Slashdot Mirror


Foxconn Unit To Cut Over 10,000 Jobs As Robotics Take Over (nikkei.com)

According to Nikkei Asian Review, "Foxconn's panel arm Innolux is planning to slash more than 10,000 jobs this year as part of the company's aggressive efforts to increase the use of automation in manufacturing." Honorary Chairman Tuan Hsing-Chien said in a press conference on Tuesday: "We will reduce our total workforce to less than 50,000 people by the end of this year, from some 60,000 staff at the end of 2017." From the report: Innolux is a liquid crystal display-making affiliate of major iPhone assembler Hon Hai Precision Industry, better known as Foxconn Technology Group. Tuan is also a technology adviser to Foxconn, Sharp and Innolux. Tuan said up to 75% of production will be fully automated by the end of 2018. Most of Innolux's factories are in Taiwan. Tuan's pledge came a few days after Foxconn Chairman Terry Gou said the company would pour in some $342 million to overhaul its manufacturing process by using artificial intelligence.

104 comments

  1. And their pink slip said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    And their pink slip said: Me Chinese. Me play joke. Me go peepee in your coke.

  2. They couldn't replace the humans . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    . . . until they could perfect a robot that could commit suicide due to poor working conditions.

    1. Re:They couldn't replace the humans . . . by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      . . . until they could perfect a robot that could commit suicide due to poor working conditions.

      http://www.zdnet.com/article/m...

      Patrick Mattimore, a fellow at the Institute for Analytic Journalism, recently published the following article on China's People's Daily Online, headlined: Media badly misplaying Foxconn suicides.

      Taiwanese-owned Foxconn has had seven suicides this year. That sounds like a lot, but the firm has an estimated 800,000 workers, more than 300,000 of them at a single plant in Shenzhen.

      Although exact figures are hard to come by, even the most conservative estimate for China's suicide rate is 14 per 100,000 per year (World Health Organization). In other words, Foxconn's suicide epidemic is actually lower than China's national average of suicides.

      I checked his figures. World Health Organization suicide figures for China (1999) are 13 males and 14.8 females per 100,000 people.

      Elderly (65+ years) suicide rates can be as much as 50% higher than youth (18 to 24 years), which means Foxconn's suicide rate, with its younger workforce, should be significantly below the national average.

      Let's estimate an average of 10 suicides per 100,000 at Foxconn. Just the Shenzhen Foxconn plant alone, with its 330,000 employees, would be expected to have about 33 suicides this year, or 14 so far.

      Foxconn has had just 10 suicides this year, and that's across its entire workforce.

      Working at Foxconn dramatically reduces people's risk of suicide!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:They couldn't replace the humans . . . by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      . . . until they could perfect a robot that could commit suicide due to poor working conditions.

      Came here to say that by cutting 10k jobs they will save a fortune on safety netting.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    3. Re:They couldn't replace the humans . . . by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Not to split hairs, but your probably just counting the suicides at work. I'm not aware of any statistics for how many Foxconn workers kill themselves outside of work. Do you have a source, or are you pulling this out of thin air?
      Most people would assume a normal out of work suicide rate and add the at work suicide rate, making it worse.

  3. and Wisconsin will pay $200K per job by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2
  4. Honorary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this honorary?

  5. Build A Wall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Build A Wall to keep the jerbs in and keep the robot Mongolians out!

    1. Re:Build A Wall by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      and a wall to keep the packers out of IL

    2. Re: Build A Wall by Reverend+Green · · Score: 0

      Hillaryists sure do have contempt for working people.

    3. Re: Build A Wall by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      This would only mean something if Trumpists DIDN'T have contempt for working people.

    4. Re:Build A Wall by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      what about the Vikings, Lions, or da Bears.

  6. Cool story, bro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    You're using some lovely RIAA math there, sport.

    Wisconsin is paying nothing by offering tax breaks and tax credits for a company that otherwise would not even be setting up shop in Wisconsin.

    Missing out on money? Debatable. But that tax income does not exist. There's literally nothing being paid.

    1. Re:Cool story, bro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're using some lovely RIAA math there, sport.

      Wisconsin is paying nothing by offering tax breaks and tax credits for a company that otherwise would not even be setting up shop in Wisconsin.

      Wisconsin is paying nothing for maintenance of the roads and public utilities that the factory is using? There is no other business that could possibly set up in these facilities? Are you saying that the people of Wisconsin are too stupid to find a use for the facility on their own?

    2. Re:Cool story, bro. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're using some lovely RIAA math there, sport.

      Wisconsin is paying nothing by offering tax breaks and tax credits for a company that otherwise would not even be setting up shop in Wisconsin.

      You seem to assume that a government wouldn't be that stupid and corrupt, but you're totally wrong.

      To lure Foxconn Technology Group to Wisconsin, state residents will have to do more than just forgo taxes from the Taiwanese electronics giant. They will have to pay cash — writing checks for up to $200 million a year.

      ...

      And because Wisconsin already waives almost all taxes on manufacturing profits in the state, these incentives represent not a lost opportunity at collecting revenue but an obligation to pay cash to Foxconn out of the state treasury for up to 15 years. When including a $150 million sales tax break for buying construction material, the incentive package could total up to $3 billion, according to the bill that lawmakers could vote on as soon as Tuesday.

