Slashdot Mirror


Investigators Crack DB Cooper Code, Identify Suspect With Possible CIA Connections (seattlepi.com)

An anonymous reader quotes the Seattle Post-Intelligencer: A private investigative team announced Thursday morning that members now believe D.B. Cooper was a black ops CIA operative possibly even involved with Iran-Contra, and that his identity has been actively hidden by government agents. The 40-member cold-case team comprised of several former FBI agents and led by Thomas and Dawna Colbert made its latest reveal after a code breaker working with the team found connections in each of five letters allegedly sent by Cooper in the days following the famed hijacking in 1971.

What's more, several people who knew Colbert's top suspect, a man named Robert W. Rackstraw, have noted possible connections to the CIA and to top-secret operations, Colbert said. "The new decryptions include a dare to agents, directives to apparent partners, and a startling claim that is followed by Rackstraw's own initials: If captured, he expects a get-out-of-jail card from a federal spy agency," Colbert said in a news release... In a brief phone call last year, Rackstraw only told SeattlePI to verify Colbert's claims; he didn't issue a denial, or comment further on Colbert's investigation...

Late last year, Colbert's team obtained a fifth letter allegedly sent by Cooper that Colbert said supports a possible FBI cover-up, but also included random letters and numbers. A code breaker on Colbert's team was able to decode the letters and numbers and find they pointed to three Army units Rackstraw was connected to during his military service in Vietnam. The code was meant to serve as a signal to his co-conspirators that he was alive and well after the jump, Colbert said... Another letter, in which Cooper claimed to be CIA openly, also had the letters "RWR" at the end -- the initials of Robert W. Rackstraw, according to Colbert.

133 comments

  1. Code cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A short ciphertext can decrypt to anything your'e motivated to make it say. All of this is very thin.

    1. Re:Code cracked? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Also one code was for the Washington Post, and one for the LA Times. NY Times and Seattle Times were TBA. Hell of a code.

    2. Re:Code cracked? by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agreed on the thinness of evidence, but also remember this was 1971, before personal computers or even the first public key cipher. Assuming for sake of argument the people behind this latest "solution" to the mystery are correct, then the text would have been ciphered by hand using some rudimentary shared-secret cipher. An expert wouldn't need much text to recover the key -- and in fact this might have been necessary if the sender had no secure channel to transmit the key over.

      The problem with "solving" the D.B. Cooper mystery is the double-edged role of imagination in understanding the world. You need imagination to connect sparse evidence into some kind of coherent picture, but that emotionally convincing "aha" feeling you get when you manage to do that drops you right down into confirmation bias territory. That's how conspiracy theories get started.

      Making Cooper out to be an ex-spook with CIA paramilitary experience connects a some of dots in an emotionally convincing way: Cooper's ability to manipulate others, his ability to make a convincing bomb and use a parachute. But it leaves others unconnected, like the titanium particles found on his tie. But that's real life, isn't it? Sometimes dots don't have any connection to the picture (e.g. contamination of the evidence after it is collected).

      The letters aren't a slam-dunk even if the decryption is valid. They could be a prank. They could be a spook taking advantage of the highly publicized event for his own purposes. What's more there is nothing really to connect this Rackstraw person to the letters, and the known details of his career don't really match up (which of course they wouldn't).

      In the end this is Yet Another D.B. Cooper Theory: a few very suggestive connections topped with a mountain of conjecture. Particularly suspect is tying it down to a specific person. That's a major leap of faith.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Code cracked? by timholman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Agreed on the thinness of evidence, but also remember this was 1971, before personal computers or even the first public key cipher. Assuming for sake of argument the people behind this latest "solution" to the mystery are correct, then the text would have been ciphered by hand using some rudimentary shared-secret cipher. An expert wouldn't need much text to recover the key -- and in fact this might have been necessary if the sender had no secure channel to transmit the key over.

      In 1971, any publicly broadcasted cypher would have almost certainly been encoded with a one-time pad. They were routinely used in espionage in the early days of the Cold War, and are still used today (e.g. the "numbers stations" on shortwave radio). Given that the cyphers in question were a few 10-character alphanumeric strings, a one-time pad would be the obvious means to send a short, unbreakable message ... assuming that's what it really was, a not simply a random string of characters put together by the letter writer to make it appear mysterious.

      Realistically, this entire "investigation" is just another example of a lot of people with too much time on their hands looking for patterns in what is effectively random noise.

    4. Re:Code cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "You need imagination to connect sparse evidence into some kind of coherent picture," - not in this case, as the codes related directly to suspect's unit #'s in Vietnam. That's not a coincidence. That's a confirmation the code is correctly broken.

      From that they can look at what the rest of the message says, and given the suspect's colorful history of both admissions and denials, all of those individual items can be confirmed or tested against - in this case quite successfully.

