Slashdot Mirror


Verizon Will Fix Broadband Networks, Landlines To Resolve Investigation (vice.com)

Joel Hruska reports via ExtremeTech: Verizon has reached an agreement with the Communications Workers of America and the New York State Public Service Commission to begin repairing infrastructure and restoring service across New York State. The agreement requires Verizon to extend broadband service to tens of thousands of New York State households and to begin repairing facilities it has previously neglected. As in Pennsylvania, Verizon has been neglecting its fixed wired infrastructure in its bid to first sabotage copper service, then force customers to adopt alternative solutions. It's also been mired in an ongoing lawsuit with the state of New York over its breach of a 2008 contract requiring it to provide fiber service within New York City.

This new agreement appears to settle these issues, provided it's followed. Under its terms, Verizon will extend fiber to 10,000 to 12,000 households not currently served by it in Long Island and Verizon's "Upstate Reporting Region" (these are Verizon-specific regions, not geographical areas, so "Long Island" may mean more than just the island). It will begin immediately replacing copper lines in certain specific NYC buildings with high failure rates and transitioning them to fiber optic cable, repairing operations within 50 upstate wireless centers with high failure rates, allow plant technicians to report plant failures and maintenance needs more accurately, and begin inspecting and replacing the batteries that provide critical connectivity in the event of a power outage when said batteries are deployed for specific customers (hospitals, police stations, and other emergency facilities). It will also begin removing so-called "double poles." A double pole is when an old telephone pole is stapled (metaphorically speaking) to a newer one. Some examples of a double pole from PA are shown below; Verizon has been hauled into court to force it to do its job in more than one state.

74 comments

  1. Keep the copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's the last utility that still works in an emergency.

    1. Re:Keep the copper by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Informative

      They're transitioning to fiber to the premises from copper. I'd take fiber over a wireless link shared by half my neighbors and dependent on the right phase of the moon to have decent speed. The idea isn't to replace copper with wireless mediocrity, but to go to fiber with guaranteed speeds.

    2. Re: Keep the copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, spamming this shit all over /. only hurts your cause by making you look like a psycho.

      I get it. Hillary is a bad person. In fact, I agree with that (admittedly, Trump was a terrible choice too). However, one, this article has nothing to do with presidential election politics, and two, if you want to argue for something, use facts, not personal attacks, to convince your readers, especially on a site with intelligent readers like /.

      Unless I'm just being trolled or this is an attempt at poisoning the well.

    3. Re: Keep the copper by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Why are you replying to me? My post was about Verizon FTTX, not the Clintons.

    4. Re:Keep the copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But fiber needs power at the premises while copper does not.

      I get that anybody in their right mind wants fiber, but copper works better in an emergency.

    5. Re:Keep the copper by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Backup battery, have it signal Verizon when it gets low. Tech and replacement is covered by cost of service.

    6. Re:Keep the copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copper these days is nothing like copper pre 90's or so. Most of that copper that runs to your house is probably terminated at a fiber to copper junction box a few blocks from your house. Guess what's inside that junction box, batteries to keep the fiber to copper converters running for some time period. Once those go flat you're going to be just as dead in the water as a battery backed FTTH box. Considering the way most of the telcos maintain their facilities these days the batteries in those boxes are probably the original ones that were installed in the 90's and probably can't hold a charge for shit anymore.

      At least in the case of a FTTH box if you know what you are doing you can rig up additional batteries to the box.

      We had the same issue here in Florida during hurricane Irma with cable internet. Most cable plants these days are fiber throughout with similar fiber to coax junction boxes in the neighborhoods. After I lost power I still had internet for a few hours on UPS till the cable light started flashing on my modem. Once the hurricane passed and I fired up the generator there was still no internet. I checked it daily. The cable internet did not return until the exact moment the rest of the neighborhood regained power 4 days later. Obviously the batteries in their fiber to coax box went flat and we got absolutely nothing till the junction box regained power.

    7. Re:Keep the copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copper these days needs power at the junction box in your neighborhood where the copper converts to fiber. Unless you live in some backwater hillbilly part of the country your copper lines were probably transitioned to fiber to the neighborhood sometime in the 90's/early 2000's with the push for expanding DSL service. Guess what those neighborhood junction boxes have in them? batteries just like the FTTH boxes. Once those batteries go flat you're just as dead in the water as a FTTH customer.

