Slashdot Mirror


Family of 'Swat' Victim Sues Kansas Police, Lawmakers Propose 40-Year Jail Terms (cbsnews.com)

An anonymous reader brings more updates about the 'Swat' call that led to a fatal police shooting: The gamer who dared another gamer to send police officers to his home had offered the address where he used to live, until his family was evicted in 2016. While he may also be charged for the fatal shooting that followed, the victim's family has now sued the city of Wichita as well as its police officers, with their attorney saying the city "is trying to put all the blame on the young man in California who placed the swatting call. But let's be clear: the swatter did not shoot the bullet that killed Andy Finch. That was an officer working under the direction of the Wichita Police Department."

The attorney points out that the 911 caller in California provided a description of the house which didn't match the actual house in Kansas, adding "How can Wichita police department officers not be trained to deal with this type of situation...? Prank calls are not new," according to CBS News. "The lawsuit cites FBI crime statistics showing Wichita has a ratio of one shooting death for every 120 officers -- a number that is 11 times greater than the national ratio and 12 times greater than the ratio in Chicago."

Meanwhle, Kansas lawmakers have introduced a new bill proposing a penalty of 10 to 40 years in prison if a swatting call ends in a person's death, which would also cause the offense to be prosecuted as murder.

One lawmaker argues that the bill is necessary because under the current system if a person phones in a swat call, "there's really no consequence for his actions."

4 of 291 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Why only when there is a death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They cannot hold people responsible for the costs, since it is only the police that determines how to react and how much cost to involve. They should, however, be held accountable for false accusation or claims involving the police, this is almost certainly already illegal and just needs to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

    Let's be clear though, the responsibility for the death lies 100% with the police. It is their job to ensure that they act reasonably to any circumstances. Clearly the police need to be held more to account on this, and need to face much more dire consequences for their incompetence.

  2. Re:Fucking cops by Daemonik · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have many guns.

    The Conservative dichotomy: I must be armed so that I can keep the police from oppressing me/We need strong police to protect us.

  3. Re:Fucking cops by Uberbah · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is a gross distortion of the facts. They don't shoot people all the time, it happens occasionally.

    It's barely February and American cops have already shot more people than most other countries do in a decade. And that's only looking at lethal shootings, not cases like a 2014 incident where a cop shot a man for following the cops orders who survived.

    A lot is expected of cops, regardless of what the bigots in the #BLM think.

    The fact that cops can gun people down for no reason and get away with it, throughout most of the country, puts the lie to that statement.

  4. Re: Bad Precident? by Uberbah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Singapore would be a good counterexample.

    Unless it's not. Cops in NYC insisted that stop-and-frisk was responsible for lowering crime rates, and if the policy was ended, crime rates would go back up. Policy was ended....and crime rates continued to fall.