Slashdot Mirror


Laser Scans Reveal Maya 'Megalopolis' Below Guatemalan Jungle (nationalgeographic.com)

Laser-toting archaeologists have discovered an entire new city in the Central American jungle, the National Geographic reported this week. From the report: In what's being hailed as a "major breakthrough" in Maya archaeology, researchers have identified the ruins of more than 60,000 houses, palaces, elevated highways, and other human-made features that have been hidden for centuries under the jungles of northern Guatemala. Using a revolutionary technology known as LiDAR (short for "Light Detection And Ranging"), scholars digitally removed the tree canopy from aerial images of the now-unpopulated landscape, revealing the ruins of a sprawling pre-Columbian civilization that was far more complex and interconnected than most Maya specialists had supposed. "The LiDAR images make it clear that this entire region was a settlement system whose scale and population density had been grossly underestimated," said Thomas Garrison, an Ithaca College archaeologist and National Geographic Explorer who specializes in using digital technology for archaeological research.

64 comments

  1. How great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How great more jungle must die.

    1. Re:How great! by DFurno2003 · · Score: 0

      You say that as if trees dont grow back.

    2. Re: How great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the "great" thing here is the extra support for a speculation that the Mayan civilization collapsed because of overpopulation and resource-depletion. We need to acknowledge/accept that fact because political conservatives routinely spout two stupid lies: that humanity is not currently overpopulated, and that there are plenty of resources (you know, like endless air and water to pollute). Their only goal is to make themselves richer at the expense of everything and everyone else --lot of good that attitude did the Mayans, eh?.

    3. Re: How great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to use propaganda and bad logic to shoehorn your political beliefs into the discussion. You do realize that China and India have three times the population of the US. So should we just kill off those 2 billion people? Moronic SJW.

    4. Re: How great! by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      ...You do realize that China and India have three times the population of the US....

      And use 1/3 the resources.
      Want to save the world?
      Guess who would have to go first?!!!

    5. Re:How great! by Mike+Frett · · Score: 1

      Trees are not Grass. You can't cut it once a week, it's takes quite some time for a Tree to grow.

    6. Re: How great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thatâ(TM)s the whole point of using technology like LiDAR, to reduce ground penetration unless itâ(TM)s absolutely necessary. Eventually this will probably be excavated but we all know archaeologist arenâ(TM)t the problem when it comes to deforestation.

    7. Re:How great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Mother nature can take one more for the team"

  2. Revolutionary? by nasask8r · · Score: 1

    Is LiDAR really a revolutionary technology at this point?

    1. Re:Revolutionary? by Narcocide · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well the scanning mechanism revolves during operation. So, yes, technically, I guess?

    2. Re:Revolutionary? by T.E.D. · · Score: 2

      Is LiDAR really a revolutionary technology at this point?

      No, but using it for the purposes of Archeology is pretty new. The first such uses I know of were only 6 years ago.

    3. Re:Revolutionary? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

      Is LiDAR really a revolutionary technology at this point?

      No, but using it for the purposes of Archeology is pretty new.

      Together, they open up new academic and career opportunities for sharks.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    4. Re:Revolutionary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first such uses I know of were only 6 years ago.

      I had a professor in university that was working with the DoD on lidar tech for "mapping and tracking" purposes. He also taught propulsions, kinematics and control systems if that helps you narrow down what they were using it for. That was at least 8 years ago, so I'd say let's make the tech a little bit older than 6 years at least.

    5. Re:Revolutionary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been around since the 1960s, says wikipedia (therefore God's own Truth, or at least jimbo's own truth, eh.) so... well, if you are used to archaeological time scales, I'm sure a case could be made.

    6. Re:Revolutionary? by bws111 · · Score: 1

      In other words, they weren't using it for archaeology, which is what TED said started about 6 years ago.

    7. Re:Revolutionary? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm looking at the article and the images, and it looks to me like they think a lot of these 'might' be structures, but also many could just be natural rock formations. It seems that everything the they think appears like a structural foundation is assumed to be a man made structure and then they add an AR building on top.

      I'm sure the researchers know what they are dealing with and will go and do some verification, but I think maybe there's some media hype on just how certain the are. They haven't actually gone and uncovered any of these newly mapped structures as far as I can tell.

    8. Re:Revolutionary? by witton · · Score: 1

      They used LiDAR in Belize in 2009 for the Caracol Archaeological Project (also Mayan). This is not revolutionary tech, nor a revolutionary application. https://news.nationalgeographi...