      One good sign, if you live in the middle of bum fuck nowhere, but your location qualifies for DSL service, but you are more than a few miles from the Central Office, then you likely have fiber run out to somewhere within a few miles of your location, then the fiber is converted to copper in a long neglected road side junction box with useless batteries that probably date back to whenever it was installed.

    8. Re:Keep the copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After witnessing what happened during Irma, id rather have my phone line be cellular than a landline. At least here in Florida most all cell towers are generator backed just because of situations like hurricanes. I never lost cell service or cellular internet during the 4 day power outage that I had. Same can't be said for any of the landline/cable services.

    9. Re: Keep the copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a spam post between your post and the GP. It's modded down to -1, so you may have missed it.

    10. Re:Keep the copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here, freezing rain caused a bunch of issues, e.g. the trees took out power lines and knocked a cell tower offline for about 3 days, but the cable internet never stopped working (we'd charge our laptops at work and use the UPS at home to keep the cable modem and router alive). Given the speeds we regularly get, I'd guess we have a FTTN, copper to house situation, like most here. I wonder if the newer fiber drops and their housings have better batteries and resilience to weather-induced issues given how long our internet stayed up?

      -anon because I modded :-\

    11. Re: Keep the copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Signal Verizon ? Haha good one, the company that needs to be sued by government to fulfill a contract, is going to just come out and fix your shit when you send a signal?

    12. Re:Keep the copper by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Backup battery, have it signal Verizon when it gets low

      During a major emergency, they don't care.... they're not deploying resources to swap backup batteries on your individual service.

      And the only way they're rolling a truck is if you call them.

      Who do you think they are? A competitive service provider? HAHA

    13. Re: Keep the copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before fiber arrives in my small French town, vdsl2 on copper gives me 40Mb download and 9Mb upload. So I can download at roughly 5MB, and I do get that almost all the time
      Enough for my current multimedia and teleworking needs

    14. Re: Keep the copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      640Kb should be enough for everyone,

      once a famous man said.

    15. Re:Keep the copper by fattmatt · · Score: 1

      Define emergency ... in a storm a tree branch can take out copper for quite a few folks.

    16. Re: Keep the copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Didja know.

      All of those boxes are actively monitored 24/7 and one of those alarms is: Battery Discharge

      Basically, once the box switches to battery power only and the battery drops to X%, an alarm is generated and tech dispatched.

      At least, thats how the other Telecom does it :)

    17. Re: Keep the copper by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Orange actually maintains their copoed network. Verizon? Nah -- you're lucky to get 3mbps on DSL.

    18. Re: Keep the copper by bn-7bc · · Score: 1

      Well in thst case cat a ups, for all other cases eher power outage isnot an issue norhing bears fiber. Show me one copper based technologuthat gives you 200+ Mbps 20Km from the head end without any repeaters etc?

    19. Re: Keep the copper by bn-7bc · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the ammount of typos, for dome reason I never spot them before it is to kate, slashdot where is rge edit post feature allmost evry other commentsecrion/forum has?

    20. Re:Keep the copper by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      It's the last utility that still works in an emergency.

      Not true. Copper is no less vulnerable than fiber to a backhoe. It fails just as completely when the circuit has no juice. The days are long gone when all copper lived on a resilient infrastructure with batteries and generators. An awful lot of it leads back to a "hut" with minimal battery power and a fiber backhaul to the CO.

    21. Re:Keep the copper by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      "During a major emergency, they don't care.... they're not deploying resources to swap backup batteries on your individual service."

      The ice storm in the Northeast US in 1998 proved that wrong.

      First, it caused so much damage to the electrical systems that I was without power for 11 days. My sister was without power for 19 days.

      It happened that the damage done was primarily borne by the electrical lines, the cable and telephone lines partly spared, though many poles were down taking everything. BUT I had telephone service, it happened that many subscribers had telephone service for most of this time, just how the wires fell.

      If it weren't for the ingenuity of the Nynex team, there would have been no service in 48 hours as the SLICs and other equipment batteries failed. They arranged for:

      - spare batteries, mostly from Massachusetts. Upstate New York, etc, having their own problems.
      - spare charging stations, because the Nynex team leader had gone through a similar event in Cape Cod the year before or so.
      - generators to run the charging stations.
      - fuel from the National Guard to run those generators.
      - extra trucks, techs, and fuel for those trucks to swap out batteries all over heck and then some.

