Slashdot Mirror


Twitter Suspends Numerous Popular Accounts That Are Known For Stealing Tweets (buzzfeed.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Continuing its battle against the "tweetdeckers," Twitter suspended on Friday several popular accounts known for stealing tweets or mass-retweeting tweets into manufactured virality. @Dory, @GirlPosts, @SoDamnTrue, Girl Code/@reiatabie, Common White Girl/@commonwhitegiri, @teenagernotes, @finah, @holyfag, and @memeprovider were among the accounts that got swept up in the purge. Many of these accounts were hugely popular, with hundreds of thousands or even millions of followers. In addition to stealing people's tweets without credit, some of these accounts are known as "tweetdeckers" due to their practice of teaming up in exclusive Tweetdeck groups and mass-retweeting one another's -- and paying customers' -- tweets into forced virality. A Twitter spokesperson declined to comment on individual accounts, but BuzzFeed News understands the accounts were suspended for violating Twitter's spam policy.

26 of 52 comments (clear)

  1. You mean ‘plagiarising’, not ‘st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The original twits still aren't deprived of their inane bloody tweets, they've still got them insofar as you can really own anything that's in the sodding cloud. The suspended accounts were plagiarising tweets: copying them without attribution.
    Words matter; the headline made it sound like they found some sort of vulnerability in Twitter allowing them to move tweets to different accounts.

  2. NOTHING of this is news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. BuzzFeed -> need I say more?
    2. Twitter -> Seriously, need I say more?

    Twitter is, has always been, and will always be, a 100% PR/propaganda site, for those PR and midlife crisis people who believe it's where the "cool" young "hip" people are, but where really them and only them live. Even the young girls there are just such people pretending to be them. And every famous person there is either a "managed account" or somebody who wants to be "cool" and precisely doesn't know what is.

    And BuzzFeed is a site that out-HuffPo’d and out-FoxNews’d both Fox News and Huffington Post in their clickbaity bullshittery. They are the epitome of fake news. Their logo is literally what you find in the dictionary when you look up "fake news" or "clickbait".

    And since BuzzFeed now has appeared multiple times here, I highly suspect Slashdot is now nothing more than a husk, put on by the likes of BuzzFeed, to disguise themselves, when raping your brain yet another time.

    Complete, total, and utter psychopathic insanity.
    Everyone involved should be expelled to Siberia or Arizona and shot on the first attempt of re-entering the human world! Including me and you due to having been tainted.

  3. Re:Frosty piss? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny

    You have plagiarized a common first post and your /. account will be suspended.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  4. Re:You mean ‘plagiarising’, not &lsquo by shubus · · Score: 1

    Maybe YouTube will follow suit with videos...

  5. weird by dreamygeek · · Score: 1

    Many users on twitters do automated Re-tweeting based on specific hash tags. If they give proper credit to the original tweeter will it still be considered spam? How do they define the boundary?

    1. Re:weird by ArtemaOne · · Score: 4, Informative

      The summary was poorly written, the accounts were banned mostly for copying the content and posting it as their own (think 9GAG).

    2. Re:weird by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      So I just need to post things with a hashtag that is automatically retweeted by many others to become viral? Hooray! #meetoo will be famous!

      --
      bickerdyke
    3. Re:weird by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

      noice

  6. Honestly this is relevant by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    In todays world, Twitter news like this is actually very relevant to nerds and even stuff that matters...

    That's right, Twitter matters, take that as you will but it's true in todays world.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Honestly this is relevant by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      No fucks given if twitter vanished forever.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  7. Twiter is useful by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I agree with you about BuzzFeed but Twitter still has practical use. I still get useful links and other information daily from the various people I follow - all of it technical, as I try not to follow anyone overtly political, and much more concise than Facebook could ever be.

    Twitter, like any other tool, is useful if you use it correctly....

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  8. Re:Frosty piss? by postbigbang · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wish there was a mod point for laughable irony.

    The sad fact is that if social media loses viral impact beyond kitty pics, their stock prices will sink into the abyss from whence it came.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  9. Re:Frosty piss? by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    It would be fine by me. Other people seem lost without it, and unable to think for themselves. I don't see any renaissance re-occurring after the bad actors leave, either.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  10. Re:Then why does the retweet feature exist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Or provide automated attribution

  11. Re:Then why does the retweet feature exist? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If Twitter realized that retweets are stupid they should just remove the feature instead of penalizing people who use it.

    I love the excessively simplistic attitude people take. Retweets are in general fine, that doesn't mean they can't be abused.

    Spam is abouse of email, but that doesn't mean email should be banned.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  12. Stealing tweets by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I confess I didn't even know that "stealing tweets" was a thing. O Brave New World...

