Slashdot Mirror


Fake 'Inbound Missile' Alert Sent To Every Cellphone in Hawaii (chicagotribune.com)

"Somebody sent out a false emergency alert to all cell phones in Hawaii saying, 'BALLISTIC MISSILE THREAT INBOUND TO HAWAII. SEEK IMMEDIATE SHELTER. THIS IS NOT A DRILL'," writes Slashdot reader flopwich, adding "Somebody's had better days at work." The Associated Press reports: In a conciliatory news conference later in the day, Hawaii officials apologized for the mistake and vowed to ensure it will never happen again. Hawaii Emergency Management Agency Administrator Vern Miyagi said the error happened when someone hit the wrong button. "We made a mistake," said Miyagi. For nearly 40 minutes, it seemed like the world was about to end in Hawaii, an island paradise already jittery over the threat of nuclear-tipped missiles from North Korea...

On the H-3, a major highway north of Honolulu, vehicles sat empty after drivers left them to run to a nearby tunnel after the alert showed up, the Honolulu Star-Advertiser reported. Workers at a golf club huddled in a kitchen fearing the worst... The Hawaii Emergency Management Agency tweeted there was no threat about 10 minutes after the initial alert, but that didn't reach people who aren't on the social media platform. A revised alert informing of the "false alarm" didn't reach cellphones until 38 minutes later, according to the time stamp on images people shared on social media.

56 of 227 comments (clear)

  1. Brown Pants by jwhyche · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bring me my Brown Pants!!

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    1. Re:Brown Pants by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

      From Red Dwarf:

      Kryten: "I suggest we go to red alert."
      Cat: "Forget red alert. I say we go straight to brown alert!"
      Kryten: "But sir, we don't have brown alert."
      Cat: "You won't be saying that in a minute...and don't say I didn't alert you!"

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  2. Orson Welles was an amateur. by sehlat · · Score: 4, Funny
  3. Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This message ostensibly was sent to every cell phone in Hawaii - didn't the guy who "pushed the wrong button" get the alert as well?

    And seriously - their first thought when sending out a correction was a Tweet? Don't they have the ability to send an "all clear" over the same channel they sent the "LOOK OUT YOU'RE ABOUT TO DIE!!!" message?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Jeremi · · Score: 5, Informative

      Don't they have the ability to send an "all clear" over the same channel they sent the "LOOK OUT YOU'RE ABOUT TO DIE!!!" message?

      No, apparently they do not:

      "[Emergency alerts] aren't like text messages, where a sender can dash off a quick 'sorry my bad' if they mistype. IPAWS notices have a specific format, which must be composed formally and in advance. Audio files for broadcast notices must be recorded or generated and uploaded. Often, this has to be done by special software on special equipment."

      https://www.theatlantic.com/te...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by c · · Score: 2

      This message ostensibly was sent to every cell phone in Hawaii - didn't the guy who "pushed the wrong button" get the alert as well?

      Off hand, I'd expect that the kind of place that monitors for ICBM's and issues that sort of warning probably doesn't allow cell phones or many other kinds of wireless device. In a lot of cases, things like Internet access might also be locked down.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    3. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Pseudonym · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given the history of the Cold War, it's a little disturbing that they didn't have a "sorry, that was a false alarm" message already formally prepared.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    4. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      This message ostensibly was sent to every cell phone in Hawaii - didn't the guy who "pushed the wrong button" get the alert as well?

      And seriously - their first thought when sending out a correction was a Tweet? Don't they have the ability to send an "all clear" over the same channel they sent the "LOOK OUT YOU'RE ABOUT TO DIE!!!" message?

      What I am interested in is the "pushed the wrong button" business. Aren't they required to have one of these? http://www.12voltunlimited.com... . I cannot imagine that if there was an actual button, it would have to have a switch guard. And if you have an alert that tells millions of people that they need to kiss their asses goodbye, a keyboard press to actuate is simply criminal.

