Slashdot Mirror


Ford is Giving Its Factory Workers Robot Exo-suits To Ease To Burden of Building Cars (qz.com)

Mike Murphy, writing for Quartz: Ford's cars are getting closer to driving themselves, but they still need humans to build them. And because people aren't quite as durable as robots, it's trying to make those jobs easier by developing a suit with Ekso Bionics that takes the stress out of working long hours on a car assembly floor. Ekes, founded in 2005 in California, builds exoskeletons, essentially robotic assistive systems that people strap into to make walking, lifting, and standing easier. It's worked with the US military to build suits for soldiers. The system Ekso developed with Ford, called the EksoVest, doesn't use any motors to make working on factory lines less stressful, and it's nothing like what you see in movies, as it simply uses hydraulics to redistribute weight so that workers can comfortably raise their arms above their heads for extended periods of time. The suit can be worn by anyone from 5 ft to 6 ft 4 inches tall, and can provide lift assistance up to 15 pounds per arm. Some assembly-line workers at the average Ford plant lift their arms 4,600 times a day -- or about 1 million times a year, the company said.

49 comments

  1. Squueeaal! by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    Do they look like the carrier suits in Aliens that Ripley wore?!?!
    Please?!?

    1. Re:Squueeaal! by the_skywise · · Score: 1

      I relinquish my geek card!

  2. Cool by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

    We are getting closer to the future every moment.

    1. Re:Cool by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Your name is proof that we're already past the future.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  3. Who will benefit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this to help the workers or to train the suits?

  4. self-driving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they offer self-driving exosuits yet? The workers would love those! (And what could go wrong...)

  5. Bioanalytics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do the suits collect analytic data on how much work each user is doing?

    1. Re:Bioanalytics by the_skywise · · Score: 1

      if you take 10,000 steps a day you get a discount on your health insurance....

    2. Re:Bioanalytics by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do the suits collect analytic data on how much work each user is doing?

      It is an assembly line, so they already know how much work people are doing.

    3. Re:Bioanalytics by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      But what if the workers only knows C++ or Java?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:Bioanalytics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what if the workers only knows C++ or Java

      In that case they probably talks like Popeye.

  6. FOOLS! by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Those suits are recording their every move. once enough data is collected they'll be able to replace them with robots!

    You're motion-training your own replacements!
    =Smidge=

    1. Re:FOOLS! by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Puh-leeze!

      Ford Motor Company, remember? UAW ring any bells? No jobs are endangered here...

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:FOOLS! by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Interesting

      UAW ring any bells? No jobs are endangered here...

      The early 1980s called. They would like you to know they ended over 30 years ago. The UAW hasn't had much clout since then.

      Besides, if the UAW is so evil and so influential at Ford then how do you explain that they are the only one of the big three that required zero government assistance to stay afloat recently?

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    3. Re:FOOLS! by Puls4r · · Score: 1

      *disclaimer* I work for Ford. The UAW has little or no power anymore. They are desperately clinging to each contract knowing full well that the tide of consumer opinion, even within their own ranks, has turned against them.

      They have people doing talentless labor who are collecting 20-30 dollars an hour. People in the same classification doing superb work collect the same amount. That is the heart of the discontent: it's always the high performers that are dragged down to the lowest common denominator. It's communism after all: if I'm going to be paid the same as the other guy despite my effort, I'm sure not going to do more work than him!

      Anyway, Ford very nearly went under. They got LUCKY. They had a number of investments and had taken out a number of loans just prior to everything going to shit. Then on top of that they actually mortgaged the Ford symbol - told the money lenders that they would have it if Ford went belly up.

      So yes, the Union is ball-less and toothless. And Ford is nothing magical, they just got a little lucky. Oh - and the current prices of industrial robots mean that replacing a human with a robot will usually tar out two years. It's a no-brainer.

    4. Re:FOOLS! by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Those suits are recording their every move. once enough data is collected they'll be able to replace them with robots!

      H-1b replacement robots!

    5. Re: FOOLS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These suits don't even exist.

      Once again, the headline directly contradicts the summary.

    6. Re:FOOLS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right. But remember what Henry For himself said : "A machine can build a car, but will never buy one".
      You have to employ people, because if only robots have jobs, there is no people with money to buy any products. Unless Universal Basic Income becomes a reality.

  7. Bet injuries go up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When they gave weight belts to warehouse workers, lower back injuries went up by a lot because people's cores got weaker. I'm guessing we'll see something similar here.

    1. Re:Bet injuries go up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking the same thing.

  8. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ford is Giving Its Factory Workers Robot Exo-suits To Ease To Burden of Building Cars

    What is "To Ease To Burden" ?

    1. Re: Huh? by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      msmash is such a shitty "editor", he/she can't even fucking copy and paste from the original stories properly. Eight fucking hours, no correction, and I doubt we'll see one. It's /. trolling from the fucking editors, FFS. They just don't give a shit and have no job qualifications.

  9. lifting every 6 seconds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Some assembly-line workers at the average Ford plant lift their arms 4,600 times a day"

    That means lifting your arms every 6 seconds during an 8 hour shift. That must take some getting used to. I don't think I'd be able to lift my arms anymore if I tried that for a couple of hours, even with empty hands.

    1. Re: lifting every 6 seconds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They were recording the person who gives out the hand jobs.

    2. Re: lifting every 6 seconds by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      as much as i hate silicon valley*, that scene was actually pretty funny.

