Slashdot Mirror


Uber and Lyft Want You Banned From Using Your Own Self-Driving Car in Urban Areas (siliconbeat.com)

An anonymous reader quotes the Mercury News: The rabble can't be trusted with self-driving cars, and only companies operating fleets of them should be able to use them in dense urban areas. So say Uber and Lyft, as signatories to a new list of transportation goals developed by a group of international non-governmental organizations and titled "Shared Mobility Principles for Livable Cities"... According to Principle No. 10, "Shared fleets can provide more affordable access to all, maximize public safety and emissions benefits, ensure that maintenance and software upgrades are managed by professionals..."
It's stated reason is to "actualize the promise of reductions in vehicles, parking, and congestion, in line with broader policy trends to reduce the use of personal cars in dense urban areas." But others remain suspicious.

Gizmodo complains that the proposal "doesn't exactly sound like the freedom-filled future sci-fi writers have been promising, now does it?" and concludes that Uber and Lyft "have a hot new idea for screwing over city-dwellers."

1 of 247 comments (clear)

  1. Re:No Parking Forever by JimSadler · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    It comes down to birth control in the end. If our population does not increase we will have the same level of congestion that we now have. Almost all of our major problems relate to excessive population and we do need to take care of that. We now have 350 million or so Americans that produce X amount of pollution. If we expand to 700 millions we will have more than 2x pollution as congestion and land use will further destroy our way of life. When we hear politicians promising growth we need to make certain they are no longer politicians. Science will not get us out of these issues. Population control can.