Slashdot Mirror


Windows 10 Is Finally Adding Tabs To File Explorer (bleepingcomputer.com)

Microsoft has released insider preview build 17618 that includes tabs in File Explorer as part of its Sets feature. Bleeping Computer reports: Windows 10 Sets is an upcoming feature where you can group documents and apps into one tabbed window that are related to the particular task at hand. This feature was released for testing to a small controlled group of insiders in Insider Preview Build 17063 and was subsequently removed after the test. With build 17618, Sets are back and with it come tabs in File Explorer. You can now open different folders in the same File Explorer window with each one having their own tabs. This way one File Explorer window can have a tab for the pictures folder, a tab for the documents folder, and a tab for your documents, which you can easily switch between. If you look closely, though, the Sets feature does more than just allow you to have different tabs for different folders, but also allows you to add applications as a tab in File Explorer. According to Microsoft, in addition to File Explorer, Notepad, Command Prompt, and Powershell are also getting tabbed support.

161 comments

  1. But who will pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not me! I always run out before that ever happens!

  2. Nomad.NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nomad.NET is a way better file manager.

    Also, it doesn't spy on you, steal your bandwidth or serve you ads like Microsoft's garbage does.

    http://www.nomad-net.info/

    1. Re:Nomad.NET by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Have you tried Total Commander Ultima Prime?
      I can't live without it.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    2. Re:Nomad.NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have gone through nearly every single file manager for Windows looking for the best one. Nomad.NET is better than all of them.

    3. Re:Nomad.NET by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Have you tried Total Commander Ultima Prime? I can't live without it.

      Do you have the Incredible Magnificent Platinum Dictator version?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    4. Re:Nomad.NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Total Commander is commercial software. How do the guys distributing that Ultima Prime version get away with it?

    5. Re:Nomad.NET by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I found an app on Google Play called Smart Ruler Pro. It was just one of those simple on-screen ruler apps... What was smart about it, and what the pro version had over the normal version was not very clear.

      I haven't looked but I bet there is an AI powered ruler app or three by now.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Nomad.NET by war4peace · · Score: 1

      They bundle the demo version in. Getting a license is your problem.
      I happen to have a license and the added bells and whistles of Ultima Prime are awesome.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    7. Re:Nomad.NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it handle Long File Paths like File Explorer does not ( for decades now >:-( ).

    8. Re:Nomad.NET by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I found an app on Google Play called Smart Ruler Pro. It was just one of those simple on-screen ruler apps... What was smart about it, and what the pro version had over the normal version was not very clear.

      I haven't looked but I bet there is an AI powered ruler app or three by now.

      I think that is the Hypnotoad app. All hail Hypnotoad!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    9. Re:Nomad.NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That still doesn't answer the question. Do they have a license to be able to distribute Total Commander? How about to distribute Total Commander with their modifications/add-ons?

      In any case, I'll take a pass on Total Commander. One can get superior file managers for free.

    10. Re:Nomad.NET by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Question is: do they NEED a license to distribute shareware products? I never thought they would.

      As for which file manager is better, to each their own. Some people are perfectly happy with Windows Explorer, for example.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  3. Just a reminder: by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 0, Troll

    Microsoft doesn't innovate, they copy.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Just a reminder: by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      Who exactly is Microsoft copying here?

    2. Re:Just a reminder: by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ALL innovation is copying.

      Most involves making a new combination of previously existing constructions or works.

      Even the iPhone copied features from previous phones and PDAs, it just refined them and made them cool.

    3. Re:Just a reminder: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The majority of file browsers on all platforms, including mobile and command line applications. Also, web browsers, which are at least theoretically the same thing. This was a phenomenally stupid question, so please leave your geek card at the door on your way out.

    4. Re:Just a reminder: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If all you are doing is copying, it is not innovation.

      Innovation requires something new and novel to be added to something that exists.

      MS is nothing more than a malfunctioning copy machine.

      numbnuts

    5. Re:Just a reminder: by paulpach · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Also, web browsers, which are at least theoretically the same thing.

      This is not the same thing at all.

      If you look at their video here:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      You can see that they can have completely different applications in the tabs. In one tab you can have a word processor, in another a command prompt and in another a web browser, all in the same window.

      Sure, it is obviously inspired by browsers, but this improves upon that by having more than just browsers together.

      Neither my mac or my linux box can do that. There is innovation here.

    6. Re:Just a reminder: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you have not seen KDE the last 15 years.....

    7. Re:Just a reminder: by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

      Microsoft doesn't innovate, they copy.

      Tabbed interfaces are just another version of MDI (Multiple Document Interface) windows. Microsoft's file manager from Window 3.1 days used MDI, so I guess they are just copying themselves.

    8. Re: Just a reminder: by Monster_user · · Score: 1

      That literally looks like they just pulled up Edge qnd opened several tabs, mostly for the web version of Office 365.

    9. Re: Just a reminder: by Monster_user · · Score: 1

      Excel remains an MDI application, but inside each document it also has tabs. Tabs and windows in a single window. Now Excel will run an MDI in a tab, so you can have windows and tabs in your windows and tabs?

    10. Re: Just a reminder: by Unkl_Shvelven · · Score: 3, Informative

      You could group multiple applications in a single, tabbed window in KDE4.

      --
      regular man whom love computer (Also, fuck beta).
    11. Re:Just a reminder: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have expected tabs to have been included some 20 years ago or so.

      Microsoft's Windows is imo decidedly a half assed piece of software.