    3. Re:Cool story, bro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the one that is wrong. The tax credits are refundable tax credits. Which means they get the tax credits regardless of whether they incurred any tax. Since the tax on manufacturing in Wisconsin is essentially zero because of exclusions, the multiple billion dollars of tax credits will be money directly out of the state treasury.

      So maybe, sport, you should get some knowledge.

    4. Re:Cool story, bro. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, I didn't realize the drivers of the vehicles going to that factory were exempt from paying gas taxes! I didn't realize that the factory gets its water, power, sewer and trash services for free! Awesome!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    5. Re:Cool story, bro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's what I think will happen in Wisconsin: Foxconn will build a plant and hire over 10,000 workers and pay them an average of 50 grand (let's say). In return, the state will pay them over a billion USD in refundable tax credits (refundable means that it doesn't matter what their state tax liability is - they get paid *all* the money regardless).

      Then, a few years down the road, Foxconn will automate most of the plant and lay off most of the workers. Thanks for playing. Good luck to those workers in leveraging their "advanced technical training" to find another good job.

    6. Re:Cool story, bro. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Wisconsin is paying nothing by offering tax breaks and tax credits for a company that otherwise would not even be setting up shop in Wisconsin.

      If no subsidies were offered, the jobs would still go somewhere (possibly Wisconsin), so by offering tax breaks Wisconsin is depriving some state of tax revenue, and, meanwhile, another state is offering tax breaks that is depriving Wisconsin of revenue. Meanwhile, businesses are locating to optimize their tax breaks, rather than where it actually makes the most sense for reasons of skill availability, resources, and logistics.

      These tax incentives are a Prisoner's dilemma. Each state does it because the other states do it, yet they would all be better off if no one did it. It would be a beneficial and legitimate use of the Commerce Clause for the federal government to just ban this economically damaging activity. It would be better and more fair for both states and businesses.

    7. Re:Cool story, bro. by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I will out-obtuse your obtuse by saying,
       
      Wow, I didn't know that state laws could preempt federal fuel taxes!

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    8. Re:Cool story, bro. by fropenn · · Score: 1

      It would be a beneficial and legitimate use of the Commerce Clause [wikipedia.org] for the federal government to just ban this economically damaging activity. It would be better and more fair for both states and businesses.

      Which just about guarantees that it will never be used by the federal government in this way. They care nothing about "better" or "fair."

    9. Re:Cool story, bro. by The+Raven · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I had never thought of tax breaks as a prisoner's dilemma, but it's completely obvious in hindsight. I learned more from your two paragraphs than everything else I've read today. Had I upvotes, you would have them.

      --
      "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    10. Re:Cool story, bro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, taxes on businesses must be very high in the US, do tell us more...

    11. Re: Cool story, bro. by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Lick those boots!

    12. Re:Cool story, bro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, businesses are locating to optimize their tax breaks, rather than where it actually makes the most sense for reasons of skill availability, resources, and logistics.

      Actually, they're not even really doing that. They just want everybody, and especially elected officials, to think that that's true. In reality, they've already picked where they're going to locate the factory or the headquarters and it had very little or nothing to do with taxes. The tax break gambit is just a side game they play to try and squeeze more dollars out of gullible state and local politicians to ice the cake and sweeten their executive bonus packages. You see, corporate executives believe that elected officials are ignorant and stupid, although they're wise enough not to say so publicly. They don't think that either the people or their elected representatives are their equals and thus will cheat them at any opportunity.

    13. Re:Cool story, bro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'all got a problem with capitalism? May I suggest you move to live in a more 'fair' country like China. Wisconsin is getting more jobs, I see that as a good thing.

    14. Re:Cool story, bro. by Freischutz · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're using some lovely RIAA math there, sport.

      Wisconsin is paying nothing by offering tax breaks and tax credits for a company that otherwise would not even be setting up shop in Wisconsin.

      You seem to assume that a government wouldn't be that stupid and corrupt, but you're totally wrong.

      To lure Foxconn Technology Group to Wisconsin, state residents will have to do more than just forgo taxes from the Taiwanese electronics giant. They will have to pay cash — writing checks for up to $200 million a year.

      ...

      And because Wisconsin already waives almost all taxes on manufacturing profits in the state, these incentives represent not a lost opportunity at collecting revenue but an obligation to pay cash to Foxconn out of the state treasury for up to 15 years. When including a $150 million sales tax break for buying construction material, the incentive package could total up to $3 billion, according to the bill that lawmakers could vote on as soon as Tuesday.

      Don't worry Wisconsin is a Republican controlled state. As we all now Republicans are the party of low taxes, small government and restraint in state expenditure. We can therefore rely upon them to vote no to this vast expenditure of money from the state treasury on the grounds that it makes no sense from a business point of view, that it is an intolerable government interference in the workings of the free market and that it is not in harmony with their long treasured Republican ideals of small government and limiting expenditure from the state treasury. Sir, you may rely upon the Republicans to be the voice of reason in this matter.

