The worst part though is that they'll likely get a pass on it just like they have on every other lie so far.

    12. Re:Underpromise, overdeliver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla has no car dealers. Either you are lying or the car dealers are lying to you!

      You buy Tesla cars directly from Tesla.

    13. Re:Underpromise, overdeliver by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      Which part of your example is either underpromising or overdelivering?

    14. Re:Underpromise, overdeliver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      according to the final figures tesla delivered 1770 model 3's in 2017, 1550 of which where in Q4
      they're currently at a production rate of 1000 cars per week

      that's way beyond your 100 cars

    15. Re:Underpromise, overdeliver by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      You know, the one where he pulled the quickest production car in the world out of the ass-end of an EV semi-truck.

      according to the final figures tesla delivered 1770 model 3's in 2017, 1550 of which where in Q4 they're currently at a production rate of 1000 cars per week

      The new roadster is not the Model 3, nor is the Model 3 the quickest production car ever built. The OP was referring to the new Roadster that isn't due to be released until 2020. As far as I know there is only one prototype which likely doesn't live up to the specs that were given . So no, one prototype car does not qualify as a production car.

    16. Re:Underpromise, overdeliver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also they are no where near 1000 cars a week.

  4. where's Rei? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1, Funny

    We urgently need Rei to inform the world that this is not really a bad thing and how fabulous Tesla is actually doing. BTW the Tesla, when it arrives, will be the best car evar!!!

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    1. Re: where's Rei? by pdms · · Score: 1

      Is this Elon or Donald?

    2. Re:where's Rei? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Karen? Karen Rei

      I haven't figured out if she's an ultimate fangirl or a freelance PR person working for a Musk publicist.

      Musk does in fact hire PR people to give him the promotion he needs. And they helped create the reputation of him being a "creative innovative disruptive genius" which many folks fell for.

      Now Musk is a religion. All of his fanboys are just as rabid as those fanatical religious people. I'm just waiting for a Muskite - Muskim -Muskian - - whatever to strap some explosives on themselves and before blowing up Jeff Bezo's rockets scream "EeeeeeeeeLLLooooooon!!!!!"

    3. Re:where's Rei? by green1 · · Score: 1

      The tesla has arrived, and it is the best car ever.
      It's also nothing even close to what Tesla promised, but hey, that's not important when you don't have any competition.

    4. Re:where's Rei? by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      It's bedtime in Iceland right now. You'll probably have to wait a few hours for the inevitable book-length puff piece.

    5. Re:where's Rei? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't figured out if she's an ultimate fangirl or a freelance PR person working for a Musk publicist.

      I'm going with ultimate fangirl. Also known as Karen Pease, the breadcrumbs suggest she fled the States to live in Iceland after her EV-related startup cratered, and is now relying on governmental largess to make ends meet. Debates with Elon about settling on Venus. They basically seem like two peas in a pod (except she's a bit rough around the edges and clearly hasn't mastered the charismatic personality that convinces people to shovel more and more billions into the latest and greatest soon-to-be-failed enterprise).

    6. Re:where's Rei? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The tesla has arrived, and it is the best car ever.
      It's also nothing even close to what Tesla promised, but hey, that's not important when you don't have any competition.

      What did they promise? The original Secret Master Plan said it would be "even more affordable" than the Model S.
      Isn't it?

    7. Re:where's Rei? by green1 · · Score: 1

      Sure, Of course they also said the S would be about half the price it is, and that the 3 would be on the market by 2015. Other than that, sure the "Master Plan" was bang on... Of course the master plan isn't the only thing they've said about the car, but why let that stop us, we don't need to pay attention to anything they've actually said about the vehicle when we can just gloss over anything that doesn't match reality...

  5. Just learned Stolkholm investors 101. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Underdeliver and convince your investors to double down to prove their investment will succeed. You get at least twice as much money and can thus expand your operation that much further.

    Continue doing this and eventually you will financially control the world, even if all of your projects are still behind schedule, because you are just growing another industry.

  6. In other news: water is wet. by green1 · · Score: 2

    Tesla hasn't met a timeline, target, or marketing promise in their entire career, why start now?

    1. Re:In other news: water is wet. by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Tesla hasn't met a timeline, target, or marketing promise in their entire career, why start now?