      Thin evidence? Pfft. This is quite robust in total compared to many, many cases where people are convicted beyond possibility of doubt on extremely circumstantial shit coupled with demonstrated motives or history.

      You're just unread on the topic and are trying to make generalizations out of the holes in your knowledge of this.

    5. Re: Code cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The woo is strong in this one.

    6. Re:Code cracked? by careysub · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be so certain about that. One time pads have existed as long as writing itself, yet ciphers were always far more commpn for cryptography, only being replaced by computer-based cryptography. If unbreakable one-time pads were universal what were all those code breakers doing? The (now) famous Venona operation was engaged in breaking spy codes. The Walker Ring used a rotor encipherment gadget.

      Generation and management of one time pads is a huge pain in the ass. It is much easier now because - computers. But it is also mostly unnecessary now because - computers.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    7. Re:Code cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Realistically, this entire "investigation" is just another example of a lot of people with too much time on their hands looking for patterns in what is effectively random noise."

      Yes, just like all the Worlds Governments are doing by Hoovering up all of our data

    8. Re:Code cracked? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Not just another D. B. Cooper theory, the whole thing has all the ingredients of and reads like a conspiracy theory. If it was true, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer should treat the story better instead of using a sensationalist style normally seen in tabloids.

    9. Re:Code cracked? by godel_56 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be so certain about that. One time pads have existed as long as writing itself, yet ciphers were always far more common for cryptography, only being replaced by computer-based cryptography. If unbreakable one-time pads were universal what were all those code breakers doing? The (now) famous Venona operation was engaged in breaking spy codes. The Walker Ring used a rotor encipherment gadget.

      The Venona project was all about breaking "one time codes". Under the pressure of Nazi invasion the Soviets in WW2 made a big whoopsie and reprinted some of their one time pads (but shuffled and mixed the pages with others), making them ultimately breakable in part.

      The pads produced during that time were used after the World War ended and into the cold war era. It's thought that none of the people that produced the pads were game to admit it to their superiors as they would have been sent to Siberia or executed.

    10. Re:Code cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best evidence of ex-CIA was the fact he knew the stairs could be lowered in flight.

    11. Re:Code cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all tabloid stories are entirely false. The truth is harder to pin down than "obvious" or "tabloid" being the two options. This isn't tabloid either, this is 40 former FBI agents - and the code makes sense. You're failing to read about it.

      You apparently aren't very thorough and are easily misled by skim-layer understandings of the complexities of reality. Some unlikely conspiracies are proven to have taken place, if you actually do read about this stuff you'd know that.

    12. Re:Code cracked? by denzacar · · Score: 1

      What's more there is nothing really to connect this Rackstraw person to the letters, and the known details of his career don't really match up (which of course they wouldn't).

      So being that he hasn't really given up anything - it's a Rackroll?

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    13. Re:Code cracked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "still used today"... for espionage? maybe in 3rd world countries (cuba or whatever) but that is stupid. sticks out like dogs balls. anyone smart would use the internet for cover.

  2. conspiracy theory by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

    I've heard some far out conspiracy theories, but this one takes the cake! It's even more far out than the crazy people who came out of the woodwork after the JFK assassination.

    --
    Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
    1. Re:conspiracy theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      When Trump declassified the JFK files it showed that the CIA promoted conspiracy theories to distract from the fact that Oswald was a communist in an effort to avoid an escalation of the cold war. When you hear far out conspiracy theories they could well be coming from the government itself.

    2. Re:conspiracy theory by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 0, Troll

      It’s so crazy that it must be true! Someone call Devin Nunez!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:conspiracy theory by Calydor · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, this is as crazy as thinking the NSA has the capability to snoop on all communication going through the internet unless it's heavily encrypted, and even that is no guarantee.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    4. Re:conspiracy theory by Entrope · · Score: 2

      So which talking points misspelled Nunes's name? That's about the fifth time I've seen it wrong, usually by people who want to derail a thread.

    5. Re: conspiracy theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's trying to derale anything??

    6. Re:conspiracy theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, they sure as hell come from your current whacko government...

    7. Re:conspiracy theory by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      So which talking points misspelled Nunes's name? That's about the fifth time I've seen it wrong, usually by people who want to derail a thread.

      That's what *they* want you to think

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    8. Re: conspiracy theory by c6gunner · · Score: 3

      When Trump declassified the JFK files it showed that the CIA promoted conspiracy theories to distract from the fact that Oswald was a communist in an effort to avoid an escalation of the cold war.

      Nonsense. The articles which make this allegation all then go on to point out that the CIA withheld some information, and that this withholding of information led to conspiracy theories. In other words they're shit articles with insanely misleading titles. There's zero evidence in any of the released documents that the CIA created or encouraged conspiracy theories.

      When you hear far out conspiracy theories they could well be coming from the government itself.