    15. Re: Cool story, bro. by houghi · · Score: 2

      Not really a prosoners dilemma. The states are able to talk to rach other. Sure, that makes it worse.
      Several years ago in Belgium Renault closed their doors, while theu opened a new one in Spain with subsidies. That would mean that Spain was paying for people to get fired.
      So they withdrew the subsidies. That was because they where able to talk.

      It also did not help Renault that their excuse of closing was overproduction if you open a new factory elsewhere.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    16. Re:Cool story, bro. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Don't worry Wisconsin is a Republican controlled state. As we all now Republicans are the party of low taxes, small government and restraint in state expenditure. We can therefore rely upon them to vote no to this vast expenditure of money from the state treasury on the grounds that it makes no sense from a business point of view, that it is an intolerable government interference in the workings of the free market and that it is not in harmony with their long treasured Republican ideals of small government and limiting expenditure from the state treasury. Sir, you may rely upon the Republicans to be the voice of reason in this matter.

      There are different factions in the GOP. The one that believes in free trade and no subsidies has essentially lost out to a populist wing which wants to use tax and tariff policy to bring jobs back.

      Will it work? Well it did for Apple - they were forced to pay US taxes on their offshore cash which convinced them to bring it onshore and invest it.

      https://www.bloomberg.com/news...

      A mix of tighter controls on immigration, higher tariffs on imports, lower taxes on US companies and higher taxes on US companies overseas operations in low or no tax jurisdictions is being pursued. It's completely the opposite of the free market approach where you have open borders and low tariffs. Both sides aimed at having lower taxes. Trump cut corporate taxes massively and most individual taxes but not by as much as most Republicans would have wanted. That's because the plan had to be revenue neutral so it could be pushed through under reconciliation rules.

      Still there have been studies that show that reducing corporate tax rates increase growth. E.g. this one of Canadian provincial governments

      https://ntanet.org/NTJ/65/3/nt...

      We examine the impact of the Canadian provincial governments' tax rates on economic growth using panel data covering the period 1977-2006. We fi nd that a higher provincial statutory corporate income tax rate is associated with lower private investment and slower economic growth. Our empirical estimates suggest that a 1 percentage point cut in the corporate tax rate is related to a 0.1-0.2 percentage point increase in the annual growth rate.

      I.e. what Trump is doing is pretty different from standard small government Republican policy.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    17. Re:Cool story, bro. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I.e. what Trump is doing is pretty different from standard small government Republican policy.

      There is no such thing. They talk a lot about small government, but then they get themselves a lot of pork projects so that they can transfer money from profitable blue states into their flyover shitholes.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:Cool story, bro. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Y'all got a problem with capitalism? May I suggest you move to live in a more 'fair' country like China. Wisconsin is getting more jobs, I see that as a good thing.

      America's middle class is shrinking, China's middle class is growing....

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Cool story, bro. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 0

      These tax incentives are a Prisoner's dilemma. Each state does it because the other states do it, yet they would all be better off if no one did it. It would be a beneficial and legitimate use of the Commerce Clause for the federal government to just ban this economically damaging activity. It would be better and more fair for both states and businesses.

      Better for who? The EU forced Ireland to charge Apple tax even though both Ireland and Apple had done a deal where Ireland wouldn't charge it.

      The EU ruled it illegal state aid. The Irish government knew that if it was forced to tax Apple, Apple would start to look at other places to put its money.

      Then of course Trump came along and took away the advantage for US firms to leave money overseas

      https://www.bloomberg.com/news...

      If US companies don't get to save money by having cash overseas, they'll probably repatriate it and that would have happened regardless of what the EU decided. Still if the US had not have done that, it's possible that the EU forcing Ireland to have higher taxes than it wanted would have reduced tax revenue.

      At some point you need to decide if you want to have Federal rules that stop regions cutting taxes, which will probably result in companies just setting up elsewhere. Or if you want to allow regions to do what they want which will result in some high tax, low economic activity areas and some low tax, high economic activity ones.

      I.e. ironically the US is actually less Federalist than the EU when it comes to tax, and that is a good thing.

      Look at it this way, You're an individual who normally charges $X per hour. You have no job, but people are offering $Y where Y is less than X. Do you take it? I'd say so long as as Y is above zero, the answer logically should be 'Yes'. And it's hard to claim that some company building a factory and employing 10,000 people is not going to bring in any revenue. Actually in this case it's more like 'they offered me $Y but the government set a minimum wage of $X so I couldn't accept'.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    20. Re:Cool story, bro. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 0

      flyover shitholes.

      Come next election you'll be whining about 'how could people in those flyover shitholes not vote for the party I told them to. It must because they're dumb racistsexisttransphobic hicks'.

      Or complaining about how Trump called Haiti a shithole.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    21. Re:Cool story, bro. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Come next election you'll be whining about 'how could people in those flyover shitholes not vote for the party I told them to. It must because they're dumb racistsexisttransphobic hicks'.

      It's not about what I tell them. It's about their own best interests. Trump is harming them more than Clinton would have, but...

      ...Or complaining about how Trump called Haiti a shithole.

      Yeah, see, Trump is the candidate of the flyover states. And Trump has established that it's okay to call places shitholes. They have consented to being called shitholes by proxy, through their choice of president.