      And why aren't the holidays marked on my calender in Windows for my country? Is that my fault?

    12. Re:Just a reminder: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither my mac or my linux box can do that. There is innovation here.

      I'm not sure how accurate this chart is, but several X Window Managers support tabbed windows. As another poster mentioned KDE4, but one of the major difference of Fluxbox vs OpenBox is FluxBox supports tabbed windows. And it was forked back in 2001.

      Honestly, though, there's a reason why applications are where 99% of tab grouping is done. Trying to find your Word document in one of twenty windows is pretty insane. The only work around is some means of cycling through all open windows...and then you have to worry about having 30+ documents, browser tabs, command prompts, etc. That's just a mess. Reduced logic grouping based on the application is the cornerstone of Windows (and MacOS before it). So, this is really a horrible idea except in limited use case for specific users.

    13. Re:Just a reminder: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fluxbox could already do that back when Windows XP was still new. Too late to call it "innovation" now.

    14. Re:Just a reminder: by The123king · · Score: 1

      Haiku has had Stack and Tile for nearly a decade now.

      --
      If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
    15. Re:Just a reminder: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither my mac or my linux box can do that

      Just off the top of my head...

      Fluxbox window manager has had that functionality for well over a decade. Option on which side of the window to place the tabs
      Compiz window manager has the option
      BeOS/Haiku has it

      Surprised more X windows managers don't have it.

    16. Re: Just a reminder: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo, dawg.

    17. Re:Just a reminder: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, I know that BeOS would at time shuffle around its tabs if you layered windows on top of each other, but I don't know when/if it actually merged the windows. If it did, then the idea could be as old as somewhere in the mid-90s. Or FVWM could have done it first, as FVWM includes a lot of such features--it's honestly one of the most full-feature lightweight WMs available*. Regardless, it's not remotely a new idea.

      * I only used it long enough to realize how amazing it was and ended up using one of the *box WMs for my purposes (a WM inside of XVnc) as all the extra features I didn't really need. Meanwhile, my experience with BeOS only seriously lasted until Tracker froze, at which point I decidedly felt that an OS where the taskbar would readily crash was not the OS for me. Then again, now days Windows 10 Explorer crashes way too often for me. *sigh*

    18. Re: Just a reminder: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not as of Excel 2013.

    19. Re: Just a reminder: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And i3wm could do that for years with any set of programs.

    20. Re:Just a reminder: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the fuck wouldn't you just use your taskbar to manage applications?

    21. Re:Just a reminder: by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      So we're saying they've gone back to Windows 3.1 only now with Tabs?

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    22. Re: Just a reminder: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2013 called...

    23. Re:Just a reminder: by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      The WordVision DOS word processor for the IBM PC in 1982 was perhaps the first commercially available product with a tabbed interface.

      It's funny how you think a 36 year old interface element being implemented by Microsoft is bad despite the fact that every piece of software you named was also copying it from earlier software.

    24. Re: Just a reminder: by paulpach · · Score: 1

      You could group multiple applications in a single, tabbed window in KDE4.

      I did not know KDE4 could do that. That is very cool.

      That said, if you look at how KDE4 did it:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      and how Microsoft is doing it in windows 10:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      It is plain to see the KDE folks are being schooled in terms of usability.

    25. Re: Just a reminder: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct, it only took a decade for MS to make something more usable than KDE 4.

    26. Re:Just a reminder: by dddux · · Score: 1

      I'm perfectly fine with having just one window open and the contents of it in it. It also makes far more sense. I've always thought of tabs as a stupid gimmick. They do make sense in a browser, though.

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
    27. Re:Just a reminder: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  4. How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by SensitiveMale · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Every other file manager has it.

    1. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by nashv · · Score: 1

      And now we won't have to install one more program just to have it. I don't know what you're thinking, but this is good news for users.

      --
      Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    2. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by sexconker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Every other file manager has it.

      Nah, that would just further expose the fact that Windows Explorer is fundamentally broken and isn't even aware enough to handle the various links in NTFS properly.

      For example, in Windows Vista and 7, you've got the dreaded WinSxS folder, which stands for "Windows Side by Side". This folder basically stores copies of every version of every library/etc. that's been installed on your system. It grows in size forever. Don't worry, though - MS says it's just REPORTING that large size, but not actually USING it, because while there are many duplicate copies of files in there, they're only hard links.

      Of course, since Explorer and the rest of the OS (including dir) are unaware of the hard links, everything reports the hard links as being copies and the effect is your hard drive runs out of usable space even though it's not actually filling up.

    3. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And now we won't have to install one more program just to have it. I don't know what you're thinking, but this is good news for users.

      Remember though, each Windows update also destroys functionality from at least one program as well, so its a wash.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    4. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2

      It really isn't that simple. You would have to spider the directory structure below the folder to get the total size. And being NTFS, you aren't dealing with just flat files. There is metadata and streams out the ears. So, let's say you do that. You could maybe cache the filesize and even with all of the fancy events and file system objects to let you know when something was MAYBE changed, you have no guarantee that it hasn't been touched outside of the currently running system at any point.

      If you enable the indexing service, then it will do just that. And it is as inconsistent as one would expect

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    5. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well the problem with folder sizes is that to take the size of the folder you have to take the sizes of all the files in the folder. The more files there are, the more work this takes, and then you're doing a lot of disk I/O just to list a folder listing for folder sizes which you might not even want. It make sense for them to be hidden in the properties dialog where you have to intentionally open it to see the folder size.