      That raises the question; since you yourself are pushing a conspiracy theory alleging that the government created the conspiracy theories, does that mean you're a government agent promoting conspiracy theories?

    9. Re:conspiracy theory by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It does flow into a predictable pattern of when someone has no evidence, they explain it away as a conspiracy. The earth is flat and no one has taken a picture of the edge because the world's governments have set up patrols to keep people from visiting the edge. It's completely circular logic.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    10. Re: conspiracy theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the more common (Spanish) spelling. People just don't realize he's of Portuguese extraction.

      Since you are inplying you are so much smarter than the OP, I would think you should realize this.

    11. Re:conspiracy theory by TWX · · Score: 1

      The earth is flat and no one has taken a picture of the edge because the world's governments have set up patrols to keep people from visiting the edge. It's completely circular logic.

      If you believe the flat earth is a disc, then yes, it really is circular logic.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    12. Re:conspiracy theory by mcswell · · Score: 1

      Be there, or be square!

      (probably before your time, but not before mine...)

    13. Re:conspiracy theory by scottrocket · · Score: 1

      I've heard some far out conspiracy theories, but this one takes the cake! It's even more far out than the crazy people who came out of the woodwork after the JFK assassination.

      I don't know, man - codes that could mean anything (including the "truth"); circular confirmations concerning possible people; and a solid foundation of much speculation, spanning decades? Well, I'm sold.

      ; )

    14. Re:conspiracy theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're kind of an idiot. Conspiracies have happened and JFK's assassination is certainly one of them.

    15. Re: conspiracy theory by careysub · · Score: 1

      That raises the question; since you yourself are pushing a conspiracy theory alleging that the government created the conspiracy theories, does that mean you're a government agent promoting conspiracy theories?

      That possibility is on the table. Stranger things have happened.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    16. Re: conspiracy theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hard to be unbiased but there's a lot of information to keep in mind. I'm not sure if this investigation is true or not, and does seem like there's decent conjecture but when discussing conspiracy theories it is important to understand the capabilities and motivations of powerful institutions especially those in the 70s when agencies like the cia and fbi were finding it easier and easier to justify taking more extreme measures to combat percieved threats during the cold war. Operation gladio and cointelpro are just two that demonstrate what they were capable of doing and shouldn't be completely ignored when discussing what could be. Having power over intelligence puts you at a serious advantage in forwarding your group's interests and shouldn't be taken lightly although it also opens up many doors to broad speculation all of which could be false or impossible to prove. If they do things correctly there won't be any evidence and so the speculation is in some ways welcomed and the crazier theories paint a target on everyone trying to make sense of what's going on by putting you in the group of "conspiracy theorists", the lowest rung on the social ladder, making any critical look at the structure difficult especially if youre someone who has something to lose by being publically discredited or smeared.

    17. Re:conspiracy theory by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I noticed this too. Maybe people are so used to getting their news from radio talk shows that they don't know how the names are spelled?

    18. Re:conspiracy theory by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      I've heard some far out conspiracy theories, but this one takes the cake! It's even more far out than the crazy people who came out of the woodwork after the JFK assassination.

      Not really. The CIA has done so much illegal shit outside the realm of their mandates that it should really be the default assumption at this point. "Did something fucked up happen? Probably the CIA." The fact this has some research put into it is practically a smoking gun.

    19. Re: conspiracy theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be ridiculous. It's not square, it's a cube.

    20. Re: conspiracy theory by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      I misspelled his name recently simply because if Android's autocorrect. Had to train it.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    21. Re: conspiracy theory by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

      Who's trying to derale anything??

      I saw what you did their.

      --
      Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
    22. Re:conspiracy theory by CSMoran · · Score: 1

      Yo!

      --
      Every end has half a stick.
    23. Re:conspiracy theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because you're such a fucking expert.

  3. .. and he's the one who invented Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ba dum pa

  4. Letters Sent After Hijacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly how did this dead man send five encoded letters.

    1. Re:Letters Sent After Hijacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He obviously wasn't dead.

    2. Re:Letters Sent After Hijacking by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      How do we know? Why is there such a strong assumption that the same person did both? The planning and execution suggest more than one person. That would explain how "he" eluded capture for so long.

  5. Fox hunt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty much everyone's dead, so it's the thrill of the hunt that's driving people.

  6. I Dunno... by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    That's an awful noisy op for a couple hundred grand. Unless part of the CIA's mission statement is to make sure life plays out like a soap opera, anyway.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:I Dunno... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes. For $200K, the CIA could just rifle a couch somewhere or sell Iran a fake surface to air missile. Or something less obvious than creating the month's biggest news story.

