Slashdot Mirror


Plastic Pollution Is Killing Coral Reefs, 4-Year Study Finds (npr.org)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from NPR: A new study based on four years of diving on 159 reefs in the Pacific shows that reefs in four countries -- Australia, Thailand, Indonesia and Myanmar -- are heavily contaminated with plastic. It clings to the coral, especially branching coral. And where it clings, it sickens or kills. "The likelihood of disease increases from 4 percent to 89 percent when corals are in contact with plastic," researchers report in the journal Science. Study leader Drew Harvell at Cornell University says the plastic could be harming coral in at least two ways. First, bacteria and other harmful microorganisms are abundant in the water and on corals; when the coral is abraded, that might invite pathogens into the coral. In addition, Harvell says, plastic can block sunlight from reaching coral. Based on how much plastic the researchers found while diving, they estimate that over 11 billion plastic items could be entangled in coral reefs in the Asia-Pacific region, home to over half the world's coral reefs. And their survey did not include China, one of the biggest sources of plastic pollution.

90 comments

  1. This is impossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How could plastic block the sun? You can see through it.

    1. Re:This is impossible! by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      A lot of plastic is colored and even the "clear" plastics can develop scratched surfaces that block some light. It's not clear that will bother reef corals, but the algae that coexist with, and presumably help nourish, the corals might not be happy with less light. In any case, most reef corals feed at night. I know that causer the Internet told me so.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  2. Only one cause by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

    Global warming and ocean acidification are other reasons.

    1. Re:Only one cause by DivineKnight · · Score: 0, Troll

      Reminds me of those white mice scientists are so fond of...coral seems to die of everything, including water, food, and being coral.

    2. Re: Only one cause by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Maybe oceans has been a petty stable environment before and their movement capability is severely limited ...

    3. Re:Only one cause by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      Global warming and ocean acidification are other reasons.

      But, hey, the economy is up, right?

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:Only one cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, corals lifeforms are billions of years old, they can deal with some variation in conditions.
      Bleaching is akin to trees shedding their leaf in the autumn.
      Most corals can recover with a bacteria that's more suited for a different temperature.
      The variations in conditions are within normal natural variation.
      Climate alarmists are lying to justify more government funds for research.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIi1b17HKF8

    5. Re:Only one cause by PoopJuggler · · Score: 2

      Sure, if by "economy" you mean the machine that makes the 1% richer at the expense of the other 99%.

    6. Re:Only one cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These mice? http://wyldtales.com/post/77582904484/procrastoceptiongent-these-creatures-you-call

      Or these? http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/7.866220-Science-Injecting-Human-Cells-Into-Mice-Brains-Makes-Them-Smarter

    7. Re:Only one cause by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Maybe. It could also be confounding. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Or it could just be coincidence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      Meaning, is human activity, warming, pollution and ocean acidification just all moving in the same direction and therefore appear correlated but only pollution and human activity being causitive and also causing the die-off of coral. I'm saying this having done a research paper on coral die-off and at the time I say the most correlation between die-off and acidification. However, now I'm no so sure.

    8. Re:Only one cause by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      I was more thinking of these mice.

  3. One problem at a time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    First, replace all carcinogenic toxic internal combustion engines with electric motors.

    1. Re:One problem at a time by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      ...made from ores obtained through carcinogenic mining and toxic refining.

    2. Re:One problem at a time by DogDude · · Score: 1

      The environmental impact of making an electric motor is what percentage of creating an ICE engine?

      The environmental impact of making an electric motor is what percentage of a tank of gas?

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    3. Re: One problem at a time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You skipped the school and system complexity classes, didn't you?

      Electric motor is 10 times less effort to manufacture than a stupid 4 cylinder block.

      The main point - where it matters, at your persons location - electric motors have ZERO carcinogenic emissions.

    4. Re:One problem at a time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Electric motor and geartrain, about the same or slightly less. Many electric cars are made of lightweight composites and metals (eg, aluminium) rather than the standard ICE gal-steel as well, so is generally much worse environmentally than an ICE car body. Electric power storage, far worse, if current battery tech is assumed.

      They might be better if you're comparing tiny little 100km-range electric citycars to the oversized ICE behemoths popular in the USA. And don't forget that most of a conventionally constructed vehicle is very recyclable into more of the same at a fraction of the original resource extraction cost. The same is not true of composite materials.

  4. Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Rivers by schwit1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just 10 rivers carry 90% of plastic polluting the oceans

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci...

  5. All the other non-CO2 pollution by SumDog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm glad this is out here, because right now everyone is focused on CO2. The reality is that there is are so many other forms of pollution that are destroying our planet that are much more devastating. We have lakes of sludge in China as a result of all our cellphones and laptops.

    To stop general pollution, we need to consume less. Our cellphones need to last 10 years, not 2. Everything doesn't need to come in a cardboard box from Amazon. We generate so much waste in our day to day lives and consume sooooo much. To really fight pollution, we need products that last longer, fewer factories with workers that get paid more, more durable goods and a restructuring of how we value things. Companies should be praised for good products when people don't buy more stuff because their previous line has stood up so well (like CPUs and memory).

    It's a tall order. It's not easy. It probably won't happen.

    And it doesn't matter if you believe climate change is man made or not. If we reduce general pollution, consume lest, demand better public transport (which can be a reality now, unlike self driving cars that might be a reality ten years from now, and won't even touch 10% of the capacity of trains), we can reduce all kinds of pollution, including CO2.

    I personally don't feel this will happen until America runs out of countries to bomb and manipulate, fuel prices hit $9/gal and the US collapses. The vote is a joke. Trump is the 2 minute hate (really 24/7 hate) and Americans have lost sight of the real enemies that are present, no matter which puppet is elected.

    1. Re:All the other non-CO2 pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Trump is however the puppet directly pointing the car for the ditch, as opposed to others who at least gave lip service to staying on the road. And now he's cutting the brakes and wedging the gas pedal down as he gets trotted of to prison.

    2. Re: All the other non-CO2 pollution by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Self driving cars will be here faster than a lot more rail roads that's definitely for sure.

      Also here in Sweden the collectivists talk about faster travel competing with planes, better transport capacity for the industry and less lorries and especially public transport. The problem is just that one rail-road track won't do that. Three would.
      The heavy cargo transports are slower. The local public transports need to stop often. The fast trains can't have the slow ones going on the same tracks and the track need to be angled / have slower turns. And how does the economy look when you consider that?

      Now if we had public one person automatic vehicles which linked up as trains when suitable however ...

    3. Re:All the other non-CO2 pollution by Kiuas · · Score: 2

      And it doesn't matter if you believe climate change is man made or not. If we reduce general pollution, consume lest, demand better public transport (which can be a reality now, unlike self driving cars that might be a reality ten years from now, and won't even touch 10% of the capacity of trains), we can reduce all kinds of pollution, including CO2.

      I 100 % agree with you, but there's a major dilemma here: it's not just about whether or not one cares about the environment, consumption is the cornerstone of the economy. It's the main driver of economic growth, which is why the idea that we should build more durable goods and buy less instead of more is one of the few major heretical beliefs in our time. I mean, for contrast I live in a society that compared to the US is far to the left with higher taxes and universal systems of education and health care, and even in here every single party in the parliament, including those on the left, is committed to economic growth. So when you say:

      I personally don't feel this will happen until America runs out of countries to bomb and manipulate, fuel prices hit $9/gal and the US collapses.

      I'll have to disagree with you, because regardless of what happens to the US in the years and decades going ahead, consumerism is a global trend now. China is investing heavily into Africa to move some of their production there in order to get a 'China' of their own to manufacture goods for their ever growing domestic market and so on. As long as the global population keeps increasing, which at the moment looks to be until at least the 10 billion mark, the economies will keep growing because we'll have more people and thus more people who need and want things and a better standard of living.