      Modern copper requires power. And it's vital. In NYC I would expect a power outage for more than 2 days to present huge problems, and landline services could be a big help, since many cell towers might be running low on fuel for generators in 48 hours. And how many of those use either fiber or copper or backhaul? Power is needed everywhere. Batteries are short lived.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    22. Re: Keep the copper by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      And the tech will get right to it. Right after all the other alarms, the COE alarms, etc, during an event.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    23. Re: Keep the copper by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      I can get that in Gilbert, Arizona, right now. vDSL, 40/4, concurrent video service. And the new modem/gateway actually works.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    24. Re:Keep the copper by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't copper these days require less power/fewer batteries to keep up and running? The US phone network is all-digital these days.

      In the 90s, it still had a mixture of digital and electromechanical switching.

      i.e.:
      - Crossbar and SxS, which actually involved moving selector arms with magnets.
      - 1ESS/1AESS, which used mechanical switches (reed switches, maybe?) moved under the control of a big old 1960s or 70s-era computer.

      Plus the digital switches (5ESS, DMS-100) that are still in use some places today.

    25. Re:Keep the copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also believe that the wireless networks are being oversold in a zealous attempt to maximize investment. The are times I can't receive or make calls because of heavy traffic on the cell sites. A land line usually works in an emergency.
       

    26. Re:Keep the copper by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Not many e/m switches in the 90s. I lived in the city that was one of the last crossbar switches converted to ESS.

      1AESS switches are pretty much gone, but SS7 has forced their hand I suspect.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    27. Re: Keep the copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This does no good if you're in the middle of a natural disaster where the junction box may not be reachable for some time due to snow, fallen trees, etc. Sure they could periodically run self tests on them. The question is DO THEY DO THAT? Or do they just ignore these proactive alarms due to budget cutting or just plain old negligence.

      Even if the batteries are brand new they are not going to last though an extended outage like we saw during Irma. The cable companies neighborhood boxes ran off batteries for several hours before they were flat and there was zilch they could do about service till the power returned. Sure they could haul out portable generators to the probably thousands of these boxes located throughout the city, but then what are they going to do, have an employee or cop stand guard over the generator 24/7? If not those generators will probably end up being swiped by residents without electric. These boxes are not major utility installations like a phone company CO. They are small like the size of a large mini fridge sitting on the public right of way. They are loaded with probably a couple hundred amp hours worth in batteries at the bottom of them and all of the fiber to coax or copper converters in racks above the batteries. I've actually seen some on the side of the road with the doors wide open where someone stripped all of the batteries out of them. Likely hundreds if not into the thousands of dollars worth in telecom grade batteries.

    28. Re: Keep the copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To add on about portable generators. If you don't live in a hurricane zone, then you probably dont know that as soon as a hurricane is announced they are damn near impossible to get your hands on, they fly off the shelves in a matter of hours. They would probably be worth their weight in gold if Florida didn't have anti scalping laws that go into effect with the announcement of things like hurricanes.

      And you better damn well chain up your generator to something immovable if you're planning to leave it out unattended, else it will probably disappear as soon as some opportunist thief comes along

    29. Re:Keep the copper by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Wasn't a large portion of the US on 1ESS or 1AESS in the 90s? First-generation ESS is semi-mechanical, and no doubt has higher power draw than current all-digital systems.

      As far as crossbar, I think parts of NYC were on crossbar till the mid or early 90s. I remember ... "griiiiing - thunk" "griiiiing - thunk" when you called some (718) numbers.

    30. Re:Keep the copper by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Also, remember the old HONK-HONK-HONK busy signals?

    31. Re: Keep the copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually anti scalping was incorrect, it is anti price gouging. Still the same idea

      http://myfloridalegal.com/pages.nsf/Main/5D2710E379EAD6BC85256F03006AA2C5?OpenDocument

    32. Re: Keep the copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except in those countries that bury their power lines. Storms don't have to take out power or internet if you do things properly

  2. Tautology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Verizon is a garbage company.

  3. Can't they revoke Verizon's license? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who needs the Russians or the Chinese to sabotage America's communication infrastructure when we have Verizon doing it for free?

    Can't they just Verizon's license?

    1. Re:Can't they revoke Verizon's license? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Better yet, pull a Bell Telephone and split it up into local utilities.

    2. Re: Can't they revoke Verizon's license? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waste of time. Just let us treat Verizon executives however we like.

      The free market will solve the problem.

    3. Re: Can't they revoke Verizon's license? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just have the government take control of the wires and license it out to companies like verizon. Increases competition, lowering prices for all. Problem solved.