      Why not? They're trying to move into the mass market. Much different expectations.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    2. Re:In other news: water is wet. by green1 · · Score: 1

      So far it doesn't matter how much they lie, how much they steal, or how much they screw up, they've gotten a complete pass. They have zero competition, and can't build cars as fast as they can sell them. What incentive do they have to change their ways when everything they do turns out just fine for them?

    3. Re:In other news: water is wet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they've met plenty of targets, they just consistently meet them late

    4. Re:In other news: water is wet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zero competition? You must not be paying attention.

      The Bolt, bless their hearts at GM, is being produced and though "not as sexy" as a Tesla, is at least being made by proper project managers who don't mix sport coats and jeans, round faux glasses and who try not to put scope creep in an automobile once it's gone to production.

  7. Fire more employees by pdms · · Score: 1

    Isn't how it works, you fire employees and expect more production.

    1. Re:Fire more employees by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Isn't how it works, you fire employees and expect more production.

      That's what Made America Great

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  8. It would be a shock if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be a shock if Telsa EVER made a target OR if they made a profit.

    BTW, no one ever brings up the problems that a self-driving care faces in winter like conditions that most people face right now. Watch how wonder the vehicle drives with no lines on the roads, not even a road to see as it is covered in ice and snow. WHOOOPS. It doesn't. lol

    1. Re:It would be a shock if... by green1 · · Score: 1

      Why bring self-driving into this? the only people stupid enough to think that the Tesla is in any way a self-driving car is Tesla themselves. Okay I guess they did manage to con a few people into paying the extra few thousand dollars for "full self-driving", but you have to be a special kind of stupid to think that the hardware that's on those vehicles right now has any hope of ever fulfilling that promise. Not that there's anything new here though, Tesla is very familiar with promising things that they can never hope to achieve. Just look at all the things they promised in 2014 around their initial autopilot suite, in fact there isn't even a single thing listed from that original presentation that the current cars can do.

    2. Re:It would be a shock if... by haruchai · · Score: 1

      "Just look at all the things they promised in 2014 around their initial autopilot suite, in fact there isn't even a single thing listed from that original presentation that the current cars can do"

      Really? See link below for the *October* 2014 event (so the year was almost over) and tell us what was promised & is missing. I gather there's going to be quite a few items on that list.
      https://youtu.be/FZ6lZJWL_Xk?t...

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    3. Re:It would be a shock if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:It would be a shock if... by green1 · · Score: 1

      Sure, every single promise that came out of Elon's mouth in regard to driver assistance is missing:
      - Can automatically pull out of your garage and meet you at the curb on private property. Not even close, they haven't released any feature remotely resembling this
      - Can be summoned to your location wherever you are on private property. Nope, doesn't do this either
      - Ultrasonics work at any speed. Nope, they top out well below the top speed of the car
      - Monitors stop signs and traffic lights. Nope, ignores them completely
      - Brings the vehicle to a full stop to avoid a collision. Nope, it actually releases the brake when it's shed a certain amount of speed, or gets below a certain speed threshold. (it actually has among the worst automatic emergency braking system in the industry in that regard)

      List me a single thing that Elon claimed the car could do in regards to driver assistance that it can actually do. There isn't anything at that event that he got right. Not a single thing.

      If you include his comments after the event, or to the media, or watch the test drives it gets even worse because even more things are claimed, none of which have come to fruition. Things like hands free on-ramp to off-ramp driving were claimed, now they pretend they never claimed that.

  9. Who cares what a stock analyst thinks by Ranbot · · Score: 1

    A stock analyst (i.e. Munster, who is quoted in the summary) saying some Tesla action will "stoke investor optimism" means nothing... there are no concrete facts here, it's just feelings. There is no rationality to the Tesla's stock (TSLA) stock price being valued many times more than the company assets, and many times higher than the stock prices of established competing car companies, which have comparable cars to the Model 3 on the market right now (e.g. Nissan, Volkswagon, Chevy, etc.) while Tesla still struggles with production. I honestly hope Tesla survives and thrives as a company, but stock analysts aren't providing any useful information here.

