iTunes Snafu Made 'Thor: Ragnarok' Available Almost a Month Early (engadget.com)
An anonymous reader shares a report: When you check out the 'Thor: Ragnarok' page on iTunes, it says pre-orders of digital copies are expected to arrive on February 20th. But as TorrentFreak reports, some people got their hands on the Marvel film about a month early due to some sort of snafu with iTunes and Movies Anywhere. According to TorrentFreak, a Reddit user said in a now-deleted post that their legal purchase of the film on Vudu landed them an iTunes copy of it the next day. "I pre-ordered Thor Ragnarok on Vudu yesterday and it links it to my iTunes also. But curiously it showed up in my iTunes library this morning (pre-orders shouldn't). And now I can watch the full movie in HD," they wrote. "I obviously downloaded it right away. I know its supposed to come out February 20th." Others then responded that going that same purchase route made the movie available to them in iTunes as well.
iTunes is somewhat known for releasing stuff early due to mishap. Their management panel must have some poor UX, as it happens quite often with episodes of less known series.
I'm sure the studio will measure the damages in the billions. And somehow blame this for their terrible year.
I know it's only a summary, but....
You place blame on consumer with "Illegal purchase"
Consumer did nothing wrong. They pre-ordered the media for viewing after release and got a pleasant surprise.
You aught to place blame on merchant with "Illegal offering" or "illegal sale" as Amazon messed up and made the media available early after collecting the $$.
Is that really illegal to begin with? Or is it just against some TOS somewhere? We are talking about an official distribution channel right?
You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
Artificial release restrictions shoudn't exist. Release early release often.
I can't remember the name but Apple bought it and created itunes.
iTunes was created by direct agreement between publishers and Apple. Some features of iTunes (like Cover Flow) were created by other people and purchased by Apple, but both the core software and the store were built by Apple.
They paid for these so who cares? It's not like they got the movie free, they just got it a month early.
my karma will be here long after I'm gone
Thor: U2 Edition?
#DeleteFacebook
And yet you clicked on the article...
And posted in the comment section
both the core software and the store were built by Apple.
The Store yes. But early versions of iTunes (pre-Store) were clearly a fork of SoundJam MP, whose developers Apple hired.
Sure - the relevant part is the store here. But still, looking at the screenshot on Wikipedia it really looks like most of what makes iTunes 1.0 what it was was created after the developers were hired on by Apple. Also, I'll fight you on the use of the term fork if it's the same developers refining the same software and merely discontinuing the original name.
I only wish someone at Apple would fork iTunes 1.0 and add some modern features to it sans-bloat. It really was a great music player/library app. They should merge the app store with their music store on the desktop and make the music player just a music player again.
I'm sure they will want to fix this bug, but I'm definitely going to watch this tomorrow.
Is there any evidence that iTunes was actually designed?
I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
It exists and was created by human beings.
(That is, unless by "designed" you mean "designed well by a true Scotsman.")