      One obvious solution is to cache the sizes and update them whenever a file changes, so they are always ready the go. This is great except it just takes one time for an OS which does not support folder sizes (eg pre-Windows 10, or older versions of Windows 10) accessing the drive directly and your caches are not only wrong, but won't fix themselves since noticing the cache is wrong would require Windows to count all the files, which we don't want it to do. At that point you can't trust the folder sizes anyway so they're useless!

      Folder sizes would be great but it seems like something that would need to be introduced as a core part of a new filesystem to ensure any OS that uses it doesn't screw up the folder sizes.

    6. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also have to take information disclosure issues into account. If you don't have permission to read subfolders/files, adding them into the file size is a security risk. Which is even more disk I/O. And since a disk can be shared, multiple people will get different views of folders as fun units multiply.

    7. Re: How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by Monster_user · · Score: 1

      Beware of Shadow Copies skewing the results. Also, I'm not entitely sure that WinSxS folder works quite how it was originally intended. I've seen some interesting consequences,...

    8. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Windows XP file explorer did it on systems with a 32bit single core processor and spinning disk HDDs, but it's just too much work for Windows 10 on a quad core with an SSD. Sure sure.

    9. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.c...

      Why doesn't Explorer show recursive directory size as an optional column?

      "Why start up another program to see folder sizes, when they should just be right there, in Explorer, all the time?"

      The same reason \\ does not autocomplete to all the computers on the network: Because it would destroy corporate networks.

      Showing folder sizes "all the time" means that when you open, say, the root of a large server, Explorer would start running around recursively enumerating every single directory on the server in order to compute the folder sizes. One person doing this to a server is bad enough. Imagine if hundreds of people did it simultaneously: The server would be hammered continously.

      Even worse: imagine doing this across a limited-bandwidth link like a VPN or an overseas link. The link would be saturated with file enumerations and wouldn't have any bandwidth remaining for "real work". Even the change-notifications that Explorer registers are cause for much hair-pulling on corporate networks. (And these are change-notifications, which are passive.)

      Even on a home computer, computing folder sizes automatically is is still not a good idea. How would you like it if opening a folder caused Explorer to start churning your disk computing all the folder sizes recursively? (Then again, maybe you don't mind, in which case, go nuts.)

      (Of course, the question sidesteps the question the linked article tries to address, namely, "What do you mean by the size of a directory anyway?")

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    10. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Every other file manager has it.

      ... disabled by default. It would be a horrible idea to do this automatically. You would need to index all files in each folder. This takes an incredible amount of time, not only on Windows, but on Linux, Unix, Mac etc.

      There's no sane file manager that shows you folder sizes automatically. And with the file manager I use I try not to hover my mouse on folders for too long, the thrashing of the HDD can't be doing it any good.

    11. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would have to spider the directory structure below the folder to get the total size.

      Why? Is NTFS really that shit?

      Good file systems behave like databases and could have that information available in a split second without losing track of anything.

    12. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by stooo · · Score: 1

      Why do you want to know the size of the "fucking folder" ?
      What is a "fucking folder" in the first place ?

      --
      aaaaaaa
    13. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that feature will come to Windows Store in near future. Watch this space!

      Meanwhile in linux: du -[h]s directory

    14. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      I'll tell you another bizarre missing feature: telling me the version of a DLL in the details window. Confusingly it gives you the file version but not the actual DLL version! I have to use ILSpy to see the real version.

    15. Re: How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Why? Is NTFS really that shit?

      In a word, yes.

      ReFS is supposed to be their new and modern replacement for NTFS, but who knows when that will go mainstream, or whether it will be much better.

    16. Re: How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm entirely sure that the WinSxS folder DOESN'T work.

      MS's solution to that whole mess? Reinstall Windows twice a year and any broken dependencies are your problem.
      This is why Windows 8/8.1/10 have big updates with stupid names ("Fall Creators Update") that actually perform a dirty reinstall of Windows, leaving you a Windows.old directory for a week or so in case you need to revert.

    17. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      That retarded lack of functionality is why I really like the program Spacesniffer which graphs folders and files relative to their size within a plane representing the entire disk.

      It is incredibly useful to quickly understand what is taking up the most space on a disk along with its folder structure.

    18. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by dddux · · Score: 1

      Nailed it! d= ;)

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
    19. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

      It really isn't that simple.

      It really is. Every other Windows file manager, yes I'm generalizing but not by much, has this feature. It isn't like I'm suggesting something impossible.

    20. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

      Well the problem with folder sizes is that to take the size of the folder you have to take the sizes of all the files in the folder.

      Yes, I know. Every other Windows file manager, yes I'm generalizing but not by much, has this feature. It isn't like I'm suggesting something impossible.

    21. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

      The same reason \\ does not autocomplete to all the computers on the network: Because it would destroy corporate networks.

      Of course, I'm equating reading the local drive with doing something that requires discovering and reading every computer on the network.

      Fuck dude, really?

    22. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

      There's no sane file manager that shows you folder sizes automatically.

      My copy of xyplorer has been doing this for over a decade. XP had this. Other file managers I've used had this. All with NTFS. If your hard drive is thrashing because of a mouse hover, buy some fucking RAM, buy a larger hard drive, and keep that drive defragmented.

    23. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about making it a fucking option then, dick-head.

    24. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes and they are all disabled by default. XP included. I'm typing this at an XP machine right now. If you want the foldersize you need to hover over the folder and a huge amount of disk thrashing ensues.

