Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Quietly Hid Webpages Bragging of Ability to Influence Elections (theintercept.com)

Sam Biddle, reporting for The Intercept: When Mark Zuckerberg was asked if Facebook had influenced the outcome of the 2016 presidential election, the founder and CEO dismissed the notion that the site even had such power as "crazy." It was a disingenuous remark. Facebook's website had an entire section devoted to touting the "success stories" of political campaigns that used the social network to influence electoral outcomes. That page, however, is now gone, even as the 2018 congressional primaries get underway.

In the wake of a public reckoning with Facebook's unparalleled ability to distribute information and global anxiety over election meddling, bragging about the company's ability to run highly effective influence campaigns probably doesn't look so great. Facebook's "success stories" page is a monument to the company's dominance of online advertising, providing examples from almost every imaginable industry of how use of the social network gave certain players an advantage. "Case studies like these inspire and motivate us," the page crows.

3 of 83 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Cambridge analytica by burtosis · · Score: 3, Informative

    It was a quarter billion sorry I posted before checking.

  2. Re:Facebook and Twitter don't seem to get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    There is a world of difference between "Dem candidate is a shithead" and pizzagate.

    I saw a helluva lot more "Trump is a RAAAACIS Nazi!" on Facebook and Twitter than I saw of the "Dem candidate is a shithead" ilk.

  3. Fakebook strikes again by p51d007 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Of course they do! They constantly "play down/block" a lot of conservative posts, stories etc, but, PROMOTE liberal causes & stories. http://dailycaller.com/2016/05... https://gizmodo.com/former-fac... http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/0... https://www.npr.org/sections/t...