Slashdot Mirror


YouTube Warns of 'Consequences' For Creators Who Misbehave (cnbc.com)

YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki has announced that creators whose actions impact negatively on its community will face "consequences." From a report: Wojcicki said the video-sharing platform is developing new policies that "would lead to consequences" if a content creator "does something egregious" that reflects unfavorably on other YouTube creators. YouTube's CEO made the comments in a blog post that detailed a list of the Google-owned firm's priorities for creators in 2018. In January, one of the service's most popular content creators, Logan Paul, published a video that showed the dead body of a man hanging from a tree. Wojcicki did not refer to the Logan Paul incident directly, but said that the misbehavior of some creators could put the broader YouTube community in a negative light. "While these instances are rare, they can damage the reputation and revenue of your fellow creators, so we want to make sure we have policies in place that allow us to respond appropriately," she said.

17 of 174 comments (clear)

  1. Youtube by Jfetjunky · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Behaving more and more like the TV networks we hate every day...

  2. Misbehave... by thegreatbob · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder when they'll extend their definition of "to misbehave" to include people who are critical of their services/policies...

    --
    There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
    1. Re:Misbehave... by mysidia · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wonder when they'll extend their definition of "to misbehave" to include people who are critical of their services/policies...

      It'll probably just be the "Reported for Community Standards violations", except instead of 1 Strike you lose Partner status and 3 Strikes you're banned from Google services with all your video's taken down ----- one strike and you're banned, and as a side penalty you can no longer use Google Search, and you'll lose access to your Gmail account, Google Drive account, etc, at the same time.

    2. Re:Misbehave... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Also, politics, it seems as if YouTube see one side as misbehavior more than the other.

      A video that became popular from the Greek right-wing/nationalist party Golden Dawn (elected in parliament ranking third in votes) was removed by YouTube as "hate-speech"...

      The video was a photography of an Athens center square in the 50's and a love song from that era with the lyrics (roughly translated by me) "I wish you could come back again, even for just a night"...

      With no text (other than "Golden Dawn") and none copyrights violations, neither for the photograph nor for the song... the solution for YouTube was to characterize it... "hate-speech" (a photography of an Athens center square in the 50's and a love song from that era...)!

  3. Morons At Youtube. by sycodon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They've demonetized many of the channels I like to watch...such a hunting, camping, home repair, etc.

    It's stupid and random. If they have an algorithm doing this the programmer is a moron. If people are doing it, they are morons. if it's a mix, then it's the Perfect Storm of Morons.

    Won't belong before the only channels unaffected by their stupidity are the Cute Cat channels and that won't last after the Animal Rights assholes get done with them.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Morons At Youtube. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The programmer is definitely not a moron, he just does what he is paid to do.

    2. Re:Morons At Youtube. by 2ms · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would say it's the last year or two where companies have really decided to impose snowflake protection censorship.

    3. Re:Morons At Youtube. by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They've demonetized many of the channels I like to watch...such a hunting, camping, home repair, etc.

      It's stupid and random. If they have an algorithm doing this the programmer is a moron. If people are doing it, they are morons. if it's a mix, then it's the Perfect Storm of Morons.

      Won't belong before the only channels unaffected by their stupidity are the Cute Cat channels and that won't last after the Animal Rights assholes get done with them.

      You have to realize that to "monetize" a video, there has to be an ad for it. And maybe just over a year ago, that wasn't a problem - there were lots of advertisers.

      The big problem is YouTube's advertisers are running thin. When thanks to the opinions of a certain president, certain views started getting rather high visibility, and the press surrounding those videos suddenly caused a lot of advertisers to wake up and take notice - their ads were playing on those videos.

      You have to realize an advertiser is a thin skinned human with a bankroll, and the only way to get them to release that bankroll is to stay on the straight and narrow. So a LOT of big name advertisers pulled their ad contracts from YouTube the first time it happened. It happened again a month later, and even more advertisers pulled out.

      So basically of what's left, YouTube has to ensure that they don't get up and leave as well. So producing a video that harms the YouTube community may be demonetized because it has the potential of losing advertisers.

      And that's what matters. If you want money, you need ads. Advertisers are thin skinned and if you're not on the straight and narrow on what values they promote, they will refuse to put an ad on your video and thus, your video does not get monetized because there's no one to pay for it.

      Unfortunately, a lot of outdoorsy type videos fall under this - guns are especially hard thanks to all the mass shootings, so advertisers really hate associating their product with something that could cause another Las Vegas.