      Poor conservatives cut off their face to spite their face and now they're complaining that people are screaming in horror at their appearance. Fuck 'em. They've proven that they would rather shit all over America than see the "other" "team" "win".

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:Cool story, bro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come next election you'll be whining about 'how could people in those flyover shitholes not vote for the party I told them to.

      What are you bitching about? That "is how the forgotten men and women of America talk at the bar. If you're at a bar, and you're in Wisconsin, and you think they're bringing in a bunch of Haiti people, or El Salvadorians, or people from Niger, this is how some people talk."
      — Fox News Talking Dweeb

    23. Re:Cool story, bro. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Don't take this the wrong way, but I would like to knock your fucking teeth down your throat, you elitist shitbag.

      That's because you're as inbred as the British monarchy, but not as well-educated.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:Cool story, bro. by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 2

      I get scoffed at regularly when talking about the negative tax-rate multinationals, but it happens way more often than most anyone thinks. Guaranteed tax refunds mean that a lot of companies, like GE and Boeing, are actually getting paid to work in the US and it's a matter of public record.

    25. Re:Cool story, bro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like I said, you are an elitist shitbag.

    26. Re:Cool story, bro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we're too stupid to elect those who can see through the bs that these deals are.

    27. Re:Cool story, bro. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Like I said, you are an elitist shitbag.

      Do I think I'm better than people who get violent when they're confronted with their failures? Yes. Yes I do. And if you don't like it, you can shake your tiny fist in incoherent red state rage.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    28. Re:Cool story, bro. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Corporate taxes for the US were amongst the highest in the G20. At least from an objective report based on the tax returns of companies around the world. Unless the tax returns are wrong, or the CBO is wrong...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    29. Re:Cool story, bro. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Well, the GP said there was a concern that taxes would not be paid to maintain the roads - but those taxes tend to come from gas/fuel taxes collected, and that would be from the workers (factories don't move that much). Likewise public utilities - I was not aware the WI deal gave them free power, water, sewer, trash service. If the company pays for those utilities, and workers do not get fuel tax-free - then I don't see how those concerns are ignored...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    30. Re:Cool story, bro. by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

      Wisconsin is paying nothing...

      From this:

      The Village of Mount Pleasant and Racine County, where the plant is to be built, have also agreed to provide $764 million in tax incentives to help get the facility constructed, including buying the land and giving it to Foxconn for free.

      The state expects to spend about $400 million on road improvements, including adding two lanes to the nearby Interstate 94. And it's seeking $246 million more in federal money to help pay for the interstate expansion.

      In addition, the local electric utility is upgrading its lines and adding substations to provide the necessary power that will be used by the plant, at a cost of $140 million. The cost of those projects will be paid by 5 million customers in the area.

      About half the state's tax breaks depend upon how many workers Foxconn hires. While the state touts Foxconn's plans for 13,000 workers, the company has only committed to hiring 3,000 at this point.

      So it the automation shows up but the jobs don't then some of Foxconn's tax breaks disappear. On the other hand, the fixed costs to the state and fed remain.

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    31. Re:Cool story, bro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Red State Rage For The Win
      https://imgflip.com/i/247rxo

    32. Re:Cool story, bro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It must because they're dumb racistsexisttransphobic hicks"

      That is correct. You're finally figuring it the fuck out. I live in one of these shitholes. Don't tell me how these fuckers act. I'm the lone liberal amongst a hundred republitards at work. All I hear all day is their racist bullshit.

    33. Re:Cool story, bro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just more lynwood lies.

    34. Re:Cool story, bro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://slashdot.org/comments.... Just more lynwood lies.

  7. Foxconn to stop exploiting workers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, Foxconn are doing the right thing, striving to eliminate those awful working conditions.

  8. Already cut 60,000 jobs by drunken_boxer777 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They already cut the workforce from 110,000 to 50,000.

    Somehow, when it is cheaper to replace Chinese workers with robots, those manufacturing jobs will come back to the US...

    1. Re:Already cut 60,000 jobs by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Well if you remove the labor cost differences, it can start to make sense to start manufacturing closer to your end customers.

      But don't worry about those laid off workers. According to the Slashdot Buggy Whip law they will all get higher paying jobs making the robots that replace them.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    2. Re:Already cut 60,000 jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And according to other Slashdot maxims, this is all the fault of the minimum wage - if they had just let the company screw over the workers (maybe to the point of being suicidal), those jobs would still be there.