  3. This has all happened before. by Narcocide · · Score: 2

    And it will all happen again.

    1. Re:This has all happened before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So say we all.

  4. Re:Lost City of the Monkey God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Non-creimer link here.

  5. Re:A civilisation brought low by global warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Accurate.

    I was about to write a post about how the spaniards destroyed them, but wanted to make sure so I checked wikipedia.

    You are correct, the mayans et al in the region were in nearly continuous war, they did tremendous environmental damage to the point their cities were unfit to live in/around. Leadership was ineffectual and eventually gave way to a ruling council.

    Rather amazing to see that they didn't leave because of a major event like disease or foreign occupation. Their society was just really built on a whole lot of crazy and stupid and it collapsed under it's own weight. Cities turned into ghost towns inhabited by squatters.

    While many people do view history for anecdotes about today there are striking differences between us and the mayans. First off our governmental structures are built in a more complex way and rarely collapse. Our civilization spans globally now, you can be in peru, india, and australia and they've probably all seen the sponge bob square pants movie. Environmentally, we are destroying everything like a 9 billion strong monkey cancer apocolypse and we are going to pay for that in horrific and never ending ways.

    The differences are very large, we will go the way of the maya eventually, however we're like a moon next to a marble when you compare our civilization to theirs and I do not believe we will go the same way. It might go similar, but we operate on a global scale not local, when we go down, we're going to burn this planet with us.

  6. Guatemala better give it back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's Mayan. Get it?

    1. Re:Guatemala better give it back by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      And that joke was Urine.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    2. Re:Guatemala better give it back by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      Both are hereby convicted and sent to the Punnitentiary.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  7. That's embarrassing. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    When the Earth realized our gaze was moving down dangerously close to the equator she yelled, "Hey! Keep your scanners up here, buddy!" ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  8. quck, someone call History and replace Oak Island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quick, someone call the History Channel and replace The Curse of Oak Island with The Curse of Maya Megalopolis.

  9. Re:A civilisation brought low by global warming by taiwanjohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Assuming you're serious... You seem to be confusing habitat overrun (a regional phenomenon) with global warming. AFAIK nobody knows for sure what brought down the Mayan civilization, but most people figure they grew too big too fast and cut down all the trees, etc.. That's not good behavior, certainly, but calling it "global warming" is way off base.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
  10. Really exciting by tgibson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm flabbergasted that there are so many finger-wagging posts out of the gate chastising everything from anthropogenic global warming to Western Civilization to the propensity of an advanced society to destroy itself. I just simply feel excited for the archeologists--how thrilling it must be to make such a discovery and the excitement over planning next steps to learn more.

    1. Re:Really exciting by Ranbot · · Score: 2

      Flabbergasted? Really? Have you visited Slashdot much in the past few years? The days of people commenting on Slashdot with actual interest and knowledge in scientific fields are long gone. Those people have left, because the trolls, political wanks [left and right], and racist ACs have made this their playground. There are still some decent articles posted, but don't expect anything from the "community."

  11. Re:Lost City of the Monkey God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for sharing -- not everything I will read has to be sci-fi this year.

  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. It's a sad day, based on Egyptian experience by mccrew · · Score: 1

    If the experience in Egypt is instructive -- and I believe it is -- look for massive looting to begin shortly.

    --
    Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
    1. Re:It's a sad day, based on Egyptian experience by Jahoda · · Score: 2

      If the experience in Egypt [scientificamerican.com] is instructive -- and I believe it is -- look for massive looting to begin shortly.

      The article states that these sites are already being looted, with LIDAR showing "thousands" of pits having been dug, and that while unknown to researchers, they are obviously not unknown to locals. They hope to raise awareness of the problem.

    2. Re:It's a sad day, based on Egyptian experience by swb · · Score: 1

      Based on the InfoGraphics(tm) in TFA, it looks like this is in a pretty well known geographic zone near other ruins/archaeological sites. The larger structures and scope may be new to archaeologists, but it sounds like the general area's likely archaeological value wasn't unknown.

      It's not like they found a giant city in an area otherwise considered lacking anything.

  14. Revolutionary technology! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Lidar originated in the early 1960s, shortly after the invention of the laser, and combined laser-focused imaging with the ability to calculate distances by measuring the time for a signal to return using appropriate sensors and data acquisition electronics."