      Motive? I don't get it. Opportunity? OK, sure, but it's awfully convoluted. Payback? Small coin.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:I Dunno... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      The only reason it got so noisy is media attention. There were plenty of hijackings and hostage situations in that era with much more money involved and even the Cooper case didn't initially raise an eyebrow until someone wrote a sensationalist story about it with a few creative liberties (eg. the name was Dan Cooper, the D.B. was added later)

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re:I Dunno... by admin7087 · · Score: 1

      The story is not about the CIA but about a suspect who is said to have had links to the CIA. Huge difference.

    4. Re:I Dunno... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Yes. For $200K, the CIA could just rifle a couch somewhere or sell Iran a fake surface to air missile.

      From what i'm seeing, $200K in 1971 would be the equivalent to about $1.2 Million dollars in today's money, adjusted for inflation.

      That's a lot of money.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:I Dunno... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to comprehend the implications of the word "black" in "black ops"; it implies that they can't use regular money that gets appropriated in normal ways, but they can manipulate the levers of power behind the scenes. This is exactly the type of scenario that was being implied every time you ever heard the term "black ops," you just didn't understand what they were saying.

      If it is on the news is irrelevant, what is important to them is mostly that it is a type of crime that looks one-off, done by one person or a small team, and where the investigation will be totally controlled by federal law enforcement. (who can easily be kept away from the truth when you're from another federal agency with have back channels (and that's no conspiracy, CIA has to have back channels to do their legit work)).

      There doesn't seem to be anything at all about the case that would make it inconvenient for "black ops" to have done it. The evidence for it is weak, but your complaint is weak too. A couple hundred grand buys exactly the explosives or drugs or whatever in Cambodia or Laos that the CIA would have wanted for a black op during Vietnam. They don't have to pay for the whole op with black money, just the parts that don't have a normal military or intelligence appropriation, or stuff that is normally tracked. So they can use their normal airplane they use for spying, they can fuel it at a military base, they can pay the pilot's salary, all that with normal budgeted money. They might need secret money for their secret payload, though. Maybe their op costs $15m and yeah, they only need $200k that is untracked. $200k is small if they can use budgeted money, but it might be a lot larger if they have to hide it.

      And they already use all sorts of tricks to hide the money they use for their non-"black" secret ops! That's important to keep in mind. Congress gives them a bunch of "untracked" money, but then Congresspeople with security clearance get briefings about how it was spent. And there are internal tracking systems. Black ops means even the people who are allowed to know about secret stuff aren't allowed to know about it, because if they did they would have it stopped and have people arrested for doing horrible things that the government never authorized them to do! Black ops is what the criminals who work for the government are doing! By definition.

    6. Re:I Dunno... by ls671 · · Score: 1

      That's a lot of money.

      No it isn't. 1.2 M is only 200K in 1971 money.

      Seriously, a million is nothing nowadays.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    7. Re: I Dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I watched "American Made" last night. It is based on a true story and shows just how fucked up the CIA truly is. It also shows how they quite cleverly hung the guy out to dry.

    8. Re: I Dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I notice they don't mention the $200,000 in the summary because it is now EMBARRASSINGLY small, even adjusted for inflation it's like - what is this a joke?

    9. Re: I Dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, no, that's just not true. Black money is most certainly budgeted. That's the major control the congress maintains on SOCOM.

    10. Re:I Dunno... by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Maybe D. in DB stands for Dr. Evil?

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  7. Related links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    https://yro.slashdot.org/story/16/07/13/0357225/fbi-closes-db-cooper-investigation-after-45-years?sdsrc=rel

    1. Re: Related links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe this DB Cooper/Rackshaw later did operations work for the SCO lawsuit against IBM? Nice.

  8. FBI is guilty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FBI is again guilty of framing conservative for illegal acts of the liberal democrat party and clinton-obama coup plotters. Destroy the FBI for great justice.

  9. Re:Your tax dollars and mine at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You obviously are not a big picture type of person. You're just comparing $. You are ignoring the intangibles, particularly that if they can solve the case and arrest someone, they discourage someone from trying this type of thing again. And the next guy could decide he didn't want to leave any witnesses.

  10. BLAH BLAH... BLAH BLAH ...BLAH BLAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what it sounds like, all these stupid fake stories and all your commentaries.

    1. Re:BLAH BLAH... BLAH BLAH ...BLAH BLAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of very thin, your analysis compared to that of the 40 former FBI and other experts who cracked this and compared 5 letters of codes to confirm that yes, they've done what the FBI didn't, and which you now doubt with positively zero demonstrated thinking behind it.

  11. Where's Geraldo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, I'm telling you, this is BIGGER than Al Capone's safe. When Slashdot scoops the New York Times, you just know it's going to be a great weekend.

  12. Intangibles by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    So it's been 40 years. He hasn't been caught. How many times has this been tried since then? There have been hijackings since then, which has led to increased security. I don't think finding DB Cooper is going to dissuade anyone from going after a plane if they are crazy or dumb enough to try.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    1. Re:Intangibles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's been 40 years. He hasn't been caught. How many times has this been tried since then? There have been hijackings since then, which has led to increased security. I don't think finding DB Cooper is going to dissuade anyone from going after a plane if they are crazy or dumb enough to try.

      did you really not feel the sarcasm in that post?it was pretty obvious.

