Slashdot Mirror


Sri Lanka Blocks Facebook, Instagram To Prevent Spread of Hate Speech (lankabusinessonline.com)

Sri Lanka has blocked social media websites Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp to avoid the spread of hate speech in the country, local media reported on Wednesday. From the report: Even though there is no official confirmation from the authorities, the Cabinet Spokesman Minister Rajitha Senaratne on Wednesday said the government has decided to block access to certain social media. Telecom Regulatory Commission (TRC) has started to monitor all social media platforms to curb hate speech related to communal riots escalated in Kandy district. Telecommunication service providers (ISPs) have also restricted internet access in Kandy district on the instructions of the TRC.

6 of 123 comments (clear)

  1. Time to block them all by mveloso · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's funny, the social networks have gotten to the point where they can disrupt a society more than they can help it. Time to shut them all down and start again.

    1. Re:Time to block them all by evanh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. No rules (global reach) + commercial = "wild-west"

  2. Re:WhatsApp? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People (protesters, rioters, whatever) often mobilize and coordinate using Whatsapp groups. A lot easier than email or SMS.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  3. Re: They say Christians are haters ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whitehouse.gov

  4. Censorship is evil, period by bradley13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When talking about elections, Stalin reputedly said: "It's not who votes that counts; it's who counts the votes". Whenever one of these "hate speech" articles come up, I think of something similar: It's not the hate speech that matters; it's who gets to define what hate speech is.

    I live in Europe, where the equivalent to the American 1st Amendment is ridiculously watered down. The European equivalent says: "Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. ... The exercise of these freedoms ... may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for..." and the list of exceptions continues...

    Which means: Just like in Sri Lanka, European governments can restrict your speech based on the ruling elite's ideas of necessity, safety and morals. Which basically means that they can restrict any damned thing they please.

    Censorship is evil. Speech may be uncomfortable, it may be offensive, but there are very, very few situations where it should be restricted.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  5. Re:The benefits of diversity! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Care to elaborate why it should be banned?

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;