Slashdot Mirror


Sierra Leone Records World's First Blockchain-Powered Election (techcrunch.com)

The citizens of Sierra Leone went to the polls on March 7 but this time something was different: the country recorded votes at 70% of the polling to the blockchain using a technology that is the first of its kind in actual practice. The tech, created by Leonardo Gammar of Agora, anonymously stored votes in an immutable ledger, thereby offering instant access to the election results. TechCrunch reports: "Anonymized votes/ballots are being recorded on Agora's blockchain, which will be publicly available for any interested party to review, count and validate," said Gammar. "This is the first time a government election is using blockchain technology." "Sierra Leone wishes to create an environment of trust with the voters in a contentious election, especially looking at how the election will be publicly viewed post-election. By using blockchain as a means to immutably record ballots and results, the country hopes to create legitimacy around the election and reduce fall-out from opposition parties," he said.

Why is this interesting? While this is little more than a proof of concept -- it is not a complete voting record but instead captured a seemingly acceptable plurality of votes -- it's fascinating to see the technology be implemented in Sierra Leone, a country of about 7.4 million people. The goal ultimately is to reduce voting costs by cutting out paper ballots as well as reducing corruption in the voting process.

4 of 72 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds like a great use for blockchain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Instant election results, that can be verified by everyone. If the voting machine spits out a randomized unique identifier the voter could then go in and view the blockchain and confirm their votes were cast as they actually selected.

    If the voting machines were setup like those used in the US where election workers checked your voter registration and that you hadn't already voted, and then you just walked up to any random available machine, cast your vote, and then it spit out a receipt with your unique id in a QR code and ascii format, there would be no way to link votes to voters other than snatching their receipt out of their hands as they left.

    1. Re:Sounds like a great use for blockchain by F.Ultra · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And if they implemented it that way then they would have opened the floodgates for violent spouses, evil employers and other people with power (either by buying votes outright for cash or by threatening with violence) to force people to vote a specific way. This cannot happen in a normal paper ballot scheme since they have no way to control that you actually voted in the way that they expected you to but if the vote can be verified like in your example then this all of the suddenly works like a charm.

    2. Re:Sounds like a great use for blockchain by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 3, Interesting

      there would be no way to link votes to voters other than snatching their receipt out of their hands as they left.

      Well, that's a real possibility. Also, timing based identification, PRNGs being predictable, and others that I'm not thinking of at the moment. "Drop your receipt when you pick up your timecard"!

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  2. Cheap Elections?!? by rtb61 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why the fuck would any government brag about cheap elections. I want a government to brag about good elections. Paper ballots, made by people and counted by people, with representatives from each person running for the election checking the vote counting process. I want voting to be on weekends to be more accessible to more people. I want lots of polling stations and short queues. I want a web site with all candidates listed, the substantiated scholastic record, the employment history and their political history on show, with promises of what they will work for on show and contractually signed with penalties for failing, don't make promises you can keep or wont even try to keep. I want all those who run for election tested, their IQ, their knowledge and their psychology including a test for psychopathy and that available online. Then elections will be guaranteed to be a whole lot more fair and you will have a much greater chance of getting what you are paying for. Voting is about people and not about machines.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen