Slashdot Mirror


How DIY Rebels Are Working To Replace Tech Giants (theguardian.com)

mspohr shares an excerpt from an "interesting article about groups working to make a safer internet": Balkan and Kalbag form one small part of a fragmented rebellion whose prime movers tend to be located a long way from Silicon Valley. These people often talk in withering terms about Big Tech titans such as Mark Zuckerberg, and pay glowing tribute to Edward Snowden. Their politics vary, but they all have a deep dislike of large concentrations of power and a belief in the kind of egalitarian, pluralistic ideas they say the internet initially embodied. What they are doing could be seen as the online world's equivalent of punk rock: a scattered revolt against an industry that many now think has grown greedy, intrusive and arrogant -- as well as governments whose surveillance programs have fueled the same anxieties. As concerns grow about an online realm dominated by a few huge corporations, everyone involved shares one common goal: a comprehensively decentralized internet. Balkan energetically travels the world, delivering TED-esque talks with such titles as "Free is a Lie" and "Avoiding Digital Feudalism."

[David Irvine, computer engineer and founder of MaidSafe, has devised an alternative to the "modern internet" he calls the Safe network]: the acronym stands for "Safe Access for Everyone." In this model, rather than being stored on distant servers, people's data -- files, documents, social-media interactions -- will be broken into fragments, encrypted and scattered around other people's computers and smartphones, meaning that hacking and data theft will become impossible. Thanks to a system of self-authentication in which a Safe user's encrypted information would only be put back together and unlocked on their own devices, there will be no centrally held passwords. No one will leave data trails, so there will be nothing for big online companies to harvest. The financial lubricant, Irvine says, will be a cryptocurrency called Safecoin: users will pay to store data on the network, and also be rewarded for storing other people's (encrypted) information on their devices. Software developers, meanwhile, will be rewarded with Safecoin according to the popularity of their apps. There is a community of around 7,000 interested people already working on services that will work on the Safe network, including alternatives to platforms such as Facebook and YouTube.

61 of 115 comments (clear)

  1. Punk failed by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

    I hope they fare better, but don't expect it.

    1. Re:Punk failed by sheramil · · Score: 2

      I was going to say. Punk's solution to what they saw as a corrupt society was to spit at it, swear a lot and hole up in squats. I hope these tech revolutionaries can bring something more to the game than a series of affected snarls.

    2. Re:Punk failed by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If they do succeed it just means they'll live long enough to become the bad guys themselves. Remember back when Jobs and Woz were starting Apple and acted much the same idealistic way or Google's early mantra of "don't be evil". Not every company or its founders start out as a complete dick bags, but most of those who become wildly successful turn into them.

    3. Re:Punk failed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Punk is back and this time with block chain!

    4. Re:Punk failed by rtb61 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They will bring exactly the same thing to the game as the current tech giants did, when the replaced the previous tech giants, as in the future when the new tech giants who replaced the current tech giants are replaced by future tech giants. Tech giants has much more to do with marketing and public relations than it has to do with reality. They way they crap on about corporations of what ever ilk, is just ludicrous. The only reason it is so loud, is because their customer service is so bad. Seriously I wonder if one day they will wake up an realise that good customer service is cheaper than advertising and far more profitable. I know that wont show up in some psychopath douche bags spreadsheet, as they try to pump up the bonus by saving money cutting service and support but it's a lie and advertising to hide shite service and support is far more expensive than providing service and support, which in reality provides free sales staff for life.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re: Punk failed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What would solve so many problems is a more educated populace. Problem is that most people don't care enough to want to learn how to safeguard privacy or security or what makes these large Internet companies tick.
      For this reason, any replacement technology will not only have to solve these problems but do it in a superior way that attracts people for that reason, not just for reasons that they don't know or care about like security/privacy.

    6. Re:Punk failed by dirvine · · Score: 2

      [repost, sry was not logged in last time] A few differences tho, (disclaimer I am in the article), MaidSafe have taken no VC funding and worked very hard (possibly harder than the tech at time, certainly took more time) to maintain that stance. VC funding seems incompatible from doing good as a VC will often seek quick profit and mostly in traditional ways (from customers). So the maidsafe design is such that it cannot know its customers. The problems to solve, I feel, become simpler when you do not have a profit seeking motive, but instead set a mechanism where income will be generated from doing a good job and cease when you don't. So for instance to achieve the goal we would fund competitors (the crowd sale was supposed to be 30% to competitors). That is also an anathema to some traditional VCs. Being free of those chains sounds just perfect, but it is extremely hard, the company majority was given away in the early days, 50% to a foundation for education and innovation and 30% to the staff, the remaining 20% to small investors (yes some bug us for quick returns, but most are fine as they see progress). There are other issues when you have less cash but the highest staff costs you can with the budget you have (so speed). It is a different structure to fix the problems of centralisation, privacy erosion and lack of security for people that leads to loss of freedom, so we had to do it differently. So the setup is maidsafe can be replaced/enhanced easily by other entities who wish to take the GPL's software and complete or further upgrade it. It is a new way really, between VC funded fast profit seeking and open source spare time projects. We try to fit the middle, funded full time staff to create marketing, graphic design, UI's etc. all with back end Engineering and research. If it works then great, it is so far, its slower but hopefully fairer to the rest of the people who will benefit.

    7. Re:Punk failed by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      See the Hudsucker Proxy movie sometime ... eh it's more like a play than a movie. Once a company gets to a certain size it's much easier to tank it's stock than to grow it. So you bring in a known company killer and pretend you don't know their history, and set them loose for a couple of years. Profit on the downturn. Then you get rid of them, profit on the upturn. Then you help them make a presidential bid.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    8. Re:Punk failed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's why the system design matters. If they design it right, then the system doesn't depend on them and can be separated from them if they turn to the dark side. Google always favored a centralized, secret or protected system over an open system, even in their "don't be evil" times. That was bound to become a tyrannical system. Likewise with Facebook. These systems are designed to serve their masters, not the people.

    9. Re:Punk failed by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Jobs was always a sociopathic dickbag himself, though. Remember how he screwed over Woz on the payment for his "Breakout" design? The guy was undoubtedly a visionary, and that vision may have been at odds with IBM's stuck-in-the-past mainframe-centric approach, but that didn't mean he was a nice guy, and his computers-as-an-appliance vision (from early on) doesn't sound that far from where we ended up.

      (For example, Jobs didn't want the original Macintosh to be expandable, and the designers had to effectively "sneak" a way to make the memory expandable beyond the original 128KB behind Jobs' back).

      It's ironic that Woz- very much a genuine hacker type- ended up not just creating the first step away from that mid-70s build-your-own-kit microprocessor scene (and along Jobs' road) with the self-contained Apple II (#), but that the company whose early success he enabled went on to become almost the antithesis of the hacker ethic.

      (#) Not that I'm saying that the Apple II et al- or the later personal computers that led on from them- were a bad thing for most of us (quite the opposite), but they *were* more off-the-shelf than what came before.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    10. Re:Punk failed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      What a totally epic failure of understanding. Punk rock's message was very simple. Be yourself, make it yourself, be self reliant and find your own way. DIY and self determination. All the hair styles, posturing, regulation safety pins, bondage pants etc. was crap tagged on by the establishment media who did their best to dilute and suppress the message.

      Punk is not a dress code. It's not a set list of music to like and it's not a set of rules.

      Be yourself. Do it yourself. Think for youself. ake it yourself. Be free.

    11. Re:Punk failed by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

      good customer service is cheaper than advertising and far more profitable

      Says who?

  2. Great idea, if not quite new by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    Let's see what their ISPs have to say about this.

    Another question is how well it blends in with regular traffic, so that some of those ISP issues and restrictions can be mitigated or circumvented entirely.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  3. btfs? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Isn't the whole file splitting and storing idea a lot like btfs?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:btfs? by coofercat · · Score: 1

      I thought it sounded like the Freenet Project, which I last saw about 10 years ago (is it still going?). It offered an anonymised browsing experience, and the ability to upload content to the network (which would be split up, encrypted and stored on multiple servers). Clients would find all the fragments and assemble them. It actually worked reasonably well, although had lots of issues (but I seem to remember using version like 0.1.5 or some such, so I'll cut them some slack!).