      But I'll bet it was a keyboard press.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    5. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In the history of forever, whenever bureaucracies fuck up - 'blame the new guy'. Someone thought it was a good idea and did it, likely for political reasons, it went down way worse than they thought and... So what was the follow up marketing meant to about, obviously stoking war fears, real war fears. Who was playing, drive war fears as an FCC distraction, make more War Industrial Complex funding more palatable, attack property values in Honolulu (Pearl Harbour is the number one target in the US and make no mistake but why force the reminder).

      They had better show some images of this magic, make an entire city panic, cause harm and suffering and even death as people try to escape, button with no safety features, otherwise I just wont believe. They were going to try something on, they still might in the next few weeks, some kind of PR=B$ stunt to push an agenda.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    6. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The US gov/mil needed to see what the US population would do in that state and all over the USA, globally given a simple cellphone message for a set time.
      How would all diplomats in the USA react? Calls made, messages sent. Reactions in their embassy, communications used from their embassy out of the USA.
      Spies been watched by the FBI all over the USA react in any way at all?
      Do US survivalist have any national or global messaging system that was not yet under constant FBI/NSA/CIA watch?
      What did average survivalist do? Drive out to their bug out location? Stay at work? Why? Did they know it was a test? Nice way to find out who they are and who got seen on CCTV, via cell phone tracking driving around in a very different way after the message :)
      Did the message get repeated on unexpected and unknown communications networks? Totally new systems and unknown people who held back for just such a warning that had not been tracked by the NSA, CIA, GCHQ, FBI in the past?
      Ham radio, cell phone, telephone numbers, IRC, forums, social media, changes to web sites, visits to strange web sites by many people? Different, direct messages to unexpected and new militia groups all over the US once thought to be isolated in their states?
      Was the message a long conversation? A word? A number? Who passed it on locally deeper into the USA? Hops to different very networks all over the USA.
      Such unexpected and urgent communications would have been a real time study for the FBI, NSA uncovering all kinds of survival and militia groups that stayed so well hidden for so long only to be detected USA wide by one simple message.
      40 mins gave the study time to keep tracking all the people with "plans" all over the USA. Spies, embassy workers, US militia groups, cults, faith groups, dual citizens, survivalist, people in the US mil/gov/contractors, police might have done something very interesting for 40 mins.
      Who stayed at their job in the US mil/gov/police? Who phoned their kin, strangers when they should not due to gov/mil secrecy? Who got a message and/or responded to someone they never had contact with in the past?
      One message gave the FBI, US mil, police and NSA years of information on their workers, contractors, staff, special forces. Who made calls to tell people it was all a test...
      Who stayed loyal to the US mil/gov and who was talking to people.
      Now the US gov knows who will do what in time of war.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    7. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by dohzer · · Score: 2

      You've got to inform the guy with the massive button so he knows it's fake, so naturally you send a tweet.
      After that you can update all the plebs.

    8. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      So have a prerecorded / preformatted "our bad, nothing going on" message.

      Seriously, if you receive a missile warning over an official emergency broadcast channel that stresses "this is not a drill", would you trust an "all clear" message that's sent as a bloody tweet?

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    9. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, if the enemy has their hands on the real messages, they can periodically create mass panic and also discredit the system at the same time. I don't think there's much you can do about scenarios where the enemy can control the system beyond try to prevent them from controlling the system.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  4. Re: State Exercise? by sound+vision · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm thinking it may not have been so accidental. This is possibly the only way to get good data on how effective the warnings are. My guess: not very effective at this point. But someone higher up needed that data to complete his that assessment regarding war with the Koreans.

  5. . . . and the other buttons . . . ? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, they have a button programmed to broadcast a missile attack, and the operator "hit it by mistake."

    So what other alert buttons are pre-programmed on the board . . . ?

    "GIANT TUNA DEVOURING BEACH VISITORS!"

    "AI POWERED SLINKY ARMY ATTACKING PASSENGER CARS!"

    And, of course, worst of all:

    "HAWAII DECLARED TO BE A SHITHOLE!"

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:. . . and the other buttons . . . ? by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

      "IMMINENT COVFEFE! STAND BY!"