      This is not to say that the problem of waste is unsolvable, I don't believe it is. Resources are finite, and the companies know this. What I'm hoping will happen is that the increased investment into different kinds of green and clean technologies will make waste processing a profitable business. The less materials we have left on the planet, the more valuable the already existing waste material is. The plastic in the oceans is worth a lot of money as soon as a way is developed to effectively reprocess and re-use it for production, which would create a direct economic interest for companies to not only stop throwing their waste away, but in fact to collect already existing waste and reprocess it for sale.

      Sustainability is the major issue of our time. and one we will have to solve no matter what is or isn't done to address climate change, because we do have limited resources combined with economies based on the assumption of continuous growth, which is not a solvable equation.

      --
      "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
    4. Re: All the other non-CO2 pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also here in Sweden the collectivists talk about faster travel competing with planes

      That isn't going to happen.
      Norway is looking to make all domestic flights electric.
      Once you remove the environmental concern with planes together with the fuel cost the competing methods of transportation can only really compete at short distances.

    5. Re:All the other non-CO2 pollution by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      To stop general pollution, we need to consume less.

      To stop absolutely yes we do. But we won't because humans don't work like that. However there's no reason we can't consume different. You're far more likely to not end up with teenage pregnancy if you teach people safe sex rather than abstinence. The same applies to everything else we do.

      My local supermarket started individually plastic wrapping vegetables. I no longer shop there, I got to the grocer next door. My girlfriend is obsessed with drinking from straws, she now uses paper ones. Electronics go to a dedicated local recycling plant. We now recycle grey water. I stopped driving to the shops (it takes 10min extra to walk but those 10min are good exercise and an excuse to get out of the house).

      There's so many things we can do to curb our pollution without relying on governments or abstinence. Ultimately if we wish to eliminate pollution entirely then we need to take more drastic measures, but you will never convince people to make those drastic steps.

      Speaking of Amazon. I'm okay with that. We're actually quite good at recycling cardboard here. When the Amazon box then contains plastic wrapping inside, along with filler because the box is the wrong size that is needless waste.

      But one thing is certain: we need to throw away large parts of our disposable culture (pun intended).

    6. Re:All the other non-CO2 pollution by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Our cellphones need to last 10 years, not 2.

      They probably do. Mine is now five years old and still works pretty well, but the problem is the software. It runs Android, so I can get third-party updates from LineageOS, but that's done by volunteers. How about taxing companies that stop producing software-updates for network-connected devices based on their sales and support lifetime and using that money to subsidise third-party development that keeps the devices in circulation?

      Everything doesn't need to come in a cardboard box from Amazon

      Why not? It's cheap cardboard made from recycled paper and it goes back for recycling. Having a single van that delivers things to me and a load of other people nearby is more efficient than all of us driving to the shops and a lot more convenient than all of us walking.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:All the other non-CO2 pollution by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      You're part of the problem.

      But hey, continue bitching, blaming America as some sort of secular Satan-figure as a focus for your particular strain of self-loathing.

      I'm sure that will result in a constructive solution.

      --
      -Styopa
    8. Re: All the other non-CO2 pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Self driving cars will be here faster than a lot more rail roads that's definitely for sure."

      ADAS5 will never happen on US streets en-masse. Never. Two reasons:

      1. Technology won't get there for at least 30 years
      All of the data coming from the big three working on ADAS (Google, Apple, Waymo) is either classified or indicates that interventions are required on nearly 100% of all journeys. The speed of classification and sensors requires vastly more powerful computers on board and training/NN that haven't even been developed yet. Current CNN models are piss-poor at anything but the most contrived sitatuons (perfect weather, freeway traffic, perfect roads).

      2. 'Muricans want their cars

      Whether it is imported techies who drive Mercedes, or dude bros who want Beemers, or 'necks who want to roll coal in their E350s, you will never see ADAS5 in the next 3 maybe 5 generations.

