Slashdot Mirror


Even Apple and Google Engineers Can't Really Afford To Live Near Their Offices (fastcompany.com)

That's according to the Y Combinator-backed real-estate startup Open Listings, which looked at median home sales prices near the headquarters (meaning within a 20-minute commute) of some of the Bay Area's biggest and best-known tech companies. Fast Company: Using public salary data from Paysa, Open Listings then looked at how many software engineers from those companies could actually afford to buy a house close to their office. Here's what it found: Engineers at five major SF-based tech companies would need to spend over the 28% threshold of their income to afford a monthly mortgage near their offices. Apple engineers would have to pay an average of 33% of their monthly income for a mortgage near work. That's the highest percentage of the companies analyzed, and home prices in Cupertino continue to skyrocket. Google wasn't much better at 32%, and living near the Facebook office would cost an engineer 29% of their monthly paycheck.

17 of 370 comments (clear)

  1. Huh? by JohnnyBGod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So they can't survive with two thirds of a presumably good paycheck? What's the title on about?

    1. Re:Huh? by bv728 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Note that's 28% before taxes. Between State, Local, and Federal, figure they get $150k a year pretax, $100k a year post-tax, but spend $50k a year on their mortgage. That's $50k a year for ALL other expenses, and that number excludes homeowner's insurance, car payments, car insurance, health insurance, property taxes, electricity, water... oh, and food. That's why 28% is so important - you wind up with 30% on Taxes, 30% on Mortgage, 10% on a Car and Related Expenses, 10% on Home Related Expenses... and you just ate 80% of the yearly income.

      Cali's actual total tax rate is a little higher than that, but you get the point I think - 28% isn't an arbitratry number, it's more like a 'this is a good margin of error' factor.

    2. Re:Huh? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      real estate is an investment

      You just put a giant target on your head. Every scammer in the world now knows you're an easy mark.

      Real estate isn't an investment unless you're a high-dollar real estate investor. If you're living in it, it's an expense, and a liability. It takes time to pay that loan off, during which you lose money to interest. You have maintenance, which costs money. You pay taxes and insurances. By the time you sell that house you've lived in, you've lost more or less about the cost of renting.

      I always assume a house is a total loss. My realtor acquaintances assume a house can be negotiated under-value, rehabbed into something worth more than the cost of rehab, and turned over quickly for a profit. We're doing different things with these houses.

    3. Re:Huh? by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Depending on the mortgage rate, you may not want to ever pay it off. If you're paying 3.9% in interest, but making 8% in the market, then you should make the smallest mortgage payment you can and invest the rest.

    4. Re:Huh? by plopez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A house is *not* an investment. It is affordable long term rent control. As time goes on the payments become a smaller percentage of income (you hope). If you are constantly playing monopoly, taking 2nd mortgages and HELOCS you *will* get screwed when the next bubble bursts.

      Anyone who tries to tell you a house is an investment is nothing more than a carnival barker trying to sucker in another mark.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  2. Taxes! by Zorro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They forgot to deduct all the California and local taxes before you ever see that amount.

    California has the highest US taxes on everything.

    1. Re:Taxes! by sycodon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They'll all really be sucking wind in April 2019 when they can't deduct the outrageous CA property and income taxes

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    2. Re:Taxes! by bsolar · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Red States and they residents are BIG BELIEVERS in those with money not providing subsidies to those without money. To walk the walk they should refuse the subsidies. It's much easier to just talk the talk...

  3. Re:Why do companies insist on expensive cities? by imgod2u · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Those cities are expensive because the tech companies are there. Mountain View, Cupertino and Sunnyvale were orchards and farms with dirt-cheap housing before the rise of Google, Apple, Facebook, Intel, etc.

    Anywhere the tech moves; high prices will follow. Just look at Portland and Seattle.