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  6. Re: State Exercise? by Monster_user · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Purely a state exercise" is disavowing all knowledge and responsibility at the Federal level. Translation: "We're staying out of this one."

  7. Obligatory... by Pseudonym · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  8. Re:Trump is trying to create... by greenwow · · Score: 2

    One of my first memories was in 1950 when the communists in NK invaded the south and the UN voted on a resolution against them. Did you forget almost 70 years of history?

  9. This one was by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Did any other state get a similar warning? No? Then how was it not a state deal? If the feds has messed up we all would have gotten a notice on our phones, or at least some other part of the U.S.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:This one was by omnichad · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or, this was real but neutralized and then disavowed with a cover story.

      I'm pretty sure the feds wouldn't send a nationwide alert for a localized threat. Initiating mass panic is dangerous enough over a small area.

  10. In addition.. by Ayano · · Score: 4, Funny

    Funny part is that there was a prompt for "are you sure?"

    --
    I don't read AC
    1. Re:In addition.. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

      Funny part is that there was a prompt for "are you sure?"

      The thing is, like all state of the art systems of this sort, it's run on NT or Win95, so Clippy is involved.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:In addition.. by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Funny

      "You have stated you are not sure you want this message to go out. Do you want to cancel the message? [OK] [Cancel]"

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  11. Real not fake...mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It wasn't a "fake alert" it was a real alert from the real Agency empowered to issue them, that's way worse than a "fake" one.

    It was a mistake... That's not the same as being "fake", words matter. Editor's please take some English classes before posting any more.

    1. Re:Real not fake...mistake by Mal-2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Agreed, it was a false alert, not a fake one.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    2. Re:Real not fake...mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      English usage nowadays is worse than malapropisms. People are laughed at for using rarely used synonyms ("LOL, look at this Thesaurus guy").

      I hate every bit of Western culture that elevates so called "common" man. I want to live in a world where people need to have some kind of exam before getting access to the Internet, before that stupid Eternal September thing.

      I miss classes. Not classes at school. Classes in Marxist definition. I want to receive a formal acknowledgement for being a Ph.D. from plumbers and waiters. I want them to take of their stupid baseball hats when they see me while I respond with dismissive acknowledgment of their existence.

      I hate egalitarianism. I am not equal to you, dumbass that was flanking high school just few years ago.

      No sarcasm. I am tired living in a consumer society.

      I miss people who knew the difference between “of” and “off,” and who bothered to check their writing BEFORE posting remarks about how much fucking better they are than everyone else for allegedly having been awarded a “Piled higher and Deeper” degree.

      Having memorized by rote other people’s ideas doesn’t make you any “better,” than other people, you fucking snob, so on behalf of all the plumbers and waiters of the world, all of whom are more useful than you, you can take your hoist-toity little degree, and shove it up your hoity-toity little ass.

  12. I was there... by bobcardone · · Score: 5, Interesting

    On the 24th floor of a Waikiki Beach condo balcony having coffee when the alert came on my cell. First reaction...WTF?? Second reaction... went straight to the roof. If it's gonna go down, I want to see it (if only for a few milliseconds).

    --
    What, me worry?
    1. Re:I was there... by msauve · · Score: 2

      Good for you. If you're going to die, why suffer?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re: I was there... by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The closest Hiroshima survivor was in a cellar only 300 m from ground zero -- which is very close when you consider that the bomb was detonated at 500 m altitude.

      Now the device North Korea tested back in September was 10x to 20x more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb, but still if a bomb were detonated over Pearl Harbor and you were standing on the beach in Waikiki, you'd almost certainly survive, albeit possibly with thermal burns.

      Here's the thing about all that Duck and Cover stuff from the 50s: when you're talking about a handful of bombs distributed over the entire country, diving under a picnic blanket actually makes sense. It wont' help you if you're at ground zero, but if you're five miles away or so it could make the difference between surviving uninjured or requiring hospital treatment. Multiply that by tens of thousands of people, and duck and cover type education is a sensible defensive strategy.