      3. Public transportation solves every issue self-driving cars are trying to solve, and we've had it for 100+ years, but it isn't PROFITABLE

      We almost didn't need cars in the US, but then this happened: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_streetcar_conspiracy

      Increasing bus schedules and inbuilding lite-rail solves every issue ADAS proponents claim they can solve. Except it isn't sexy, and there are trillions to be made by a few tech bros.

  6. Re: MI6 Rotting Clinton in bathtub had Clinton dat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LMAO.

    If Hilary is gonna go down as a traitor then Trump is too, theyâ(TM)re from the same cesspool.

    Fucking âell, John... people are twats.

  7. A study ? By scientists ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But aren't all scientists untrusworthy bastards part of a global conspiracy of evil to suck always more grant money from not-at-all-evil governements ?

    If you don't trust scientists when they tell you that global warming is caused by human activity, or that diversity of life on earth is the product of evolution through natural selection, or that the universe is 15 billion years old and not six thousand, or that vaccines don't cause autism, then why would you trust them when they tell you that plastic pollution is killing coral reefs ?

    1. Re:A study ? By scientists ? by DivineKnight · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not true. I am a scientist (Computer Scientist), and am definitely an untrustworthy bastard (I cheat at poker, and on my taxes)...and possibly part of a global conspiracy of evil (I write software for both world of Microsoft (the beast of Redmond) and for the open source community (who are all peace-loving hand-holding communists)...but I have never received any grant money from any government (Local, State or Federal).

      So you see, you are quite wrong in your presumptions.

    2. Re:A study ? By scientists ? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      When 3 1/2 of the 4 contaminated countries they found in their study of 159 Pacific Ocean reefs lie in the Indian Ocean, you've got to wonder.

    3. Re:A study ? By scientists ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as a fellow computer scientists, all the evil deeds you mention are peanuts. But I see that you are also writing posts with unbalanced brackets. You Evil Bastard!

    4. Re:A study ? By scientists ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cheat at poker, and on my taxes)...and possibly part of a global conspiracy of evil ... but I have never received any grant money from any government

      There is, only one possibility: you, sir, are a coin miner, a guilty of the suffering of all the crying gamers, young and old, who cannot get their hands on decent graphics cards! Shame, shame!

    5. Re:A study ? By scientists ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Answer: we don't. That is why we have to dismantle things like the EPA where the religion of enviromentalism has gone too far. When goverment interfers with the workings of the free market, it is an affront to human rights no matter what the justification. The free market will fix any so-called "environmental" problems. I think it was Ayn Rand herself who said the invisible hand is all powerful and cannot be stopped, ultimately doing what is best for the people who give back to it.

    6. Re:A study ? By scientists ? by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      Errh ... The Indian Ocean and GBR are where they looked. Nowhere does it say they wouldn't have found plastic pollution to be a problem in Biscayne Bay (Florida) had they looked there.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    7. Re:A study ? By scientists ? by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      Actually...due to the coin miners, and the low reviews for the AMD Vega Frontier Edition...which has twice the RAM and precision of the AMD Vega 64, but is a few FPS slower...I was able to snag one for $750.

      Nice card that makes sense business and game-wise.

    8. Re:A study ? By scientists ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are the acoustics? I too have the need to do productive, non-shameful work with OpenCL, serving a family architecture office from my personal machine. Support will get even better soon on Linux, with the work currently going on.

  8. Re: MI6 Rotting Clinton in bathtub had Clinton dat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump was asked by the military intelligence white hats to run for POTUS.

    It's the military taking down CIA/Clinton/Rothschild, not Trump.

    #Qanon: Snowden mission complete, coming home soon.

  9. Re:Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Rive by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

    Obviously we need to build about 10 walls...

    Wall.

  10. Bullshit by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 0

    Paul Allen literally killed 70% of the Earth's coral reefs by parking his yacht over them for weeks at a time while letting the anchor drag around over the course of many trips spread over years. I'm not even fucking joking, Paul Allen is practically the sole reason coral reefs are dying, look it up.