      But Americans don't want this "communism " in their country.

    4. Re: Can't they revoke Verizon's license? by orlanz · · Score: 1

      THIS!! Throw them to the curb. This BS is why they do stuff like this. Tell them their incompetence is fine and a few competitors will take care of them.

      Governments need to stop sucking up to these types of companies and basically encouraging their bad behavior. This was a bad deal for these citizens. They should have taken the short term costlier road for the long term benefit. Take the infrastructure, bid out an upgrade, own it, and sue Verizon to recoup some costs. Don't settle, drag them to court even if it is costlier. Set the damn precedent so it is easier in the future for you and others. Then charge the players who want to play on YOUR network and move on!!

    5. Re:Can't they revoke Verizon's license? by nasch · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't help, as each of them would still be a local monopoly. I'd rather see Verizon, Comcast, and AT&T broken up into about eight to twelve national broadband providers that would then compete with each other. That would require some other changes like forced line sharing or publicly owned infrastructure, so is never going to happen.

      Unless by utility you mean municipally owned. Interesting idea, but also politically infeasible in the current climate.

  4. Re:5G will fix this by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The union? God forbid that their employees be paid a non-slave wage and be given civilized amounts of time off. There should be more unions for tech workers, not less.

  5. Re:5G will fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The troubling part is: "As in Pennsylvania, Verizon has been neglecting its fixed wired infrastructure in its bid to first sabotage copper service, then force customers to adopt alternative solutions." In some other countries, the telecoms directly end the landline service and replace it with wireless. No sabotaging in a shady way, like the submission suggests. If this is true, Verizon loses its face with their customers and bleeds money to unmaintained services and suffers opportunity costs just to be shady.

  6. Sad state of affairs by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know it's bad when "Company begrudgingly agrees to hold up it's end of the deal" becomes a "good" headline.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Sad state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should wait for Verizon to finish their upgrades then terminate their franchise rights in the state.

    2. Re:Sad state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should wait for Verizon to finish their upgrades then terminate their franchise rights in the state.

      I'm sure at&t would be glad to milk profits off someone elses investment. Not that they are ever going to bother to update their own lines...

  7. And this is why the market solves nothing ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As in Pennsylvania, Verizon has been neglecting its fixed wired infrastructure in its bid to first sabotage copper service, then force customers to adopt alternative solutions. It's also been mired in an ongoing lawsuit with the state of New York over its breach of a 2008 contract requiring it to provide fiber service within New York City.

    And this is why all of the people telling us the market will find a solution are utterly full of shit.

    The free-market is always going to be filled with players who will do anything to get an advantage. They'll outright lie to you or manipulate the game to their advantage.

    The only thing the "free market" optimizes for is greedy assholes.

    The market is completely incapable of solving or fixing this issue, because a bunch of selfish companies will never arrive at a solution which works.

    The reality is, we don't have competing water, sewage, and electricity. We don't have competing roads, fire hydrants, fire services, or police forces. This shit is infrastructure, and built to serve and benefit everyone.

    It's about fucking time we recognized that if telcos want to compete for our business (instead of telling us what we can have as a monopoly) that the cabling which comes to our homes must be common and universal.

    Then let's see what they fucking do.

    These greedy cocksuckers have already collected huge amounts of money which had been required to be earmarked to expand and maintain this infrastructure. The problem is they kept it for profits and failed to invest in their network so they could move on to the next thing they could oversell and under-deliver on.

    That they're trying to let it rot and go away to push us to more modern and profitable stuff is unsurprising. That they're starting to get backed into a corner by states and municipalities is a good sign.

    Free market my goddamned fucking ass ... let the fuckers compete starting from the curb, and then we'll begin to see if there can be such a thing as a free market.

    Of course, Ajit Pai the great puppet of the telcos will probably hand it masters relief from this, because he's such a paid shill it isn't funny.

    Welcome to your oligarchy, America. If you think you have, or ever will have, a free market, you're fucking delusional.

    Somehow I want to see killer clowns executing corporate executives after reading this article. That would be awesome.

    1. Re:And this is why the market solves nothing ... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Go to France...

      You have a choice of 4 ISPs in many parts of the country, not just cable/DSL. Fast >100MB service can be as cheap as $30/mo equivalent.

      Funny that a more socialist country has more competition than the "free market, Horatio Alger" USA.

    2. Re:And this is why the market solves nothing ... by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but then you have to deal with the French....