      There is, however, a simple counter: attack with a lot more warheads. By the early 70s the Soviets had something like 25,000 of them. An all-out attack would not only result in multiple bombs falling on every city, it would guarantee the collapse of American society and a short and hellish existence for anyone unlucky enough to survive. Fatalism makes sense in that scenario. You might as well enjoy the show for a few hundred milliseconds and then die.

      That's not where we are with a North Korean nuclear attack, not by a long shot. North Korea's arsenal is not large enough yet to cause the collapse of American society, or even to kill the majority of people in a city like Honolulu. So maybe we should be dusting off those old civil defense films.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re: I was there... by hey! · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nope. The radius of destructive effect rises as the 2/3 power of yield. That's because the energy is dissipated in a three dimensional volume, and you're calculating the radius of intersection of that volume with a two dimensional surface. TL;DR: 20x the yield equals 7x the destructive radius.

      Anyhow you can look up on the expected fatal radius by bomb type and yield, and the immediately fatal thermal effects of the warhead NK tested for an unprotected individual would be less than 5 miles, although many closer would survive because of shelter. Honolulu is about 12 miles across. If you put the warhead in the geographic center of the city to maximize casualties a lot of people on either end will survive. A lot of them will be uninjured too. The 5 psi blast radius is only three miles, outside that radius even residential buildings will still stand and people shaded by them will likely escape uninjured if they can get inside before the fallout.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  13. Shitty wat to wake up by surfcow · · Score: 2

    Hope I never read a message like that again.

    Didn't last long, but people were running red lights, etc.

    Friends were trying to decide which of their children to save.

    1. Re:Shitty wat to wake up by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bring them to shelter. People have survived nuclear attacks before, no doubt they will in the future as well. If you avoid being killed by the initial blast and radiation you want to shelter from the fallout, most of which fades in two weeks.

      Survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

      Fallout Protection - What to Know and Do about Nuclear Attack

      Nuclear Strike Drills Faded Away In The 1980s. It May Be Time To Dust Them Off

      Nuclear weapons and their effects operate according to the laws of physics, not magic. The physics, effects, and countermeasures are known.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:Shitty wat to wake up by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      The shelters from the "Cold War" may have been reused in many buildings for parking, storage, converted to other use, the building might have been replaced by a new building with no new shelter.
      Private shelters from the cold war had design limitations given the idea was to sell owners on bunker not design a bunker for different locations.
      The land the 1950/60 shelter got placed into might not have been well prepared and by 2018 that shelter might have cracked, moved, failed. Soil conditions and what water would do to under a bunker was not often considered by people motivated to sell a lot of bunkers to consumers.
      A lot of people in a city do not have the needed land outside a city or a yard to build their own shelter in.
      They might know of a good company to build one but not have the land for a $20,000 to $1000000 walk in or drive in bunker.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:Shitty wat to wake up by nmb3000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I really liked this TED talk about it: Surviving a Nuclear Attack.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
  14. Re:Accident my ass... by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

    Hanlon's Razor.

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  15. Re:The government shouldn't have everyone's number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes and no. Yes, they can easily get a list of everyone's number, but no, it is a little more difficult to locate each individual number at any given time.

    Instead, the broadcasts are sent based on connected tower. Think of it just like a broadcast packet on a LAN Subnet. Phones connected to the particular towers (in this case, literally every single tower in the state) received the message.

    This is also pretty much the same system the AMBER alter system uses.

  16. Re:Inquiring minds want to know by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I grew up in the 60s and 70s. I remember some of the cold war films they showed us in school. According to them:

    Stay indoors. If you’re close enough to the blast, you’re probably dead anyway (that was mostly just implied). For many more people, though, fallout is going to be the main worry - so stay inside. And even if you still have running water... you probably shouldn’t drink it. Use what’s already in the back of the toilet and in your hot water heater.

    Of course nowadays, post 9/11, most reservoirs are supposedly covered - so I have no idea if that’s as important.