  13. Exclusive! Must credit crackpots dot com! by Entrope · · Score: 1

    The coded letters, reportedly sent by D.B. Cooper, actually reveal that D.B. Cooper wrote the Voynich manuscript while deployed to the grassy knoll so he could fake the moon landing videos.

  14. More books, videos, interviews by p51d007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The guy "outed" isn't the one. It's been disproved. He's 15 years younger than "DB Cooper" for one thing. If the person didn't die jumping from the plane, he would be over 85 years old today. Most likely he died in the attempt, or has long since died. These "hounds" pop up about every year of the anniversary, to hawk their books and what not.

    1. Re:More books, videos, interviews by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      What is your reason for thinking DB Cooper had to be over 40 when he committed the crime? Is there something about the crime that would make it hard for a young adult? What would that even be? There aren't many things you can't do at 25 that you can do at 40!

    2. Re:More books, videos, interviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a moron p51 douche wanna-be 007 lol. DB Cooper was wearing a disguise, was in 20's at the time of the hijacking and a trained Army parachutist.

      Dumb faggots like you don't get a say, you're fucking illiterate.

    3. Re:More books, videos, interviews by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Age was never absolutely ascertained . . . try again!

  15. Lol.....OK sure by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

    Because there is a vast government conspiracy it must be true.

  16. Re:Your tax dollars and mine at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey! Conspiracy theorists pay taxes too, you know!

  17. Re:Your tax dollars and mine at work by JoshuaZ · · Score: 5, Informative

    I know reading TFA is hard, but at least read the summary. These were private investigators doing this in their own time. The team includes a whole bunch of former FBI and other former government people, but none of your tax money is going to this.

  18. Robert Rackstraw is Amazing by techsoldaten · · Score: 2

    Robert Rackstraw stories always amaze me, mostly because we forget so much about what life was like during the Vietnam Era. There's a lot of context missing from this analysis, like how so many people went around claiming to be D.B. Cooper during the 70s and how a good number of them had similar military training. This is back when Soldier of Fortune was a guide to being manly and a life of adventure that didn't involve a snowboard was still to be had.

    You could apply the same logic the author does to the cases of Ted Mayfield, Richard McCoy, and a few others to reach the same conclusions. Robert Rackstraw is undoubtedly a badass and someone I'd love to have a beer with, just the stories about his Silver Stars are pretty incredible.

    But, when you consider all the other things he's done, for Rackstraw to be DB Cooper is outside-the-realm-of-possibility amazing. Apply some common sense: how could he have done this without some help from the FBI? Why would the FBI protect someone who also stole an airplane trying to fake his own death?

    I think the author watched too much A-Team as a kid and has a fascination with Murdock.

    1. Re:Robert Rackstraw is Amazing by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      He was also 28 at the time, and the suspect was reported to be in his mid-40s. You can tell the difference.

    2. Re:Robert Rackstraw is Amazing by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I'm mid 40s and people mistake me for being in my 20s.

      I knew a woman who had her real ID confiscated by a store for being fake, because she looked "way too young" for it to be "possible." The same employee had sold her wine the day before, and didn't recognize her. My friend thinks it is because the earlier day she was also buying diapers, so she looked older.

      Witness accounts giving an age in the 40s does not mean you have evidence that the person actually is in their 40s. All you have evidence of is that the person has, or affected, minor wrinkles and maybe a few gray hairs.

    3. Re:Robert Rackstraw is Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew a woman who had her real ID confiscated by a store for being fake, because she looked "way too young" for it to be "possible."

      They have zero authorization to do that. Stop lying.

    4. Re:Robert Rackstraw is Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember sitting behind one of the prettiest girls in school for math my entire junior year, and spending a good deal of time counting the gray hairs she had over her parents' divorce. Some things just simply age you. Best wishes for her, she was most definitely as kind as she was pretty.

    5. Re:Robert Rackstraw is Amazing by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but when you were 28, were you ever mistaken for 45?

    6. Re:Robert Rackstraw is Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but when you were 28, were you ever mistaken for 45?

      If he's a rich, white, North American with health insurance like yourself, then probably not.

      Maybe we could do an experiment where I knock your fucking teeth out to simulate one possible outcome of poverty, and then we see how much everyone thinks it's aged you?

    7. Re:Robert Rackstraw is Amazing by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      As a bouncer I took fake IDs all the time.

  19. There is a simple test to verify this hypothesis.. by DrTJ · · Score: 4, Informative

    A quick look at the wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D._B._Cooper) reveals that in 2007, FBI secured DNA traces from the hijacker's tie.

    If this DNA matches the suspect, this would be hard to explain.

