Slashdot Mirror


Google Makes Push To Turn Product Searches Into Cash (reuters.com)

Reuters reports of how Google is working to turn product searches into cash by partnering with some of the largest retailers in the United States: Under a new program, retailers can list their products on Google Search, as well as on the Google Express shopping service, and Google Assistant on mobile phones and voice devices. In exchange for Google listings and linking to retailer loyalty programs, the retailers pay Google a piece of each purchase, which is different from payments that retailers make to place ads on Google platforms. The listings will appear under sponsored shopping results and will not affect regular search results on Google, the company said. Google's pitch to retailers is a better chance to influence shoppers' purchasing decisions, a move that is likely to help them compete with rival Amazon. Google hopes the program helps retailers capture more purchases on desktop, cell phones and smart home devices with voice search -- the next frontier for e-commerce. The previously unreported initiative sprang from Google's observation that tens of millions of consumers were sending image searches of products, asking "Where can I buy this?" "Where can I find it?" "How can I buy it?" "How do I transact?" Daniel Alegre, Google's president for retail and shopping, told Reuters exclusively.

15 of 66 comments (clear)

  1. Making Google Search less and less relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When people search for those things, they want relevant results. Not paid ones.

    1. Re:Making Google Search less and less relevant by SumDog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But Lycos, Hotbot, AltaVista, DogPile and all the alternative indexes are gone. We're a search mono-culture. I use DuckDuckGo personally, but a good 1/3 of my searchers I add a !g if I can't find the results I want. There are some things I can't even find at all, kept in my notes but no longer present on any major search provider.

      The Internet simply isn't as searchable as it once was.

    2. Re:Making Google Search less and less relevant by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Internet simply isn't as searchable as it once was.

      Seriously? I seem to recall that search services before Google absolutely stunk, with pages and pages of completely irrelevant result. Trying to find what you're actually looking for was a complete PITA. The reason Google became the giant it is now is because they were the first to figure out a truly effective internet search algorithm. And despite showing sponsored results (clearly marked), Google still has highly relevant results for most of what I search for, and presumably most other people, given their current market share.

      Am I happy that Google dominates search the way Microsoft dominates desktop OSes? No, of course not. But to claim the internet is "less searchable" smacks of hyperbole, especially with high quality competitors like Bing and DuckDuckGo. It's just that everyone has gotten used to using Google by now, and their competitors aren't really any better*, so why switch?

      * DDG has better privacy, but I'm talking about quality of search results.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    3. Re:Making Google Search less and less relevant by JMJimmy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I spend so much time fighting with Google's intrusive results these days I could hardly even care. The first search engine that builds a sizable index where I can manipulate the search without AI getting in the way, and I'm gone. DuckDuckGo is the closest but their index is about 1/10th the size it needs to be.

      I'm so sick of "Google knows best", inserted images/twitter/"news"/etc, "movies playing in ireland" when I search for "irish movies", and all sorts of other fuckwitterty. I mean why the hell do I care what other people searched? Other people are idiots based on the crap that comes up.

    4. Re:Making Google Search less and less relevant by Megol · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My experience is that Google(TM!) delivers worse to much worse results today than before. Searching for a certain document I know is available, searchable (not hidden away with robots.txt etc) and not on an obscure site often gives pages after pages of places that doesn't match the search at all or only when "correcting" 50%+ of the search terms. Even when adding terms related to e.g. computers, computer architecture etc. that the wanted document covers the results are hit and miss often with the highest ranking results being completely irrelevant and badly matching. Don't understand it at all.

      Google is still the best search engine sadly.

    5. Re:Making Google Search less and less relevant by Megol · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That seems like it is today and not when Google started. Correcting search terms to something related that is more popular to search for instead of actually doing the search requested. Again that's how it's today and not before Google started making their engine cater to sloppy searches by sloppy people.

    6. Re:Making Google Search less and less relevant by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      I spend so much time fighting with Google's intrusive results these days I could hardly even care.

      In addition to this apparent statement that Google is going to be serving you a lot of ads in the search results - otherwise how could you monetize them - Google might be attempting social engineering.