    In any case, water is probably going to be the main short term issue. If you have some pre-blast warning, filling up as many containers as possible with water is a good idea.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  17. Re:State Exercise? by cold+fjord · · Score: 5, Informative

    Scaring the crap out of everyone is considered "a state exercise?"

    It was a mistake by state officials, plain and simple.

    Hawaii officials give timeline of events surrounding false alarm

    Approx. 8.05 a.m.: A routine internal test during a shift change was initiated. This was a test that involved the Emergency Alert System, the Wireless Emergency Alert, but no warning sirens.

    8.07 a.m.: A warning was erroneously triggered statewide by an employee at the Hawaii Emergency Management Agency (HI-EMA).

    8.10 a.m.: State Adjutant Maj. Gen. Joe Logan validated with the US Pacific Command that there was no missile launch.

    Honolulu Police Department notified of the false alarm by HI-EMA.

    8.13 a.m.: State Warning Point issues a cancellation of the Civil Danger Warning Message. This would have prevented the initial alert from being rebroadcast to phones that may not have received it yet. For instance, if a phone was not on at 8.07am, it would not receive the alert later on.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  18. Not much of a timeline by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Although interesting to see what happened after "the wrong button was pressed", I would still love to know more about how such a terribly incorrect action could be triggered so easily with no outside verification. Like the governor doesn't even get one minute to verify and cancel a state-wide alert?

    I know time is of the essence in these things but it just seems crazy a shift change could trigger this, and in a way crazier that if that was possible, it never happened before. It seems pretty obvious something must have changed recently to allow this to happen, what was that?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  19. Re: State Exercise? by kenh · · Score: 3, Informative

    Scaring the crap out of everyone is considered "a state exercise?"

    Yes.

    It was a state warning system activated by state employees that was sent to everyone in the state of Hawaii.

    The clear meaning is that there was no federal involvement in the alert.

    --
    Ken
  20. Re: The government shouldn't have everyone's numbe by kenh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why do you imagine that the only way the message could be sent to every phone is to have a list of all phone numbers? I suspect the system relies on beacon signals broadcast from cell towers that every cellphone within range picks up, displays the message, then stores a record of the alert for a pre determined period of time (24 hours), after which the alert is ignored.

    Do you really imagine the system sends out several million simultaneous text messages? Why just send a message to every device within range?

    --
    Ken
  21. good by hdyoung · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There should be more of this in the US. Lots more. In fact, we should reinstate bi-yearly air raid drills for schools and businesses. For everyone within 100 miles of a strategically important target. That would be 95% of the population I bet. Remember that the nukes are wayyyyyy more powerful nowadays? It needs to be made perfectly clear to the US population that if our great leader pops his top and starts a nuclear confrontation, people have a 10% chance of survival, and that's only IF they manage to get to a shelter. A ton of people in this country have forgotten that the world is connected. They think that they can just ignore the rest of the world and they will be fine. Personally, I think that a lot of this has to do with the fact that WW2 is fading into the rearview mirror. Up until the last decade, there were a lot of vets from that war still around. People who were actually in Japan after the bombs and saw it with their own eyes. Lots of people who lost friends and family members fighting overseas. The population generally understood that what happens on the other side of the planet can come home to roost on their own doorsteps. We've largely forgotten this, and we elected an unstable, unqualified, angry leader and put him in charge of the nuclear arsenal. Because hey, we don't really believe anymore that what happens on the other side of the world can actually impinge on our lives in any real way. The entire US population needs a brutal reminder of how small the world actually has become. We all ought to spend some time practicing the soothing art of putting our heads between our legs and kissing our asses goodbye. Let all those conservative rural parents and grandparents spend some time answering awkward questions from the kids about the air raids drills they get at school.

  22. Re: Trump is trying to create... by kenh · · Score: 4, Informative

    Trump is trying to create... a problem in Korea where there has never been one before?

    You can't be that stupid.

    Ever heard of the Korean War? They made a tv show about it called M.A.S.H., it was quite popular.

    There was also a movie, called Team America, that explored some of the issues involved with North Korea.

