Slashdot Mirror


'Flippy,' the Fast Food Robot, Turned Off For Being Too Slow (chicagotribune.com)

He was supposed to revolutionize a California fast food kitchen, churning out 150 burgers per hour without requiring a paycheck or benefits. But after a single day of working as a cook at a Caliburger location in Pasadena this week, Flippy the burger-flipping robot has stopped flipping. From a report: In some ways, Flippy was a victim of his own success. Inundated with customers eager to see the machine in action this week, Cali Group, which runs the fast food chain, quickly realized the robot couldn't keep up with the demand. They decided instead to retrain the restaurant staff to work more efficiently alongside Flippy, according to USA Today. Temporarily decommissioned, patrons encountered a sign Thursday noting that Flippy would be "cooking soon," the paper reported. "Mostly it's the timing," Anthony Lomelino, the Chief Technology Officer for Cali Group told the paper. "When you're in the back, working with people, you talk to each other. With Flippy, you kind of need to work around his schedule. Choreographing the movements of what you do, when and how you do it."

126 comments

  1. Unfortunately... by nospam007 · · Score: 0

    ...not switched off fast enough to not show up here as a dupe.

    1. Re:Unfortunately... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      ...not switched off fast enough to not show up here as a dupe.

      Which is why /. will be shutting down their robot "Posty" -- similar problems as with Flippy.

      "When you're in the back, working with people, you talk to each other. With Flippy, you kind of need to work around his schedule. Choreographing the movements of what you do, when and how you do it."

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    2. Re:Unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? I don't see this story duped.

    3. Re:Unfortunately... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Nooooo! Flippy want to live!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the 2nd story about flippy in 3 days. He probably assumed both stories were the same. They aren't. The first one was about flippy about to be deployed, and this one is about the failed deployment.

  2. Beedeebeedeebee... You want cheese on that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL

    1. Re:Beedeebeedeebee... You want cheese on that? by TWX · · Score: 1

      Beedeebeedeebeedee... fuck you, Buck!

      (supposedly a real outtake from Mel Blanc when he was getting annoyed/tired after a long day in the recording studio)

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  3. I have seen the future, and it sucks by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Mostly it's the timing," Anthony Lomelino, the Chief Technology Officer for Cali Group told the paper. "When you're in the back, working with people, you talk to each other. With Flippy, you kind of need to work around his schedule. Choreographing the movements of what you do, when and how you do it."

    Yeah, that sounds like a great place to work. Take one of the only pleasant things about working at a fast food restaurant - socializing with your friends/coworkers - and then tell them to knock it off and just serve the robot.

    Six months from now, they're going to have trouble hiring anyone.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:I have seen the future, and it sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Women probably used to socialize while they washed the clothes down by the river. Not so anymore. You don't even have to leave your house to do the laundry!
      You probably had someone bring a check to your desk at work every 2-4 weeks back in the day. Not with direct deposit!
      You used to have to go shopping for groceries. Not with curbside delivery!

      All they did was discover that they need to get few more of these robots. If the work sucks as much as you suggest, it's the perfect job for a machine.

    2. Re:I have seen the future, and it sucks by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      Service jobs require providing services to people, whether that's a burger or fixing their plumbing. This all requires human interaction and that robot is never going to take over that job.

      This is what's so silly about the whole argument that raising the minimum wage will eliminate jobs, the vast majority of minimum wage jobs that still exist are service jobs and very few of those can be replaced by a robot without people simply getting fed up with the robot and going to the store or business without a robot.

    3. Re: I have seen the future, and it sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like how bank tellers couldn't be automated away?

    4. Re:I have seen the future, and it sucks by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Service jobs require providing services to people, whether that's a burger or fixing their plumbing. This all requires human interaction and that robot is never going to take over that job.

      Really? If I enter my order on a touch screen, it's cooked by a robot and delivered in a self-service kiosk and it's the same burger... who really appreciates the social interaction with the McD/BK staff? Usually my interaction is "Next, please" "Hi, I'll have [order]." "Anything else?" "No, that's it." "That'll be $X" *pay* *wait* "[order]" "Thanks" *eat* *put trash in bin on way out*. If you want to talk about something that could be replaced with a very small shell script it's the social interaction. I don't know how it could possibly get less personal or less meaningful. And you don't go there for the culinary experience, you go there for standardized grub. A robot is perfect for giving you a consistent experience. Of course if I go to a high-end restaurant with a waiter and a real chef my expectations are different, but it's different leagues.

      And even three star Michelin restaurants have "standard" dishes, like they're training the staff to exactly replicate whatever the master chef has cooked up. Granted it's an entirely different level of service but it's not really that unique, personal service that we'd like to imagine. If I go to a steakhouse and get a prime steak cooked to perfection I'll probably put up with a whole lot of other downsides, whatever you think the service is I think it's a small auxiliary. The service is not why I go to your steakhouse and poor service probably won't make me leave as long as the product tastes to high heaven. And the product can be made by a robot.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:I have seen the future, and it sucks by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 0

      And when the robot fucks up your burger, or you want it made a certain way and can't get the robot to do it, then what do you do? Just eat it anyway, like a good little pleb? Maybe you get lucky and the manager goes back there and makes it for you himself -- and now you're back to 'human customer service'.

      I don't want robots making my burgers. Or steak. Or anything else that I go to any sort of restaurant to eat. I want a PERSON making my food, and a PERSON bringing it to me. Otherwise I'll just stay home and make my own food.

    6. Re:I have seen the future, and it sucks by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good for you. Nobody else gives a shit. I just want my food, I don't care if its cooked by a person, a robot, or if the cow jumps on the grill voluntarily. I don't go to the restaurant for interaction, I go because I don't want to cook. So long as its good, I don't care what prepared it.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    7. Re: I have seen the future, and it sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the thing. They can't get more robots yet. People are required to actually complete each burger, and pack it up for the customer. Flipping it is the easy part. It's mostly waiting anyways.

