Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

New Horizons Probe Captures Images At Record Distance From Earth (engadget.com)

Posted by BeauHD on from the galaxy-far-far-away dept.

jwhyche writes: The New Horizons probe has captured the farthermost images of Earth. The probe took images of Earth from a distance of over 3.79 billion miles on December 5th, 2017. This beats the image Voyager 1 captured 27 years ago. The Voyager image was taken at a distance of 3.75 billion miles and has become known as the "Pale Blue Dot" photo. Engadget notes that this new record is likely to be broken again within a matter of months. "The [New Horizons spacecraft] is slated to swing by another Kuiper Belt object (2014 MU69) on January 1st, 2019 and record more imagery in the process," reports Engadget. "So long as the mission goes according to plan, New Horizons could hold on to its lead for a long time."

55 comments

  1. Looking back into the past by sheramil · · Score: 1

    That works out to a bit over five and a half light-hours... good lord *choke*! We can use this probe to see INTO EARTH'S... radio... transmission... past. A bit.

    1. Re:Looking back into the past by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

      What a vanity mission! We can see the influence of the Facebook indoctrinated generation here:

      We sent up an expensive space probe to take a selfie!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Looking back into the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, if this worked with enough clarity I bet that the CIA would love it.

      "Dammit, I wish we had a wiretap on this guy three hours ago!"

    3. Re: Looking back into the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deja View movie all over again!

    4. Re:Looking back into the past by zifn4b · · Score: 3, Funny

      We sent up an expensive space probe to take a selfie!

      Once upon a time there was a plan to build a space elevator. Next project: Space Selfie Stick

      --
      We'll make great pets
    5. Re:Looking back into the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of coarse they'd need to send the command to the probe at light speed and then the whole idea falls through.

    6. Re:Looking back into the past by meglon · · Score: 2

      On a slightly more serious note, a selfie of the entire planet at that distance probably wouldn't be a bad thing to help remind people of how pretty insignificant our species, and even our planet, is in the grand scheme of the universe. The first one seemed to help some people, although there's a lot of others it could help now if they'd only pull their heads out of their backsides.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  2. The article is crap by FeelGood314 · · Score: 1

    Beating a 3.75 Billion mile record by 0.04 Billion miles is not smashing a record. The language in the linked article doesn't get much better after that.

    1. Re:The article is crap by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      40,000,000 miles is quite far

    2. Re:The article is crap by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      40,000,000 miles is quite far

      Not really. 40M miles won't even get you to Mars.

    3. Re:The article is crap by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, this is a relatively pointless "record" with respect to the pointlessness of records. If you want to "break" it, just design a probe to break it. The record is just getting broken incidentally or because the probe is in a position during its mission to snap the photo.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    4. Re: The article is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last I checked, 35M was less than 40M.

      https://marsmobile.jpl.nasa.gov/allaboutmars/nightsky/mars-close-approach/

      http://www.hoax-slayer.com/mars-earth-close.html

      Another post by ShanghaiBill that authoritatively broadcasts his ignorance.

    5. Re: The article is crap by Ranbot · · Score: 2

      Your links don't really prove anything, but this one does: https://www.space.com/16875-ho...

      To your point the theoretical shortest distance to Mars in ~33M miles, but the planets' orbits rarely ever get that close to each other. The average distance between Earth and Mars orbits is ~140M miles, and launches use the most fuel efficient path, which [counter-intuitively] is not the shortest path. So ShanhaiBill is correct that 40M miles doesn't get you to Mars.

    6. Re: The article is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another post by ShanghaiBill that authoritatively broadcasts his ignorance.

      Meanwhile, you broadcast your ignorance on what it takes to get to Mars. Protip, the parabolic arc that a rocket takes over the course of 6 months is longer than the straight line that you are citing.

      Now it's entirely possibly that that parabolic arc is still less than 40M miles. But neither of your links seem to say anything about that.

    7. Re:The article is crap by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

      When was the last time you travelled 40 million miles? Never? I thought so.

    8. Re: The article is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Protip: the best path to Mars is not a parabola, it is an ellipse via a Hoffman transfer orbit or similar (depending on mission opitisation parameters).

      To get onto a parabolic arc you would need to achieve escape velocity for the solar system. This wastes significant energy (actually impulse) at both ends of the journey.

    9. Re:The article is crap by Baton+Rogue · · Score: 1

      I traveled 584 million miles last year. So did you!

    10. Re:The article is crap by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      You forgot a few things.
      Depending where you are on the surface of Earth, you travel up to 40,075km every day.
      There's also the orbit our solar system takes around our galaxy and the movement of our galaxy in the universe.

      You also forgot this is a record from Earth, so none of that matters.