      If your hard drive is thrashing because of a mouse hover, buy some fucking RAM

      You would dedicate the complete index of ever changing files on a disk into RAM? I'm impressed. I thought your desire to know the folder sizes at all times was the dumbest idea. I was wrong. What an unexpected one-up.

    25. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft really needs to bring NTFS into the 20th century. 21st century would be even better.

    26. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by Toshito · · Score: 1

      I had folder sizes with MacOs 8 on a 33 MHz (0.033 GHz!) 68040 processor with 8 MB of RAM... on a 350 MB IDE hard drive.

      It took 1 or 2 seconds to show the folder size.

      --
      Try it! Library of Babel
    27. Re:How about fucking FOLDER SIZES microsoft? by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

      a huge amount of disk thrashing ensues

      If you're getting any disk thrashing over a folder size, something is wrong with your PC.

  5. don't need tabs, tyvm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    what we need is control of OUR computer back. updates when WE WANT THEM, not when you insist upon slowing down our internet, consuming our precious quotas, and rebooting whenever the fuck you want.

    fuck, just today, we had a pc launch the "upgrade assistant' which went and started downloading fcu while windows update was also already downloading it... attempts to remove the "assistant" were met with it magically reappearing over and over, even after reboots, and, yes, downloading the 4 fucking gigabytes itself over a metered connection again with windows update's own download of the same damn thing. we had to disconnect the pc from the internet, manually download the installer to a usb drive on a different pc, and run the 'upgrade' from that removable drive instead.

    we also want absolute and full transparency (i hate that term, but it applies here) on exactly what data you're gathering on us, and allowing us absolute and full control to turn that spying shit off.

    1. Re:don't need tabs, tyvm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then run a Free and Open Source Software operating system. If you haven't learned this by now and are still whining about Microsoft Windows then there's little hope for you.

    2. Re:don't need tabs, tyvm... by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      If you don't like it, then don't run it.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    3. Re:don't need tabs, tyvm... by sexconker · · Score: 3, Funny

      what we need is control of OUR computer back. updates when WE WANT THEM, not when you insist upon slowing down our internet, consuming our precious quotas, and rebooting whenever the fuck you want.

      fuck, just today, we had a pc launch the "upgrade assistant' which went and started downloading fcu while windows update was also already downloading it... attempts to remove the "assistant" were met with it magically reappearing over and over, even after reboots, and, yes, downloading the 4 fucking gigabytes itself over a metered connection again with windows update's own download of the same damn thing. we had to disconnect the pc from the internet, manually download the installer to a usb drive on a different pc, and run the 'upgrade' from that removable drive instead.

      we also want absolute and full transparency (i hate that term, but it applies here) on exactly what data you're gathering on us, and allowing us absolute and full control to turn that spying shit off.

      No.

      - Satya Nadella

    4. Re: don't need tabs, tyvm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not an answer.

    5. Re: don't need tabs, tyvm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a perfectly acceptable answer, Microsoft has proven that they are going to continue down this path irrespective of what some of their customers say. The fact that you keep banging on about it but continue to be a user and customer just demonstrates how stupid you are.

    6. Re:don't need tabs, tyvm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First get rid of all the old copies of bind and sendmail out there that are easily exploitable, then update all the web servers, then update all the OS's.

      THEN you can complain about not wanting updates... you stupid faggot.

    7. Re:don't need tabs, tyvm... by tepples · · Score: 1

      Then run a Free and Open Source Software operating system.

      Good luck finding a laptop warranted for compatibility with such an operating system in any major electronics or office supply chain. Good luck even mail-ordering such a laptop in 11.6" size, as the well-known options are 13" (Dell XPS Developer Edition) or 14" (smallest System76 laptop). What am I missing?

    8. Re:don't need tabs, tyvm... by tepples · · Score: 1

      downloading the 4 fucking gigabytes itself over a metered connection

      First get rid of all the old copies of bind and sendmail out there that are easily exploitable, then update all the web servers, then update all the OS's.

      In context, that's not quite comparable. DNS, mail, and web servers tend to have a far higher monthly data transfer quota than PCs attached to a home network whose Internet uplink is satellite or terrestrial wireless (i.e. cellular).

    9. Re:don't need tabs, tyvm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then run a Free and Open Source Software operating system.

      Good luck finding a laptop warranted for compatibility with such an operating system in any major electronics or office supply chain. Good luck even mail-ordering such a laptop in 11.6" size, as the well-known options are 13" (Dell XPS Developer Edition) or 14" (smallest System76 laptop). What am I missing?

      How about the fact that nearly all consumer grade laptops sold on the display shelves in any major electronics or office supply chain these days are pieces of trash with build quality so terrible that you can almost watch them disintegrate in real time as you compare models? If you want a decent laptop, you usually have to order it online, and from the business laptop section, where you have a pretty decent selection of models that either come preloaded with Linux or are well known to be Linux-friendly.

    10. Re:don't need tabs, tyvm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First get rid of all the old copies of bind and sendmail out there that are easily exploitable, then update all the web servers, then update all the OS's.

      THEN you can complain about not wanting updates... you stupid faggot.

      We would, but then all the managers would raise unholy hell about a few minutes of downtime per server (Linux) or a few hours of downtime per server (Windows).

    11. Re:don't need tabs, tyvm... by tepples · · Score: 1

      Good luck even mail-ordering such a laptop [with a free operating system] in 11.6" size, as the well-known options are 13" (Dell XPS Developer Edition) or 14" (smallest System76 laptop).