      They still need at least 1 more robot, or do it like Fuddruckers and make the customer add the fixins themselves. But then you need someone to keep up with the giant salad bar.

    8. Re:I have seen the future, and it sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go get a feedbag then. Live like livestock.

      Just don't expect anybody to listen when you complain about getting treated like livestock.

    9. Re:I have seen the future, and it sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A robot in the kitchen is one less pair of human hands that didn't get washed after taking a dump, one less human mouth to sneeze on my food, etc. That's comforting to me at a fast food restaurant.

      Do you mind automated butchering of meat and how would you know?

      If your order isn't to spec (less likely of course with a robot as it doesn't get bored, tired, or misread the order), you'd do just what you do now - complain to the human manager who should make it right.

    10. Re:I have seen the future, and it sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when the robot fucks up your burger, or you want it made a certain way and can't get the robot to do it, then what do you do? Just eat it anyway, like a good little pleb?

      Yes. Same as if you have a human make your burger. Unless you like eating someone's loogie.

    11. Re: I have seen the future, and it sucks by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Wow, you must have some really good humans cooking your steak. Instead of a robot cooking to an absolute, repeatable perfect temperature, you want some kid making variable temperature steaks? The last two times I ate at high end steak house with 5 or more people, at least one person has a poorly cooked steak, one has perfect, and the rest falls in between. At least one person who should send it back lives with it so not to hold up the rest of dinner. I welcome the food making robots. Humans fuck up, a lot. The variation in topping application varies from person to person. Robot food should actually look closer to how they look in marketing.

    12. Re:I have seen the future, and it sucks by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      ... or if the cow jumps on the grill voluntarily.

      I would definitely go to that restaurant!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    13. Re: I have seen the future, and it sucks by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would definitely go to that restaurant!

      Well you could try, but it's a little hard to get to. It's called The Restaurant at the End of the Universe.

    14. Re: I have seen the future, and it sucks by TrumpThemAll · · Score: 0

      You want hydrollic fluid with that?

    15. Re:I have seen the future, and it sucks by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      And when the robot fucks up your burger, or you want it made a certain way and can't get the robot to do it, then what do you do?

      So, when you go to McDonalds and ask for your burger medium rare, what generally happens?

      I'm curious, because you seem to be conflating real food with fast food in your complaint.

      At the moment, the robots are coming for fast food. And I'm with you, to a point. When a robot can cook a perfect rare duck breast with crispy skin, I'll have a robot cook for me at restaurants. Because I've had chefs fuck that up. But until a robot can do that consistently, I won't be visiting that restaurant.

      I don't care if it's done by a robot or a human, I just want it done right. I don't get why you insist on imperfect, shitty humans being involved in your food prep. The ones hung over, on drugs, bitter about a divorce, working through the flu to make rent, etc. I love my fellow humans, but when I'm looking for something good to eat, I could care less how involved they were in the process. If the result is good, it's good.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    16. Re:I have seen the future, and it sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit dude you are missing the entire point. You want your burger a special way, fine go to some fucking place with humans. It's an 80-20 rule here. 20% of the population is going to need humans making the food, that special touch. That's never going away. However, the rest of us just want a fucking piece of food to shove into our mouths before we go back to whatever shit hole it is that we call work.

      You want a person, great! No one is saying that we're wholesale going to replace every single fucking person on this planet with a fucking robot. The only idiots that actually say that are folks who don't know better or folks that just like being an idiot for fucks sake.

      So you can ride that horse back to whatever shithole you crawled out of because there is plenty of room in a free market for people to decide if they want carefully crafted goodness of food or if they just don't give a fuck about the shit they shove into their digestive hole. We're so fucking glad you came here and let us all know that you'll never trust a robot. Great. No one fucking cared.

    17. Re:I have seen the future, and it sucks by jbgroup1 · · Score: 1

      I don't think that the CTO is referring to socializing. He is talking about communicating changes in work conditions such as that a rush is coming and one will need to work faster to keep up.

    18. Re: I have seen the future, and it sucks by KaiserGuy · · Score: 1

      Yes, but "couldn't" care less please and thank you.

    19. Re: I have seen the future, and it sucks by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It's commonly called "the Restaurant at the end of the universe." It's actually named Milliways.

    20. Re: I have seen the future, and it sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At over 7 billion individuals on this planet, You already ARE the livestock!

    21. Re:I have seen the future, and it sucks by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      or you want it made a certain way

      We're talking about fast food here. Ever successfully ordered a medium rare BigMac? As for choice, you already have that. And if you're as fussy as you claim you wouldn't be in this kind of restaurant anyway but likely off somewhere downtown insulting the waiter for no good reason.

    22. Re: I have seen the future, and it sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still working on programming Flippy to spit in burgers.

    23. Re:I have seen the future, and it sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but this whole discussion is only relevant for the US, where people eat and die of this disgusting fast food. These kind of "burger" places are becoming increasingly unpopular in the rest of the world where there is a lot of competition by restaurants with changing dishes and real cooks.

      Where I live there are only two Starbucks and very few burger restaurants (for the tourists), people generally prefer small, family owned places or modern international cuisine which can also be fast food but is hand-made with fresh and comparatively healthy ingredients. At least in larger cities in Europe the general "gourmet" trend has put the last nail in the coffin of the fast food chains. I've seen many, many cities in Europe, and Flippy will not be able to compete with the small takeaway restaurants in the long run. Many of them change their menu every week or only serve daily dishes, and their overall food quality is just much better. Whether you like that trend or not, if you open a burger restaurant today, it better be a "deluxe gourmet" burger restaurant that also offers locally brewed beer and organic salad, or you can close it again a few months later.

      So the whole Flippe discussion is rather pointless P&R, in reality it's just another kitchen machine for a slowly dying type of fast food.