    11. Re:The article is crap by BoogieChile · · Score: 1

      Well, I racked up 11,972,000,000 miles last year, so I don't know what planet you've been living on, but it's clearly an awful long way from here by now.

    12. Re:The article is crap by BoogieChile · · Score: 1

      About half an hour ago, actually.

  3. a better link please? by swell · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Engadget page linked has 9 trackers and 21 scripts according to my sources. Slashdot often sends us to Engadget. Ever wonder why? The NASA page has the same information without the crap and far fewer trackers and scripts. But maybe NASA doesn't kick back anything to Slashdot. I don't know but I'm really getting tired of these crappy links to second class news sources. Try this site: https://www.nasa.gov/feature/n...

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:a better link please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Neither the Engadget site nor the NASA site load at all without Javascript enabled. Is there any version of this news available in standards-compliant HTML?

    2. Re:a better link please? by tquasar · · Score: 1

      I try to practice safe web behavior. I clicked an unknown link and got the BSOD from a site in Argentina. Doh! It took some time to fix my laptop.

    3. Re:a better link please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither the Engadget site nor the NASA site load at all without Javascript enabled. Is there any version of this news available in standards-compliant HTML?

      I agree with your sentiments. However, the script element/tag is HTML 4.0 (and later) compliant. Can't speak for the rest of the HTML on their site.

  4. Correction by meglon · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not the farthest picture of earth, its the farthest picture from earth. The twin images the link goes to is actually a couple of KBO's (2012 HZ84 and 2012 HE85). The first image it took was of the Wishing Well open star cluster.

    The pale blue dot is still the farthest away picture of earth itself.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    1. Re:Correction by StatureOfLiberty · · Score: 5, Informative

      This article is the most poorly worded article I have read in a long time. It was not at all clear what they meant. However, the NASA link is quite clear.

      https://www.nasa.gov/feature/new-horizons-captures-record-breaking-images-in-the-kuiper-belt

      It is not the farthest picture from earth. It was not taken from earth, or even near earth. It is not the picture itself they are talking about. It is the space probe that took it. New Horizons was the furthest from Earth of any space probe that has taken a picture (any picture).

      Voyager 1 was 3.75 billion miles away from Earth when it took a picture. It just so happens it was a picture of Earth.
      New Horizons was 3.79 billion miles away from Earth when it took a picture. (That is the record they are talking about).

    2. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and I love how +0.04B is "smashed". What word would they use for +10B?

    3. Re:Correction by meglon · · Score: 1

      Right. Your wording is better than mine.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  5. Shouldn't it have been a line segment, not a disc? by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

    After all -- isn't the earth flat?

  6. Re:Shouldn't it have been a line segment, not a di by Calydor · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're seeing it from above because the turtle is shy.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  7. every.fucking.thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Fuck this. I am sick to fucking death of hearing about you Americans talking about Don and Hillary.

    You fucking voted for him, stop fucking whining about it. And if you didn;t vote, well you fucking should have.

    You should have voted for Bernie or Stein, or someone who cared, but you didn't and there you have it. You fucked yourselves in your own assholes and are complaining about the butthurt.

    1. Re:every.fucking.thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. I did vote for Bernie and I would again. My proposal to fling Trump into deep space to freeze for eons is not a "complaint" it's a solution to the problem. Probably quite cost effective, given his policy suggestions of late.

      What fucked us in the ass was the Citizens United ruling pushed through by John Roberts. Equating corporate donations to free individual speech was the original treason. Someday we'll think up a solution to that too.

      However sick you are of this, you're a fucking TOURIST by comparison. I don't care how "fuck this" sick you think you are. Blow it out your Bastille Day parade.

    2. Re:every.fucking.thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm really sick of every single story here being spammed re: Trump. Get over it and vent your issues in proper forums.

    3. Re:every.fucking.thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I voted against Trump and Hillary. I fully retain my rights to whine like a little b*tch about Trump whenever and wherever I want. If Hillary had won I'm sure I'd be doing the same about something she did.

    4. Re:every.fucking.thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or what, you'll suck my cock? I'm sick of him being President and an obvious retarded criminal. Tough shit, until Mueller locks the bitch up YOU HAVE TO DEAL WITH IT TOO.

  8. Farthermost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's probably the most ridiculous word I have encountered so far.

  9. Yo momma's so fat... by johannesg · · Score: 1

    When New Horizons spotted her from the Kuiper Belt, astronomers assigned her object code "2018 YMFA"!

  10. Let's enhance it! by Kiuas · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's some pretty impressive zoom, but can we enhance it?

    --
    "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
    1. Re:Let's enhance it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, that was pretty good.

    2. Re:Let's enhance it! by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
      ...

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    3. Re:Let's enhance it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      crap. clicked the wrong moderation level. sorry about that.