    1. Re:Bullshit by SumDog · · Score: 2

      Source for those who want it:

      https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/paul-allen-megayacht-destroyed-most-of-protected-coral-reef-officials-say/

    2. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the thing. I've started making strong investments in wind and solar energy, and your story is not helpful. CO2 in the water is what's killing coral reefs. Thanks in advance for correcting your record.

    3. Re:Bullshit by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly, Paul Allen couldn't do that all by himself. He had help. Some folks claim it was the illuminati who did it. Others blame Hillary Clinton. I'm told there's video of her in an old fashioned diving suit meticulously killing individual coral polyps with a poison dagger of some sort that she took off Vince Foster after doing him in. Me? I'm keeping an open mind.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    4. Re:Bullshit by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      You've literally posted this after someone posted the source. You didn't even have to Google it, you disingenuous hippy.

    5. Re:Bullshit by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Someone posted a source, you didn't even have to Google it.

  11. Re: MI6 Rotting Clinton in bathtub had Clinton dat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oleg, this was supposed to be MY turn to post the spam for Operation Distract from Trump's Impeachment (ODTI).

    You know I get paid by the post and I don't have two rubles to rub together. Give the rest of us a chance, huh? Plus, I need 11 more posts to qualify for the raffle. I really want to win that microwave oven. #Qanon #MAGA #IAmNotARussianBot

  12. Re: MI6 Rotting Clinton in bathtub had Clinton dat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think the MI6 agent got murdered just so you can feel distracted? Not good enough.

    Hard to spin everything to Russia when every prediction Qanon made turned out to be true and #Qanon is now top 10 most popular hashtag on Twitter.

  13. Re:Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Rive by Z80a · · Score: 1

    Net walls to capture the plastic and reuse it?

  14. Re:Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Rive by drago177 · · Score: 2

    The only industrialized western country on the list of top 20 plastic polluters is the United States at No. 20.

    The U.S. and Europe are not mismanaging their collected waste, so the plastic trash coming from those countries is due to litter, researchers said.

    Smh. We have the money and organization to manage disposal properly, yet as individuals we ruin it by manually trashing the place.

  15. Re: MI6 Rotting Clinton in bathtub had Clinton dat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #Qanon is now top 10 most popular hashtag on Twitter.

    Not in the US it isn't. The guys in the Ministry of Spamming Twitter have been off their game. Probably because their vodka allotment came through today and you know how those guys get.

  16. Re:Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Rive by xxxLCxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, as we were able to find out only recently, that 'disposal' consisted in shipping it to China and declaring it 'recycled'. We learned that, when China refused to take any more of that plastic wastes from the US and GERMany, upon which both nations are now facing the problem of keeping their statistics 'green'.
    I believe the term to use here is "whitewashing". The western world is very good at this, thanks to our – totally independent – media. ;-)

  17. Re:Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Rive by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    Sources of ocean plastic From a peer-reviewed paper. (I apologize that I do not have a direct reference to the paper ready at hand).

    So, I suppose what we should infer from this, is that we should help developing countries become developed countries, so they can clean themselves up, yes?

    But we don't do that by redistributing wealth. The idea is not to drag everyone to the bottom, but to assist everyone to the top.

  18. Re:Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Rive by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    See my reply below.

    By the way: China ASKED for the waste, for use in recycling and putting it to its own use. Nobody was foisting it off on them.

  19. Re: Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Riv by aliquis · · Score: 1

    Learn the trash people to act like responsible educated people?

    Americans don't seem to be all that great in this regard either. But maybe better. At least they collect their trash. Into one pile but ...

  20. Re:Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Rive by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This was China's own plan to bolster its own plastics industry.

    The fact that they decided to end it suddenly and then blame the shutdown on others trying to "push" their waste onto China is a rather consistent pattern for the Chinese government.