    24. Re: I have seen the future, and it sucks by TWX · · Score: 1

      Does dripping gear-oil count?

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    25. Re: I have seen the future, and it sucks by TWX · · Score: 1

      Except that when I use an ATM to transact with the bank I'm not working with humans in-concert in real-time with the ATM, I'm working solely with the ATM.

      This robot is part of a greater process, and apparently requires interaction with staff both prior to and after its portion of the job. A human in that role might have the ability to adjust work-flow, but apparently the robot is not yet configured to do so.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    26. Re:I have seen the future, and it sucks by TWX · · Score: 1

      Yep, the longer I take for lunch, the longer I stay at the end of the day. If the work cafeteria isn't serving what I want then it's more time-efficient to walk over to the fast-food restaurant that's 400' away to get something quick than it is to get in the car, drive to a sit-down full-service restaurant, wait for the staff to provide service, eat, wait for the check, and then get back to the office.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    27. Re:I have seen the future, and it sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given how often humans fuck up my orders and force me to deal with a lunch I didn't like or go back to the restaurant and be the one guy annoying everyone cause something was wrong I'd rather stick to robot assembled predesigned meals with minor customization honestly.

    28. Re: I have seen the future, and it sucks by lgw · · Score: 1

      It means the same thing for all in tents, and porpoises.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    29. Re: I have seen the future, and it sucks by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      I never realized this until now; but when I need to do a deposit or withdrawal at my credit union, there is rarely ever any wait at the ATM outside. However, the tellers inside are almost always busy with customers. And of course, since it was built well after ATMs were standard, its ATM apparently replaced no one.

      And on top of that, the one bank that remains from the three that existed here since I was little got its ATM in the late 80s, and apparently that did not cause any tellers to lose their jobs either.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    30. Re:I have seen the future, and it sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trouble with the world today,
      It's plain to see,
      Is coffee in a cardboard cup

    31. Re: I have seen the future, and it sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This! I actually like the ordering kisosks at McDonalds. I can punch in exactly what I want. Nobody is unfriendly to me because my French sucks/is nonexistent. Nobody misunderstands my order and then gets pissed when I tell them I wanted something different from what they punched in. I don't have to wait in line either, especially now where they have 1 regular line and 4 kiosks. And no that doesn't really remove jobs, they usually only had one cash open before as well.

    32. Re:I have seen the future, and it sucks by mjwx · · Score: 1

      And you don't go there [fast food] for the culinary experience, you go there for standardized grub.

      Actually, you go to a fast food place because you want something tasty, cheap and now. Emphasis on the now part.

      whatever you think the service is I think it's a small auxiliary. The service is not why I go to your steakhouse and poor service probably won't make me leave as long as the product tastes to high heaven. And the product can be made by a robot.

      To you perhaps... but not to most people. To most people service is as important as the food. If I get bad service at a restaurant, I certainly wont be going back not matter how good the food is.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    33. Re: I have seen the future, and it sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Different country, different people.

      Here in Belgium a lot of the banks no longer have real tellers. Everything's done by online banking, usually mobile, or an ATM.

      My bank works solely on appointment when you want to talk to a real living person.
      I haven't interacted with a living person at the bank in over 8 years. So yeah quite a few people either lost their jobs here, or extra jobs haven't been created.

    34. Re: I have seen the future, and it sucks by TWX · · Score: 1

      I expect that the business that most customers seeking a live-person for either entail things that aren't so readily done on an ATM, or else the people seeking a live teller have trouble using an ATM. My inlaws are both legally blind. They can't really use ATMs well. They tend to go in and talk to the teller.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    35. Re:I have seen the future, and it sucks by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      So long as its good, I don't care what prepared it.

      It won't be, and when you discover that, you will. Also you apparently have no taste and probably wouldn't know good from bad if you were slapped in the face with it, probably think that drive-thru food is 'good'.

    36. Re:I have seen the future, and it sucks by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Implying that your 'robot chef' is being sanitized properly every day.

  4. Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Say what you will about machines taking jobs, I'd rather have a machine make my food than a human. On more than one instance I've been at a fast food place, looked back in the food prep area, and saw someone give their nose a good scratch-pick in between putting on the lettuce and tomato. I'm not saying there's any malicious intent or anything, just that people are gross, particularly when they're rushed and not paid enough to care (or simply don't take cleanliness into much consideration themselves, which is quite a large number of people). More incentive for me to make my own food, but still, machines can't some soon enough as far as I'm concerned.

    1. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing it will be a well trained highly skilled person engaged in their work that will be cleaning the machine then eh?

    2. Re:Too bad by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I'd rather have a machine make my food than a human. "

      You know those odd horror stories about a dead rodent found in a can of tomatoes or jar of pickles. Yeah, that's how good the machines are. Admittedly that's the worst case scenario; but for every dead rat in a can or jar, there's 10 generations of rats living in and around those machines, getting into the food, taking shits, and otherwise living their lives out.

      As for the robots in a fast food joint; same thing. I worked fast food as a kid; a good team would tear down, strip, and sanitize the milkshake machine, every gasket, and o-ring. A lazy cleaning crew might it rinse out, but not do a complete tear down, and leave all the rings and gaskets in place. And you'll get nasty residue and build up in all those little nooks and crannies.

      The milkshake machine is a 'robot' and it can get gross fast. A lazy graveyard cleaning crew might not get caught for a month... until a health inspector opens it up and notices the brown crust growing around the drive shaft. Or a customer completes about some 'gross' sludge from finally broke off and game out in their serving.

      "machines can't some soon enough as far as I'm concerned."

      Very few human staff will tolerate a rat or a roach on the table while they're preparing your food. A rat can nibble on the bun, with roaches hanging out in the lettuce while a machine puts your burger together.