    This is not the first time Rackstraw is under investigation. He appeared already in 1978 in the investigation, but this is far from the only suspect that has been identified. The Wikipedia article lists ten other individuals that - on the surface of things - appear just as likely as him.

    I'd say that this is another hypothesis generated by the famousness of the case, like other famous crime cases in the past. The "Jack the ripper" suspect list on Wikipedia counts no less than 29 persons.

  20. headline is incorrect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you work for the feds, you aren't a "suspect", you're an "operative".

  21. Does it explain evrything ? by orsayman · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Does it explain evrything ? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      OMG. It makes much more sense now.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  22. Journeyman plot? by pghmike4 · · Score: 1

    This was the plot of an episode of the short-lived TV show "Journeyman". Just sayin'

  23. I call B.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Late last year, Colbert's team obtained a fifth letter allegedly sent by Cooper that Colbert said supports a possible FBI cover-up, but also included random letters and numbers. A code breaker on Colbert's team was able to decode the letters and numbers and find they pointed to three Army units Rackstraw was connected to

    emphasis mine.

  24. Why now? by EricTDuckman1414 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gee, I wonder why somebody suddenly wants to call attention to this outlandish story that alleges the FBI is riddled with corrupt yet devilishly competent conspirators who have been able to conceal the real identity of the most famous hijacker in history for over four decades?

  25. I smell a History2 series coming! by Suki+I · · Score: 1

    ROFL, sounds like another crackpot book in the making and a decent check for a marketing firm.

  26. Re:Your tax dollars and mine at work by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

    Yeah, clearly needed more coffee.

  27. Archer by Templer421 · · Score: 1

    This sounds like an Archer episode.

    1. Re:Archer by careysub · · Score: 1

      Maybe he is related to Slater.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  28. Re:Your tax dollars and mine at work by slickwillie · · Score: 1

    You're letting facts get in the way of a good rant. Sometimes facts don't do what you want them to.

  29. Switching now to Ubuntu release format by hawk · · Score: 1

    Given the semiregularity of these announcements, they will now switch to Ubuntu-style scheduling.

    Twice a year, on April 1 and October 1, releases of the latest proof and confirmed cooper will be made. No attempt will be made to keep these going longer than six months.

    Every two and a have years, though, a LTN (Long Term Nonsense) will be released, with the wild guesses, speculation, and made up stuff promised to be supported for a full three years, or until you can't read it anyway from your eyes rolling too far from forward, whichever comes first.

    hawk

  30. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same group has announced they've also found the REAL Hope Diamond (the one on display is a fake), Obama's Birth Certificate, and recordings of Trump's meetings with Putin.

    Because they've cracked the code.

  31. Wow by Njovich · · Score: 1

    You are telling me Jimmy James was in the CIA?

  32. Re:Exclusive! Must credit crackpots dot com! by mcswell · · Score: 1

    You left out the part where, after faking the videos, he was taken up by aliens, to be re-united with Elvis.

  33. AMP link is broken. Here's the direct link. by gnunick · · Score: 1

    I clicked the link in TFS but after the page loaded it had a lot of blank space and just didn't look right. So I glanced at the URL, saw "www.seattlepi.com/seattlenews/amp/..." and realized I'd been had.

    C'mon Slashdot, why can't you filter links to catch AMP URLs, then find and offer us a direct, un-"enhanced" link to the article?

    Here it is:
    http://www.seattlepi.com/seatt...

    --
    I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
  34. Re:Exclusive! Must credit crackpots dot com! by Entrope · · Score: 1

    Who did you think was finally able to decipher the code?

  35. Re: Your tax dollars and mine at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah, just a brain.

    Trump 2020!

  36. Comprised? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    Jesus H Christ, the grasp of English here is not getting better.

    >The 40-member cold-case team comprised of several former FBI agents

    No. Several former FBI agents comprised the team. The team was *composed* of several former FBI agents.
    Comprise, compose. It's not difficult. They teach it in school, to schoolchildren.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    1. Re: Comprised? by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      You know what? I'd rather them use the wrong words than leave out words or misspell them, which is pretty often. /. should be turned over to some high school newspaper editors for a major quality improvement. At least they'd fucking proofread and correct mistakes.

    2. Re: Comprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comprised of are the only two words comprising my outlook right now. I would have posted a rant too. Where's the Anon army on this? Half of the replies on this story should be about grammar failure.

  37. Re:Exclusive! Must credit crackpots dot com! by mcswell · · Score: 1

    Tom Lehrer? Who worked for the NSA in the mid-50s. But I'm sure you're right--he had help from his contemporary, Elvis.

  38. Central Comedy Agency by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    Should we really be basing our opinions on something we learned from the Colbert Report ?