      If you want a decent laptop, you usually have to order it online, and from the business laptop section, where you have a pretty decent selection of models that either come preloaded with Linux or are well known to be Linux-friendly.

      For one thing, how would I go about trying the screen and keyboard of a laptop I'm ordering online in order to avoid having to pay a substantial restocking fee should I dislike its feel? For another, who sells a laptop with a free operating system in a size smaller than 13 inches, in order to deter thieves by carrying it in a bag that isn't obviously a laptop bag? I currently use a ThinkPad X61, but its battery life isn't the best, and its 4:3 swivel screen is just a bit too tall.

    12. Re: don't need tabs, tyvm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you niggas do is whine like Jamaican ass - Joell Ortiz

  6. Go linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Forget MS and just go linux already. I did, my wife did, my parents did, my last 2 employers did. It is easy, it does not spy on you, it will not reboot on you, it will not erase your data or hold you hostage for unwanted updates, it will not try to sell you things, it will not steal your information to sell to others, it is not in league with shady dictatorships, it is free and open and it is the future, embrace it and join the side of freedom join the side of liberty join the side of thinking and productivity and learning.

    1. Re: Go linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it doesnâ(TM)t do all that stuff because it doesnâ(TM)t have functioning drivers

    2. Re:Go linux by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Sorry... but I searched for "linux" and found a forum, a wiki article and a bunch of operating systems related to it. So... which one could I play World of Tanks on?

      The above was a bit ironic, but that's exactly how Average Joe would see your parent post.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    3. Re:Go linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sorry... but I searched for "linux" and found a forum, a wiki article and a bunch of operating systems related to it. So... which one could I play World of Tanks on?

      All of them

    4. Re:Go linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ubuntu would be Linux by most people's definition and it has tried to sell me stuff.

      Though generally I would agree with your comment.

    5. Re:Go linux by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Which is more important to you though. You count and people like you count, desktop users, not the average mug punter for whom smart TV, a smart phone and maybe a tablet are enough, no desktop for them any more and if they have children a cheap notebook for school. The desktop is shrinking back to it's original market and M$ in the ultimate dick move is apparently doing everything they can to piss of the remaining likely long term users of desktops.

      For you, which is more important, control of your digital life or playing pvp (purse vs purse) world of tanks.

      When I started with PCs there were fuck all games and I mean green screen. Everything changes, so I will bin all my steam content that does not port to Apple or Linux. I don't need M$, they need us but they are cunts so fuck em.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    6. Re:Go linux by easyTree · · Score: 1

      and M$ in the ultimate dick move

      Uhh, it's not wise to poke the beast - there's likely a platinum super ultimate dick move in store.

    7. Re:Go linux by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Harsh. Did it have a single-level undo twenty years ago? Progress in action...

    8. Re:Go linux by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Weird new-post-parenting bug.

    9. Re:Go linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enjoy your shitty video card performance.

    10. Re: Go linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ?

      Original poster here. I have never nor have I witnessed anyone who has had a driver issue with linux. You appear to be spreading lies in the special interest of a terrible corporation where drivers must be found at the manufacturers website, downloaded, and installed, often with many problems and issues (that was my experience with windows). Linux on the other hand has ever worked flawlessly for me and has never once presented a driver issue, nor has it done so for my wife, my coworkers or anyone else that I know of.

      Perhaps you should simply try a flavor of linux (I recommend MINT but there is a wide variety of choice) loaded from a USB stick. This will reveal the truth to you that drivers are not a problem in the least for linux and have not been for well over a decade or 2.

      Keep cashing those paychecks for being a paid shill though, but reality does not follow your false narrative.

    11. Re:Go linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Original poster here,

      Actually I am an avid gamer, I utilize steam. Also for most free to play games they want to ensure a wide market penetration and often have a linux version available. I believe world of tanks is available via wine though a version of it is not available on steam.

      It is a little difficult to predict whether a game will work on linux or not but it certainly is not difficult to say that you can find a similar game easily for linux. War thunder would be the linux equivalent.

      Being on linux does not mean you will not be able to play games, nor does it mean you cannot get top shelf A games.

      Research is your friend.

      Btw, linux can be used for games, but it is more of a work horse system for accomplishing things, games are realistically fantasy and ego masturbation, I love them, but I do not pretend playing games is the same as doing work for money.

    12. Re: Go linux by Brockmire · · Score: 2

      "I have never nor have I witnessed anyone who has had a driver issue with linux." You're either fucking young, fucking inexperienced, or don't have any fucking friends. Making statements like that just exposes your inexperience, not expertise.

    13. Re: Go linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your anger is indicative of the fact that you are a paid shill attempting to discredit a professional operating system in favor of a well known spyware/malware system best suited for playing games.

      I see no real reason anyone would get angry about the true statement that there are no driver compatibility problems with linux. Your strawman attack about youth and ignorance is revealing of the fact that you are scared and angry. Why would a technological truth set you off in such a way? These are such dry and dispassionate topics. Again, your obviously being paid for such an opinion as it is not rooted in reality in any way shape or form.

    14. Re:Go linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hello,

      Actually games on linux which have a counterpart on windows often see performance boosts when run on linux. The key is the operating system, windows has a rather thick overhead and that interferes with game performance, linux by contrast has a very low overhead due to its nature and even when the overhead of wine is factored in produce superior frame rates. I am not really sure what windows is doing in the background but I assume it is its nature of spying and advertising along with poor programming that leads to its inevitable poorer performance.