    1. Re:Who cares what a stock analyst thinks by Luthair · · Score: 1

      I think it actually fits the pattern, when they announced their truck a journalist pointed out that every time Tesla missed a target they announced something else to distract the press. I didn't exhaustively look at it but their examples seemed reasonable at the time.

    2. Re:Who cares what a stock analyst thinks by Tom · · Score: 1

      Stock analysts being about on par with reading from tea leaves has been scientifically proven several times, including the famous studies with the main authors 9 year old daughter and a randomly thrown dart as the control groups.

      That said, no, nobody has a Model 3 competitor on the market right now. I was shopping for a new car as recently as last autumn, and I checked all the electric models available over here. While some of them are surprisingly nice (Hyundai Ioniq) and some of them are pathetic excuses for something that wants to be a car when it grows up (Nissan Leaf), they all feel and by technical data are one generation behind Tesla. The BMW i8 might be an exception, didn't check that one as it's outside my price range. But the i3 is the shame of the BMW brand and so are many other electric cars that are very clearly this or that manufacturers attempt to get a foot into the door.

      Tesla is in this business and this business only, so it is swim or sink for them. No other manufacturer has yet embraced electric cars seriously, they are all testing the waters and putting their main effort into the next model of the combustion cars. Hyundai might be the most serious with the Ioniq series where they simply build the same car with different engines instead of having a seperate electric model, and that might be one reason why it was such an unexpectedly positive surprise during my test drive, because it's an actual car and not a prototype.

      The TSLA stock price reflects that fact. Investors (like me, full disclosure) believe that Tesla is betting on the right horse here and that the all-or-nothing approach will give them a serious advantage over the "I want to play, too" approach of the traditional car manufacturers. This advantage will manifest in the long run, so falling short on short-term production goals is not so very important (unless you are a journalist who needs to hand in a story about Tesla this month) and that's why the stock price barely moves whenever these announcements are made. I and other people who own TSLA stock don't expect the ROI in the next quarter or even the next year. There are other stocks if you enjoy gambling and day-trading.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    3. Re:Who cares what a stock analyst thinks by Ranbot · · Score: 1

      Investors (like me, full disclosure) believe that Tesla is betting on the right horse here and that the all-or-nothing approach will give them a serious advantage over the "I want to play, too" approach of the traditional car manufacturers.

      Tesla surviving/thriving long-term is only tangentially related to whether the stock is over-valued. They can survive as a company and still have a market correction on their stock price, suddenly or gradually. Stock analysts pumping up Tesla are peddling in feelings not facts, so I don't really care what they say (my main point). To be fair, much of the stock market is based on feelings and behavioral economics, but I think Tesla stock is particular glaring example of feelings taking over facts. Tesla doesn't have the physical assets to support the stock price, they don't have production capabilities to support the stock price, they don't have profits to support the stock price, there questions about whether they can obtain the raw materials of production long-term, and arguably the industry in general probably cannot support a stock price like they have currently. To that last point, the fundamental sales model is the same or at best marginally different than all other car companies.They have a good product, but it's still a car that makes most of the profit on the initial purchase and little afterwards. People act like they are tech company like Google, Amazon, Apple, Facebook, etc. but the difference is those companies have myriads of potential revenue streams to exploit to support stock speculation, which are not available to Tesla selling cars. There's even some questioning if overall the car market will shrink because younger generations have less interest in owning cars.

    4. Re:Who cares what a stock analyst thinks by Tom · · Score: 1

      You think that stock price needs to be somehow supported by physical assets, but that isn't true and hasn't been for decades.

      I buy Tesla stock because I believe that in the future I can sell it for more than I paid for it today. And I believe that because I believe that Tesla will prove that it has the right mission, and more people will want to buy into that. I believe they are doing a lot of things right, not just technologically and by betting on electric cars, but also by cutting out the dealers, which not only in America have a bad reputation.

      What, you think any of the tech companies you mention have the physical assets to justify their stock prices? If you sell off all the physical assets of Google or Facebook, you can probably buy a single-digit percentage of their stocks from the profits. They have revenue streams - but Tesla has that as well. Heck, people don't even pre-order iPhones a year in advance!

      There's even some questioning if overall the car market will shrink because younger generations have less interest in owning cars.