    Every president since Eisenhower has had to deal with a "North Korea Problem", even Obama, the difference is Trump isn't trying to bribe North Korea to get them to pretend to suspend their nuclear weapons efforts...

    --
    Ken
  23. Re:State Exercise? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Scaring the crap out of everyone is considered "a state exercise?"

    It was a mistake by state officials, plain and simple.

    My interst is that I would want to know where the thing is aimed for, so I could stand a few miles away and enjoy the show. Radiation poisioning isn't pretty, and to actually witness the explosion, then get quickly incinerated seems like the ticket. Google Hiroshi Ouchi - but only if you have a very strong stomach. Ouchi and another fellow were pouring Uranyl Nitrate solution into a container, and for some reason poured 16 Kilograms worth of Uranium into a vessel that was only supposed to have 2.4, and there went the pretty blue flash that announced to them that they had a criticality. Ouchi caught 17 freaking sieverts of radiation, when 8 is likely to kill ya. His buddy Shinohara experienced 10 sieverts. They ded. For some reason the powers that be did everything possible to keep him alive, possibly to save face, but the combination of having no more skin, losing incredible amounts of bodily fluids - one day over 20 Kg, and organ failure. 83 friction days of nuclear provided happieness, as you can see by his last photo. But once again, don't look if you are sensitive - it looks like something from a horror movie.

    Which is why my popcorn and tequila party to witness the event and check out before I turn into Mr Ouchi is much more appealing. And if it is a fake or a mistake, at least we had a fun party.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  24. Re:Inquiring minds want to know by Brett+Buck · · Score: 3, Informative

    Duck and cover, mocked endlessly, is a good way to react. If you are close enough either the radiation or the blast will kill you outright, but that's a pretty small area (particularly when its a maybe 20kt fission weapon from Korea, probably with an impact trigger). Otherwise, your biggest danger is from the flying debris. Ducking out of the way of flying glass and getting under some substantial cover to avoid falling roofs and ceilings will certainly raise your odds of getting through it.

  25. Re:Inquiring minds want to know by hey! · · Score: 3, Informative

    Baby boomer here. I remember when they taught this shit in school. Stay in your house, away from windows, keep curtains drawn. Have a battery radio and fill up containers with drinking water.

    There are multiple ways for a nuclear strike to kill you: ionizing radiation burn, pressure wave, thermal radiation burn, firestorm, and fallout. Each has its own characteristic radius within which you will probably die from it, but your chances are improved by being inside.

    You car would be a bad idea for many reasons unless it is in a garage. If your car is outside it will get quickly covered with very hot short-lived radioactive fallout. The gamma rays will cut through your car like it wasn't even there. You want physical distance to cut down your radiation dose until the hottest isotopes decay. The area in which the fallout will kill you quickly actually begins to contract after only an hour or so, even though the fallout is spreading. The area in which short exposures to fallout represents a health risk starts to drop after a day.

    Get inside, stay inside, listen on the radio for the all clear.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  26. Re:The government shouldn't have everyone's number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    you don't need everyones number for these sort of broadcast alerts, hell your phone doesn't even have to be connected, as long as it can receive the broadcast towers signal it should display the alert.

  27. Re:Accident my ass... by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

    It's not a universal law, it's a methodological tool for critical thinking. Like Occam's razor, it encourages you to include no more assumptions than you have evidence for.

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  28. Re:This is so colossally bad as to be irrecoverabl by Mal-2 · · Score: 2

    I don't know, people can wrap their heads around fucking up once. A second such incident would probably have the result you mentioned, though.

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  29. Not every cellphone. Only allegedly "smart" ones by jabberw0k · · Score: 2

    Feature phones like most flip-phones are not equipped with this protocol, so folks like me with a Samsung T-219 for example are blissfully unaware of all this silliness. At some point I gather the cell towers will require me to get a new device, but so far I can't find a new mobile telephone with real buttons, no web, and no camera; most confusing.

  30. Re: A lie is a bad start by oobayly · · Score: 2

    FALSE. NK missles have gone a bit over Japan. There is zero indication they have the technology to hit anything besides the ocean.