      In terms of GPU performance you can get native drivers from both nVidia and AMD for linux, also nVidia and AMD drivers are available in all deb repositories. They are proprietary but if you go to the drivers options you can enable them though by default open source drivers are set to enabled and work quite well.

    15. Re: Go linux by TrumpThemAll · · Score: 2

      Ah, yes, Linux. The operating system that has been just around the corner from taking over the desktop for only 30 (?) years now. Gonna happen any day. Wait, don't they still have less market share than macs? Maybe if they only had one version or there was some effort made to make sure all software was compatible with all versions of the os. The last time I looked I would have had to use 4 or more versions of the os to use the programs I was looking at because each of them had issues with different Linux distros. I'll be sticking with windows 7 for the foreseeable future. Maybe when widows 11 comes out things will be better (yeah, I know) .

    16. Re: Go linux by Carewolf · · Score: 2

      "I have never nor have I witnessed anyone who has had a driver issue with linux."

      You're either fucking young, fucking inexperienced, or don't have any fucking friends.

      Making statements like that just exposes your inexperience, not expertise.

      I have not observed or witnessed anyone with a driver issue on Linux... In the last 10 years. It happened frequently in the olden days though.

      When I bought a new sound card (to get better isolation from CPU noise), it worked out of the box on Linux, but needed a manually installed driver on Windows.. And it was using a standard AC/97 sound-chip protocol. Windows is terrible with drivers compared to Linux these days.

    17. Re: Go linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know quite well your being abused by a large corporate entity which will force updates on you regardless of your hosts file, your registry editing, your settings etc. The updates will require a high speed connection, your precious applications will most likely not work after the forced update, your files will most likely be destroyed, the update can happen in the middle of a work day causing you monetary loss, you have no legal recourse for that monetary loss. If things do not go well your system will be bricked into an endless reboot loop, you will need to contact the manufacturer for a CD if your system even has one, if not you will attempt to call in and then will be guided as to how to download the newest version as your CD key will suddenly only be viable for the latest version, this whole scenario could end up costing you a week or more of your time. The process will also cause reboots interrupting anything you may be attempting to do.

      Contrast that with linux where you will steadily be able to work without interruption, your system will never go down and will show rock solid consistent performance.

      Again you are most likely a paid shill attempting to discredit the vastly superior stability and performance of a great operating system with a lot of choice in favor of a malware/spyware system which is abusive and can end up costing you your job.

    18. Re: Go linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love Linux and would never go back to the spyware that is MS. And I actually liked Win 3.11, Win98, and XP. Hated Vista, too slow, and 8 screwed with the interface too much.

      I have to say though, Linux support for wireless AC sucks. Yes, it's the hardware manufacturers fault but I'd like to use my TP-Link T2U on several different kernels.

      Older hardware seems to be seemless though.

      Linux does have technical advantages that I don't see as ever being available on Windows.

      I run Linux on a Sandisk Cruzer Fit flashdrive that is heavily modified to reduce unnecessary file writes and use my RAM. If I shutdown, I can plug the same device into my desktop or my work computer and boot to the exact same desktop and apps with all my local files. I can image the device easily for backup and run the backup as a functioning OS. I can see all kinds of live info in Conky and easily launch a web server in a firejail with a default upload/download directory in RAM (nosuid, nodev, noexec) and provide friends a link allowing them to upload or download files directly through https.

      Try any of that in Windows.

    19. Re: Go linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did Ubuntu try to sell you? Enquiring minds want to know.

  7. On the top?? by rwven · · Score: 2

    Why are the tabs at the TOP of the window in the title bar? That's a HORRIBLE design.

    1. Re:On the top?? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Why are the tabs at the TOP of the window in the title bar? That's a HORRIBLE design.

      Yes, and you'll learn to like it, Citizen. Next you'll be asking us to make it configurable, you ungrateful user!

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    2. Re:On the top?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, that's Microsoft all right.

    3. Re:On the top?? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Why are the tabs at the TOP of the window in the title bar? That's a HORRIBLE design.

      Because it is the most sensible place give that the application runs inside the tab. If you put it underneath it would make users think that the tab is part of the application, and THAT would be horrible design.

      Go have a look again at how this works then you'll see it makes perfect sense to put it there. The way it works may not make sense, but at least the location of the tabs do.

  8. BAHAHAHA! Be original will you! by gabrieltss · · Score: 0

    Try to be original Microsoft. Directory Opus has been able to do this and give file, folder sizes and a WHOLE lot more than your lame worthless POS of a File Explorer. I've been using Directory Opus since the days of the Commodore Amiga.

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
    1. Re:BAHAHAHA! Be original will you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only USD 70$ for a file manager! What a deal!

    2. Re:BAHAHAHA! Be original will you! by necronom426 · · Score: 1

      Same here. I used Directory Opus for about 10 years on the Amiga and now I use it on the PC. It's too expensive, but I got it when they had a sale.

      Before that I used Cubic Explorer, which I use at work. That one's free.

  9. LONG FILEPATHS LONG FILEPATHS LONGFILE PATHS.txt ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So can File Explorer now, finally, in 2018 after DECADES of this bug, FINALLY HANDLE FILE PATHS IT CREATES ITSELF ?!

  10. Welcome by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 3

    Welcome to 2005 or thereabouts, we hope you enjoy your stay.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Welcome by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Welcome to 2005 or thereabouts, we hope you enjoy your stay.

      Oh? A mainstream OS nested its apps in tabs in 2005? Sounds interesting.

    2. Re:Welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By "mainstream OS" you mean Windows? Sorry, they take well over a decade to catch up with the rest.