      Yes, it will. I am one of those people, didn't own a car for 10 years (after selling my old one), now owning one again because I moved into the countryside. But you know what? Tesla is on the right track there as well, understanding that electric cars and autonomous driving go together. In the near future, taxis will go the way of the Dodo bird, and will be replaced by autonomous car-sharing vehicles, which you summon to your location by App and when you are done they drive off to the next customer.

      Guess who is closer to having a car like that than any other company?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  10. I don't think so, model 3 buyers very much fans by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    No, they are not Tesla fanboys and they are not going to be appeased by a downloadable Easter egg.

    A friend or two that has the Model 3 is very much a Tesla fan. And so it will be for some time to come - or did you forget the pre-order lines just to lay down $1k for a car that would not be delivered for a year or two? None of the buyers for a long time is going to be anything but a die-hard Tesla fan. When they clear out pre-orders two or three years hence, then you can talk about the remaining buyers actually treating Tesla on an equal footing.

    Range even when using air con and heating, charging stations, the time it takes to charge versus filling up (whatever did happen to those quick replace batteries?), build quality, everything has to be spot on perfect.

    Another responder already talked about this, but I just wanted to add on - why? Why does it have to be "perfect" when no-one else is? A lot of little flaws can be made up for in big design choices - like that sweeping all clear roof. Some videos have already pointed out model3 body panels do not have a perfect fit, but it does not matter because in so many other ways the car is doing an excellent job already compared to any other car someone might be thinking of.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:I don't think so, model 3 buyers very much fans by ranton · · Score: 1

      A friend or two that has the Model 3 is very much a Tesla fan. And so it will be for some time to come - or did you forget the pre-order lines just to lay down $1k for a car that would not be delivered for a year or two? None of the buyers for a long time is going to be anything but a die-hard Tesla fan.

      The type of people who can afford a $50-60k car (which most early Tesla 3's will be) don't care too much about a $1000 refundable down payment. If your rainy day fund (which is generally in a no interest or very low interest bearing account) cannot spare $1000 which could take a few months to retrieve then you shouldn't be buying a Tesla 3.

      I am one of those who waited in line to pre-order on day one, and the down payment was a meaningless amount. Not because I am wealthy, but just because I already keep about $30k in a savings account so I wasn't missing much by having $1k in a non-interest bearing account for a year or two. Maybe I lost a few dollars in interest from my savings account.

      And while I am a big fan of Tesla, I ended up recently buying a traditional ICE BMW when I found the Tesla 3 I would have ordered would cost about $60k. While reasonable, it was too high to be competitive with used luxury cars already in the market. To me at least.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  11. Tesla's inability to deliver on schedule .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    .... is the main reason I did not reserve a Tesla 3 (after waiting in line). I wasn't about to wait YEARS for a vehicle that could in the end be out of date by the time I receive it.

    They claimed that the vehicle could be delivery by Dec 2018 (i.e., 20+ months wait), but as you can see, Tesla has NEVER delivered in time and is always around 2 year behind schedule. With so many companies going into production (for EVs) in the next couple of years, it was just plain stupid to make the investment without any guarantee that the vehicle would be delivered within a reasonable time.

    1. Re:Tesla's inability to deliver on schedule .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I wasn't about to wait YEARS for a vehicle that could in the end be out of date by the time I receive it"
      Have you been watching Tesla even a little bit in the past few years? They haven't been standing still.
      I wouldn't expect the Model 3 to get updated as often as the S or X but it's extremely unlikely that the Model 3 of 2020 will be the same as the cars that were delivered in Q4 2017

    2. Re:Tesla's inability to deliver on schedule .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy has an unhingable lower jaw. Elon must LOVE him.

  12. Difference is they produce real product by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tesla has survived until this day by missing just about every target they ever set and making pie-in-the-sky announcements to divert attention every time that happens.

    The thing about Tesla is, they have a track record of delivering.

    Yes they deliver really late. But that does not matter to the people investing in them and buying from them, because they have already baked in the understanding of these delays. When someone was waiting in line for a model 3, they knew it may well be years before they get the car. But they do not care, as long as it is eventually be delivered - and since Tesla is indeed producing model 3's, it eventually will be. That is enough.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Difference is they produce real product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing about Tesla is, they have a track record of failing to deliver.