    3. Re:Too bad by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      You are however, ignoring the potential advantages that a human-free environment can provide. You can make sure that an environment is very sanitary if you regularly flood it with high levels of UV that human workers wouldn't care for.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    4. Re:Too bad by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      The milkshake machine is a 'robot' and it can get gross fast. A lazy graveyard cleaning crew might not get caught for a month...

      Who the hell is making milkshakes in a graveyard?

      ... until a health inspector opens it up and notices the brown crust growing around the drive shaft. Or a customer complains about some 'gross' sludge from finally broke off and game out in their serving.

      Note to self: Get buried in a different graveyard.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    5. Re:Too bad by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      You can make sure that an environment is very sanitary if you regularly flood it with high levels of UV that human workers wouldn't care for.

      Added bonus: No vampires in the kitchen.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    6. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could, I don't know, maybe keep one or two people purely for sanitation? It's hardly impractical to go the automation route.

    7. Re:Too bad by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because there is no way that we'll invent cleaning robots. No. Way.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    8. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm personally skeptical that we can actually teach a machine to distinguish between "clean" and "sanitised" surfaces within the foreseeable future. I can foresee a solution where the cooking robots are disassembled and cleaned on a completely automated and a regular basis e.g. they get cleaned three times day. Whether we see such machines being used in real restaurants in the near future is something that I am betting won't happen.

    9. Re:Too bad by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      I'm personally skeptical that we can actually teach a machine to distinguish between "clean" and "sanitised" surfaces within the foreseeable future.

      Why would it need to do that? Does a car wash check how clean your car is before washing it?

      I can foresee a solution where the cooking robots are disassembled and cleaned on a completely automated and a regular basis e.g. they get cleaned three times day.

      It doesn't have to be automated, a human is probably cheaper in the near term and they can wash the robots in several different stores in a day. They'll go from needing 2 or 3 full-time employees per store to 1/3rd or 1/4th of an employee per store.

    10. Re:Too bad by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      It depends on how seriously the company takes consistency and sanitation when they order the robots they want. Most food assembly lines use cameras to check items for faults, and they can do so much more reliably than people, let alone dozens of times faster. Yes, employees still tear down and clean the machines, but if a weird spot is detected on a pizza crust or that potato chip is burnt or too small, a quick blast of air will shoo it off the belt.

      Eventually, I expect fast food robots to do the same. People don't expect fast food to be high in quality, but consistency is paramount. Cameras and other sensors will eventually be able to detect crust, mold, and flattened buns -- let alone rats.

    11. Re:Too bad by vux984 · · Score: 1

      " Does a car wash check how clean your car is before washing it?"

      It doesn't really verify its clean afterwards either. That's the bigger problem. You ever go to unload the dishwasher and find rice stuck to all the glasses, or something caked on to a pot that didn't come off? The robot will use those dishes, because... "they're clean".

      "It doesn't have to be automated, a human is probably cheaper in the near term and they can wash the robots in several different stores in a day. "

      Yeah, and if five minutes after the human crew leaves for the next store a mouse gets caught in the machine and dismembered, the robots will happily continue serving burgers through the disgusting mess until the cleaning crew gets back the next day.

    12. Re:Too bad by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Of course you could. But those are the same low paid unsanitary people he wanted to replace because he didn't want them touching his food. Does he think they're going to do a good job cleaning the food machines?

    13. Re:Too bad by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You know those odd horror stories about a dead rodent found in a can of tomatoes or jar of pickles. Yeah, that's how good the machines are.

      I used to work at a large biscuit (cookie for the Americans) factory. We had a moth fly in and land on the dough during the kneading and forming section right before the oven. The guy just looked at it, turned to me and said QC will catch it. 20min later I had to deliver something to packing and noticed the QC guy wasn't even there that day and they just ran the line without him.

      I also worked at a Pizza Hut. The pasta cooker in the back of the restaurant got cleaned every day by just wiping over the strainer, no one ever really removed it from its mounting while the machine had no water in it. When I was working in that area one day at the end of the shift I wondered what was under there. Thick caked on muck. We tried cleaning it but got nowhere. I pointed it out to my manager who said we should have an industrial strength floor cleaner in the back somewhere which would dissolve the grease, so we poured that in there and watched maybe 10 dead cockroaches get released from their greased on prison, and I gagged at the smell.

      THAT'S how good people are.

    14. Re:Too bad by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Ahh forgot to mention: The biscuit line was upgraded 2 years after I left. I went through for a tour, and the QC department has installed a camera based reject system which monitors the colour and consistency of what comes out of the oven. It doesn't break for lunch, it doesn't chat to other employees, and it doesn't fall asleep in its chair either. It was a combined program with a local university and the university press credited it with a ~70% reduction in customer complaints.

    15. Re:Too bad by Kjella · · Score: 1

      It all depends on how advanced automation you want to build. The simplest form is purely mechanical operation, no input or output validation and no self-integrity checks. This is how power tools work, push the button and the drill starts drilling. From there you can add sensors, like a thermostat adjusts the output relative to an input. You can add self-integrity checks like a photocopier complaining about a paper jam. Any coin-operated machine validates that what you put in is actually coins. For an automated lock add contacts to sense if the door is locked or unlocked and if it doesn't follow control signals report a lock malfunction. And you can enforce service intervals with timers, if necessary with sensors too that you've removed all the pieces that should be removed or that the bin you're supposed to empty weighs that of an empty bin. Unless you can automate the whole cleaning cycle too.

