Slashdot Mirror


Pentagon Document Confirms Existence of Russian Doomsday Torpedo (popularmechanics.com)

Popular Mechanics reports that "a key U.S. nuclear weapons document confirms that the Russian government is developing the most powerful nuclear weapon in more than a half century...a 'new intercontinental, nuclear-armed undersea autonomous torpedo'" with a range of 6,200 miles. But what really makes "Kanyon" nightmare fuel is the drone torpedo's payload: a 100-megaton thermonuclear weapon. By way of comparison, the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima was 16 kilotons, or the equivalent of 16,000 tons of TNT. Kanyon's nuke would be the equivalent of 100,000,000 tons of TNT. That's twice as powerful as Tsar Bomba, the most powerful thermonuclear weapon ever tested. Dropped on New York City, a 100-megaton bomb would kill 8 million people outright and injure 6 million more.

Kanyon is designed to attack coastal areas, destroying cities, naval bases, and ports. The mega-bomb would also generate an artificial tsunami that would surge inland, spreading radioactive contamination with the advancing water. To make matters worse there are reports the warhead is "salted" with the radioactive isotope Cobalt-60. Contaminated areas would be off-limits to humanity for up to 100 years.

Slashdot reader schwit1 adds that "being sea-based makes it immune to ballistic missile defense."

5 of 375 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Practically immune, not theoretically immune by Goetterdaemmerung · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, you have to launch it from your submarine anyway - you don't want it to detonate on top of you, do you?

    This is a "Drone Torpedo" capable of 6,200mile range. It *is* the submarine.

  2. Re:bluff by iggymanz · · Score: 2, Informative

    obligatory XKCD what-if: https://what-if.xkcd.com/15/

    Summary: even with twice Tsar-bomb level yields, trying to create a wave dangerous to cities is a waste of a good nuke. Instead just nuke a city with ordinary sized nukes, it'll ruin inhabitant's day in a much worse manner

  3. Re:Hmmm by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Informative

    I decided to read TFA, and it appears you are correct. The document in question compares the number of “New Nuclear Delivery Vehicles Over the Past Decade” between Russia, China, North Korea, and the US. The other three countries show numerous new ways to kill Americans, while the US section is woefully blank except for one only little blip in the far right corner.

    It really is apparent the referenced one-page infographic’s sole purpose is to convince politicians that we need to spend lots of money on new nukes.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if the back side of the sheet had some sort of graphic spelling out the economic damage all those unemployed Bechtel engineers are inflicting on the US economy.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  4. Re:A great leap backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    America supported a coup in Ukraine putting literal Nazis in power whose stated objective was to commit genocide on Russian speaking people in Ukraine.

    Oh, and they also had a number of weapons systems just like the one said to have shot down MH17, which happened to look exactly like Putin's presidential aircraft.

    Also, Bubba Bill gave the Norks the fuel to build their nukes.

    Also also, the US deep state and the Democratic party have troll armies as well. They were out in full force shilling against first Sanders, then Trump.

  5. Re: A great leap backwards by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Informative

    You're conflating a few different things.

    There was some thought by US scientists that the first nuke test might start the atmosphere on fire.

    The tsar bomba was designed with a max yield of 100 megatonnes if the jacket material was uranium. But that would cause a huge amount of fallout so they tested it with an inert casing, which made it one of the cleanest nukes ever detonated, proportionally.

    Everyone stopped making giant nukes because they're pointless. It's better in pretty much every way to scatter lots of little ones than detonate one big one. Which is what makes this story so unlikely to be true.