    3. Re:Already cut 60,000 jobs by IsaacGrimnebulin · · Score: 1

      Labour costs barely make a dent in the technology industry nowadays, nearly everything is heavily automated but it isn't only that, the processes used in manufacturing advanced semiconductors is not contingent on cost of materials or cost of labour anymore, some of the most expensive things we can make as humans are expensive because the tools we require to make these things are very expensive which requires an upfront investment but more importantly, electricity consumption can be absolutely absurd. For example if you were to sneak into Google and tell them you know a guy who can get you Xeon's for 20% off they would be listening. If you told them you can reduce their energy consumption by 10%, you'd be the CEO a few seconds later. After all hardware, even when expensive is a one off purchase, recurring costs are like the pebble in your shoe. I mean technically speaking I can make you a billionaire right now, go gather all the pencils in your house, trust me, I'll go get the sciencey-kit I stole from school. Gather all those pencils and we can start messing around with chemicals and heat and stuff and when we get our patented formula right we are going to zap the clay out of those pencils and then splice the graphite into atom thick layers. I mean an atom is small... realllllllly small. If we start cutting the graphite into atom thick layers your (I'm hoping) abnormally large pencilcase would give us enough graphite to cover most cities in a material thats a million times more conductive than copper, forget money, we'd be in the history books! Of course I'm just jesting but the point I am trying to make is though that with a lot of technology right now, "material costs" and "labour costs" are something that affects our margins drastically in the past and maybe present but not in the future. The Semiconductor industry started this process decades ago using silica sand to make chips and when those chips started shipping with components that are a fraction of the size of a human hair, humans were slowly eliminated from the process almost entirely. Having said that if I was an evil billionaire I'd totally hire human workers to make CPU's but I'd force them to forego the techniques that are automated/machine orientated and do it manually. I want to see how many of the several billion transistors on a CPU or GPU the worker can place before losing his sanity.

    4. Re:Already cut 60,000 jobs by IsaacGrimnebulin · · Score: 1

      Yeah I was going to post that myself, Foxconn is a subsidary of Hon Hai. Hon Hai has actually been around since the 70's but they weren't as big then. People now associate Hon Hai/Foxconn with Apple but if you did some digging you'd find that your Pixel XL, Playstation 4, Nintendo 3DS and faithful old iPod Touch might be strangely familiar with Hon Hai too. Suffice to say HH has grown enormously in that time in terms of the amounts of stuff it produces but if you track the companies history it went from making a few million dollars a year with tens of thousands of employees to a few billion dollars a year with... uhmm tens of thousands of employees. In fact Foxconn hit it's peak in terms of revenue and the amount of workers it employs a few years ago and since then it has shed hundreds of thousands of workers whilst increasing it's revenues and profts. The CEO is a bloke called Terry Gou and he's stated time and time again, whilst firing anywhere from tens to hundreds of thousands of workers systematically every financial year, that he plans to go 100% automated in his factories and I mean 100%. The way he sees it, human workers heavily affect the way a factory is designed, everything from our height, our need for bathrooms, the space we require to work have an effect. He wants to make assembly lines with small to medium sized robots stacked in very efficient ways. If you've ever been Tokyo, they have these "tall" carparks, you park your car, get a ticket and then leave, the carpark takes your car up and then "parks" it somewhere. When you return, you put your ticket into the machine and wait a few seconds whilst the car is bought back down to ground floor. They have these all over Tokyo and if you've ever seen how hard it is to find ANY parking in Tokyo, you would realise how amazing this technology is. I mean the thing is automation is not new, we used to have people write books with pen and paper till printers became a thing, in human society right from the beginning we've had jobs that are accessible and jobs that aren't accessible, when we had printers replace scribes we didn't replace the people writing interesting stories with printers, we just replaced the people copying and pasting the stuff by hand. If you want job security doing a job that can be done by anybody is not the way to go about it because that job by default is the one most at risk, it's just simple logic. If you want job security you acquire a skillset that takes some time and/or effort to get to. CEO's are not going away anytime soon(unfortunately), but the guys that are turning that knob really well? Sorry Larry, who knew this day would come, I can't imagine my knob polisher losing his job, how will we ever replace thee? Now I just need to find a guy that will invest in the combustion engine, buy all my coal, buy a bridge that may or may not be the London bridge and resurrect buddha to see how many transistors he can put on a CPU by hand.

    5. Re:Already cut 60,000 jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      these guys are making your frigging iphone; show them some love,

    6. Re:Already cut 60,000 jobs by RedK · · Score: 1

      The factory doesn't operate fully automated. So when you cut the labor force, and thus labor wages aren't a factor, why pay for transport from China to mainland USA ?

      Bring the factory back, and hire locally for jobs that can't be automated (Q&A, control, maintenance).

      It actually makes TOTAL sense.

      --
      "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
      Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
    7. Re:Already cut 60,000 jobs by drunken_boxer777 · · Score: 1

      The cost of shipping is negligible vs. the increased cost of "local" US maintenance and QA jobs compared to Chinese maintenance and QA jobs. (Using your assumption that low skilled labor wages aren't a factor because those workers were cut when the robots came in.)

      It costs $516 to ship a 20' FCL from Shanghai to Los Angeles. The internal dimensions are about 19' 4" long x 7' 8" wide x 7' 9" (approximate conversion from metric). An iPhone box is about what size? 8 x 4 x 2 inches? Thus, you can fit approximately 88,000 (110 x 20 x 40) iPhones in a shipping container. At $1000 retail each, that's $88M of revenue shipped for $516.

      Even assuming import duties of 10% ($8.8M), are you certain that manufacturing locally is cheaper?

      If we're talking on the scale of 10,000 jobs in the US, you have to stay below an $880 increase in cost per worker per container's worth of iPhones in a year to break even.