    --
    Nullius in verba
  39. Not just thin, but trillions to one against by raymorris · · Score: 1

    There is about a one in a million chance that Rackstraw (or any random person) was a black ops CIA operative. There is a one in 200 million chance of someone being DB Cooper. The odds that a person is BOTH DB Cooper and a black ops CIA operative is 1 in 200 trillion.

    1. Re: Not just thin, but trillions to one against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So, you are saying there's a chance?

    2. Re:Not just thin, but trillions to one against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like invented statistics as much as the next guy, but the truth is every unknown is 50/50. Either you can prove something or you can't. CIA operatives exist, DB existed. So far that's 100% provable and 100% provable.

      There's really nothing being offered by you to say this specific person doesn't fit the criteria - because he does, that's why they found him and are convinced of it, whether or not it turns out to be the truth after all is said.

      It's certainly not one out of millions any more than a single individual in America is, and the evidence points at this individual more than anyone else. Further testing can determine if it's true - perhaps. Perhaps not.
      It is either way the best lead in a long time.

    3. Re:Not just thin, but trillions to one against by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      You don't have nearly enough information to know if you can multiply those here, or not.

      It may actually be true that all DB Coopers are black ops CIA, and the chances of being both are only "one in 200 million" meaning that there are only 38 DB Coopers in the whole world.

      Just because you have probabilities for two events doesn't mean you have a probability for them to both happen. That would require additional facts.

      But I'm actually going to go out on a limb and say that chances of being DB Cooper are much lower than 1 in 200m. Maybe even as low as 1 in 7.6b.

      The chances of you being you are exactly equal to the chances of you being DB Cooper, if we assume that the identity of DB Cooper is totally unknown. The chances of you being Santa Claus could easily be over 1 in 50k! And that assumes we only count Santas that have graduated from some sort of Santa College!

    4. Re:Not just thin, but trillions to one against by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      There is about a one in a million chance that Rackstraw (or any random person) was a black ops CIA operative. There is a one in 200 million chance of someone being DB Cooper. The odds that a person is BOTH DB Cooper and a black ops CIA operative is 1 in 200 trillion.

      So he never existed (1 in 200 trillion odds in a population of under 5 billion means a 99.999% chance of a non-event)?

      When doing stats on a population your realistic lower bound is 1 inpopulation-size and your realistic upper bound is population-size in population-size. Within that range your odds of finding a speciman matching your criteria are linear to the num when saying odds are num in $population-size. Once you go below that range your odds of finding a speciman matching that criteria grow exponentially towards zero (for above you start growing exponentially towards 1.0).

      DB Cooper was an American or Canadian by all accounts - hence the lower bound for any random person being DB Cooper is 1 in 230 million (I think that was the combined population of 20yo to 60yo at the time). That number also includes being a black ops CIA operative because all of the black ops CIA operatives are part of that 230m population size.

      In much the same way, the lower bound on the odds of DB Cooper being the sitting president of the US at the time is *also* 1 in 230m - the odds simply do not go below that.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    5. Re: Not just thin, but trillions to one against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is about a one in a million chance that Rackstraw (or any random person) was a black ops CIA operative. There is a one in 200 million chance of someone being DB Cooper. The odds that a person is BOTH DB Cooper and a black ops CIA operative is 1 in 200 trillion.

      That isn't how conditional probabilities work Ray.

      We know that the upper limit is about 5,000 in 8 billion.

    6. Re: Not just thin, but trillions to one against by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Can't you reduce further (diminished returns, yes), by removing other confirmable alibi, like being in prison or being deployed overseas, disabled, etc?

    7. Re: Not just thin, but trillions to one against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mate, you obviously failed maths in school, that's not how you combine those probabilities.

    8. Re: Not just thin, but trillions to one against by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Can't you reduce further (diminished returns, yes), by removing other confirmable alibi, like being in prison or being deployed overseas, disabled, etc?

      Yeah, but that raises the odds, not lowers it. It makes it better than the 1 in trillion that the OP specualted.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    9. Re: Not just thin, but trillions to one against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cut your estimates in half: DB cooper was a man => 50% of population

    10. Re: Not just thin, but trillions to one against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are in desperate need of some classes in statistics and discrete math
      Also just in common sense.

  40. Re:There is a simple test to verify this hypothesi by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    I thought Jack the Ripper had been positively identified as the Loch Ness Monster.

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  41. cache by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

    This guy is a writer and he thinks a cache of money is pronounced cash-ay?

    1. Re: cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The author used "comprised of". Maybe you'd like to present to the panel of grammarians who also noticed this gaffe. I move for censure.

  42. Outstanding! by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

    Although not an avid DBCooper ID'd fan, that was also the name I came up with several years back, which leads me to believe they are correct.