    FALSE. The missiles were a lot more than a bit over Japan, in one case the apogee was 4,500km. An ICBM will generally have an apogee of about 1,200km, so by flattening the trajectory the range can be greatly increased.

    South Korea’s Yonhap news agency says that during its 53 minutes flight time, the missile soared some 4500km into space — that’s 10 times higher than the orbit of the International Space Station.
    Defence analysts say this demonstrates it has the power and range of a fully functional ICBM capable of travelling more than 10,000km - putting all of the United States mainland and most of the world within its reach.

    http://www.news.com.au/world/a...

  31. Re:State Exercise? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    So, if I shout "FIRE!" in a crowded theater, I can just say it was an "accident"? I suppose, with the right connections...

    The guy responsible should at least have to wear a pink tutu and dance the "Sugar Plum Fairy" downtown during rush hour.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  32. Re:Inquiring minds want to know by hey! · · Score: 2

    Depends on the altitude of the blast. EMP is primarily produced by the interaction of gamma rays with the upper atmosphere. A single large warhead detonated at an altitude calculated for maximum casualties would almost certainly NOT produce the kind of EMP effects lazy thriller writers have taught the public are an inevitable part of any nuclear attack.

    I know this because I've critiqued a number of science fiction manuscripts, and the "huge bomb creates the end of technological civilization" scenario is so popular as an inciting incident in crummy manuscripts that I actually did the research that the authors didn't do. The optimal profile for an EMP attack is a large number of small, non-thermonuclear atomic warheads detonated well above the stratosphere. This is not to say there would be *no* EMP effects of a ground level burst, but they're likely to affect long conductors like transmission lines, not the printed circuit traces in a transistor radio.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  33. Re:State Exercise? by careysub · · Score: 2

    Scaring the crap out of everyone is considered "a state exercise?"

    It was a mistake by state officials, plain and simple.

    My interst is that I would want to know where the thing is aimed for, so I could stand a few miles away and enjoy the show. Radiation poisioning isn't pretty, and to actually witness the explosion, then get quickly incinerated seems like the ticket.

    Knowing where to be in Hawaii to see a nuclear attack, and not be injured, is easy to figure out.

    If North Korea is dropping one its new 250 kT warheads on Hawaii (which could possibly be a 500 kT design), they will be dropping it on the Honolulu/Pearl Harbor urban/military complex. They are cheek by jowl and regardless of the actual aim point, the entire area will get devastated. 72% of Hawaii's entire population lives on Oahu (a total of 950,000 people in the island) and 81% of those live in or near the Honolulu urban area.

    According to NukeMap site (airburst option) such an attack with a 250 kT warhead on downtown Honolulu would kill about 215,000 and injure 155,000, thus making 40% of the population of Oahu (and 30% of the entire state) as casualties. If the military complex at Pearl Harbor is targets then "only" 40,000 would die, but 180,000 would be injured.The worst case, a 500 kT warhead on Honolulu would kill 265,000 and injure 175,000.

    An attack would likely be an airburst (which produces the most blast and thermal radiation damage) and which produces no local fallout. Even if a ground burst the tradewinds blow steadily to the south-west, to west and blow the fallout away from the rest of the island.

    So the place to be is somewhere on Oahu that is outside of the southern coastal strip, and you will want to be at least nine miles away from its detonation point. This would put you outside of the thermal burn range (even for first degree) even if its yield is 500 kT. So most anywhere on the north half of the island will be fine.

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  34. Re:State Exercise? by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 2

    The official statement is that state employee "hit the wrong button on a computer". Unlike a physical button you'd imagine when he clicked "Send Alert To Everyone In State" button there would be a "Are you sure?" follow up question -- or two -- with possibly "Sending mass alert in 10...9...8... press Cancel to abort". And then if it was a mistake, wouldn't he have clicked on the button again and said "sorry ignore the last one" immediately, not after 38 minutes?

    Could it be that the said employee was acting on his own, possibly having been in distress?