      The gravy train has basically come to a halt. At least YouTube still keeps the video up - and until someone wants to advertise on those kinds of videos, they can't be monetized.

      And no, the alternatives will have to face exactly the same problem - Steem and DTube, short of charging people money to view the videos, will have to rely on the same kinds of advertisers that YouTube goes after. Well, they could go after the crapware advertisers, you know, the ones that will advertise on any site regardless of content, mostly because the ads are deceptive, illegal, and will be the kind that install 10 kinds of malware on your computer. They're the ones you find on torrent sites and other questionable content sites.

    4. Re:Morons At Youtube. by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 5, Funny

      get a job and move to a city asshole

      Are you one of the city assholes they should move to?

    5. Re:Morons At Youtube. by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sorry but horseshit, Google is trying to push their political narrative. Look at Steven Crowder who has had NO TROUBLE finding tons of advertisers for his channel...did you see what ads google was running before he was demonitized? Shit like gay cruises...on a conservative Christians channel!

      Google knows exactly how to make sure that advertisers will scream and they use that knowledge to demonitize. Its like running ads for pork sausage on a Muslim's channel, sure its a legit ad but does anybody think its a good match for the product? But seriously what do you expect when their former CEO was actively spending millions to put Hillary in the white house and rig search results to make Hillary look good is it any surprise they are trying to silence those that do not fit the narrative?

      Steven Crowder met with Google and talks all about it on the recent Joe Rogan podcast, if anybody wants to learn more about how one sided Google is I'd urge them to watch the podcast.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  4. Wojcicki is deep inside the SJW echo chamber by blind+biker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I say this as a European socialist. Wojcicki is a cunt and Youtube suffers from it.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  5. Re:Needed on Slashdot by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    We need some consequences for people on Slashdot who misbehave.

    Yes, Slashdotters who misbehave should be spanked by Brandi Love dressed as a school marm.

    I've been bad, so I'll go first.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  6. Transparency by Pyramid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    More talk of "consequences" for "misbehavior" with absolutely clarity about what that means. Just more ass-covering maneuvers by an Alphabet company that allow it to do whatever it wants with absolutely zero explanation.

    Given Google's ideological track record both online and in the workplace, there is no reason whatsoever to believe this will be good for the content creator or the free exchange of ideas in general.

    --
    ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
  7. Re:Nazitube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does this mean they are finally going to do something about all those people posting Nazi screeds thinly veiled as comic book or movie commentaries?

    Ah yes, the traditional leftist approach: "I don't like it, so somebody else force them to stop so I don't have to be inconvenienced."

    I'm kinda sick of those polluting my searches.

    There are a lot of people who are pretty sick of various degenerate agendas polluting their searches too. Should be ban that too? What qualifies one to the noble position of having sensibilities that can be enforced by law? Surely it's not being of Jewish heritage.

  8. Re:Needed on Slashdot by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would try to Google who Brandi Love is, but I am at work.

    She's an award-winning actress. Let's just leave it at that.

    And it's best that you don't Google her, because then you'd not only be at work, but you'd be hard at work.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  9. Youtube Should Fix Their Site Design First by dryriver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Youtube has the largest collection of video content in recorded human history, and only provides a basic search box and a very half-baked suggestions algorithm to access them. There is no good index, by alphabet, by content type, by content subject or by or any other good way to really explore and sift through content on the site that you do not already know. I've been listening to a bunch of good music artists on Youtube the last few months, and the suggestions algorithm has completely boxed me in both on Youtube.com in the browser and in the Youtube Android app. I keep seeing the same artists and same types of songs being suggested over and over, as if the rest of the musical world doesn't exist at all. The only way to "break out of the box" is to start searching for a completely different type of artist whose name you already know. So from a technical/engineering/UX design standpoint, Youtube is NOT a well designed site at all. Maybe if you search for simple stuff like "Rihanna" or "SNL", the site will work for you. But if you want a text-based or better visual network-graph based UI that really lets you explore the site, that just doesn't exist on Youtube. I bet Alphabet see Youtube that way in their offices, but we ordinary Tubelings only get the search box and the -15 IQ suggestions algorithm that was probably put together by 3 programmers. THIS is what Youtube should be focusing their efforts on. A better UI, especially for the mobile app.

    --
    Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
  10. Anita Sarkeesian by FerociousFerret · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Then Anita Sarkeesian should be banned for life.