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:And this is why the market solves nothing ... by Solandri · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And this is why all of the people telling us the market will find a solution are utterly full of shit.

      What free market? Verizon has a government-granted monopoly in these areas.

      The free-market is always going to be filled with players who will do anything to get an advantage. They'll outright lie to you or manipulate the game to their advantage.

      Exactly right. Which is why in a free market, you have competition. You allow multiple players to offer products and services. If one regularly rips off customers, word gets around and customers stop buying from them, and they end up putting themselves out of business.

      Except in this case the government decided to get involved, and prohibited anyone from competing with Verizon. Yeah Verizon are lying, cheating bastards. But it's not the free market which put them in the position of dominance they enjoy. The government did that. The market kills off bad businesses like Verizon. The government keeps Verizon alive.

      There are lots of areas where the market has problems finding optimal solutions. But this isn't one of them. This turd is 100% on poor government regulation.

    4. Re:And this is why the market solves nothing ... by sacremon · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is poor government regulation.

      However, the free market wouldn't have touched this kind of project. You have companies that have bought the baby Bells, who in turn inherited the infrastructure of the original Bell monopoly. Those companies have what is often the only existing telecommunications infrastructure in the area. For another company to compete, like Google tried with their fiber service, means trying to set up a competing infrastructure to something that has been in place for decades. That is just prohibitively expensive and would take years to accomplish.

      --
      If you can't beat them, embrace and extend them.
    5. Re:And this is why the market solves nothing ... by jezwel · · Score: 1

      In many cases it appears that government recognised that telcos would not rollout to their areas as it was non-profitable unless they had 100% captured market share to squeeze dry. Hence the government granted monopoly. The telco reneging on deals is the problem - currently under rectification here in some areas at least going by the summary. (Of course this is glossing over corruption on any level).

    6. Re:And this is why the market solves nothing ... by jezwel · · Score: 1

      It's about fucking time we recognized that if telcos want to compete for our business (instead of telling us what we can have as a monopoly) that the cabling which comes to our homes must be common and universal.

      Free market my goddamned fucking ass ... let the fuckers compete starting from the curb, and then we'll begin to see if there can be such a thing as a free market.

      We tried that in Australia - fibre to the premise (FTTP) for everywhere financially viable (93% was the latest estimate), fixed wireless / satellite elsewhere. All centrally owned by a government backed entity, with eventually private investment. Was in rollout stage (slow, but on budget) and working OK until that government was voted out (for other reasons) and the new incoming government changed strategy to use the cheapest to connect technology (which typically excludes fibre) as the preferred connection type. This conveniently excludes TCO over the lifespan of the infrastructure, where fibre wins hands down.
      We're still on track for similar fixed line coverage, with ISPs competing over the one connection type, however the service capability of copper / HFC is absolute crap in comparison to fibre. We also have the inability to run high speed or even reliable services over non-fibre connections, so there goes revenue streams for SLA backed business connections, plus anything higher than 100Mb as that's the max the copper will allow.

      So, there's good and bad to the single player entity for infrastructure. Done right it can be sensational. Done wrong, and it's a money pit.

    7. Re:And this is why the market solves nothing ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was it being run solely by the national government? The usual proposal in the U.S. is to have it handled more at the county or municipal level, like water and sewer, with the state and federal government possibly kicking in money to get it up and running, and maybe subsidizing poorer areas. Most local governments in the U.S. manage to keep the water flowing and toilets flushing no matter who's in office in Washington. It's national news when something goes wrong in one place, like in Flint, Michigan.

    8. Re:And this is why the market solves nothing ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have to be government monopolies because if they had to negotiate right of ways with individuals, a single nimby could completely screw over the entire system.

    9. Re:And this is why the market solves nothing ... by nasch · · Score: 1

      However, the free market wouldn't have touched this kind of project.

      Some would say that is the ideal scenario for a government project...

    10. Re:And this is why the market solves nothing ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are mostly one people, so they look out for the general good. Not like here.

  8. Ajit Pai moving to Long Island? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get the infra built up before he leaves FCC to rejoin VZ

  9. OK but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had Verizon DSL until just recently despite the fact that FIOS is deployed all around me. As soon as I canceled my land line they killed that DSL connection so fast it would make your head spin. I think I was the only DSL user within 100 miles and they were happy to finally disconnect me and release those ancient copper wires and infrastructure.

    1. Re:OK but by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Oh, so what you're saying is, this is all your fault.

