Amazon Recalls 260,000 Portable Power Banks For Fire Hazard (cnbc.com)
Amazon is recalling 260,000 AmazonBasics portable power banks that can "overheat and ignite," according to a release by the Consumer Product Safety Commission. The company has received more than 50 reports of the power banks overheating in the U.S., causing chemical burns and property damage. CNBC reports: "Consumers should immediately unplug and stop using the recalled power banks and contact Amazon for instructions on how to return the unit and receive a full refund," the release says. Amazon is contacting everyone who purchased one of the affected devices. The recall covers six versions of the AmazonBasics portable battery: 16,100 mAh; 10,000 mAh; 5,600 mAh; 2,000 mAh with micro USB cable; 3,000 mAh; and 3,000 mAh with USB micro cable.
A few Amazon basics are OK, but most of it is just too cheaply made. I know a person who had problems with this battery I believe. Didn't catch fire, but was getting pretty hot. Crummy China made stuff is just too risky to use to save a few bucks. Buy a good known brand that has circuitry that protects the device.
How else will I be able to recharge my Chinese knock-off hoverboard from Amazon?
I've really mostly used Amazon Basics for cables so far, those have seemed to be fairly decent. I would be a little more hesitant with something complex, though I would not have thought a mobile charger would be that tricky.... guess I"ll not be getting an Amazon Basics UPS for my computer!
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
I thought by now Amazon would have AI-driven hoverable drone-like power banks, that would simply fly back to base to Amazon on the recall signal.
From a practicality side, having to be within 6 feet of an outlet to be able to charge your device sucks.
Little had been gained.
Or they could just put decently sized batteries in the phones in the first place.
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
Got the email, but couldn't find a reliable source to validate it.
I recevied the email, too. It contained details that only a bona fide vendor would have. It had the Amazon order number. It was sent to the email address I use for Amazon (please tell me you know better than to just have a single email address for everything). The product description matched my order history.
So yes, I was sure - to a level of certainty that outweighed the potential (very limited) "hack attack" probability and scope for damage.
The only worrying thing is that since I bought this in 2015, I have parted company with the power bank. I don't know where it is, or who has got it. Though I do still have the charger, so I guess / hope the device isn't being used by anyone.
politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
I bought three of these for various things, and they always seemed to work well. In particular, the 5600mAh one is thin, much thinner than the typical power bank based on cylindrical cells. I have never had any problems with them, but I shall stilll be disposing of them. I suspect that Amazon got bitten by a a slightly out of tolerance manufacturing technique, which happens to a lot of other power pack and battery makers too. Amazon is, unlike many of them, able to do a recall and willing to do so. I don't hold this against them, and I'd buy "Amazon Basics" again.
I am replacing the slim pack with this one from Anker: https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/pr...
Amazon's returns process was pretty slick. They do send you an email with an external link, but:
The order number can be searched against your Amazon order history, and their help pages recommend you do this if you get an email about an Amazon order;
The product name, email, order number, etc, all matched what I had purchased;
The external site didn't ask for any personal information.
The external site only asked what power packs I had, gave a bunch of links to disposal information in various countries, and said I would get a refund. So the security risks are close to zero, even if the link didn't see legitimate.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled"
Got the email, but couldn't find a reliable source to validate it.
I recevied the email, too. It contained details that only a bona fide vendor would have. It had the Amazon order number. It was sent to the email address I use for Amazon (please tell me you know better than to just have a single email address for everything). The product description matched my order history.
So yes, I was sure - to a level of certainty that outweighed the potential (very limited) "hack attack" probability and scope for damage.
The only worrying thing is that since I bought this in 2015, I have parted company with the power bank. I don't know where it is, or who has got it. Though I do still have the charger, so I guess / hope the device isn't being used by anyone.
I still haven't gotten any kind of response on its validity from Amazon; and Slashdot is sadly the most reliable source I've heard about the recall from.
Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
Oh, and no - it didn't have anything other than the models affected and a phone number to call. Nothing verifiable.
Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)