Slashdot Mirror


Trump Administration Approves Tariffs of 30 Percent On Imported Solar Panels (axios.com)

The Trump administration just approved tariffs of 30% on imported solar panels. Axios explains why it matters: "Most of the American solar industry has opposed tariffs on panels, saying they would raise prices and hurt the sector. A small group of solar panel manufacturers argued -- successfully -- that an influx of cheap imports, largely from China or Chinese-owned companies, was hurting domestic manufacturing. It's also part of President Trump's broader trade agenda against China." From the report: The tariffs would last for four years and decline in increments of 5% from 30%: 25%, 20% and finally 15% in the fourth year. The tariffs are lower than the 35% the U.S. International Trade Commission had initially recommended last year, per Bloomberg. This is actually the third, and broadest, set of tariffs the U.S. government has issued on solar imports in recent years. The Obama administration issued two earlier rounds of tariffs on a narrower set of imports. Monday's action also imposed import tariffs on washing machines, a much lower profile issue than solar energy.

8 of 445 comments (clear)

  1. Not sure if this is good or not by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Cheap Chinese panels were probably going to kill local production. OTOH those cheap panels were getting us off dirty fossil fuels. But OTOOH the reason those Chinese panels are cheap is they don't have much in the way of labor law or environmental regulations. But OTOOOH I don't expect to see much in the way of other tariffs (This one was easy to get through because the coal lobby got Trump elected).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Not sure if this is good or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      OTOH those cheap panels were getting us off dirty fossil fuels

      If this is true the correct action is to tax fossil fuels, not subsidize solar.

  2. Remember the 59% Chinese tariff already in effect. by Mspangler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It applies to US produced polysilicon shipped over there.

    The Chinese want a monopoly on PV panels and the entire supply chain, and to that end anything goes. Daqo gets free electricity for one example.

  3. Re:Hail trump!!!! USA USA USA!!!! by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So how does that view fit in with the fact that the tariffs will reduce to elimination over the next 4 years?

    Sounds to me that it's an opportunity for american manufacturing to get their feet before competition resumes, and nothing else.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  4. Re:Hail trump!!!! USA USA USA!!!! by jwhyche · · Score: 5, Interesting

    China has a habit of doing just that. Subsidizing their industries and dumping cheap products on the world at the expense of other economies. The have done this in the past with cheap steel. Make no mistake, the Chinese are purely looking after Chinese interest. I, personally can't find any fault with this logic.

    There is a difference between efficiently produced panels and cheap panels. Cheap panels will have a shorter lifespan than say more quality produced panels. So to replace a cheaper panels as they wear out will require the manufacturing of more panels. Solar panels are not with out a environmental cost, that is most evident in the manufacturing phase.

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  5. Re:Hail trump!!!! USA USA USA!!!! by deathguppie · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Back in the day the British did this with the tea trade. Only British owned ships could transport to Britain. By the mid 1840's they were getting owned by cheaper, faster American shipping worldwide. In 1850 they were forced to open shipping up to other countries to force British shippers to get with the times and compete.

    If you expect protected American companies to be able to compete on the world stage you are delusional at best. American companies have risen to the competition in the past and were in the process of doing so before this happened. Now we have an artificially created short supply on panels. I don't see this helping anyone, especially America

    --
    once more into the breach
  6. Re: Solyndra by kenh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Solyndra was simply a textbook horrible business plan from beginning to end:

    Built fragile, complex solar panels, in a heavily automated factory, on some of the most expensive land inte world, paying some of the highest wages and taxes, that sold at a premium that way exceeded the slight performance boost their curved design provided over plain, flat Chinese imports.

    Their plan was so obviously horrible that when they applied for a half-billion dollars the analysts could predict, to the month, when Solyndra would go bankrupt - so they denied their federally-secured loan application.

    Then the company 'liberally' donated to President Obama's campaign, theirloan application was approved, and then, as if by magic, Solyndra went bankrupt EXACTLY when the previous administration's analysts predicted!

    Amazing!

    --
    Ken
  7. Re:Spiraling retaliation ... by Powercntrl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Although economists disagree by how much, the consensus view among economists and economic historians is that "The passage of the Smoot–Hawley Tariff exacerbated the Great Depression.

    The problem with import tariffs is that they're a burden on the many, for the benefit of the few. I don't know about you, but my source of income will in no way increase due to more American workers building solar panels or washing machines, here in the USA. The only thing I'll notice is a higher price at the store on those items.

    Since this is such a great idea, why doesn't the Trump administration just go ahead and tariff the fuck out of imported everything? I'm sure the MAGA crowd will absolutely love it when that South Korean-made TV they were eyeballing for the Superbowl costs twice as much (along with just about everything else at Walmart).

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.