Slashdot Mirror


Major Websites Are Planning a 'Day of Action' To Block Repeal of Net Neutrality (medium.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Fight for the Future, a nonprofit advocacy group concerned with digital rights, has posted to medium today, revealing that many major websites, online communities, and internet users are planning a "day of action" focused on finding the final vote needed to pass the Congressional Review Act (CRA). "50 Senators have already come out in support of the CRA, which would completely overturn the FCC's December 14 decision and restore net neutrality protections," the post reads. "Several Senators have indicated that they are considering becoming the 51st vote we need to win, but they're under huge pressure from telecom lobbyists. Only a massive burst of energy from the internet will get them to move."

The day of action is scheduled for February 27, and participants include Tumblr, Etsy, Vimeo, Medium, Namecheap, Imgur, Sonos, and DuckDuckGo. "Internet users will be encouraged to sound the alarm on social media and sign up to receive alerts with their lawmaker's position on net neutrality and prompts to take action on the big day, while websites, subreddits, and online communities will display prominent alerts driving phone calls, emails, and tweets to Senators and Representatives calling on them to pass the CRA." The post notes that we're faced with an uphill battle as the fight will elevate to the House of Representatives if the CRA can pass the Senate. From there it will go to the President's desk.

16 of 88 comments (clear)

  1. Kind of a waste of effort by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the current administration has ignored everything thrown at them with regards to net neutrality. They've used obviously false & spam comments as proof that people support repeal. They've lied about cable companies expanding. They just plain don't care what anyone thinks.

    The thing is, NN is small potatoes to most people. It's gonna mean $10-$20 month out of their pockets for their cable bill, if that. 99% of Americans are never going to start an internet business to compete with established players. They don't have the capital, the skills or the time & energy. For most Americans surviving is all they can do. 40% of us don't have $1k in the bank.

    I've said it before and will say it again, if NN is important to you then you have to listen to issues that are important to the rest of Americans. You need to get them health care, jobs and education. One they've taken care of survival and other more pressing concerns then you can hit them up to support your pet freedom project.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: Kind of a waste of effort by ljw1004 · · Score: 2

      You think the repeal of NN is unimportant to most because it will add $100 - $250 to their annual bills.

      You think most people have less than $1k in the bank, I.e. the repeal of NN will be a significant chunk of money to them.

      I don't know how to reconcile those two things?

    2. Re: Kind of a waste of effort by kenh · · Score: 2

      Care to support the notion ThatcHer Neutrality, as it is being discussed here today, will shave up to $20/month off my internet bi!l? It really seems like you pulled that number out of your backside.

      Also, I'm a little confused how most people don't care about $20/month, or $240/yr, when 40% of Americans have less than $1K in savings? Please explain that seeming contradiction...

      --
      Ken
  2. Huge pressure? by realmolo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Several Senators have indicated that they are considering becoming the 51st vote we need to win, but they're under huge pressure from telecom lobbyists."

    Jesus.

    "We want to do what we know is the right thing, but we can't just say no to a pile of money for doing what we know is the wrong thing!"

    This country is so fucked up.

  3. Waste of time, Sadly by hillbluffer · · Score: 2

    Trump will veto any action to overturn Pai... and I don't think a 2/3rds majority to support such action is likely. Say goodbye to Net Neutrality until Trump is gone.

    1. Re:Waste of time, Sadly by Xenx · · Score: 2

      Fighting what is perceived as a losing battle is not a waste of time. The battle itself has meaning, regardless of outcome.

  4. Re:Net Neutrality... by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 2

    Why are the idiots multiplying in droves?

    Child Tax Credit.

  5. Those are "major web sites"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Tumblr, Etsy, Vimeo, Medium, Namecheap, Imgur, Sonos, and DuckDuckGo

    Those are not "major web sites". This is a list of major web sites. Only one of those is even on the list, and it clocks in at #47.

    I'd wager the average dude on the street hasn't heard of a single one of those sites.

    Now if you can get Google, Facebook, or Youtube to join, then maybe somebody will notice. You know, the kind of sites you can mention to a random stranger on the street and they know what you're talking about.

    1. Re:Those are "major web sites"? by supremebob · · Score: 2

      Of course... the companies in the top 40 can easily afford whatever additional fees the telcos will want from them. Hell... they might even appreciate the additional barrier of entry for new potential competitors.

  6. Major Dicks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Stop playing with yourselves. You ain't gonna do shit.

  7. I have to do this every time by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    NN is not what you think it is.

    We don't have to "think" about the definition of net neutrality. We have had a perfectly good one for over a decade:

    https://www.eff.org/issues/net...

    So maybe you should tell us what you think it is.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:I have to do this every time by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      3) Prior to NN, the internet was fine.

      No, it was not.

      https://www.freepress.net/blog...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:I have to do this every time by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 3, Informative

      You know what's missing from that exquisitely curated list?

      A closing sentence at the end of each item that says (1) the situation was not resolved prior to Net Neutrality; and (2) it WAS resolved (and by the FCC, mind you) following the institution of Net Neutrality.

      I can't imagine why they didn't fill in those details.

  8. 40% not having $1k _is_ most people by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    where it counts. If they're concentrated in swing states then it might as well be most people. And they are.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  9. Re:Blame the Obama appointee... by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

    Obama had no choice but to appoint Ajit Pai to the FCC. A Republican seat was open. The Republicans proposed Pai. Obama had to accept him.

    If you want to blame anyone, blame Trump for elevating Pai to the chair.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  10. Re: Simple : Throttle Down their Connection by kenh · · Score: 2

    Yea! Drag Ajit Pai's internet connection all the way back to those horrible early-2015 days - that'll show him!

    Problem is, the internet in the US wasn't horrible before NN rules (not laws) went into effect in 2015, and for 99.9% of Americans the passage of NN rules (not laws) had zero impact on their life/on-line Internet experience.

    --
    Ken