  11. miles? by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

    me and 6.7 billions people does not understand miles.
    You mean 40.8 AU ?

    --
    "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    1. Re: miles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you do.
      It's news from a U.S. agency, for a primarily U.S. audience, on a U.S. centric website, to a primarily U.S. audience, using units used primarily by the audience in the U.S.

      Why would they use anything different?
      The rest of the world wouldn't pander to the lowest denominator.
      Why would this be any different?

    2. Re:miles? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      You mean 40.8 AU ?

      You aussies need to impose your units everywhere.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    3. Re:miles? by meglon · · Score: 1

      Wait, i'll do the conversion for you... lets see, if i start with hectares in a furlong, per stone of the average European swallow.... or was that an African swallow....

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    4. Re: miles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone in U.S.A., Liberia and Burma knows what a mile is.

      Every other country is metric, and doesn’t know what the fuck you’re talking about.

    5. Re: miles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone in U.S.A., Liberia and Burma knows what a mile is.

      Every other country is metric, and doesn’t know what the fuck you’re talking about.

      So they're too stupid/lazy to spend a few seconds with Google/Startpage/etc and learn that one mile is about 1.61 km? Good. Stupidity and laziness should be painful. They should feel the pain of missing out on something everyone else easily understood. That is the only way to reduce stupidity.

      You've heard the complaints that megacorps want to privitize their profits and socialize their losses? Well, this is what stupid/lazy people do. They enjoy the benefits of having someone else point out basic things for them. Yet they don't do any of their own legwork or learning. It's the same concept. Both deserve to perish. You are not being nice or helpful by accommodating stupidity. You are being part of the problem.

  12. Farthest FROM Earth, not OF Earth by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

    The New Horizons probe has captured the farthermost images of Earth. The probe took images of Earth

    No it didn't. The images are not of Earth.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  13. Point the probe camera back towards earth! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    I want to take a selfie!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  14. judi online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [url=http://7asiabet.com/]7Asiabet[/url]
    [url=http://7asiabet.com/]Agen Bola[/url]
    [url=http://7asiabet.com/]Judi Bola[/url]
    [url=http://7asiabet.com/]Judi Online[/url]
    [url=http://7asiabet.com/]sbobet[/url]
    [url=http://7asiabet.com/]7asiabet[/url]
    [url=http://7asiabet.com/]7asiabet.com[/url]
    [url=http://7asiabet.com/]asiabet7[/url]
    [url=http://goal4d.com/]Togel Online[/url]
    [url=http://goal4d.com/]Togel Singapura[/url]
    [url=http://goal4d.com/]Togel Hongkong[/url]
    [url=http://goal4d.com/]Judi Online[/url]
    [url=http://goal4d.com/]Agen Bola[/url]
    [url=http://goal4d.com/]Sbobet[/url]
    [url=http://goal4d.com/]Judi Bola[/url]
    [url=http://goal4d.com/]Goal4d[/url]
    [url=http://goal4d.com/]Goal4d.com[/url]
    [url=http://flashbet338.com/]Judi Bola[/url]
    [url=http://flashbet338.com/]Casino Online[/url]
    [url=http://flashbet338.com/]Judi Online[/url]
    [url=http://flashbet338.com/]Agen Bola[/url]
    [url=http://flashbet338.com/]Agen Sbobet[/url]
    [url=http://flashbet338.com/]flashbet338.com[/url]
    [url=http://flashbet338.com/]Maxbet338[/url]
    [url=http://flashbet338.com/]Maxbet[/url]
    [url=http://flashbet338.com/]Ibcbet[/url]
    [url=http://flashbet338.com/]Maxbet338.com[/url]
    [url=http://model18plus.com/]Cerita Dewasa[/url]
    [url=http://model18plus.com/]Cerita Sex[/url]
    [url=http://model18plus.com/]Cerita Hot[/url]
    [url=http://model18plus.com/]Cerita Porno[/url]
    [url=http://model18plus.com/]Film Semi[/url]
    [url=http://model18plus.com/]Video Hot[/url]
    [url=http://model18plus.com/]Video Mesum[/url]
    [url=http://model18plus.com/]Majalah 18+[/url]
    [url=http://model18plus.com/]Video Porno[/url]
    [url=http://dutaprediksi.com/]Prediksi togel[/url]
    [url=http://dutaprediksi.com/]prediksi hongkong[/url]
    [url=http://dutaprediksi.com/]prediksi singapura[/url]
    [url=http://dutaprediksi.com/]berita bola[/url]
    [url=http://dutaprediksi.com/]prediksi parlay[/url]
    [url=http://dutaprediksi.com/]prediksi bola[/url]
    [url=http://dutaprediksi.com/]prediksi hk[/url]
    [url=http://dutaprediksi.com/]prediksi sgp[/url]