      I while back I did a search experiment on this, using a search term that certain groups might find offensive. Used Google and DDG with safesearch off. Not many results for Google, while pages of them from DDG.

      Forgetting for a minute my using a rude term to likely trigger a difference in results, less rude terms will be easy to alter. Think of it as gateway manipulation.

      I think that the twin aspects of monetization of the search results themselves, coupled with active manipulation of the results by determining what Google allows you to see is going to make the search engine worse than useless, as in inherently untrustworthy.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  2. So much Google by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Man, I couldn't even finish the summary as my eyes glazed over from seeing Google, Google, Google every few words or so... hope they aren't up to anything that will amount to anything because I just can't finish whatever that is saying.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:So much Google by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I am starting to forget google even exists I am having to look it up https://duckduckgo.com/?q=goog... all of the time. It's a choice, be the consumer slave or make digital companies your bitch, your choice, digital slave or ifreeman ;D.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:So much Google by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Note to younger Slashdotters: Listen to rtb61. Use duckduckgo as your search engine. You never really know, but it doesn't appear that they're collecting your info or selling your eyeballs. Don't fall in love with any dot com. Be prepared to switch up at a moment's notice.

      Big corporations mean you no damn good. They will sell you out cheap. Treat them accordingly.

      Also, don't do drugs and stay in school. We're rooting for you.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  3. Sponsored = by sit1963nz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sponsored = spam
    which means I ignore it and the company pushing it

    I certainly never buy stuff based on the first advert I see, I search and see who has the best price, and I use Bing, DuckDuckGo to make sure I get the best price.

  4. Re:Amazon by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

    Amazon could be dominating (more than they already are), except their search sucks. It's a large part of the reason I still buy most of my computer components from Newegg. Newegg has really useful and easy to use topical include/exclude options for pretty much every search I do, and it's easy to narrow down the results list to a handful of products which are exactly what I want. Amazon's searches seem to be fuzzy - even the include/exclude options seem to be polluted by vendors misrepresenting their products. Their "best match" algorithm seems to work best, except you can't sort it by ratings. If you try, you end up with a bunch of products which are seemingly only vaguely related to your search at the top of the list, or only have 1-2 ratings which are probably paid for. You often have to drill down 3-5 pages before you find a highly-rated product that you're actually searching for.

    A lot of times I actually find it quicker to search for a product on Google, then follow the Amazon link in the search results. I mean I do that too for other sites (e.g. Best Buy, Staples) because they're intolerably slow. But I do it for Amazon simply because their search engine plain sucks. I'm pretty sure it all stems from Amazon trying to satisfy both sides - buyers and sellers. Buyers want highly-rated products that lots of other users have bought and reviewed. Sellers want to be able to break into a market with a new product. So Amazon feels compelled to return search results with few reviews even if that's not what customers want - to encourage more customers to try out new products instead of sticking with the safe choice. The problem is, many product markets are flooded with hundreds of cheap Chinese knockoffs of dubious quality, and Amazon's search engine makes it nigh impossible to filter them out except via the "best match" algorithm which often doesn't return the highest-rated products.

    If Google's offering concentrates on meeting the needs of the buyer, rather than the seller, I could see it becoming very successful.

  5. Who are these people by mukinrestak · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who are these people that search for "How do I transact?"

    I'm willing to bet not one person on God's green earth has EVER searched google for "How do I transact?"

    And if if Google can tell me how to transact, can they follow through and tell me how to transact my transactable transactions in the most self transactualizing transactivations of my transactionless office? I didn't think so!

  6. Re:Amazon by ProzacPatient · · Score: 2

    I hate to admit it but I often use NewEgg as a search engine. Once I find something I want on NewEgg I'll search for it on Amazon by model number, or something like that, and find it is cheaper there. I used to go to NewEgg 100% of the time years back but after they dropped free three day shipping I find myself using Amazon more on account of having a Prime subscription.

  7. Ad Bombs by biggaijin · · Score: 2

    Four weeks ago, I went to Zappo's and searched for work boots. Since then, nearly every ad-containing website I visit has been plastered with the same Zappo's ad -- for the same boots I looked at. This cannot be a coincidence. I resent having my online behavior followed so closely and used for Google's profit.