  21. Re: Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Riv by aliquis · · Score: 1

    I was interested to see what haopened here in Sweden since we like to think we're good at it. No idea about exports but I know we burn our own and others waste and before you were supposed to throw soft plastics with the rest garbage simply to burn it.
    This is 17 years old so unlikely accurate but:
    "Sverige Ã¥tervann, enligt PlastForum nordica 2001/7, 79 % av all plast, 17 % materialÃ¥tervanns och resterande 62 % energiÃ¥tervanns, dvs fÃrbrÃndes."
    "Recycled" 79% but just 17% as material and 62% was burned. Yay. Recycling. Now if you burn waste in general what's the difference?

  22. Trump is proven correct again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These south pacific shithole countries need to clean up their act.

  23. Re: Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Riv by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    It doesn't appear from this study map (see comment below) that Sweden is a significant contributor to ocean plastic pollution.

  24. And still Trump does nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He doesn't care.

    1. Re: And still Trump does nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is he to do, when the top polluter is China?

    2. Re: And still Trump does nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is he to do, when the top polluter is China?

      Stop having his overpriced hats made there.

  25. Re: Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Riv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's actually a useful rule of thumb: if you are doing something worse than the Americans, you are really, really doing it wrong.

  26. Re:Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Rive by xxxLCxxx · · Score: 1

    Did you never hear about corruption in China? Somebody surely profited from this and it wasn't China as a total, so much can be sure.
    You can get a Brazilian kid from the favelas to cut somebody's throat for a few bucks. That doesn't make it the child asking for the job...

  27. Re:Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Rive by xxxLCxxx · · Score: 1

    ...and as always the answer is 42, according to Oxfam. ;-)

  28. Re: MI6 Rotting Clinton in bathtub had Clinton dat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #Qanon is in top 10 trending, with #ReleaseTheMemo at #1.

    Nobody buys the "Russian did it" angle.

    Deep State needs to be taken out, with or without Russia.

    It's not like only the Russians would find out how corrupt the USA is, so why keep spinning it like morons.

  29. Re:Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Rive by Freischutz · · Score: 2

    Net walls to capture the plastic and reuse it?

    You can only downcycle plastic. Eventually you still end up with a mountain of plastic garbage. A more interesting idea is to replace petroleum based plastic packaging with something biodegradable. The dilemma is that with petroleum based plastics you sequester the carbon in the packaging but you are stuck with mountains of plastic garbage clogging up your landfills and your oceans, bio plastics degrade but that means they release, methane which is a powerful greenhouse gas. However, if we could come up with a packaging material that could actually be composted into soil with no harmful residue and bring it into universal use you might actually have a situation where you could make money off of disposing of the stuff in a sustainable way and you would skip the problem you currently have when recycling petroleum based plastics of washing and sorting the plastic before you can downcycle it. With bio degradable plastic you just pile your used food wrappers and other packaging into a composer, let bacteria do the work and harvest the methane. There are already Bio-plastics whose environmental footprint ranges from 0 percent less to 42 percent less than petroleum based plastics depending on the material. However, even if the environmental footprint of a bio plastic was the same as that of a petroleum based plastic, the fact that the bio plastic bio degrades means that with the bio plastics at least you don't clog up the oceans with garbage that takes it takes natural processes millennia to break down. Also, if there is a way to make a profit off of disposing of bio plastic there is an economic incentive to collect and dispose of it. If you compost the bio plastic and capture the methane you can at least burn the methane, turn it into less harmful greenhouse gasses and do something with the compost. Either way, there is no way around the fact that we need to seriously rethink our laws and regulations regarding product packaging starting with how much of it we even need and what materials we are going to have to banish because petroleum based plastic packaging will have to be eliminated sooner or later and I'd rather see it happen sooner. Why does a package of cookies have to consist of a cardboard box, with a plastic bag inside it that is full of smaller plastic bags each containing one or two cookies? ... and I don't remember Coca Cola tasting any worse when it came in mutli use bottles (who can be made from plastic) or that a Mars bar tasted worse when it came wrapped in paper.

  30. Happy Australia Day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...from Australia!

  31. Re:Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Rive by campuscodi · · Score: 1

    Yes. A wall will solve this problem. Walls solve every problems nowadays.

  32. Re:Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Rive by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    However, if we could come up with a packaging material that could actually be composted into soil

    They tried something like that. It was made from trees, if I remember well.

