Slashdot Mirror


Lyft Says Nearly 250K of Its Passengers Ditched a Personal Car In 2017 (techcrunch.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch: Lyft has a new report out detailing its "economic impact" for 2017, and the document includes a lot of stats on its performance throughout the year. The ride-hailing provider claims 375.5 million rides for the year, which is 130 percent growth measured year-over-year. It served 23 million different passengers, itself a 92 percent YoY increase, and had 1.4 million drivers on the platform -- 100 percent growth vs. its total for 2016. Lyft is making some especially strong claims regarding its impact on car ownership trends: In 2017 alone, it said that almost a quarter of a million passengers on its platform dropped owning a personal vehicle, due to the availability of ridesharing specifically. Fifty percent of its users also report driving their own car less because of Lyft's service, and a quarter of those on the platform say they don't feel personal vehicle ownership is that important anymore. The ride-hailing company also found attitudes generally favorable towards self-driving vehicles and their use: 83 percent of Lyft passengers surveyed by the company said they'd be open to hailing and riding in a self-driving vehicle once they're available.

12 of 109 comments (clear)

  1. ride-hailing by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You mean "illegal taxi service" right? I don't care if people use these services, I am on the side of the taxi companies! They provide such great service.

    1. Re:ride-hailing by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The latter is almost instantaneous. On a really cold night a few weeks ago I couldn't get my car started, nor could AAA. How to go pick up my takeout food? He suggest Uber (taxi company had a wait of 10 people ahead of me.)

      A minute to install, a few more to enter my name, address, and CC info, then enter destination and push a button. Wtf, ETA of Uber driver 6 minutes???

      Standard taxies and the politicians who protect them can go drive off a cliff.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:ride-hailing by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Robocars will also destroy privacy, since they'll be paid for via (trackable) electronic means and likely be loaded with cameras. Robocars are a government suckups' wet dream.

    3. Re:ride-hailing by sdinfoserv · · Score: 3, Insightful

      complete BS..
      Lyft & Uber are parasite entities that attempt to suck profit off the back of "workers". Calling them "contractors", no benefits, using their own vehicles, competing against each other to drive down cost - by the time you factor in all costs and taxes (of which independent contractors pay ALL), these are sub-minimum wage gigs. Driving someone you don't know to a place you aren't going for money isn't "ride share", it's a taxi. period. The drivers are shorted the most and your municipalities are shorted tax revenue so your roads crumble, first responders go under funded and nobody keeps out the “bad” drivers

    4. Re:ride-hailing by Dorianny · · Score: 2
      I could have been more clear. I said replace the medallion licensing system with apps, not with ride-sharing (lyft, uber whatever)

      FYI because medallions are so expensive the taxi drivers can't afford them and "rent" the taxis for exorbitant fees

    5. Re:ride-hailing by desdinova+216 · · Score: 2

      and what would you suggest to do for that money when most of the vehicles on the road are not using gasoline or diesel?

    6. Re:ride-hailing by mi · · Score: 2

      No sarcasm intended

      You are not 110010001000, are you?

      His objection (sincere or sarcastic) was not the diminishment of anonimity, but simply the alleged illegality.

      they accept cash. Cash = anonymity

      Not quite... Many taxi companies keep record of where each ride originated and ended. And many (most?) take at least a picture of the passenger, if not a video of him. Such video-equipment is a booming business.

      Of course, Uber and others are doing it too. Get used to it — with very few exceptions, whatever can be legally perceived, can also be legally recorded...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    7. Re:ride-hailing by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Informative

      The camera systems are MUCH better than Uber and friends.

      Pictures are a lot harder to tie to an identity than credit card info and an email addy. Also, your link implies that the cameras use local storage, which probably gets cyclically wiped after a day or maybe a week, unless there's evidence of a crime that needs to be preserved.

      I'm a lot more comfortable with a camera in a cab, since the pictures don't hit a large corporate database, and disappear from (local) storage after a short time unless there's evidence of a violent crime. And taxi companies are taxi companies -- they're not into selling your data to marketeering filth.

  2. Re:I've Seen This at my Worksite by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My lose math was $15k car, $5k maintenance, $300/month gas, $180/month insurance.

    When a cheapskate like me thinks of a "car," I think few-thousand-buck Craigslist special, under $100/mo liability-only insurance, wrench on it myself. God bless simple older cars and the used-by-owner section of Craigslist.

  3. Re:I find this hard to believe by AvitarX · · Score: 2

    Taxi service was worthless where I live (Wilmington, DE).

    45+ minute waits (after telling you 30), sometimes no show. I saw someone wait in the shopping center where I work for 2 hours being told 30 minutes and then constantly 15 minutes away.

    Uber/Lyft have the greatest benefit in medium cities, the type where things aren't too far apart, but there isn't enough people to support cabs.in these areas they are not particularly cheaper than a cab, but do show up, and are happy (at least in the face) to do short runs and runs to the suburbs.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  4. Re:I've Seen This at my Worksite by vux984 · · Score: 2

    "Park on street."

    That requires street parking. There isn't much in a lot of places, and much of what there is pay parking. Won't be suitable for work since it mostly has 2 hour maximums. Won't suitable at home or on weekends for much the same reason. What little free parking is out there is nearly always full.

    "Get state-minimum liability insurance."

    Cheapest insurance I could get in Toronto in the late '90s as a university student with a fender-bender on his record and a car 10+ year old car from the mid 80s was upwards of $3000.

  5. Re:I've Seen This at my Worksite by known_coward_69 · · Score: 2

    sounds like parts of NYC where people take the train instead of driving or uber to work