      There's no revolution but there's been a constant evolution towards more and more "intelligent" automation. There's a reason getting the error codes out of automobiles was a big deal, because very often the car knows what's wrong these days. Advances in robot vision means you're now automatically processing variable input like raw fish and produce. More and more advanced machinery refuses to operate when it detects an out-of-spec condition, not because there's a human hitting the stop/abort switch. For example the SpaceX launches, it's usually been the computer halting the countdown not human intervention. Of course this has nothing to do with AI and machine learning, it's just logic built into the system. But when we're trying to make it do one thing under a very narrow set of conditions, that's plenty.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    16. Re:Too bad by TWX · · Score: 1

      At least the cleanliness of the machine is something that can be inspected, kind of like how restaurant inspections already look into other kitchen machinery when they visit. If a restaurant machine is not sufficiently clean then it could result in that machine being forced to not operate until it has been sufficiently cleaned and reinspected, and even if the restaurant manages that while the inspector is present it still results in a demerit.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    17. Re:Too bad by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Oh, i agree people are inconsistent. I don't dispute for a second any of the horror stories out there about shit work done by people.

      But its a mistake to think simply putting robots in is the solution. Robots are terrific at doing exactly what they're told for days on end, and lousy at anything else. Humans... aren't great at doing exactly same thing over and over again, and are apt to get lazy. But they can deal with the things the machines can't deal with.

      Your pasta maker example, for example... nobody ever checked underneath, until you did. But you did. A robot would NEVER have checked unless it had been programmed to check.

      Upon looking you discovered a disgusting mess and set about cleaning it. The robot would not have checked, and if had and got nowhere, it wouldn't have dug around in the bag for industrial floor cleaner. Your example is look how shit people are... but people also correct the problem.

      When you do it with robots, those problems still exist, but they never get checked.

      The camera watches the conveyer belt for imperfections, great, but if there is a bunch of mold just outside the cameras view, it never sees it, despite everything that comes thorugh getting a nice dose of spores. Or what if the rat sits on the other side of the camera nibbling away AFTER they've passed the camera inspection...

      Or perhaps the mold is on the camera itself, and depending on the camera programming, if we're lucky it'll start rejecting everything and someone will come over to find out what's going on. If we're unlucky... it'll fail such that since its not seeing the flaw its looking for and it'll pass everything while running blind undetected.

      Robots/machines are great at improving the productivity of people. But replacing people with robots doesn't necessarily make things better, if the people are lousy, the robots just let them be lousy at greater scale.

    18. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're totally correct about the shortcoming of robots, but I think that Flippy is the right approach to automation, since it monitors the cooking process of the patties, and still keeps the humans around to shoo away the rats and roaches.

  5. What they left out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Loud disco music from the '70s to accompany Flippy's work.

    People would've gone nuts.

  6. But does it like dolphins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "If I told you there were two guys, one named Flippy, and one named Hambone, and I asked you which one liked dophins the most, you'd probably say Flippy, wouldn't you? But you'd be wrong, because it's Hambone." -- Jack Handy

  7. Re: Just like moron republicans, too slow get em o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking of morons, this article is about California. You know, a state thatâ(TM)s Democrat controlled? Yeah, I know, Iâ(TM)m talking to a brick wall

  8. How hard can it be? by jwhyche · · Score: 5, Funny

    Really, How hard can it be to come up with a burger flipping robot? I'm actually sitting here thinking of a design that cooks the patty on both sides at the same time. No need to flip. I think a guy name Foreman was shilling a grill like it on tv the other night.

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    1. Re:How hard can it be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, How hard can it be to come up with a burger flipping robot? I'm actually sitting here thinking of a design that cooks the patty on both sides at the same time. No need to flip. I think a guy name Foreman was shilling a grill like it on tv the other night.

      Hell, use an extruder nozzle to place a ball of meat on a conveyor and load it into heated a double-sided heated conveyor, pizza oven style. There is literally noting to automating burger cooking.

      Engineers of today are exposed to way too much technology so they always want to overthink of ways to throw more technology at a problem instead of using a low-tech and low cost solution that still gets the job done.

    2. Re:How hard can it be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I smell a publicity stunt. There are plenty of burger cooking broilers that just run on a conveyor belt. All of that R&D and they shut it down after ONE day. Hmmm.

    3. Re:How hard can it be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because flame grilled is better.

      2.5 burgers a minute is a bit slow though. Just need part time workers for the peak teams, and use the robot for the rest of the time.

    4. Re:How hard can it be? by Balthisar · · Score: 1

      McDonald's uses (or used to use?) "clamshell" grills that cooked both sides at the same time, and this was even before George Foreman.

      --
      --Jim (me)
    5. Re:How hard can it be? by PPH · · Score: 1

      I can recall seeing 'burger patty conveyors' that flame grilled on one side and when the patty reached the end, it flipped itself onto a second belt, cooking the other side.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    6. Re:How hard can it be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Burger King already has it perfected. They put their patties on a conveyor belt. It doesn't seem as glamorous, but same end result.

    7. Re:How hard can it be? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

      It's called a "George Foreman Grill". You should probably just stay home and make your own burgers, you'll get better quality ingredients that way anyway.

    8. Re:How hard can it be? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Yup, Burger King makes the best fast food burgers out of all the big chains. They're still way behind places like In N' Out and whatnot, but I think we're calling them "fast casual" now.

    9. Re:How hard can it be? by Nkwe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really, How hard can it be to come up with a burger flipping robot?

      Setting aside for a moment the humor aspect of the parent, I think the non-sarcastic answer to this question is actually pretty interesting. If the question is really "How hard is it to automatically cook a hamburger patty?", the answer is that it's pretty easy if you get to design the whole machine in and the environment that it runs in. If you can use a wire conveyor belt and heating elements on both sides similar to how the sandwich toasters at Quizno's and Potbelly and add some stuff for grease management, you are probably set. Even if it turns out that you really need to heat from the bottom and let the patty sit in the grease, you could build something similar to how an automated tortilla cooker works. But on the other hand, if your requirement is to build a device that must operate in conjunction with an existing restaurant grill, without modifying the grill itself, and the device needs to take no more space than would a human standing in front of the grill, and this device has to safely operate around other human restaurant workers amidst the chaos of motion and activity that occurs in a small kitchen, and the device has to be as productive as a human would, the task is pretty complex and hard.