    8. Re:Already cut 60,000 jobs by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Yea but labor costs are so small in most of tech because the labor intensive jobs, particularly in manufacturing have moved to areas with cheap labor.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  9. Are progressives happy about them losing their job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Now they won't have to work in those "sweat shops," right? They'll be so much better off unemployed than having that "sweat shop" job.

  10. What WI has to look forward to by gabrieltss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    FoxCONN (as it was a CON) bringing in the big new Diplay factory to Mount Pleasent, WI promising 30,000 jobs - yeah for ROBOTS! Foxconn even bought the old Northwest mutual building in Milwaukee to make it their North American Headquarters.
    A bunch of property owners are SUING over the use of "eminent domain" to take their land for the foxconn plant. Boy is Good old Scott Walker FUCKING the people of WI with this one!

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
    1. Re:What WI has to look forward to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just what all you dumb WI shitbags deserve!

    2. Re:What WI has to look forward to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the AC eats the WI peoples shit with a smile on the AC's face.

    3. Re:What WI has to look forward to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FoxCONN (as it was a CON) bringing in the big new Diplay factory to Mount Pleasent, WI promising 30,000 jobs - yeah for ROBOTS! Foxconn even bought the old Northwest mutual building in Milwaukee to make it their North American Headquarters.
      A bunch of property owners are SUING over the use of "eminent domain" to take their land for the foxconn plant. Boy is Good old Scott Walker FUCKING the people of WI with this one!

      No kidding! We in WI are fucked by this A-Hole of a Governor. I want him and the rest of the crooks to go to prison for life.

    4. Re:What WI has to look forward to by Solandri · · Score: 1

      The use of eminent domain to take land for commercial purposes is possible because of a Supreme Court decision in 2005. Prior to that decision, eminent domain could only be used to obtain land for government use and public works projects (e.g. freeways). Note that all the conservative justices dissented against the majority decision.

      Walker didn't make the rules - the liberal wing of the SCotUS did. Walker is simply using the law as liberals intended it. That's the problem with expanding the powers of government - it by definition diminishes the people's ability to complain about the (ab)use of said power. I believe the relevant idiom here is: You made your bed, now lie in it.

  11. Good News! by dohzer · · Score: 1

    The good news is that the replacements will have higher wages and better living conditions.

  12. Re:Are progressives happy about them losing their by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They'll be so much better off unemployed than having that "sweat shop" job.

    It is unlikely anyone will be unemployed. Most of these robots are going into areas where labor costs are highest, which means the areas around Shenzhen. There are plenty of other jobs in that area. Nearly every business is looking for workers.

    The headline and summary are misleading. What they describe as "job cuts" and "slashing" are really Foxconn dealing with hiring shortfalls. The one child policy started in 1979 and became more strictly enforced in the 1980s. Workers born in the "bulge" generation before that are no longer interested in working on factory floors, and there just aren't enough young people to replace them.

    There are three solutions:
    1. Move manufacturing further inland or to other countries (such as Vietnam), where supply chains will have to be rebuilt, and new workers trained.
    2. Raise wages to draw more workers off the farms.
    3. Use robots.

    From a business perspective, #3 is the best choice.

  13. Re:Are progressives happy about them losing their by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like a late stage capitalist to paint a false dichotomy between death and sweat shop conditions. Come the revolution, perhaps you'll recant as you're lined up against the wall.

  14. Intolerable!!! by LoyalOpposition · · Score: 2

    We will reduce our total workforce to less than 50,000 people by the end of this year, from some 60,000 staff at the end of 2017.

    That's outrageous! People really need to contact them and let them know what they think about this statement. It's not less than 50,000 people. It's fewer than 50,000 people.

    ~Loyal

    --
    I aim to misbehave.
  15. Re:Are progressives happy about them losing their by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Shenzhen is in China not Taiwan you idiot, so the the Chinese government has no say over this.

  16. Meanwhile in a civilized country.... by Uberbah · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ....a German union responded to increasing automation by striking for a 28 hour work week with a pay increase....and they won.

    1. Re:Meanwhile in a civilized country.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the link: "Pay will be reduced to reflect the shorter working week."

    2. Re:Meanwhile in a civilized country.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the link: "Pay will be reduced to reflect the shorter working week."

      Start: $30*40hr=$1200/wk
      End: $50*28hr=$1400/wk

      Nothing mathematically prevents an hourly wage increase being accompanied by a decrease in hours per week from resulting in a net increase in weekly earnings.

      Even with a more moderate increase, a net improvement is possible even with reduced take home pay, since most people, if not you, value their leisure time.
      End B:$40*28hr=$1120/wk, + a day and a half extra with friends, family, hobbies...

    3. Re:Meanwhile in a civilized country.... by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      In a country where Labor what the amount of power they deserve this happens. You see, the US is *not* a free market country. Labor banding together is logical if the market is free.

    4. Re:Meanwhile in a civilized country.... by geekmux · · Score: 1

      ....a German union responded to increasing automation by striking for a 28 hour work week with a pay increase....and they won.

      Good for them. Now let's see how well their products compete.

      Seems we're rather fucking oblivious to the fact that price rules over all. Amazon didn't become the dominant market because consumers care about quality...