  43. Actually not fully correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The best code at that time and the easiest to do with a piece of paper, were one time pad. You agreed in advance with your accomplice of a series of book and chapter, then you encode each letter once using the book letter as one time pad, heck even a roman cipher is good enough using the OTP as key. You omit space and punctuation so that word can't be recognized, and statistic will be useless due to the OTP nature. If necessary add a simple shift for each letter e.g. fibbo modulo 26. Then switch to next book/chapter. Good luck finding out even with a good computer due to the nature of OTP and that pretty much any text could be validly output, but you don't need a powerful computer to encode, just a pieces of paper and the aforementioned books, same for decoding. The reason such method are not nowadays used widely , is because exchanging keys is easier for commercial exchange of message. But the spy stuff nowadays? You can be your ass it is still some form of OTP. Sometimes the oldest method are simply uncrackable.

  44. Re: There is a simple test to verify this hypothes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heared it was the queen Elizabeth who was ruling during that time and absolutely detested prostitution. I like that theory a lot! For it to be more plausible you could say it was someone hired by the queen but I prefer to imagine it was her majesty in disguise concealing her voice as manly and wearing all black with a cape, it would almost be a better version of batman.

  45. We need new conspiracy plots! by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    JFK, Marilyn Monroe, Jimmy Hoffa, Amelia Earhart, DB Cooper, Oswald, [insert your character here] conspiracy theories of what really happened are same old rehash and retreads. I guess nobody is creative these days to come up with new genres.

    Bernie Rhodes author of "The Real McCoy" about the 1972 hijacker that managed to do a DB Cooper from a 727 but was later caught. Rhodes, a DOJ probation officer, said many guys already arrested for other crimes come to him claiming to be DB Cooper. Rhodes would ask questions like what kind of tie did they wear, what did they exactly say to the flight attendant, etc. I asked Rhodes why would they confess to something serious like skyjacking. "Some of these guys were facing much more serious charges besides skyjacking."

    And to think DB Cooper, whether died jumping, actually got away with one fifth of ONE MILLION DOLLARS (which aint diddly these days).

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  46. Fishing expedition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would be more inclined to look into the motivations and funding of the investigators. This looks from the outside like another case of waiting until the players/witnesses who can easily call bullshit on the assertions to die off, and then making some clickbait-worthy claims in order to get access to some otherwise restricted datasets. The goal might not be the DB Cooper case at all, but casting doubt on something else or exposing some operation they were tangentially associated with.

  47. Existence isn't the question by raymorris · · Score: 1

    >>The odds that a person is BOTH DB Cooper and a black ops CIA operative is 1 in 200 trillion.

    > So he never existed (1 in 200 trillion odds in a population of under 5 billion means a 99.999% chance of a non-event)?

    We're not talking about the odds that Robert exists. We're talking about the odds that both he is DB Cooper (roughly one in 200 million) AND ALSO he's a black ops CIA agent (roughly one in a million).

    > That number also includes being a black ops CIA operative because all of the black ops CIA operatives are part of that 230m population size.

    The odds that you are male are about 50/50. Because about half of all people are male. The odds that you are both male AND are over seven feet tall are much less than 50/50, though both are "part of that 230 million population size". The only thing that "both are part of the population" tells us is that it's POSSIBLE to be both. To find the odds of being both, you multiply the odds of A times the odds of B, unless being A makes you more likely to be B.

    You said "that number also includes being a black ops". That number would also include being black ops IF we knew that all people who are DB Cooper are also black ops. On other words, if we already knew that DB Cooper was black ops, the odds of a random person being DB Cooper would be tough to 1in 200 million and that would include what we already knew - that Cooper was black ops.

    In fact we know that very, very few people are CIA black ops. It's very unlikely that I'm black ops, very unlikely that you're CIA black ops, and very unlikely that DB Cooper was black ops. Even IF Cooper was black ops, Cooper probably wouldn't be Robert.

  48. Possible, but unlikely by raymorris · · Score: 1

    > It may actually be true that all DB Coopers are black ops CIA,

    It may be true that you are CIA black ops. Unlikely though. Unlikely as in million to one odds against.
    It may be true that I'm CIA black ops. Unlikely though. Million to one shot.
    It may be true that Robert is black ops. Unlikely though. Million to one unlikely.

    It may be true that Robert is DB Cooper. Millions to one odds against it, though.

    The odds that he's BOTH black CIA AND ALSO DB Cooper - trillion to one against.

    1. Re:Possible, but unlikely by CSMoran · · Score: 1

      You left out the part where you prove "being black CIA" and "being DB Cooper" are independent. Only then the probability of being both is the product of the two probabilities.

      --
      Every end has half a stick.
    2. Re: Possible, but unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct.

  49. It was the FBI and the Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nunes just wrote a memo about it.

  50. Re:Your tax dollars and mine at work by dcooper_db9 · · Score: 1

    To be fair, there was a great deal of tax money spent on the investigation. The case was actively investigated for 45 years. It was suspended in 2016 but remains open.: https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us...

    --
    I do not block ads. I do block third party scripts.