    10. Re:How hard can it be? by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      Extrusion. Yes. Exactly correct.

      http://theyesmen.org/index.php/portfolio_page/let-them-eat-hamburger/

      The relevant frames begin right around 3:58.

    11. Re: How hard can it be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it wasn't. He's older than McDonald's.

    12. Re:How hard can it be? by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      I think that there is a very human perception issue here as well. If you're just running a frozen patty through a conveyor, that feels like a factory. If there's a robot emulating a human, that feels much closer to "handmade". It doesn't matter that it's just a less effective way to cook the burger, most humans are going to feel like the human-mimicking activity produces a higher quality burger.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    13. Re:How hard can it be? by PastTense · · Score: 1

      The robot will probably cost more than the grill; so it's not a problem that the existing grill goes.

    14. Re:How hard can it be? by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that every pizza parlor I go to never uses a conventional oven. They use a conveyor belt that runs at just the right speed. Really, they would just need to get robots to stretch the dough and put on the toppings -- the cooking is already down pat.

      Professional chefs cook hamburger patties in an oven, not on a grill. As you said, a patty toaster oven makes a lot more sense, and would make it easier to produce items to order, eliminating the problem of having to store burgers under a hot lamp.

      Making a robot that flips patties is either a publicity stunt or a stop-gap measure, so no surprise it hasn't immediately lived up to expectations.

    15. Re:How hard can it be? by Fulminata · · Score: 1

      This is basically the machine that places like Burger King and Dairy Queen were using back in the 80s and 90s. I assume that something similar is still used today, but maybe that's changed.

      Nobody was flipping burgers back then, you just put a frozen patty in the machine at one end, and it came out done on the other. Have the patty roll over an open flame at some point in the trip and you get your "flame broiled" part.

    16. Re:How hard can it be? by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 1
      --
      Say no to software patents.
    17. Re:How hard can it be? by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      Your link gets right to the meat of the argument but mine has the full video for those who want to understand the background.

  9. Nothingburger by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    after a single day of working as a cook at a Caliburger location in Pasadena this week, Flippy the burger-flipping robot has stopped flipping.

    Just so you all know, Caliburger is a shit place. It's an overpriced version of In and Out. When we moved to California, we stopped at the Caliburger in Bakersfield and the fries are frozen like McDonalds and the burgers are tiny and mushy. We had driven in from the Mojave and we were hungry and it was really a disappointment.

    There are much better burger places around here.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Nothingburger by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Frozen fries are better. You get a better texture inside if you freeze first. What sucks about McDonalds fries is that they're too thin and they're often limp because they rush it.

    2. Re:Nothingburger by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      If you have a wild side and want to live dangerously, try committing to some shitty burger tourism, I recommend the Hermitage TN Jack in the Box. It will really leave you asking, "am I going to get food poisoning from eating this?"

      A1 in awfulness, best worst service, glad I didn't get sick, will never eat there again! F++++++

    3. Re:Nothingburger by Khyber · · Score: 2

      "You get a better texture inside if you freeze first."

      WRONG. You get a better texture inside if you parboil first. Freezing freshly-cut potatoes does exactly jack and shit to the product except turn it to mush.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:Nothingburger by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      https://aht.seriouseats.com/20...

      Getting Inside the Fluffy Interior

      Now that I'd perfected the crust, the final issue to deal with was that of the interior. One last question remained: how to maximize the flavor of the interior. In order to stay fluffy and not gummy, a lot of the interior moisture needs to be expelled in the cooking process, so my goal should be to make this evaporation as easy as possible. I figure that so far, by cooking it all the way to boiling point, I'm doing pretty much the right thing--the more cooked the potatoes are, the more the cell structure breaks down, and the easier it is for water to be expelled. To confirm this, I cooked three batches of potatoes, starting each in a pot of cold, vinegared water, and bringing them up to various final temperature (170 degree F, 185 degree F, and 212 degree F) before draining and double-frying them. Not surprisingly, the boiled potatoes had the best internal structure. Luckily, they were the easiest to make as well.

      But was there anything more I could do? I thought back to those McDonald's fries and realized a vital step that I had neglected to test: freezing. Every batch of McDonald's fries is frozen before being shipped out to the stores. I always figured this step was for purely economic reasons, but perhaps there was more to it?

      I tried freezing half a batch of fries before frying them and tasted them side-by-side against the other half.

      The improvement was undeniable. The frozen fries had a distinctly fluffier interior, while the unfrozen ones were still ever-so-slightly gummy. It makes perfect sense. Freezing the potatoes causes their moisture to convert to ice, forming sharp, jagged crystals. These crystals damage the cell structure of the potato, making it easier for them to be released once they are heated and convert to steam. The best part? Because freezing actually improves them, I can do the initial blanching and frying steps in large batches, freeze them, and have a constant supply of ready-to-fry potatoes right in my freezer just like Ronald himself!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    5. Re:Nothingburger by Khyber · · Score: 1

      He boiled in vinegared water - instant failure. Period.

      I speak as someone with over two decades of professional culinary experience.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    6. Re:Nothingburger by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I guess you've never poached an egg

      https://www.bbcgoodfood.com/vi...

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    7. Re:Nothingburger by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Wrong, retard! Vinegar is necessary.

    8. Re:Nothingburger by sexconker · · Score: 1

      WRONG.

      I both par boil AND freeze. Par boiling is to make it easier to crisp up the outside and removes excess starch (much better than an ice bath), but it isn't strictly necessary. You can also oven bake at high temperatures after (which makes it easier if you're cooking multiple batches) or double fry (which takes forever for a decent sized batch in a home fryers as you have to reheat the oil). It doesn't do shit for the inside. Par boiling alone will give you a softer inside, but it will be rubbery and mushy. I consider it worse than doing nothing.