    Alrighty then, I guess I'll go yell at some kids to get off my lawn after Matlock is over.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Stealing tweets by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

      I confess I didn't even know that "stealing tweets" was a thing. O Brave New World...

      Alrighty then, I guess I'll go yell at some kids to get off my lawn after Matlock is over.

      Matlock?

      Is that one of those newfangled theater performances in a box?

  13. Re:Frosty piss? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    ... if social media loses viral impact beyond kitty pics, their stock prices will sink into the abyss from whence it came.

    If there was a Kickstarter I could donate to that would cause social media to fail spectacularly and disappear, I'd put in some money.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  14. Re:Then why does the retweet feature exist? by pseudofrog · · Score: 3, Informative

    These accounts weren't retweeting. They were straight-up copypasting original jokes from other accounts. They've been a bane of Twitter for years and the platform is now slightly less terrible because of this move.

  15. Social media is to Society... by sycodon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...as Bitcoin is to economies.

    Fortunes are gained and lost on something that is intrinsically without value.

    Reputations are gained and lost through shallow, ill conceived, and impetuous statements that, without social media, would have never been expressed.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Social media is to Society... by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin actually has classically-defined value. The lesson about that value is classic supply and demand.

      The value of social media Is a different phenomenon. There are lots of lonely people in this world, who want to be heard, Consequentially, this means that they must also then put their lives into the contexts of others (some successfully, others not), and be prepared to defend themselves, for which most are quite ill-equipped.

      If you accept that there are sheep, shepherds, and wolves in this world, the lonely are often fallen prey to wolves. Bitcoin, by contrast, is gambling.

      Both are very addictive, but in bitcoin, you know you're gambling with supply and demand. If you look at the tens of millions across the planet that are stock market gamblers, you can get a sense of the differing, yet addicted motivations involved in both. Everyone wants to be loved and have power and money. This is the sauce that suits both contexts.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    2. Re:Social media is to Society... by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Society is not found on Facebook, Twitter, etc.

      Society is made up of your neighbors, your church, your children, your parents, your friend, your colleagues, and even if you are poorest or the poor, the people you huddle around the fire with at night drinking your Boones Farm and Schlitz.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    3. Re:Social media is to Society... by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      But it is under attack by Facebook, Twitter et al.

      Not by the companies itself. By your very friends, neighbours, church... well "society" itself.

      It's subtle. But everyone posting "happy moments" builds expectations in others. Why doesn't my dinner look as perfect as hers? Why didn't my boyfriend propose to me with such an expensive ring? Why did we not go to Paris for honeymoon? Why don't I have such adorable kids? That builds up huge pressure! You feel like a failure because you compare your (pretty good) life to the "best of highlights" sampler from others social media, but of course can't admit that! (or that your cake on your post looks perfect because you baked and threw away 10 others before you got the hang of decorating it right)

      But does that keep you from joining that game? NO!

      Real life example. Girlfriend heard of Paris as "city of love". Overdose of "the Bachelor" and others honeymoon pictures I guess. Yes, it has nice places, but turns out that first of all, Paris is a regular big city with all the big city problems, too. (noise, trash, homeless people in subway stations) Sorry but it's a real place and not Disneyland. She hated it. But what ended up on facebook? The picture of us below the Eiffel tower in sunshine as "memory of a perfect trip". Yes! Go ahead, help other being disappointed, too!

      (Ironically, it wasn't my first trip there and that time, I felt I i started to know my way around there and got some ideas of what really cool thing one could do there.)

      --
      bickerdyke
    4. Re:Social media is to Society... by gnick · · Score: 1

      But everyone posting "happy moments" builds expectations in others. Why doesn't my dinner look as perfect as hers? Why...

      If your life gets worse because there's something nice in someone else's, the problem is on your side of the fence. My brother makes a shitload more money than I do and outpaces about every perk I can buy myself. That doesn't remotely slow me down from enjoying what I have.

      Real life example... Yes! Go ahead, help other being disappointed, too!

      If you're disappointed in Paris because somebody else got a nicer picture of the Eiffel tower, you're Parising wrong. There are much better reasons to be disappointed with Paris. There are even pretty good reasons to enjoy it, which is where I'd try to focus.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    5. Re:Social media is to Society... by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Absolutely agree. That's why I was shocked to see the effect it had on my girlfriend. As you said, I know better than than to build my expectations on social media and "reality" tv.

      And the problem wasn't the better picture of the Eiffel Tower. The problem is with continuing that game. If you don't like it - for whatever reason - why no say so?

      --
      bickerdyke
  16. So.. by bn-7bc · · Score: 1

    Mr Musk ks not rhe leader in AI so he wants regulations and calls it worse thsn nukes. OK, aai have my doubts about that but he probably knows way more thsn me about the subject so who knows hemight be genuinly concerned for non buisness reasons