    5. Re:Meanwhile in a civilized country.... by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      You a capitalist fart-sniffer? Germany makes twice as many cars as the US while paying their workers twice as much....so they compete pretty damned well.

    6. Re:Meanwhile in a civilized country.... by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      No, it means workers still doing the "full" week of 35 hours will get paid more than those working 28. But the pay raise offsets much of of the difference from those working one less day per week.

    7. Re:Meanwhile in a civilized country.... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Your Euro-worshipping America-bashing is noted. Not that the point needed to be made, it gets pointed out to us on a daily basis by Europeans that America sucks and is an uncivilized shithole.

      Your link states that this is a maternity leave type thing that they can only do for 2 years, and they take a pay cut to do it. You're trying to insinuate that it's instead of the 40 hour week. Yah fake news.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:Meanwhile in a civilized country.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you got the memo. Americans haven't been allowed to be proud of anything about their country for quite some time now. You're all supposed to be ashamed and realise that every other country is superior. If you help another country, you can't be happy about it. You're all so terrible. If a company builds a great product or accomplishes something fantastic, like the Falcon Heavy launch, you're meant to be quiet about it because reasons. It's getting beyond silly IMHO. Every country has positives and negatives. You can't colour everything they do with the same brush.

    9. Re:Meanwhile in a civilized country.... by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Note that German car manufacturers have opened up many plants in the US such as Spartanburg [BMW] and Chattanooga [Volkswagen].

      28% of German-owned company vehicles sold in the US were built in the United States in the first 4 months of 2017.

      I suspect the percent will keep rising...

  17. Hope all the jobs cut... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...are in Wisconsin.

  18. Hey, I live about 2 miles from the new Foxconn by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    factory that is supposed to be built in Wisconsin. Our brilliant governor gave them 3 billion dollars in incentives to build the factory because they promised "as amny as" 13k jobs would be created. I guess they didn't specify that they'd be jobs for humans...

    1. Re:Hey, I live about 2 miles from the new Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So assuming that's spread out over 15 year, that is around $15k per employee per year.

      Seems like a very good deal for Foxconn, probably not a good deal for the Wisconsin taxpayer.

    2. Re:Hey, I live about 2 miles from the new Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of this should be surprising to anyone. We have been electing short-sighted morons to office for the last 30 years.

    3. Re:Hey, I live about 2 miles from the new Foxconn by captbollocks · · Score: 1

      Sounds like there was a kickback in there somewhere. I am not sure what the latest kickback techniques are in the US. I know a favoured kickback in China is for your child to win a scholarship to Oxford, Harvard, etc. with generous living expenses, car, etc..

    4. Re:Hey, I live about 2 miles from the new Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scott Walker has never met a corporation whose dick he didn't want to suck.

  19. The real issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know what the most important issue is here: the pay gap between male robots and female robots.

  20. Re:Are progressives happy about them losing their by nnull · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "From a business perspective, #3 is the best choice."

    It does look nice if you don't know what's involved. It's not so great when you actually try to implement robots and automation. It requires a lot of good involved key technical people and lots of patience. There are quite a lot of pitfalls, lots of headaches, things not working, lots of planning, lots of engineering involved and a lot of innovation involved. If you can't keep these people around, your robots might as well be expensive paper weights.

    I run into a lot of plant owners around me who think automation allows them to get rid of all their expensive employees, but it's actually the inverse. You end up getting rid of your cheap labor for highly paid skilled positions. To me it's a great thing, it's actually overall cheaper for me with better paid employees who care and knowing things get done without me having to worry or be stressed out. But there are a lot of managers and owners who don't see that at all and expect automation to replace their expensive maintenance people and engineers. They buy these expensive automated machines and expect Juan on minimum wage to be able to figure out how to run it, fix it, troubleshoot it, and also at the same time expect Juan to be QC. Then they cry and wonder how it turned into a disaster.

  21. American businesses chose 1 in the 90s, why 3 now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    American businesses chose cheap labor in the 90s, in spite of the availability of robots, so, why pursue robots now, instead of more cheap labor?

  22. Re:Are progressives happy about them losing their by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol You are an idiot. Shenzhen is in China. This news is happening in Taiwan. How did you even get Shenzhen when it's not mentioned anywhere?? The subtitle is 'Taiwan's Innolux upbeat on mini LED display that can be used in cars'. How in the world do you miss that? God, you are probably American too. We are so fucked if this is the level of reading comprehension in this country.

  23. Re:American businesses chose 1 in the 90s, why 3 n by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

    American businesses chose cheap labor in the 90s, in spite of the availability of robots, so, why pursue robots now, instead of more cheap labor?

    Because the 90s were 20 years ago, and robots today are way better.

  24. Re:Are progressives happy about them losing their by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... you expect us to believe that in a country with over a billion people, they can't find factory workers?

    You're joking right?

    Maybe, just maybe, they've decided that raising wages to attract more workers is more expensive than installing robots to replace the workers they can't attract?

  25. Re:Are progressives happy about them losing their by Freischutz · · Score: 1

    lol You are an idiot. Shenzhen is in China. This news is happening in Taiwan. How did you even get Shenzhen when it's not mentioned anywhere?? The subtitle is 'Taiwan's Innolux upbeat on mini LED display that can be used in cars'. How in the world do you miss that? God, you are probably American too. We are so fucked if this is the level of reading comprehension in this country.