    9. Re:Nothingburger by sexconker · · Score: 1

      This is the same guide I followed in my own quest for a good homemade french fry. After many attempts following other tips (par boiling, double or triple frying, adding corn starch), I found this guide, tried it, and bam. Crispy (fairly), fresh, delicious french fries WITH a perfect texture inside.

      I par boil and freeze now, sometimes double frying but sometimes not. The only remaining issue I have is the fact that modern home-use deep fryers are all limited to relatively low temperatures and capacities. This makes it hard to get a good crisp without burning or soaking the fries in oil. Double fry takes too long because you have to wait for the oil to reheat, and if you're doing more than 1 batch, forget about it.

      I was seriously considering buying a thousand dollar commercial unit just for french fries (and a wall mounted fry press), but freezing has elevated my fries so much that I no longer see it as necessary. If I want a harder crisp on them I'll throw them in a hot oven toaster oven for a bit after frying. That has the bonus of keeping them warm (and uneaten) while I work on the next batch.

    10. Re:Nothingburger by Khyber · · Score: 1

      But that's how you're SUPPOSED to poach an egg. I've got recipe books transcribed from the 1600s that mention that basic fact.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    11. Re:Nothingburger by Khyber · · Score: 1

      No, vinegar is not, oh ye with NO FUCKING CULINARY LICENSE, whereas I hold two licenses. That reminds me, the state renewal term for one is coming.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  10. 24 down and 24 on the turn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flippy has a long, long way to go. 12 is the limit, but we simply had to go to 24 during lunch rushes to keep up. I was cooking 150 burgers in under 10 minutes.

  11. big surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would have thunk replacing a 1/10th? of a persons job wouldn't be very efficient. Slow and cheap might work but they didnt actually reduce any costs it appears.

    Looked rather overhyped for what it did anyway!
    A few people previously thought he was too slow. Probably some guy standing over him waiting to add cheese cussing at his pace.

  12. Clippy by zifn4b · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I see you're trying to flip a burger, would you like help with that?"

    --
    We'll make great pets
    1. Re:Clippy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Alexa: "Ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha HA HA HA... "

    2. Re:Clippy by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      “It looks like you’re making a burger!”

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  13. if this was at a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this were at a Mexican Restaurant, would we call it a Mexi-Flip?
    Moving past that, far beyond that, if it would be labeled as "mexi-flip" what would be the difference, other than consistency..
    It's Still Garbage in, Still Garbage out, the difference being the robot got to shutdown and management actually had to think. If that were a human, I think the situation would be verry different..
    Wonder whom got fired over this colossal blunder-fuck..
    With that said, Whom do YOU think should be fired??
    and dont say the Robot.. Please..
     

  14. Re: Just like moron republicans, too slow get em o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's take stock of your Fearless Leader Donald Trump: o Was continually Machoed Out by a little blonde girl (Megan Kelly)
    o Had to resort to personal attacks against other candidates (a sure sign of "no ammunition" and "low intelligence")
    o Grabbing the genitals of random women WHILE MARRIED
    o Fucking skeezy porn chicks WHILE MARRIED, and right after her HAVING HIS BABY
    o Shit 'businessman', keeps going bankrupt to the point where no bank will loan him money (except the Russians, LOL)
    o Is so dumb he actually falls for all the flattery the Russians laid on him since the 80's
    o Is so dumb that now he's in the hip pocket of Russia and Putin
    o Employs mainly criminals and idiots; the smart ones get tired of his shit and leave
    o Is HATED more and more every single day, by even his own so-called 'core support'
    o Will soon be indicted on criminal charges and very likely TREASON; enjoy your firing squad, Donnie
    ..and you voted for this fucking loser. Really, you should just kill yourself, there's no recovering from this.

  15. Ha, ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suck it, millennial nerds that were just last week proclaiming the inevitable doom of humans based on the original Flippy piece. I second my own 'Ha, ha!'.

    1. Re:Ha, ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So your reasoning is that because robots have not taken over the world in one week, they never will?

  16. RTFM by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    You'd think the maximum output per minute would have been detailed in the user manual, but it was probably written up as YMMV based on network conditions. I wonder if Flippy requires a direct connection to the net and then could be hacked to serve raw burgers or burn them up and start a fire.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  17. Flippy's too limited by Ken_g6 · · Score: 2

    It's designed to work with existing appliances and workers. They should just get a machine to do the whole burger, like this.

    --
    (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
  18. Re: Just like moron republicans, too slow get em o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was continually Machoed Out by a little blonde girl (Megan Kelly)

    Slanderous selective editing which has caused her ratings and credibility to tank.

    Had to resort to personal attacks against other candidates (a sure sign of "no ammunition" and "low intelligence")

    Pot/Kettle

    Grabbing the genitals of random women WHILE MARRIED

    Starstruck women who throw themselves at rich/famous people. What a concept.

    Fucking skeezy porn chicks WHILE MARRIED, and right after her HAVING HIS BABY

    She was paid to make up the story and can't back it up. Reminds me of the made up pissing hookers story.

    Shit 'businessman', keeps going bankrupt to the point where no bank will loan him money (except the Russians, LOL)

    How much money have you made? How many businesses have you started and what ratio of them were successful? Try to avoid dividing by zero.

    Is so dumb he actually falls for all the flattery the Russians laid on him since the 80's
    Is so dumb that now he's in the hip pocket of Russia and Putin

    Russia is moving away from the murderous communism of its past and is trying to become prosperous. Clearly everyone should hate that!

    Employs mainly criminals and idiots; the smart ones get tired of his shit and leave

    Well gosh, you've stumped me. I didn't know he employed the DNC!

    Is HATED more and more every single day, by even his own so-called 'core support'

    Polls over-sampling leftists still find him at/over 50% approval.

    Will soon be indicted on criminal charges and very likely TREASON; enjoy your firing squad, Donnie

    Charges like...? Pro tip: not liking him doesn't make him a criminal. Also, trying to improve the nation he represents is the opposite of treason.