  4. Re:Yo! Taxes, fool! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In a place like California, between paying local, state and federal income taxes, plus social security and medicare taxes, the government is probably letting you have only HALF of your paycheck. Perhaps 60% of you're lucky. So of the 50-60% you're allowed to keep, spending 28-30% of it on a place to live is going to give you maybe 20-30% for ALL other expenses. I certainly wouldn't want to live that way.

    In a place like England too. I am certainly happy to live this way and I even advocte for people of my income level paying more tax.

    Civilisation is paid for with taxes.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  5. Re:Smallest Violin by bobbied · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But they want that CA lifestyle I guess.

    What is this CA lifestyle thing? Got to love living in poverty making $100+K/year. But hey, the sunset ocean view from the refrigerator box is stunning every evening it's not raining and the neighborhood isn't on fire...

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  6. Re:Yo! Taxes, fool! by eth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In a place like England too. I am certainly happy to live this way and I even advocte for people of my income level paying more tax.

    Civilisation is paid for with taxes.

    You have a somewhat sane healthcare system, so you don't have to spend yet another 10-20% on healthcare for your family.

  7. Re:Yo! Taxes, fool! by judoguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Civilisation is paid for with taxes.

    That's possibly the dumbest thing I've ever heard. No, government is paid for with taxes. To confuse government with civilization is sad. really sad.

    Civilization happens in spite of government, not because of it.

    Good government is the result of civilization, not the cause.

    --
    Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
  8. Re:Yo! Taxes, fool! by Dragonslicer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Civilization happens in spite of government

    Not to any significant extent. Otherwise I would just kill you and take all your stuff.

    It's a positive feedback loop. A small amount of civilization comes together, and it starts to grow. At a certain size, a small amount of government is needed to organize the civilization. The small government allows the civilization to grow a bit more, which requires a bit more organization and thus a slightly larger government. The feedback loop continues for as long as the value of being organized is greater than the cost of the government.

  9. Re:Real estate prices. by judoguy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What in the world are you talking about? The price of a house is utterly dependent on what someone's willing to pay.

    The governments valuation has nothing at all to do with house value on the market. That's just government greed.

    The price of real estate is determined by what someone is willing to pay for it. Period.

    --
    Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
  10. Re:Yo! Taxes, fool! by cje · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are a lot of places on Earth that have no functioning government (and therefore have no taxes). One would think that the the "taxation is theft" crowd would be flocking to these places en masse, but for some reason they are not. Interesting, that.

    --
    We're going down, in a spiral to the ground
  11. Re:Yo! Taxes, fool! by another_twilight · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Taxation is systemic theft

    FFS, this is even worse than the copyright=theft meme. Taxation is a levy. It's a portion of personal (household/business) wealth paid to a governing body to fund public works. It's no more 'theft' than membership fees that cover costs of an organisation.

    an institutional framework of extracting wealth from people

    That's better, even with your use of scare-word 'extracting'

    through the threat of violence

    ... and then you're back to ranting

    a perfect example of terrorism

    Hot tip; in english, words have meanings and 'terrorism' doesn't mean 'bad thing I don't like'.

    A society that admits the practice is, by definition, uncivilised.

    Only if we use the ... irregular definitions that you've used.

    I presume you favour a low-to-zero tax system. You'll happily ignore the enormous benefits that come from living in a country and civilisation that's been built from the wealth that so many other citizens, past and present, have pooled and concentrate on the limitations that expecting you to make a similar contribution places on you, and/or the inefficiencies (and even corruption) of those we've arranged to spend this wealth.

    While I'm sure that you're quite capable of re-inventing civilisation on your own with nothing more than a small set of nail clippers, most of the rest of humanity have consistently, across history and culture, seen the benefit of pooling resources and co-operating. So would you mind very much setting aside the keyboard that taxes have helped build and stop posting on the internet that exists only because of taxation and find some lonely place to beat your manly chest and declare loudly about how much of a rugged individualist you are? Or is Poe's Law biting me in the ass?