    Never caught on.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  33. Re: Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Riv by aliquis · · Score: 1

    Haven't stopped two of them from starting some ocean focus group like yesterday to get a head-start of some UN thing after 2020 or whatever it was.

    That of course line up nicely with yesterdays or so /. post about how Sweden was #2 in how innovativeness (well, USA being #11 or whatever it was, but the second placement was in there too.)

    They would of course prefer if one could show Swedish solutions or ideas on the subject. As for whatever that cause economical returns I don't know. I guess the group by itself may not be very expensive.

  34. Plastic is toxic garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who would've thought that grinding it up in microscopic particles and dumping it in the ocean would cause damage? Go figure.

  35. Re:Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Rive by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    Last time I was in the bay area, most of the 'plastic' disposable things I picked up were compostable biomass. I've not seen them much elsewhere, so I don't know if there's some subsidy or penalty that means that it's only economically feasible in California, but it seemed like a good replacement.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  36. Re:Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Rive by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    I believe the term to use here is "whitewashing".

    I think Greenwashing is the term that you're looking for.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  37. Worms / Microbes eat plastics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is happening?
    https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/04/wax-worms-eat-plastic-polyethylene-trash-pollution-cleanup/
    http://science.sciencemag.org/content/351/6278/1196
    https://futurism.com/newly-evolved-microbes-could-be-eating-90-of-ocean-plastic/

  38. Re:Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Rive by vtcodger · · Score: 1

    "The dilemma is that with petroleum based plastics ..."

    Nitpicky, I know, but at least in the US, most plastics are made from Methane or Ethane -- i.e. Natural Gas. You CAN make them from petroleum or coal, but NG or Natural Gas Liquids (Ethane, Propane, Butane) are cheaper feedstocks.

    Biodegradable plastics? Nifty idea. But how do you keep them from biodegrading on the shelf? Most folks want containers to ... like .. contain.

    I actually do think that overuse of plastic is a genuine problem, even if I don't have any answer for what to do about it. ... Maybe significant refundable deposits and significant non-refundable recycling fees on every plastic product ...

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  39. 4 years diving in the south for that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm available for grants to study the sexual migration of starfish and their affect on the tide of the southern carabean

  40. This is a very big problem by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 2

    I won't forget the time I learned about small plastic fiber pollution. Most of us are familiar with the dryer lint we have to clean, but just as much or more lint is ejected by our washing machines. The plastic based fabrics we wear and wash are emitting tons of these microfibers into the waterways and ending up in our seafood.

    I'm trying to wear more cotton and natural fibers and have put a better trap on my washing machine.

    I fear that we are one of the last generations to enjoy the level of natural beauty of our planet currently offers. The future of our planetary ecosysem is pretty bleak because the likelihood of humanity addressing pollution to the extent required is nil.

    --
    Greed is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:This is a very big problem by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to wear more cotton and natural fibers and have put a better trap on my washing machine.

      Nobody wants to drink plastics; it isn't just about the fish. But individual washing machines are really not the right place to solve the problem. Those fibers don't just end up in the washing machine. They end up on people, which means they go down tub and shower drains, sink drains, etc. So even if everybody added filters on their washing machines, it still wouldn't even come close to fixing the problem.

      And switching to natural fabrics is probably just trading one set of ecological problems for another. Animal-based clothing is a popular home for the larvae of moths and other insects, and thus can be somewhat prone to unexpected holes when stored for long periods of time. Cotton clothing wears out faster than synthetic clothing. There's a significant environmental impact involved in manufacturing and transporting additional clothing. Also, cotton fades faster than synthetic materials, which means that more of the dye from those cotton fabrics ends up in the water. So which is worse, synthetic fibers or (frequently petroleum-based) synthetic clothing dyes?

      Really, there's only one good solution: If our municipal water filtration systems aren't adequately filtering its waste water, we must demand that they be fixed. Anything short of that is like trying to solve world hunger by planting an onion.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  41. Re: Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Riv by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Now if you burn waste in general what's the difference?

