Slashdot Mirror


Google Blocks Pirate Search Results Prophylactically (torrentfreak.com)

Google is accepting "prophylactic" takedown requests to keep pirated content out of its search results, an anonymous reader writes, citing a TorrentFreak report. From the article: Over the past year, we've noticed on a few occasions that Google is processing takedown notices for non-indexed links. While we assumed that this was an 'error' on the sender's part, it appears to be a new policy. "Google has critically expanded notice and takedown in another important way: We accept notices for URLs that are not even in our index in the first place. That way, we can collect information even about pages and domains we have not yet crawled," Caleb Donaldson, copyright counsel at Google writes. In other words, Google blocks URLs before they appear in the search results, as some sort of piracy vaccine. "We process these URLs as we do the others. Once one of these not-in-index URLs is approved for takedown, we prophylactically block it from appearing in our Search results, and we take all the additional deterrent measures listed above." Some submitters are heavily relying on the new feature, Google found. In some cases, the majority of the submitted URLs in a notice are not indexed yet.

38 comments

  1. But but but by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 2

    I thought prophylactils were extinct.

    1. Re:But but but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New Google brand prophylactics--still in Beta.

    2. Re:But but but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're better than Intel brand, fewer holes.

  2. Prophylactically ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure what this means. Is it related to prolapse ?

    1. Re:Prophylactically ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is about digital images of rectal prolapse due to a lifetime of unnatural acts and buggery.

  3. Were Google's takedown notices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    designed for HER pleasure?

    1. Re:Were Google's takedown notices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I submit a prophylactic takeoff request to most girls it gets rejected.

    2. Re:Were Google's takedown notices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because they know you're gay.

  4. Trojan Searches. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WoW! Who knew Trojans could be so useful.

  5. blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MY laptop has ridges.

    For HER pleasure.

    1. Re:blocker by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Too bad the only 15" you have to offer is your laptop's screen.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. ContentID for search indexes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, yes, let the hate flow through you.

  7. Don't Be Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Google is, at this point, privatized corporate law enforcement. In more ways than one.

    You're either decentralizing ALL of your shit, or you are prey waiting to be milked for fun and profit.

    1. Re:Don't Be Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Europe there is no first amendment so the governments are free to go full-Minitrue, but in America Big Brother must be privatized. Google may not be able to throw you in jail, but they can drive you out of business and hide your entire existence from the rest of the world.

    2. Re:Don't Be Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... they can drive you out of business and hide your entire existence from the rest of the world.

      Google isn't doing this purely for the benefit of government: As mega-corps own more and more property, individuals are separated into consumers or competitors. There's plenty examples of how mega-corps treat smaller competitors.

    3. Re:Don't Be Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hide your entire existence from the rest of the world.

      Only from those who think Google is the only search engine.

    4. Re:Don't Be Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this point they might as well be. Bing stopped showing good porn results, DuckDuckGo has already been proven to leak their results to Google, Startpage is just Google with a blue interface, and nobody uses Yahoo for anything besides old email accounts.

      RIP Altavista
      RIP Dogpile
      RIP AskJeeves

      You are all missed.

  8. From Planned Parenthood by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    How effective are condoms against pregnancy?

    If you use condoms perfectly every single time you have sex, they’re 98% effective at preventing pregnancy. But people aren’t perfect, so in real life condoms are about 85% effective

    I expect even worse numbers for google....

    1. Re:From Planned Parenthood by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Do you know what is the most effective birth control, alimony. Google wants to fix it's shit, than charge for uploads to access advertising review. Free uploads no ad revenue, want ad revenue, pay for the upload so many cents per minute. Stick up a movie, to gain ad revenue, pay and then get caught in the first thirty days before any revenue and lose your upload investment cost. It becomes a balance between paying for uploads and earning ad revenue, slows things down, makes it more manage able. It wont stop everything but it will slow it all down and shift goggle cash flow (they'll pick up income early before paying ad revenue). People will of course be more careful when it comes to uploading content if they want ad revenue because of the initial investment, they can still practice with free uploads with no ad revenue to gauge audience numbers and see whether the upload investment will generate an ad revenue return.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:From Planned Parenthood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know what is the most effective birth control, alimony. Google wants to fix it's shit, than charge for uploads to access advertising review. Free uploads no ad revenue, want ad revenue, pay for the upload so many cents per minute. Stick up a movie, to gain ad revenue, pay and then get caught in the first thirty days before any revenue and lose your upload investment cost.

      You can't upload links into the search results. Only googles bots that crawl for such things can.

      And one can't simply obtain ad revenue simply by being related to a link in googles search results.
      You would need to place advertising on your website to do that.

      It also has nothing at all to do with Google if one uploads something to the pirate bay, let alone would Google pay you to do so.

      I also fail to see how Google would have anything to do with if the pirate bay did or did not charge someone for uploads.

      What on earth are you talking about?

    3. Re: From Planned Parenthood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 85% value includes Africa where Christian missionaries prevents education about condom usage.
      For places where they teach you that the condom goes on the dick and shouldn't be reused you can expect it to work.

    4. Re:From Planned Parenthood by tepples · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly certain that rtb61 was referring to YouTube, a video host operated by Google.

    5. Re:From Planned Parenthood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then he should probably have clearly indicated that he was talking about something else than what we are discussing (i.e. Google Search).

  9. given how many pirate sites are "hacks" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is probably for the best. There's a lot of people who end up mining coins, ransoming their computer, and otherwise getting messed up because they simply don't know how to pirate content safely.

    But for 9.95, you can read my book on how to safely and securely download all the content you want with never a worry in the world.

    1. Re:given how many pirate sites are "hacks" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already grabbed the epub from TPB, thanks for writing.

  10. *sigh* We so desperately need an alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's up, people? Why isn't anybody discussing how to get around this problem?? Help a brother out!

  11. Any warez search engine available? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like google has rendered itself totally useless

    Any useful search engine available for warez?

  12. stop Google before it's too late by Reverend+Green · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Google sure does hate allowing poor people access to cultural data.

  13. Google is a Search Engine Not The Police by WindowsStar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is absolutely wrong!! Google is a Search Engine Not The Police of the Internet! That is like Google blocking searches for Gay's because it is illegal in some places. Or it is like blocking searches for Marijuana because it is Federally illegal. Google should NEVER block anything. If the someone has an issue with a search then they need to work on stopping the source not killing the messenger. My 2 cents!

    1. Re:Google is a Search Engine Not The Police by tinkerton · · Score: 2

      How about Google just monitoring your searches for marijuana?

    2. Re:Google is a Search Engine Not The Police by WindowsStar · · Score: 1

      Nice! Oh, noooo the Google Police are at my front door.

    3. Re:Google is a Search Engine Not The Police by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      Google stores it but it can allow others to query it.

  14. Unless they earn money for Google by nagora · · Score: 1

    I can't see YouTube or Google Books' industrial-scale copyright violations being stopped by this new policy, can you? And Scribd is the biggest piracy site on the Web as far as normal punters are concerned; will it get blocked? I doubt it.

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  15. Block Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't use Google services for anything anymore, and on my network we block Google including the use of their 8.8.8.8 DNS server. If you want to use another DNS server not belonging to your ISP I suggest Quad 9 (9.9.9.9) by IBM which still has some filtered results, but 9.9.9.10 is supposed to be unfiltered.

  16. I remember when Google was a search engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I miss that.