    - Wiki

  15. LiDAR by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    I see this being pronounced in "air quotes" a la doctor evil. LiDAR has been around for a very long time now, it is hardly revolutionary. In fact there was a similar story years ago, about the exact same thing, probably just a different place (or maybe the same story now in duplicate).

    It is pretty cool. However at the same time my spidey sense is going off a bit on how "undiscovered" these places were. It seems much to vast and complex to have been unnoticed entirely. Locals perhaps have known about it forever but they have just not been unearthed as it isn't worth the trouble (or it is in a difficult region to get to).

    1. Re:LiDAR by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      " (or maybe the same story now in duplicate)."

      You're here long enough to know it must be a dupe.

  16. Re:Lost City of the Monkey God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Pirate link here.

  17. This belongs in a museum! by hackertourist · · Score: 3, Funny

    But watch out for the massive boulder.

  18. Re:A civilisation brought low by global warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    AFAIK nobody knows for sure what brought down the Mayan civilization.

    Epidemics and diseases is the leading explanation. Almost the same thing happened to Europeans with plagues. The same thing happened to Roman Empire prior to complete collapse. So when conquistadores showed up, they were both immune and carriers.

  19. Re:A civilisation brought low by global warming by St.Creed · · Score: 1

    "man made localized climate change", aka "deforestation and erosion".

    --
    Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
  20. 1491 - excellent book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For more info on what the Americas were like before the Europeans arrived - 1491.
    It successor 1493 goes into a lot of the connections that were made around the world because of the gold and esp Silver in central America.
    1493 explains how the mosquito governs where the Mason-Dixon line was put.

  21. Maybe, just maybe by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    I'm hoping they find a ton of Mayan scripts. We have so few and finding more would tell us a great deal about their civilization. The Spanish priests burned every scrap of Mayan script they could find. Shameful.

  22. Lost City of the Monkey God PDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://dw.convertfiles.com/files/0448242001517616673/the-lost-city-of-the-monkey-god-a-true-story.pdf

    1. Re:Lost City of the Monkey God PDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine's an ePub, so it behaves as an ebook should.

  23. Zarahemla by elainerd · · Score: 1

    This is obviously the city of Zarahemla. This is known.

    --
    Faith: Belief in Truth. Superstition: Belief in Falsehood.
  24. Re:Lost City of the Monkey God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad for you. If my Mom can help you achieve some sort of normal human sexual competence, that's a good thing.

    Sex is usually free, Chris. Unless you're repulsive, incompetent, and undesirable.

  25. Re:Lost City of the Monkey God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Her tail was also cute.

  26. Re:Lost City of the Monkey God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I'm one of the first people borne to a Brazilian shemale. It didn't bother you that she's thicker, longer, and harder than you?

    No?

    Welcome to the family, stepdad!

    She looks like Camilla Jolie a lot.

    https://www.ashemaletube.com/m...

  27. Re:A civilisation brought low by global warming by eddeye · · Score: 2

    Epidemics and diseases is the leading explanation. Almost the same thing happened to Europeans with plagues. The same thing happened to Roman Empire prior to complete collapse. So when conquistadores showed up, they were both immune and carriers.

    That's Aztec not Mayans. The Mayan civilization collapsed centuries before Columbus ever showed up.

    --
    Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch.
  28. Re:Lost City of the Monkey God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most adults don't want "free sex"" from raping their neighbors' goats.

  29. No time line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The scans do not show what existed when. They show everything, assuming that everything existed and was fully populated at the same time.

  30. Re:A civilisation brought low by global warming by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I'm sure AmiMoJo will find some way how to blame whitey.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  31. Ooh, but will they find the Shakuras Plateau? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Megalolopolis is great, it's got that crazy gold base. I have a feeling that it will be easy to find the Jungle Basin. But if they find Shakuras Plateau as well, we'll have to unfreeze idrA and MMA and have them go at it. Husky can cast it.

  32. Re:A civilisation brought low by global warming by skovnymfe · · Score: 1

    In the 9th century, there was a widespread political collapse in the central Maya region, resulting in internecine warfare, the abandonment of cities, and a northward shift of population. The Postclassic period saw the rise of Chichen Itza in the north, and the expansion of the aggressive K'iche' kingdom in the Guatemalan Highlands. In the 16th century, the Spanish Empire colonized the Mesoamerican region, and a lengthy series of campaigns saw the fall of Nojpetén, the last Maya city, in 1697.

  33. Re:A civilisation brought low by global warming by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

    All true, but didn't things get better when they made peace with the Sons?