Slashdot Mirror


Cryptocurrency Classes Are Coming To Campus (nytimes.com)

While the price of Bitcoin has dropped since Christmas, the virtual currency boom has shown no signs of cooling off in the more august precincts of America's elite universities. The New York Times: Several top schools have added or are rushing to add classes about Bitcoin and the record-keeping technology that it introduced, known as the blockchain. Graduate-level classes this semester at Carnegie Mellon, Cornell, Duke, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the University of Maryland, among other places, illustrate the fascination with the technology across several academic fields, and the assumption that it will outlast the current speculative price bubble. "There was some gentle ribbing from my colleagues when I began giving talks on Bitcoin," said David Yermack, a business and law professor at New York University who offered one of the first for-credit courses on the topic back in 2014. "But within a few months, I was being invited to Basel to talk with central bankers, and the joking from my colleagues stopped after that." For a class this semester, Mr. Yermack originally booked a lecture hall that could fit 180 students, but he had to move the course to the largest lecture hall at N.Y.U. when enrollment kept going up. He now has 225 people signed up for the class.

11 of 81 comments (clear)

  1. Classes? by rmdingler · · Score: 3, Funny

    It seems likely on the order of tomorrow's sunrise that educating the public about the Bitcoin would certainly not lead to more folks purchasing it.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Classes? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It seems likely on the order of tomorrow's sunrise that educating the public about the Bitcoin would certainly not lead to more folks purchasing it.

      Even if they are educated, folks still will speculate in Bitcoins anyway. It's like gambling, alcohol, tobacco and opiates. People like to mess with stuff that they know is bad for them.

      I can understand why there is high interest in Blockchain among students. Even if it is riddled with scams right now, Blockchain skills are good to have when applying for your first job. That and Automation and AI.

      Bitcoin is going to run its course, and a lot of folks are going to make a lot of money from idiots during that run. Hell, even Beanie Babies made money for folks . . . for a while.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Classes? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Its spec says up to 18,000,000 (18 million units) can be added per year. This means the value of ETH can dilute itself by a factor of 18 million every 12 months.

      No. It means that by the end of the year it can dilute by a factor of 1 + ( 18e6 / X ), where X is how many there were at the start of the year.

      18 million in yr 1, add another 18M = 36M - factor of 2. Ding dong, Auld Lang Syne, add another 18M, 54M - factor of 1.333' and so on.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. Re:Demand by Nkwe · · Score: 4, Funny

    For a class this semester, Mr. Yermack originally booked a lecture hall that could fit 180 students, but he had to move the course to the largest lecture hall at N.Y.U. when enrollment kept going up. He now has 225 people signed up for the class.

    If only there were some means by which colleges could limit the number of students allowed to sign up for a particular course offering... perhaps, someday, they'll come up with one.

    Well you could obtain a network of computers and have them all race to solve a mathematical problem, those computers that win the race would be rewarded a seat in the lecture hall. To make sure that the process was transparent, every computer should have a copy of the ledger containing what seats were assigned. You would have to use strong cryptography to ensure that nobody cheated. Since people might want to trade or sell their seats, the ledger would allow transfers of seats from one holder to another. To ensure that a limited number of seats were assigned you would want to have the algorithms stop assigning seats when the limit was hit. As an incentive to continue processing the seat ledger after all the seats are assigned, the system should allow people to offer a transaction incentive to sell a seat...

  3. Re:Demand by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

    I have an idea! What if everyone had a unique number, and they kept it secret, in something we can call a wallet. Then when they want to go to a class, they can add their number to a list of other numbers signing up for that class, and it will be hashed so that everyone can verify that they were added, but because it's done with secret unique identifiers it won't really be public, but kind of anonymous! Then groups of classes - we'd call them "blocks" - could be strung together for your entire scholastic career, like a "chain". I call it "BlockClassChain". And we can fund your education with special money that is pegged to this BlockClassChain, so it would be BlockClassChainCoin!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  4. Re:Donald Trump will teach illiteracy in prison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Obama would literally wipe the floor intellectually and physically with any Republican contender. He fucking owns you bitches and you know it.