    Depends HOW you burn it.

    Burning it in open air, low temperature fires, is not the same as plasma gasification.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  42. Americans DO NOT dump plastic in the OCEANS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least not at the rate of Asian countries. Look at any random Asian city outside of Japan and Singapore and you will see where all the plastic waste comes from. But keep hating on America and blaming one country for all the evils of the world.

    If things were sane, the world would acknowledge that the USA is a net positive for the world. The greatest innovation to come out of the USA was not punishing the losers of WWII and instead recognizing that it is better to offer them friendship. Look at Japan, Italy and West Germany for examples of this. While the USSR was building a wall around Berlin and establishing satellite dictatorships and KGB franchises, the USA was pumping money into rebuilding.

  43. Let's look at the root cause of the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We have too much plastic in the environment. Where does plastic come from. Silly frivolous packaging. Who demands all the silly frivolous packaging. White liberals. We need to ban white liberals. Redneck crackers pretty much drink straight from the faucet. Disadvantaged blacks and brown people do likewise. Smug white liberals on the other hand love their fancy plastic bottles holding tap water distilled from springs in Mt Kilimanjaro.

    If we get rid of the white liberals, I think rednecks and black would get along just fine.

  44. Re:Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Rive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The current CiC has built a wall against facts. That wall is in his mind and leaves little room for anything else, so his tiny hands are free to do what they choose.

  45. Re:Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Rive by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    You can only downcycle plastic. Eventually you still end up with a mountain of plastic garbage.

    There's always thermal depolymerization, which can turn all that plastic (and other organic materials, to some extent) into a rough approximation of crude oil. And that material in turn should be readily convertible into various kinds of plastics, unless I'm missing something.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  46. Re:Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Rive by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    I actually do think that overuse of plastic is a genuine problem, even if I don't have any answer for what to do about it. ... Maybe significant refundable deposits and significant non-refundable recycling fees on every plastic product ...

    Blech. Plastic isn't overused. In fact, if there's anything that would become better (or remain as good, but become cheaper) if it were made out of plastic, then I would argue that plastic is still underused.

    The problem is not that plastic is being used, but rather that some of the plastic isn't getting reclaimed (whether by recycling it or by burying it for future recycling). That problem can be largely solved by levying heavy fines against garbage haulers that leave litter behind. That garbage doesn't end up in the ocean by chance. It ends up there because the people handling municipal waste are often careless. If you make that carelessness expensive enough, those people will be more careful.

    Ideally, we should also filter municipal runoff before it enters a major body of water. That small change would dramatically reduce the amount of plastics ending up in the oceans. Basically, I'm envisioning a giant holding pool with huge, high-volume inlets, huge, high-volume outlets, and a fine mesh across the middle of the pool, with scrapers that periodically pull the detritus to one side for collection. But I digress.

    Blaming plastics for ending up in the oceans is like blaming oxygen for forest fires.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  47. Re: Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Riv by aliquis · · Score: 1

    Depends HOW you burn it.

    Burning it in open air, low temperature fires, is not the same as plasma gasification.

    But if anything I assume generic waste is burned at an even higher temperature than just plastic waste?

  48. Re: Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Riv by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Municipal waste is usually a mix of various waste products, but the temperature is more determined by the kind of plasma technology and configuration used.
    E.g. The pyrolysis stage will run at around 600 C, to separate most of the gases, but then the gasses are "cleaned" of particulates by plasma at about 1200 C.
    Or, plasma arc can burn the mix at 6000-15000 K (hot electrode) or 7000 K (cold electrode).

    It's not yet a world-wide standardized technology, mainly due to attempts to make it both economically viable as an energy source and to minimize solid waste output in an economical fashion.
    Places which can't waste land area on garbage dumps, and which produce a lot of waste, like Japan, get most out of it.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  49. Re: Where does the ocean plastic come from? 10 Riv by aliquis · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the info. Seem like ours was "at-least 9000 degrees C."