    ..and you voted for this fucking loser. Really, you should just kill yourself, there's no recovering from this.

    What a kind, loving and tolerant person you are!

  19. In other news: by TrumpThemAll · · Score: 0

    California condemns flippy as being racist because it could end the careers of thousands of illegal aliens and CNN blames this in Donald Trump. Hillary is sure that Russia has something to do with this and says you should completely ignore the uranium mines she sold to them.

  20. Re: Just like moron republicans, too slow get em o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  21. A burger making machine isn't new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked at Burger King (no, I'm not embarrassed), and they don't flame broil burgers by hand, they use a machine with a conveyor belt. You put the frozen burger in one end, and it comes out the other end flame broiled.

    It means less burger flipping jobs, so what, it also means more cleaning and deep fryer jobs.

    The only reason people who have a clue care about this robot is because it's a robot. The sleepeople don't know why they like it, but it's a robot.

  22. The King already beat them to it. by kimgkimg · · Score: 1

    I think Burger King already has a working burger cooking robot. It's called a charbroiler.

  23. robotic milkshake machines??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when are milkshake machines robots?

  24. what human staff will tolerate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would be surprised what "human staff" will tolerate when they aren't the end consumer or have a vested interest in success or cleanliness. I used to work with a company that produced food processing equipment and there are things I cannot "un see" and food brands I will never consume again.

  25. Too slow? Easily solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I watched the video - those things spend way too much time and motion screwing around swapping spatulas. Redesign the hand - include multiple spatulas already.

    And then there's the whole concept of having TWO or more flippy's... done.

  26. Missed Value Creation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They could have made the Flippy burgers twice the price of regular burgers, with a separate line to give the people ordering Flippies a viewing opportunity to the assemblage of their burger as they wait.

  27. AI to the rescue by shayd2 · · Score: 1
    Flippy could have a camera and learn the other worker's routines

    If necessary, s/he could get Alexa's voice (without the cackling laugh)

  28. Re:Too slow? Easily solved by ledow · · Score: 1

    Question - why does it need to be arm at all?

    Surely just sliding the burgers into a double-sided wire-cage "envelope", then sticking them on the heat, lifting, rotating 180, putting on the heat again, then lifting, tilting, open a little "gate" at the end, and slide them out is not only quicker, easier, more consistent, more sensible and easier to make but it also reduces pretty much all the difficult jobs involved in it.

    The excuse they used was that the robot can flip individual burgers when they get hot enough, but my brain just says "have even heating, for even times" rather than pissing about with computer vision, articulated hands, and still needing kitchen staff to arrange the meat in a certain way and work around it.

    There have been automated burger machines for decades. It was always cheaper to just pay someone to do it, especially when it comes to cleaning, faults, maintenance, etc. The burger-flipping and consistent-cooking is the EASY part. They've taken that, over-complicated it to extremes, and not solved any of the original problems anyway (i.e. who cleans Flippy?).

  29. The challange with automation is fixed throughput by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The issue with automation like this is they run at a specific rate. The machine can produce X number of burger per hour or pick X number of boxes an hour etc...

    So for things like manufacturing were you run at a fixed rate turning out X number of widgets per hour they work great.

    However in a variable environment like this when Flippy can't keep up, it can't ask the order taking kiosk to come in the back and help catch up. You can't schedule extra flippy's to come in on a day you know will be busy like a holiday, sporting event, festival etc..

    Doesn't mean it can't work, but makes it much more expensive as you have to design for peak volume by having 3 of these machines with one always running 2 running during normal peaks and 3 when you have an unusual high demand.

  30. Pick your implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flippy is either a Gimmick or the creation of people who don't understand automation. You don't just stick a 6-axis robot in an otherwise bone stock grill station. The more obvious solution is a conveyor belt and a double sided griddle. Servos and solenoids perform material handling much cheaper and more efficiently.

  31. RUR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the future...where not only humans are unemployed...

    I wonder what the current RUR (Robot Unemployment Rate) is?

  32. Re:I have seen the future, and it repeats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seem to be an exception. Millennial's actually prefer doing things the touchscreen in hundreds of languages, with pictures, and an incredible number of options. Because non-English speaking, uncaring, fast food workers screwup about 30% of the orders they get.. Please look at some of the results in Los Angeles McDonald's restaurants where there was an option of the machine versus a human. The machine was uniformly more correct, more polite (think about that) and completely accurate.

    Have you ever considered that perhaps something should not be done by people? Like weaving cloth harvesting grain, etc. by hand? How much (if you're old enough to actually remember this) do you actually miss human telephone operators making your long-distance connections? How much do you miss having a human elevator operator? I remember both of these and we kind of accepted them as the natural order of things. But they're not.

  33. Robots are too expensive in most cases by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    Seriously.

    As soon as you add mechanical complexity then you're adding maintenance costs.

    If the worker being replaced is paid a low wage, the cost:benefit is low. The low-hanging fruit for automation are more-or-less intellectual but repetitive tasks with higher pay rates and that's been going on for 40 years (when was the last time you saw a room full of accounts ledger clerks scratching away?)

    The more likely targets for unemployment are accountants, junior lawyers and suchlike. The investment to do so is lower and the rewards are higher.

    Minimum wages won't fall, but the number of higher-paid jobs will decline, bringing more people DOWN to minimum wage.

  34. are you 12? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd starve to death if you expected the robot to make it look like the marketing pics. They spend hours making sure every detail is just right, individual placement of the sesame seeds etc. You aint ever getting it like it look in the pictures.

  35. Re:Too slow? Easily solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Question - why does it need to be arm at all?

    Well, I think the whole reason for having articulated arms is so they can be used for other purposes.

    Having a machine that just flips burgers is a waste of technology. Aren't we pursuing AI so that we can have general-purpose robots that are smart enough (or programmable enough) to do a variety of tasks that humans do?