    That's why you really hate him. The black man made you look like inbred retarded yokels who turn out to be frauds, actual traitors, as you die in prison.

    Enjoy bitch. You earned it.

  5. Watch Andreas Antonopoulos by psnyder · · Score: 2

    If you really want to understand this topic, start by watching Andreas Antonopoulos, a computer scientist who specializes in Data Communications and Distributed Systems. If you care to go further, he has 2 books Mastering Bitcoin (very technical), and The Internet of Money (for the layman).

    I would recommend starting with Blockchain vs. Bitcoin in front of Consultants. You can watch his videos on x2 speed because he enunciates well.

    Don't believe anything in the Slashdot comments. On every article about Bitcoin / Crypto, so many comments are factually inaccurate, even when they sound intelligent, plausible, and are modded +5. In the words of Andreas, "(Bitcoin) isn't what it appears to be at first glance."

    Finally, Princeton has a series of free lectures here: Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies

    1. Re:Watch Andreas Antonopoulos by psnyder · · Score: 2

      4 talks from Andreas that directly address your concerns.

      Scaling
      Delivering Liberty, at Scale

      Blockchain
      Blockchain vs. Bullshit: Thoughts on the Future of Money. Too long? Watch a few minutes starting 6 or 7min in.

      51% Attack
      Andreas Antonopoulos - 51% Bitcoin Attack from 2015. Short clip from a longer talk. You may have to look more into the ASIC miner distribution, and mining rewards to understand this clip.

      Fool Bubble
      Investing in Education Instead of Speculation

      Thank you for posting the exact type of comment I was writing about. You may be completely sincere, and the concerns may be intelligently thought out, based on the information you've been given. But the premises you are starting from are factually inaccurate. Bitcoin is not what it appears to be at first glance.

    2. Re:Watch Andreas Antonopoulos by psnyder · · Score: 3, Informative

      Andreas also put his Mastering Bitcoin book on GitHub for free.

    3. Re:Watch Andreas Antonopoulos by Mr307 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most things can be explained very simply, this guy takes forever to say simple things, sounds more like a salesperson than a tech talk, I dont find him very convincing on that basis alone but whatever, to your points.

      1. Takes him 10 minutes to say increase the blocksize and another 14 minutes to say Lightning network or sidechain.
      https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Blo...
      Sidechains are divorced from the block so require other layers of trust and are therefore not blockchain.

      2. complete waste of my time, was a sales pitch more than anything.

      3. 51% attack is completely possible, in 2 cases especially.
              a. The network has fallen out of favor and everyone has moved on to the new bestest coin ever, and the only people left on the old garbage coin for slow people are just hacking it to get whatever 'value' they think they can steal and its trivial to have enough processing power.
              b. New super good coin is 'worth' a bajillion megabucks and now its trivial to spend 1 billion dollars to do an attack.

      https://blockchain.info/pools
      Only 3 of the top 4 pools need to conspire to further their own self interest, less than that is necessary for shorter term control of the network, even if they are able to disrupt the network for their own purposes with 30% of the hash rate.

      One of the biggest failures of new technology, especially when advocates are vociferously certain that its so perfect and cannot fail is a lack of imagination, this has taken down the most secure certain absolutely guaranteed 'things' time and time again. Someone will find a hole and take advantage of it over and over in ways not originally even considered.

      Maybe there is a simply a spam attack possible that delays all transactions for many hours or days.
      Maybe there is a trust attack where proof appears from multiple sources.
      When does a classic man in the middle attack become 'worth it', impersonate the work originator.
      Who knows.

      Thats if its not regulated out of use by governments in short order anyways.

      4. was a sales pitch again.

      In practice Bitcoin is a complete failure, too expensive, too slow, doesn't scale, too much risk, not convenient.
      Blockchain may be interesting but V2.0 looks useless so far. No reason it can't be looked at some more but my original descriptions stand from where I sit.

  6. Re:Demand by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    I take it that if you manage to enrol, you've automatically passed?

    A bit like underwater Klingon dance studies.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."