  4. You mean Freenet 2.0? by vix86 · · Score: 3, Informative

    This sounds a lot like Freenet except they've made cryptocurrency a part of it. Freenet is incredibly slow because hunting down less used resources can take forever or be nigh impossible. They might be able to interest a few people because "CRYPTO!" but once Bitcoin crashes back to reasonable values, most of these digital tokens will shrivel up and leave a lot of these companies struggling. A lot of these tokens are simply ideas tacked onto a coin instead of coins tacked onto an idea; in other words, if the coin dies, the idea dies because the idea was never the real foundation.

    1. Re:You mean Freenet 2.0? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      It does seem basically to be Freenet.

      But Freenet was intended to solve a somewhat different problem: how to share files without getting the copyright police on your butt.

      Not the only purpose, of course. But it was a major motivator.

      I think that rather than distributing data all the way to hell and back, which is very inefficient, instead we need some kind of distributed, decentralized DNS system.

      Yes, I am aware that is far from a simple thing.

    2. Re:You mean Freenet 2.0? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      A lot of these tokens are simply scams tacked onto a coin instead

      FTFY. Seems like a lot of these so called ideas don't peter out and die, they end when the founders liquidize their store of coins and run, I mean of course when the company is "hacked" and the coins are "stolen".

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  5. Yeah, but no. by Nutria · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the kind of egalitarian, pluralistic ideas they say the internet initially embodied

    Completely ignores who developed the Internet, and for what purpose...

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:Yeah, but no. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between a TCP/IP network and its funders, isn't it?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Yeah, but no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yep... developed by the universities for the military... Oops, should I have included a spoiler alert?

    3. Re:Yeah, but no. by Nutria · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between a TCP/IP network and its funders, isn't it?

      A TCP/IP network made by egalitarian, pluralistic utopians is completely different from a TCP/IP network created for the Military Mndustrial Complex and the purpose of withstanding nuclear war.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    4. Re:Yeah, but no. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      A TCP/IP network made OF egalitarian....

      Etc. etc.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    5. Re: Yeah, but no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you just tried to equate layer 7 with layers three and four.

    6. Re:Yeah, but no. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Completely ignores who developed the Internet, and for what purpose...

      Universities, for research? How does that conflict?

      The ARPAnet was created for the military; the Internet is the result of repurposing it for peacetime. It was developed from a military project into a civilian project, and the protocol is inherently peer to peer.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Yeah, but no. by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Brilliant nut air-headed fools may have thought it was the dawn of an egalitarian utopia, but spam is 40 years old. There's no way it would ever be what they hoped.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  6. Foolproof isn't. by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >> hacking and data theft will become impossible

    muahahahahahahahahhahahhaha.

    That right there is Nevada beachfront property. An app is going to consume that data. To consume it requires access to it. If the hacker steals the keys used by the app to get the data then they can steal the data. To think less of it is naive.

    1. Re:Foolproof isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >> hacking and data theft will become impossible

      muahahahahahahahahhahahhaha.

      That right there is Nevada beachfront property. An app is going to consume that data. To consume it requires access to it. If the hacker steals the keys used by the app to get the data then they can steal the data. To think less of it is naive.

      Give it some more time. There will be beachfront property in Nevada soon enough.

    2. Re:Foolproof isn't. by green1 · · Score: 1

      Making data impossible to steal is easy. Being able to access it again once you've done so, that's the hard part!

    3. Re: Foolproof isn't. by UrbanMonk · · Score: 1

      Mandalay Bay.

  7. Slashdot used to be like those guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nowadays, itâ(TM)s like Facebook

  8. I have an idea for a round thing helps move things by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    I'm going to call it a "wheel"

    In other news, someone has re-invented distributed file storage. aka BitTorrent Sync

  9. Cyberpunk net? by jonr · · Score: 1

    Wasn't this how the net worked in Neal's Stephenson or William Gibson's novels?

