Slashdot Mirror


Hackers Are So Fed Up With Twitter Bots They're Hunting Them Down Themselves (theintercept.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Even if Twitter hasn't invested much in anti-bot software, some of its most technically proficient users have. They're writing and refining code that can use Twitter's public application programming interface, or API, as well as Google and other online interfaces, to ferret out fake accounts and bad actors. The effort, at least among the researchers I spoke with, has begun with hunting bots designed to promote pornographic material -- a type of fake account that is particularly easy to spot -- but the plan is to eventually broaden the hunt to other types of bots. The bot-hunting programming and research has been a strictly volunteer, part-time endeavor, but the efforts have collectively identified tens of thousands of fake accounts, underlining just how much low-hanging fruit remains for Twitter to prune.

Among the part-time bot-hunters is French security researcher and freelance Android developer Baptiste Robert, who in February of this year noticed that Twitter accounts with profile photos of scantily clad women were liking his tweets or following him on Twitter. Aside from the sexually suggestive images, the bots had similarities. Not only did these Twitter accounts typically include profile photos of adult actresses, but they also had similar bios, followed similar accounts, liked more tweets than they retweeted, had fewer than 1,000 followers, and directed readers to click the link in their bios.

45 comments

  1. Who the fuck cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If twitter disappeared right now it would have zero impact in my life. In fact I think we'd all be better off since its used mostly by SJW types and n1ggers.

    1. Re:Who the fuck cares? by Kokuyo · · Score: 2

      Yo whipslash... I think this one actually might have read the article... That wouldn't bode well for that anti-troll filter that was mentioned a while ago.
      Still, it seems to be somewhat more intelligent than the average troll.

      Interesting specimen for sure.

    2. Re: Who the fuck cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whipslash, EditorDavid, and msmash are all bots. SmarterChild showed greater intelligence than all combined as far back as 1999.

      BeauHD is real and needs the money to get through his first years at San Jose CC. He's like the drunk guy at the radio station they leave there to be sure the transmitter is still working on Christmas Eve. The guy who gets so depressed that he comes on air for 30 seconds just long enough to joke about suicide and have the SWAT team bust down the door and kill him because that's San Jose's policy. Shoot active killers first. Ask questions later. Even if they are just joking.

    3. Re: Who the fuck cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Donald uses it to spread lies among his uneducated supporters.

    4. Re: Who the fuck cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who the fuck cares about your worthless life?

  2. Missing context by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Among the part-time bot-hunters is French security researcher and freelance Android developer Baptiste Robert, who in February of this year noticed that Twitter accounts with profile photos of scantily clad women were liking his tweets or following him on Twitter.

    and like any other slashdotter, seeing attractive women made him immediately stare at his feet and scream REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

    1. Re:Missing context by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I watch porn when I want to. Not when some advertiser wants me to. Spam is spam even if it is 'for porn', and is hated along with all other spam.

  3. Like the Florida Legislators by fermion · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Outlaw porn, while letting the real criminals, the online scammers who cheat people out of money, the murders, go free.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  4. What did you expect? by PmanAce · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Social platforms that promote popularity (and even pay for it) will always have actors that will try and profit from it in any way possible. Heck I even coded a Twitter bot to try and build up followers once as an experiment, I actually posted a quote of the day, image of the day, joke of the day, so it wasn't that evil of a bot.

    Social media is a social deconstruct, hopefully it dies sooner than later and spares humanity more grief. You reap what you sow right?

    --
    Tired of my customary (Score:1)
    1. Re:What did you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Careful, Blueshare, communists, and other paid Democrat shills we get really angry.

    2. Re:What did you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And at least half of your followers were also coded bots/apps as well. Which is why Twitter will never do anything or release insights.

  5. Load the OS first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see that they "directed readers to click the link in their bios". There's the problem. You can't expect support for pointing devices before the OS is loaded.

    1. Re:Load the OS first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      capiTalizatIon mAtters.

  6. Wow by c · · Score: 4, Funny

    Am I the only one who see this as the equivalent of going over to the nearest gas station and volunteering to clean their bathrooms?

    --
    Log in or piss off.
    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not really. It's more like going to the local Starbucks and removing postings on the community bulletin board that *you* don't like. I personally don't like clutter. I would remove it all.

    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more like engineering a CleanBot and sending in it before you get to be upset about the bathrooms. Maybe this should be gamified. Bot Hunter's World: Code and neural nets instead of swords and mallets.

  7. I am doing that by fabiomb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I started finding bots on twitter since a few years, first as a hobby, but then i write some code and start to find patterns. I even ended in the local news because my findings. The bots are evolving because the bot creators need to keep them alive and working more and more, there is a huge business and it gives a lot of money. My actual software has a catalog of more than 50k users with political affiliations (from Argentina), some 10k fake accounts, and fake accounts are more important than bots. The problem is: a bot is detectable because it follows predictable patterns, but a fake account used by a human is... very human like. So you can't detect it, is not so obvious, if you say something to them they answer you, and is a real human there. Fake accounts are the real problem, so my research moved from bots to fakes, still capturing bots (easy part), but identifying fakes is the most hard job here. And i'm only working with Argentina accounts because we have a very active political twitter bubble, and because Twitter has limits in it's API, i think if i move to a bigger country the thing will be amazingly huge. My actual database has 10GB worth of tweets, many of them a nice feed for Machine Learning, my next development :P sorry for my limited english ;)

    1. Re:I am doing that by OYAHHH · · Score: 1

      A "Fake Account" that has a human behind it is not a fake account. If your premise is correct then your Slashdot "fabiomb" account is by your definition "fake".

      --
      Caution: Contents under pressure
    2. Re:I am doing that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a long way of saying you suck for dick for money or cheeseburgers.