    3. Re:Welcome by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Welcome to 2005 or thereabouts, we hope you enjoy your stay.

      Oh? A mainstream OS nested its apps in tabs in 2005? Sounds interesting.

      KDE

    4. Re:Welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MDI is 2005?

    5. Re:Welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used the stack and title sliders in BeOS two decades ago. It's absolutely pathetic that Windows not only has built-in spyware, advertising and a perpetual stream of forced updates to try to fix poorly coded software, but that it still isn't anywhere near the capabilities of a twenty year old OS.

    6. Re:Welcome by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      So no mainstream OS then but rather an optional feature used by a very tiny minority of a minority of GUI users, on an at the time almost non-existent desktop OS. Got it.

  11. Big whoop by kmassare · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's going to take more than tabs to make it useful. I don't know if it's the Windows 10 file structure or the file manager but it has become very difficult to find anything on my drive since "upgrading" to Windows 10. Stuff seems to get randomly stashed in any of numerous Documents Folders.

  12. 2006 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had this on WinXP in 2006, and it looks better than Sets so far.

    I remember Sets being touted as grouping distinct windows together, like browser + web editor, or browser + research notes, or maybe some other configurations, like old MDI interfaces in the modern age.
    Nope. Another Longhorn and micro-kernel.
    Microsoft couldn't pay me to use Windows 10.

  13. "The new sets experience" by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

    Why do major software vendors have to sound like hustlers these days?

  14. Ubuntu must have shown them how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile, Microshit pretends to be greatful and then continues to make proprietary software from open source and stab Linux in the back with patent attacks.

  15. They're changing NOTEPAD?! by BitwiseX · · Score: 1

    Wow. I feel like notepad.exe's functionality has been the same for 20+ years.

    1. Re:They're changing NOTEPAD?! by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      Yep, and that's why we now have Notepad++!

    2. Re:They're changing NOTEPAD?! by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Harsh. Did it have a single-level undo twenty years ago? Progress in action...

      (Post v2!)

    3. Re:They're changing NOTEPAD?! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      functionality

      If by functionality you mean spitting out garbled text, making people swear and forcing them to open wordpad then yes, yes it's functionality has been the same for 20 years :)

    4. Re:They're changing NOTEPAD?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than anything Microsoft needs to update applications such as Notepad to actually support UAC, so I don't have to save windows files on my desktop and then copy them back to where I originally opened them from.

  16. -o- by easyTree · · Score: 1

    Windows 10 Sets is an upcoming feature where you can group documents and apps into one tabbed window that are related to the particular task at hand

    Does it..... maintain state for that task across reboots which occur one second after you've gone afk or does that still require seventeen hours of manual recreation? :|

    1. Re: -o- by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Many Linux distros lost that feature years ago. Google says Unity stopped years ago. I learned this when I set up some laptops for production use, ended up having to launch screens as workaround because session state doesn't work. This would have been mint or lxle distro. Fucking pissed me off to learn that. Fragmentation in linux is a real bitch.

  17. when will windows get a mc file manager by FudRucker · · Score: 2

    Midnight Commander in Linux is my favorite Go To file manager for doing all my heavy lifting, moving and unpacking source code, editing and viewing files, (has excellent syntax highlighting) i love mc.

    when a good double pane file manager with an excellent built in text editor comes to windows post an article on slashdot, because windows explorer is so 1990's

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:when will windows get a mc file manager by BBF_BBF · · Score: 2
      You can get mc that is compiled for windows.

      https://sourceforge.net/projec...

      Norton Commander, the original "commander" file manager, was originally a MS-DOS program. So mc is so "1980's". ;-)

      (I'm not knocking mc, the dual pane file manager is my preferred setup.)

    2. Re:when will windows get a mc file manager by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      sweet! it works good! thanks :)

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    3. Re:when will windows get a mc file manager by dargndorp · · Score: 1

      You might also want to give http://silk.apana.org.au/fc.html a go, available for Windows, Unix and OS/2.

    4. Re:when will windows get a mc file manager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should get Total Commander for windows if you like this style of file mangers. I've been a user of it for almost 10 years, never looked back. It's a pity it does not have a Linux version.

  18. You signed up for this by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not necessary to have such large updates, or to reboot during updates. Microsoft explicitly and deliberately forced that upon the world, and have consequently been responsible for more wasted man-hours than really bear contemplation. This happened some decades ago, however, and it's generally widely known. So if you are choosing to run this software, you are signing up for the upgrade hassle, and various viruses, and (in the modern era) some degree of surveillance. If you are regretting that decision, you might seek alternatives. You're probably not going to get much sympathy for your problems, however.

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  19. Tabs? Bring back XTree by sphealey · · Score: 1

    About the last thing we need is tabs in Windows Explorer. How about Microsoft pay ZTree one beeeelion dollars for a non-exclusive license to ZTree (XTree(tm) implemented for Windows) and include that with their OSs

    sPh

  20. When we were youngsters by nanospook · · Score: 1

    My earliest memory of tabs is from Opera back in the 90's.. I "think" they invented the concept and then other browsers copied it..

    --
    Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
  21. Omg guy by thewebsiteboy · · Score: 1

    This is will be soo cool!!!!!!!!!

  22. D Opus by rossdee · · Score: 1

    "I've been using Directory Opus since the days of the Commodore Amiga."

    Yep DOpus has been around since the days of Workbench 1.3
    30 years ago

  23. ASUS T100TA still an incompatible poster child by tepples · · Score: 1

    I have never nor have I witnessed anyone who has had a driver issue with linux.