    Foxconn is a Taiwanese company to be sure but it operates factories in mainland China. One of those factories is a flat-panel display factory in Shenzhen, China. He probably assumed that Foxconn is making these panels there which is not an unreasonable assumption. Myself, I have no idea where these panels are being made, it could be that Foxconn also has a flat-panel factory in Taiwan so this is my first and last contribution to this flame war.

  26. Re:Are progressives happy about them losing their by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll be so much better off unemployed than having that "sweat shop" job.

    It is unlikely anyone will be unemployed. Most of these robots are going into areas where labor costs are highest, which means the areas around Shenzhen. There are plenty of other jobs in that area. Nearly every business is looking for workers.

    The headline and summary are misleading. What they describe as "job cuts" and "slashing" are really Foxconn dealing with hiring shortfalls. The one child policy started in 1979 and became more strictly enforced in the 1980s. Workers born in the "bulge" generation before that are no longer interested in working on factory floors, and there just aren't enough young people to replace them.

    There are three solutions:
    1. Move manufacturing further inland or to other countries (such as Vietnam), where supply chains will have to be rebuilt, and new workers trained.
    2. Raise wages to draw more workers off the farms.
    3. Use robots.

    From a business perspective, #3 is the best choice.

    If these jobs are so horrible that workers at Foxconn factories are committing suicide the perhaps it is for the best these jobs are being automated. Having said that, this is a situation where you can't really win, automate the jobs and you are a villain, do not automate them and you are driving workers to suicide on behalf of Apple, the root of all evil in this and all other parallel universes so you are also a villain. People in the west piss and moan about automation and the condition of workers at Foxconn (and make no mistake about it the conditions are no less brutal at other non-Foxconn operated factories). Do those same people want to pay USD 1000 for that plasma flat-screen they can currently buy at Costco for USD 500 so Chinese workers can get a better living wage? The hell they do, that would be highway robbery!!

  27. Foxconn Suckered Wisconsin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Itiot Governor Scott Walker and bigger idiot Dotard gave away the farm to Foxconn, thinking they could take credit for the new factory to be built in WI. That factory had been planned for a long time, but Walker gave them a ton of tax breaks, anyway. Now, these idiots are going to learn how dumb they are when all those promised jobs end up being done by robots. Walker and Trump are fools!

  28. Re:American businesses chose 1 in the 90s, why 3 n by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    Because robots provide a much higher consistent product, can do it much faster, can work 24/7 without having to change shifts, no need to take any safety procaution, so can actually do it's work in a much smaller room (so more lines could be stacked upon each other in one room), and are less prone to 'sickness' as a human (with that I mean, they break down less than a human). So there are so many reasons why it's better to use a robot.. Also robots have become much better and much cheaper the last couple of years.

  29. Re:Are progressives happy about them losing their by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    If these jobs are so horrible that workers at Foxconn factories are committing suicide ...

    They aren't. A few Foxconn employees have offed themselves over the years, but with over a million employees, that is a statistical certainty. Foxconn employees are actually less likely to kill themselves than the average in China for people of their age and gender.

  30. Re: American businesses chose 1 in the 90s, why 3 by peragrin · · Score: 1

    Not only are they better today but also more widely dispersed, as well as increased availability.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  31. Re:Are progressives happy about them losing their by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The irony is that "come the revolution" the capitalists will flee the country and it'll be the "true believers" among the bourgeoisie that will be lined up against the wall by the poor they claim to represent.

  32. Re:Are progressives happy about them losing their by Rockoon · · Score: 2

    Foxconn employees are actually less likely to kill themselves than the average in China for people of their age and gender.

    ...as well as less likely to commit suicide than an American university student is.

    If Foxconn factories are so terrible because of the suicides, then the American universities campuses must literally be hell.

    Facts get in the way of the evil Foxconn suicide narrative.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  33. lower production cost is a good thing ALWAYS by backslashdot · · Score: 1

    Reduced production costs mean more goods are produced cheaper. More goods produced cheaper means those items can be sold for less and used to create jobs. If Henry Ford had decided not to use automation less cars would have been made and while he may have had more workers fewer people would have been able to buy the cars because they would have been more expensive. The low cost of automobiles have made product delivery cheap and accessible.

    Automation has created more jobs than it has "taken away" .. if automation only takes jobs, how do we have more employed people in the world today than 100 years ago when women didn't even work. The workforce has increased even though manufacturing uses automation.

    The more low cost products we have the more services and things around that product will be needed. If more people have smartphones more people will be needed for everything from setting up cell phone towers to making cat videos.

    For every person losing their job assembling iPhones, there will be two new jobs for people making content for smartphones.

  34. Re:Are progressives happy about them losing their by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as do the suicide nets!

  35. Re:Are progressives happy about them losing their by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    as do the suicide nets!

    The suicide nets were a PR response to pressure from the media to "do something" about a problem that didn't actually exist.

  36. Good news, right? by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    This is good news, because 10,000 people will no longer be exploited by Foxconn. Right? That is how it works, no?

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.