      Tesla has failed at everything they said they would deliver.

  13. Tesla miss - anyone surprised? by fozzy1015 · · Score: 1

    Tesla delivered only 1,550 Model 3 vehicles in the Q4, lower than the lowest "analyst" guidance. But as they say, "Hope springs eternal". http://www.latimes.com/busines... [latimes.com]

  14. No Shit! Sherlock! by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    May be the CEO saying "it is in production hell" clued them on to it? may be? Just saying ...

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  15. What's the big deal? by jezwel · · Score: 1
    So expectation for a quarter was 1600, actual 220.
    The next quarter, expected production is 15,000, though potentially only 5,000 will be made.

    Looks to me that Tesla are less than 3 months behind schedule. So why the anxiety?

  16. Re: I don't think so, model 3 buyers very much fan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in so many other ways the car is doing an excellent job already compared to any other car someone might be thinking of

    For years I dreamed of a day where I was forced to swipe thru a fucking iPad to open the bloody glove box. That day is now.

  17. You trust teslas automation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do realize that musk aggressively avoids all attempts at code audits and is stonewalling all attempts at a consensus standard for safety. Just as he blew off space safety standards and got congress to waive standards with spaceX, he will blow of all safety standards for autonomy in cars, but will fall catastrophically when the insurance companies rip him apart in court.

    1. Re:You trust teslas automation? by green1 · · Score: 1

      I don't trust Tesla's automation for one second. Of course they've also never sold a car with autonomous features, only driver assistance, and I trust their driver assistance every time I get in the car. The difference is that I am always in control of the system. I am driving. Tesla isn't. The absolute worst thing the automation is capable of doing if it screws up is to move the car a foot or so to the side before I catch it and override. And if there wasn't several feet beside the car to start with, I never would have engaged the system in the first place.

      The way the system is designed, there is still a physical link between the steering wheel and the steering of the front wheels, and between the brake pedal and the brakes. The software simply cannot override that no matter what it does wrong.

      If you treat it as the feature it is (a better cruise control) it's great. If you expect it to drive itself you're both ignorant, and stupid.

      That said, apparently too many people were both ignorant and stupid, so in a pure marketing move, and against the law in almost every jurisdiction, Tesla retroactively removed a paid for feature from all the cars it had already sold. Luckily for me, I've rooted my car and was able to re-instate the feature that Tesla stole.

      As for resisting code audits, that's partly to cover their blatant copyright infringement using GPL software without adhering to the GPL, and partly because Tesla is of the opinion that they know better than the rest of the world on all things and have a right to do anything they want to other people's property without their permission. I'd say that it will come back to bite them eventually, but as long as they have no competition, and most countries consumer protection laws lack any teeth, what incentive do they have to change?

      As for Tesla's "full self driving" that's just another of a long line of marketing lies, they'll never get there with the current hardware, nor will any regulatory body ever approve it with this hardware (we don't even need to talk about software for this, the hardware is so obviously incapable of it that the software is irrelevant)

    2. Re:You trust teslas automation? by Rei · · Score: 1

      One thing that I think Autopilot gets right versus most of its emerging competitors is the situation display. It tells you what it's thinking, how it sees the world - e.g., "I see you here in your lane, I sense something in your blind spot over here, I see two cars ahead of you, one to the front right..." etc. It may seem like such a little thing at first, but it's absolutely critical to owners being comfortable with any degree of automation (even glorified TACC+lanekeeping, aka Autopilot as it currently stands) that it not just be some "black box" randomly making inexplicable decisions. IMHO, Tesla could do even more to make clear why it decides things as it does - but they're at least much better than what most other companies are doing.

      --
      The chloride owes the sodium money.
    3. Re:You trust teslas automation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw an article a couple of weeks ago about how several insurers where lowering the insurance cost for tesla owners as data was showing they got into significantly less accidents/mile then non-tesla owners

      I don't buy you're 'tesla is bad on safety' story, it strikes me as bullshit

    4. Re:You trust teslas automation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Repeat after me:

      Tesla's DO NOT HAVE A FUCKING AUTOPILOT AND NEVER HAVE HAD ONE, Anyone who thinks they do is a fucking idiot. and should never be allowed on the road.