    3. Re:I am doing that by gnick · · Score: 1

      Using an alias is not the same as registering using someone else's credentials.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    4. Re:I am doing that by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Most fake human accounts are easy to detect with a simple reverse image search on Google. They almost always just steal a profile image, from real social media users or from fake account packs that people on 4chan put together.

      The other dead giveaway is copy/pasted messages and links. Those guys are not that original, it seems.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:I am doing that by PmanAce · · Score: 1

      The real problem is social media itself...your efforts are very noble and valiant, but ultimately useless. Like evolution, the prey/predator will always evolve to outwit the predator/prey. The good news is that extinction for both is not a tragedy, but instead a necessity!

      --
      Tired of my customary (Score:1)
    6. Re:I am doing that by fabiomb · · Score: 1

      this not always work but is very usfeul, Facebook does a good job at it (that's a use of the face detection algorithm they have), but, for example, many fake facebook accounts use pictures from VK and are not in FB, so they can't detect it. Twitter simply does nothing, they let anyone steal pictures and names from real users.

    7. Re:I am doing that by fabiomb · · Score: 2

      an alias is not an fake account, is an alias, if you have 200 aliases in Slashdot, 199 are probably fake accounts... or not, that's the problem here, how you identify a fake user...

    8. Re: I am doing that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A mans gotta eat"- Randy Bobandy

    9. Re:I am doing that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Using an alias is not the same as registering using someone else's credentials.

      What would the real gnick say about that?

    10. Re:I am doing that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the user with 20 different astroturfing accounts and a bot army of "Like" clickers.

  8. WITCH HUNT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WITCH HUNT!

  9. Twitter is not the problem ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... it's made out to be.

    It's a depressing shitstorm rabbit hole and not one fucking person is unaware of that.

    The people writing code to spot bots already know how to ID the bots, right?

    Just navigate around the bastards (or bitches as may apply).

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:Twitter is not the problem ... by gman003 · · Score: 2

      The signal-to-noise ratio in a lot of subjects gets so low that, even if you can immediately and perfectly identify a bot as such, you'll still be unable to have useful communication because you'll have to scroll through dozens of bots to get to an actual person - who is probably just arguing with bots.

      For instance, click on *any* trending hashtag. Top one right now, for me, is "#MondayMotivation", a recurring hashtag for people looking for some vague platitudes to try to motivate themselves on a Monday morning. First two (again, for me, at the time I clicked the link) were relatively on-topic, by "verified" twits. One's @DisneyAnimation posting a gif from Mulan's training montage, the next is some platitudes from @VexKing, whoever that is. Both of these are hours old - two and six hours, respectively.

      Next one is some idiot yammering about how the Mueller probe is fake news, only dems colluded, #maga. It's either a bot or a human who fails the turing test. I could see a tenuous connection to the topic, but there's no actual connection given. The hashtag was just thrown on there to get views and responses.

      Then there's a RT/follow "competition", obviously a bot, no relevance whatsoever to the topic.

      I'm not going to bother combing through the rest, because I've got better shit to do, but you can see how roughly half the "above the fold" tweets were noise. And it's pretty apparent that Twitter's doing some sorting to put "verified" twits at the top, to try to boost the signal.

    2. Re:Twitter is not the problem ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      I am well aware of the rapid thread degradation and I question the utility of clicking on that hastag in the first place, knowing it will turn to shit in 1 ... 2 ... 3 ...

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    3. Re:Twitter is not the problem ... by fabiomb · · Score: 1

      THIS is one of the main problems: the noise

    4. Re:Twitter is not the problem ... by eaglesrule · · Score: 1, Informative

      'Trending' is whatever Twitter decides suits their sensibilities and therefore you should be allowed to see. So the signal to noise ratio is even lower than you think.

      And just in case something interesting does get said on Twitter amidst the bot spam and greasy food picts, it will be subjected to Twitter's political purity tests.

      So even as a communication medium, Twitter is unreliable unless one has enough outside influence or political capital to make being deplatformed a hassle for them.

      I'm not seeing the appeal at all.

  10. Makes me want to write a bot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to make a bot that uses reinforced learning to try to hide from these bot finders.
    I'm guessing just tweet lots of good things about Clinton, and gun control, bad things about Trump and christians, pro headscarfs, anti-bikini and you are good to go.

  11. Think of it as a game by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    If you can't hunt down a few thousand each day, you're low on the leaderboards ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Think of it as a game by eaglesrule · · Score: 2

      The only way to win is not to play.

    2. Re:Think of it as a game by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      The only way to win is not to play.

      So, you're not joining in the next Raid event? Sad.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:Think of it as a game by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      The only winning move is not to play.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:Think of it as a game by eaglesrule · · Score: 2

      Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Your turn.

  12. How many bots post like this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "My three-year old just asked me [something about guns, grabbing pussy, russia, or transsexuals]. I didn't know how to answer."

  13. Hope they exercise SOME caution.... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    ...as I know that http://flowingdata.com/2018/03... this simple algorithm classifies my twitter feed as distinctly a 'bot'.

    No, I don't use it much - I've used it to subscribe to a WWI history feed and the Onion, that's it.

    In the years since Twitter started, I've posted a grand total of 123 tweets.

    --
    -Styopa
  14. Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So all those hot chick who follow me on twitter are robots?

    Can I keep one of them as a souvenir of all our adventures, Rick?

  15. Bump Stocks by sycodon · · Score: 1

    Twitter is to social interaction as Bump Stock are to the Civilian Marksmanship Program

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  16. Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this show that Twitter isn't really trying all that hard to deal with its spam bot problem. Looks like it's an easy one to solve but low on Twitter's list of priorities.

  17. replicants by bbash · · Score: 1

    bots are like any other script, are either a benefit or a hazard