  10. Freenet broke my heart. by Larsen+E+Whipsnade · · Score: 1

    But I'd be willing to give the idea another shot if there were no dependency on a particular programming language and the protocol could at least be sufficiently nailed down for backward compatibility.

    (This was years ago. If things had improved, I presume everyone would be talking about it.)

    Fetching some stuff takes forever, but I'm not always in a hurry. There's always the regular Web, or maybe Tor.

  11. Hacking by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    hacking and data theft will become impossible.

    No, they won't... You will just need to hack a different device in order to steal the data. Hacking an end user's system will typically be much easier than a large provider, but you'll only get one user's data each time and have to hack many devices.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  12. Pied Piper - Beat me to it by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    Be interesting to see which came first, "SAFE" or Season 3 (I believe) of "Silicon Valley" where Richard Hendricks gets the idea for the distributed interwebs?

    If it was Silicon Valley, can they sue? I imagine they would want to, just to get publicity about what's being described in the show.

    1. Re: Pied Piper - Beat me to it by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      The MaidSafe folks were hanging out at San Francisco Bitcoin meetups way before the "Silicon Valley" TV show first aired.

  13. What "giants"? by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The brands that helped the clandestine services with PRISM? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    The brands that could not get crypto to work and allowed plain text data to exist on networks that could be seen from the internet?
    The brands that hire SJW to remove links, derank news? Remove accounts and ban movie reviews?
    The brands that demand users allow malware on computers as "ads"?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  14. history repeating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Today's rebels are tomorrow's tech giants.

  15. Headline by fubarrr · · Score: 2

    While reading the headline, my first thought was that this was about Yemeni hipsters making budget medium range ballistic missiles from scraps.

  16. Punk by physick · · Score: 1

    There's something quite beautiful about this solution... let's call it Punk-Chain...

  17. Concentration of power by Atmchicago · · Score: 2

    I think the idea is to set up a system where no one is in complete control. In this way, even if the founders change their minds, it doesn't matter because the system is de-centralized. Whether or not such a system is feasible, or popular, remains to be seen.

    --

    You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    1. Re:Concentration of power by BlueStrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the idea is to set up a system where no one is in complete control.

      And that's why governments will work to make certain no such system ever gains traction. Government will insist on being able to track, monitor, and hack into individual user's private data as they do now, with any new system. Just look at how crypto-currencies are faring with various governments.

      They'll throw up the usual smokescreen about terrorists and pedos, and it will die stillborn. What, you didn't think they'd simply allow you to walk away from their system of digital surveillance and control, did you?

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    2. Re:Concentration of power by infolation · · Score: 2

      Without a charismatic visionary at the helm, a social enterprise of any worth devolves into an aimless, directionless mess.

  18. Re: Search Engines by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    DuckDuckGo is an obvious honeypot.

  19. Re: hashtag home server persecution by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    The courts are fond of discovering new and innovative rights. Perhaps they could discover a constitutional right to run one's own home server.

    I mean, if a bunch of unelected dunderheads in robes are going to be the ultimate legislative authority in the land, it would be pretty awesome if they at least invented *good* laws.

  20. Re: New C Language by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

    Ebba GrÃn. 800 grader.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  21. Re: Search Engines by Reverend+Green · · Score: 2

    Slightly worse. It's self-selection. By doing a search on DuckDuckGo you have flagged your search activity as "interesting". Perhaps you'll get a little more compute resources devoted to analyzing your activity. A shorter escalation path to attention from a human analyst.

  22. They are no more "working to replace tech giants" by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They are no more "working to replace tech giants" than Radio amateurs are "working to replace broadcasting giants". They are doing a lot of interesting stuff, some of which will be adopted by tech giants and some of which will remain niche.

  23. The Shill is strong in this one.. by thesupraman · · Score: 1

    You could say they took the SAFE Shilling ;)

    FFS, could this be more transparently Yet Another Coin Scam (tm)?

  24. Not only rebels, but startups too - like us by hognetitlestad · · Score: 1

    We're working on decentralizing the internet too. We're a startup that was founded in Norway who have gotten an international team of highly experienced Tech personalities who also agree that this is the future. This is also partly what's behind the Blockchain movement. We've made an open source operating system that we're inserting into the internet. Autonomous infrastructure that allows for building desktop and mobile apps on decentralized technology. Check out the Friend Unifying Platform. https://friendup.cloud/ - https://github.com/FriendUPClo...

    1. Re:Not only rebels, but startups too - like us by thomaswoob · · Score: 1

      Not to forget our highly nerdy team of programmers that will help give JavaScript an even bigger push by allowing JS deveopers to built whole apps within a desktop just using JavaScript, including file management, window management, user management.. all you need, open sourced, install on your own hardware or run somewhere else. Client side encryption and DOS drivers to allow integration of arbitrary datasources included. disclaimer: I am part of that team :)

    2. Re:Not only rebels, but startups too - like us by AceZeroX · · Score: 1

      And security with as strong as possible encryption to keep the user in full control of his/her content and where it is exposed. Preserving privacy even on public servers in the cloud.

    3. Re:Not only rebels, but startups too - like us by sfcat · · Score: 1

      We're working on decentralizing the internet too. We're a startup that was founded in Norway who have gotten an international team of highly experienced Tech personalities who also agree that this is the future. This is also partly what's behind the Blockchain movement. We've made an open source operating system that we're inserting into the internet. Autonomous infrastructure that allows for building desktop and mobile apps on decentralized technology. Check out the Friend Unifying Platform. https://friendup.cloud/ [friendup.cloud] - https://github.com/FriendUPClo... [github.com]

      Not to forget our highly nerdy team of programmers that will help give JavaScript an even bigger push by allowing JS deveopers to built whole apps within a desktop just using JavaScript, including file management, window management, user management.. all you need, open sourced, install on your own hardware or run somewhere else. Client side encryption and DOS drivers to allow integration of arbitrary datasources included. disclaimer: I am part of that team :)

      I think you just defeated your own argument.

      --
      "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
  25. Protocols can't be monetized by grumling · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The trend since the early 2000s has been client server because VC backed companies couldn't monetize email. So instead of having an open protocol blogging system (RSS), or open protocol instant messenger (XMPP), we get Facebook and Twitter owning 90+% of the market.

    Just promote protocols instead of websites and this will sort itself out.

    --
    "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  26. Holochain by traldar · · Score: 1

    This really looks like the Holo project. Holo proposes a more human, agent centric internet — where you control your personal data and chose how the applications work. With Holo you share your computer's spare capacity running peer-to-peer apps. When people use the apps you host you get rewarded in cryptocurrency by the apps's creator. Holo is based on a technology called Holochain, a next generation platform for decentralized apps that is more scalable, exponentially faster and far more energy efficient and 10000x cheaper than Blockchain, not using global consensus and not based on tokens, rather on a mutual currency. You can join the crowdfunding campaign (already more than 200% funded by now) by purchasing a Holo port, a preconfigured silent linux box that sits on your desk and earns you criptocurrency (the open source software will also runs on any machine).

    1. Re:Holochain by rgbscan · · Score: 1

      It sorta of reminded me of Diaspora in spirit, with blockchain as a bonus. Of course it was riddled with security issues and never went anywhere.

  27. Re: hashtag home server persecution by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    There is a constitutional right to run ones own server. I'll give you a hint. But *first* you need to read *one* of the amendments.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  28. Tahoe LAFS by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    people's data -- files, documents, social-media interactions -- will be broken into fragments, encrypted and scattered around other people's computers

    Hey, this is almost Tahoe LAFS.

  29. Meet the new boss... by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

    ...same as the old boss.

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  30. Balkanization by sapped · · Score: 1

    "Balkan and Kalbag form one small part of a fragmented rebellion" How odd that someone named Balkan would form part of a fragmented solution.