  10. How 'bout they pay back the billions in subsidies by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    and tax cuts for the fiber network they were paid to build and never did? Seriously, why the hell do we never call companies to task on this shit? You know, they couldn't get away with it if we'd stop voting people in who let them. Why do we keep doing that!?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  11. Re: 5G will fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fix my cock nylon bc å¥hush my fun sheaf fob ç(TM)hajj bud desk used

  12. Re: 5G will fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in your ass?

  13. They do this in Virginia too. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    As in Pennsylvania, Verizon has been neglecting its fixed wired infrastructure in its bid to first sabotage copper service, then force customers to adopt alternative solutions.

    I had Verizon for a home POTS (copper) landline until a few years ago - ('cause it works through all but an extended city-wide power outage). I started having problems with reliability and the tech said they wouldn't fix it and I'd have to "upgrade" to FiOS. Since I already had TV and Internet service with Cox, I just switched to them for phone too -- addition reason, there was no where to easily/nicely mount the new Verizon gear near the exiting hook-up and the TV/Internet hook-up is on the other side of the house. Also, not enough of a Verizon fan to put all my eggs in their basket.

    FYI, if you missed it: You are responsible for paying for the replacement backup battery in your FiOS modem.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  14. Finally fixing by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    that NN ready paper insulated wireline.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  15. Big deal? by bestweasel · · Score: 1

    Verizon will extend fiber to 10,000 to 12,000 households not currently served by it in Long Island and Verizon's "Upstate Reporting Region" (these are Verizon-specific regions, not geographical areas, so "Long Island" may mean more than just the island).

    The agreement says there will be about 7000 on Long Island itself. With a population of 7.8 million and assuming 3 per household that means Verizon will get round to at most 1 in 400 households. If that's worth celebrating what has their performance been like up till now? Also, call me cynical but there's no mention of anything to stop them from giving fiber to the richest 1 in 400 households.

    It looks like they'll only do it if they get public money:

    Verizon has bid for grants under the State Broadband Program Office/CAF
    auction. To the extent that any such grants are awarded to Verizon, the
    company commits to making fiber-based broadband service available to
    certain additional households in the areas covered by such grants

    Ps. editors. Some examples of a double pole from PA are not shown below.

  16. Unions are monopolies by mi · · Score: 1

    paid a non-slave wage

    The only fair and true arbiter of fairness of a wage is an open market. Government-backed unions are the opposite of that — they are monopolies. Trusts, which unabashedly seek to maintain and raise the prices on what they are selling.

    There should be more unions for tech workers, not less.

    Instead of glamorizing them, we ought to apply anti-trust laws to them. And, when they commit crimes to further their goals, RICO-laws should apply.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Unions are monopolies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only fair and true arbiter of fairness of a wage is an open market.

      Yeah! And on that same note, when clean water becomes difficult to come by and you are priced out of being able to afford water, well, that's only fair too!

      Goit.

    2. Re:Unions are monopolies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let the water market decide! Why do you hate children?

  17. Re:5G will fix this by jjbenz · · Score: 1

    a wired connection will always be better than a wireless one.

  18. Re:5G will fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They probably agreed to this because they know that as soon as 5G rolls out, all the copper is nothing but dead metal anyway. And why the fuck was the union involved? These people are simply trying to line their pockets with massive overtime. I'd say this is an enormous conflict of interest and should be challenged in a court of law.

    Unions get overtime? Surely you jest!

    I can see and hear the union complaints now about actually having to do REAL WORK instead of sitting around all day pretending to work.

    So I guess it's time for another strike by Verizon's east coast unions, right? It's been about 2 years now.

    Let the whining begin ... on both sides of the bargaining table.

  19. Re:How 'bout they pay back the billions in subsidi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and tax cuts for the fiber network they were paid to build and never did? Seriously, why the hell do we never call companies to task on this shit? You know, they couldn't get away with it if we'd stop voting people in who let them. Why do we keep doing that!?

    Really? Stop voting them in, huh?
    ok, which ones are the ones who keep doing that, and which ones are the "good" guys who would call them on it?
    go ahead, take your time, I'll wait.

    The fact is, BOTH 'sides' are bought-and-paid-for corporate shills, and our political system is rigged in such a way that the average person can't even hope to compete, unless they happen to win PowerBall or something.
    On top of that, all of the tax money given to these parasitical companies is free of any rules or restrictions. The politicians responsible for that made sure there were no caveats, so their corporate overlords can settle back with a fat bank account and absolutely no guilt.