    5. Re:You trust teslas automation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By that standard, NO AIRPLANE HAS A FUCKING AUTOPILOT AND NEVER HAD ONE.

      Autopilot in a plane keeps the plane flying in the right direction.

      The Autopilot feature in a Tesla keeps the car driving at the same speed and in the same lane.

      Nope, they're nothing alike. Nuh-uh.

  18. I'll just reiterate what I have said before by bravecanadian · · Score: 2

    Tesla is most likely not going to survive as an independent car maker.

    Maybe they'll make it as a niche luxury brand, but unless the miraculously start producing, they are going to be crushed by the real carmakers.

    All the majors have EVs and hybrids on the way, and they can actually build them across the globe and in large quantities.

    I think they are going to be bought up after their stock crashes, or turn into a battery company. Making money on cars is a very tough business.

    1. Re:I'll just reiterate what I have said before by rkordmaa · · Score: 1

      Unless I have missed something it isn't exactly public knowledge what precicely the manufacturing bottleneck is, could be something major and pretty much unsolvable, or it could be relatively minor issue, no way to tell without insider information really. As for the competitiveness, well EV is pretty much a battery pack with wheels, being a battery manufacturer is a major advantage over other car manufacturers. Trying to manufacture EVs without being a battery manufacturer is like trying to manufacture normal cars without being able to manufacture the bloody engine.

    2. Re:I'll just reiterate what I have said before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was a minor solvable issue would not have been ongoing for the last 12 months forcing them to fail to meet every production estimate by huge margins.

    3. Re:I'll just reiterate what I have said before by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      As for the competitiveness, well EV is pretty much a battery pack with wheels

      The unibody is harder to get right and costs more than the battery pack, so no. No it is not.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:I'll just reiterate what I have said before by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Trying to manufacture EVs without being a battery manufacturer is like trying to manufacture normal cars without being able to manufacture the bloody engine.

      Car manufacturers already have experience with vast networks of suppliers, the already outsource a significant amount of parts. Batteries are one of the least complex parts of a car.

    5. Re:I'll just reiterate what I have said before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have missed something, a fundamental understanding of car manufacturing. the suppliers, the shipping companies, sending out specs, the legal agreements. Automotive manufacturing is an incredibly complex machine that takes careful orchestration and alot of life long learning.

      Things like using dissimilar metals in the unibody construction, which due to different rates of thermal expansion can cause huge problems. combine that with the fact that Tesla is building a new car and trying to be "new" about almost everything instead of just building the next generation.

      So in conclusion, the established automakers are just taking all of their lessons learned in making of cars and apply it to the next generation with an electric propulsion system while Tesla is trying to re-invent every single part of the car.

      Personally, i dont want the large infotainment screen and touch screen nonsense. I want knobs and tactile buttons that i can touch and discern with out my eyes even having to leave the road. FFS, my hands shouldn't even need to leave the wheel for driving critical functions like windshield wipers or turn indicators. The largest problem that Tesla has is that they are trying to be new and different and thus cannot take advantage of the decades of knowledge about automotive manufacturing because every new feature they dream up creates new manufacturing challenges that havent been solved yet.

    6. Re:I'll just reiterate what I have said before by srichard25 · · Score: 2

      The major car manufacturers don't seem to WANT to play in this specific space. Sure, each of them have a token EV. But they are mostly ugly and slow and don't sell extremely well. Nobody other than Tesla seems to want to make an EV that is fast, fun and looks nice. Maybe the majors don't make as much money on maintenance of EVs and that's why they don't want to play in that space.

  19. Typical Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a poor repeat of "Apple" complete with fawning fanbois competing and comparing the size of their compensating batteries.

    At least Apple had a revolutionary product. Tesla is just wrapping an old product in a shiny package. I'd take a 1980 Renault Lectric Leopard in good condition over a Tesla-3 any day of the year.

    The more crap they pack in the more there is to break.

    The only winner here is Musk who's laughing all the way to the bank with the money Obammer gave him to pull this ruse over the American people.

    It is clear the only winners here will be established automakers like BMW, Merc and dare-I-say-it, GM and Ford who come out of this better off. Tesla will be a footnote like Tucker. But this time only by their own hand, folly and hubris; and not by the collusion of the automakers.