    Then you are fortunate not to have been handed an ASUS Transformer Book T100TA. As of 2018, many things are still broken, including suspend, screen backlight control, Bluetooth, and the internal camera. Audio and networking require proprietary firmware packages that Debian cannot include in the install image, and good luck downloading said packages without networking.

    1. Re:ASUS T100TA still an incompatible poster child by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually my favorite machine was an ASUS EEEPC which ran faithfully for quite a long time. However it was running linux that entire time. No driver problems, no problems what so ever. It died because I smoke around it, the fans seized up, took several years for that to happen and was a nice bit of hardware.

    2. Re:ASUS T100TA still an incompatible poster child by tepples · · Score: 1

      I had an Eee PC 901 running Ubuntu. It gave up the magic smoke not because of cigarettes (our house is tobacco free) but because of a heat problem. But why did support for GNU/Linux on ASUS kit go so downhill between the 901 and the T100?

  24. Next Version: Dual Panes by BBF_BBF · · Score: 1
    Meh. I just want the old two pane file manager back again. (yeah, I know about 2xplorer, etc, etc, but I'd like microsoft to restore what it took away.)

    So much for Microsoft's original excuse of getting rid of the two paned one... It's not "object oriented" enough. You should open up (instantiate) a new explorer window for each directory you want to move things from/to. This tabbed explorer doesn't fit the "object" model, either.

    1. Re:Next Version: Dual Panes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Restore? Windows NEVER had a dual pane explorer. There is nothing to restore.

  25. Re:LONG FILEPATHS LONG FILEPATHS LONGFILE PATHS.tx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably not.

  26. Re:Every other file manager has it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Courage bro.

  27. Document embedding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably not the same thing and I'm not going to google it you can embed document in other documents and edit them.

  28. How about saving the contents of Notepad by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

    So that, you know, when Windows suddenly reboots for an update, your unsaved Notepads don't get lost forever.

  29. WOW, new feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That pretty much every other OS has and that gave it a new name. Bless their hearts and lack of brains.

  30. Something I've never, ever wanted. by TrumpThemAll · · Score: 2

    How about instead of useless crap, my be get rid of that ribbon garbage. That would be much more useful. Seriously, who thinks searching trough a bunch of tabs is easier that just clicking on a drop down menu. Having a few often used items in a toolbar is nice, but having EVERYTHTING in a tool bar is just idiotic. They even have things hidden in drop down menus from the toolbar icons in some of their apps. Pure idiocy!

    1. Re:Something I've never, ever wanted. by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

      What's worse is how the Ribbon in Outlook 2017 changes depending on where you are.

      IE: If you're in your Inbox, the HOME tab will be all about sending email and shit, but if you go to DELETED ITEMS suddenly you get "Recover Deleted" and a bunch of other shit. It's completely unintuitive and garbage. Menus were great because you could access settings regardless of where you were. Now you have to remember which section to go to in the program (totally dropping whatever the fuck you were working on) and then remember which ribbon tab to go to, and where in the mess of icons the button is that you're looking for.

  31. Turtles all the way down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Explorer.exe will be my shell, my virtual desktop, my application, and my window tabber. There'll be Explorers all the way down.

  32. QTTabBar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've been using QTTabBar for this, it uses the native Windows Explorer and adds Tabs + a search panel that won't disappear every time you browse to a file location.

  33. Re:LONG FILEPATHS LONG FILEPATHS LONGFILE PATHS.tx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like how Slashdot truncated the post title.

    People worry about AI taking their jobs, but they'll never replace you if you just change your name to "Adolph Blaine Charles David Earl Frederick Gerald Hubert Irvim John Kenneth Loyd Martin Nero Oliver Paul Quincy Randolph Sherman Thomas Uncas Victor Willian Xerxes Yancy Zeus Wolfeschlegelsteinhausenbergerdorffvoralternwarengewissenhaftschafers wesenchafewarenwholgepflegeundsorgfaltigkeitbeschutzenvonangereifen duchihrraubgiriigfeindewelchevorralternzwolftausendjahresvorandieer scheinenbanderersteerdeemmeshedrraumschiffgebrauchlichtalsseinu rsprungvonkraftgestartseinlangefahrthinzwischensternartigraumaufde rsuchenachdiesternwelshegehabtbewohnbarplanetenkreisedrehensichund wohinderneurassevanverstandigmenshlichkeittkonntevortpflanzenundsiche rfreunanlebenslamdlichfreudeundruhemitnichteinfurchtvorangreifenvon andererintlligentgeschopfsvonhinzwischensternartigraum”

  34. Finally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this something people were clamoring for for years?
    I don't think I've ever thought "I wish explorer had tabs".

    1. Re:Finally? by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

      I've been wanting it for 15+ years.

  35. Let's make it fullscreen and tabs on the bottom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And let's call it the Desktop.

  36. Holy shit it's about time by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    I've been saying this needs to be a thing since at least 2002. It's about fucking time they finally decided to add it.

  37. This ain't a technical problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This ain't a technical problem.

    It's the lack of will.

  38. Another name for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Putting a kickstand on the side of a cruise ship.

  39. Windows has had this for years by rcharbon · · Score: 1

    Nothing to see there. Windows has had it for years. Though the 'tabs' you click on are down (or up, or over) in the taskbar. Big whoop.

  40. XYplorer by david999 · · Score: 0

    XYplorer is a very good file manager.
    https://www.xyplorer.com/