      *every single fucking episode:
      1. dude comes up with a way to save the company
      2. dude gets 90% of the way through succeeding
      3. SURPRISE! it all blows up in his face.

      rinse, repeat.

      pass.

    3. Re: lifting every 6 seconds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which TV series or movie is not like that?

    4. Re: lifting every 6 seconds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three's Company?

  10. So they can do more, faster, and with less people by HalAtWork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Naturally

  11. Let us help you with this. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    ... it's trying to make those jobs easier by developing a suit with Ekso Bionics that takes the stress out of working long hours on a car assembly floor.

    Sure, but they could also hire more employees, instead of making the remaining - I mean current - ones work longer and harder - I mean easier.

    [the suits are] nothing like what you see in movies, as it simply uses hydraulics to redistribute weight so that workers can comfortably raise their arms above their heads for extended periods of time.

    Sounds like bunches of fun. (Is it still a torture stress position with the suits?)

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Let us help you with this. by dj245 · · Score: 1

      ... it's trying to make those jobs easier by developing a suit with Ekso Bionics that takes the stress out of working long hours on a car assembly floor.

      Sure, but they could also hire more employees, instead of making the remaining - I mean current - ones work longer and harder - I mean easier.

      [the suits are] nothing like what you see in movies, as it simply uses hydraulics to redistribute weight so that workers can comfortably raise their arms above their heads for extended periods of time.

      Sounds like bunches of fun. (Is it still a torture stress position with the suits?)

      I am not an industrial hygienist, but if a suit applied uniform pressure to the legs, it may help to get more bloodflow higher up in the body and into raised arms. That could eliminate some of the discomfort of poor circulation in raised arms.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. No, Ford is giving them exosuits by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    to improve productivity. If it happens to make their jobs easier that's a side benefit, and one that, in the absence of Unions, will be used to lower their pay.

    I'm not saying this is a bad thing, I'm just saying that, like all productivity increases, it needs to be approached with careful forethought. I can't be the only one who's seen this chart.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  14. video of exoskeleton by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 2

    I had to see it work https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  15. Wrong solution by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "Ford's cars are getting closer to driving themselves, but they still need humans to build them."

    There's your problem right there.
    They don't need human operated robots but AI driven ones.

  16. Re:So they can do more, faster, and with less peop by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    That was what made the assembly line an innovation. More people working at the same time, but the were only doing one specific thing, so the overall productivity was much higher than the same number of people building individual cars.

    Doing more with less people is what Ford was built on.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  17. Long hours? That's the problem right there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody should have to work more than 6 hours a day. Let's demand that with the 30 hour week standard, then the companies can add a fourth shift when they need it. Our rights will not be given to us. We have to take them by whatever means necessary!

    1. Re:Long hours? That's the problem right there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU you hippie burn out.

    2. Re:Long hours? That's the problem right there by blackomegax · · Score: 1

      He's right though. Productivity has skyrocketed since the 40 hour work week became a thing. realistically, most people only need 10-20 actual hours of work a week to do their jobs. Everything else is just capitalist oppression to enslave the worker class and keep seats warm

    3. Re:Long hours? That's the problem right there by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      So why haven't you started a company to compete in some industry and given your employees a 20 hour work week? If you actually believed your statement, that'd destroy the "capitalist oppression to enslave the worker", right? You'd get all the best employees flocking to your company to get the reduced hours and since they could still do their jobs, you'd compete just fine.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    4. Re:Long hours? That's the problem right there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why haven't you started a company to compete in some industry and given your employees a 20 hour work week?

      You're just thinking like a 19th Century dinosaur. That's not how we got the 40 hour work week. We had to raise holy hell. Now it's time to demand that the 6 hour day, 30 hour week be codified into law. It's easily affordable with today's automation and capital hidden away in Wall Street derivatives, so save your greedy breath.

  18. Need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " they still need humans to build them."

    "Need" is way too strong a word there.

  19. In other news... by Oroka · · Score: 1

    Ford, unable to completely automate due to being held hostage by unions is rolling out robots that contain flesh bags made of mostly water. These flesh bags will be nominally in control but ultimately will be nearly as productive as a traditional robot.

  20. VIVA LA COMMUNISM by blackomegax · · Score: 1

    FORD WORKERS, take the suits! Then weaponize them, and take back this beautiful country from your capitalist oppressors!

  21. no hiding by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Resistance is futile. Enter your exoskeleton.

  22. And in the off hours... by tlambert · · Score: 1

    And in the off hours... Ford employees are encourage to use the suits to fight crime in ... MEGADetroit!

  23. As long as the software for the suits isnt outsour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Otherwise you might get arms bending in the opposite direction

  24. Re:So they can do more, faster, and with less peop by Kjella · · Score: 1

    And? The alternative is probably that they price themselves out of the market, consumers buy some other brand and everybody lose their jobs. In fact, if they're successful there could be more jobs at Ford despite being less in the industry. Unless you're in some form of cartel/monopolist market or public service where people have no choice but to suck it up being intentionally inefficient to protect jobs is folly. I have an old Ford that might get replaced soon, it's been good to me so obviously I'm looking at new Fords. But I'm also seriously looking at Audi, BMW, Mercedes, Volvo and a few outsiders too. I know what they were 10+ years ago may not be that relevant today, neither in terms of features or quality. It's not exactly a market to be complacent in.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  25. "to ease TO burden" WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh wait - AMERICANS....

  26. Why not just ROTATE the cars a bit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just rotate the cars through 90 degrees for that part of the production line, so that the workers see the bottom of the car facing sideways?