Slashdot Mirror


FTC Probing Facebook For Use of Personal Data: Bloomberg (bloomberg.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Facebook is under investigation by a U.S. privacy watchdog over the use of personal data of 50 million users by a data analytics firm to help elect President Donald Trump. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is probing whether Facebook violated terms of a 2011 consent decree of its handing of user data that was transferred to Cambridge Analytica without their knowledge, according to a person familiar with the matter. Under the 2011 settlement, Facebook agreed to get user consent for certain changes to privacy settings as part of a settlement of federal charges that it deceived consumers and forced them to share more personal information than they intended. That complaint arose after the company changed some user settings without notifying its customers, according to an FTC statement at the time. If the FTC finds Facebook violated terms of the consent decree, it has the power to fine the company thousands of dollars a day per violation.

6 of 78 comments (clear)

  1. Re:It's about time. by Train0987 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It would be nice to have Zuckerburg asked under oath about who he's willing to sell everyone's data to. Also which politicians he's given it to for free.

  2. Double standard by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Amazing how Obama can target voters using facebook data and it's lauded as smart and effective.

    Trump targets voters and facebook doesn't care before the election(*), but now months later it's an obscene violation of peoples' privacy.

    Were any laws broken? If it's illegal to hire non-citizens to do campaign research, how does the Hillary campaign paying Christopher Steele get a pass?

    Is this just a company whinging about a violation of their TOS, after the fact, while ignoring hundreds of other companies who do the same thing?

    What exactly is the alleged infraction here?

    (*) Facebook was informed of the "breach" many months before the election, and literally didn't care.

  3. Re:U.S. privacy watchdog by Hognoxious · · Score: 3

    Yes. Their function is to watch out in case somebody gets some.

    By somebody I mean the plebs, of course.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  4. Flashback to the Obama 2012 campaign by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's an article from NYT discussing Obama's use of facebook data during his 2012 campaign.

    The campaign’s exhaustive use of Facebook triggered the site’s internal safeguards. “It was more like we blew through an alarm that their engineers hadn’t planned for or knew about,” said St. Clair, who had been working at a small firm in Chicago and joined the campaign at the suggestion of a friend. “They’d sigh and say, ‘You can do this as long as you stop doing it on Nov. 7.’ ”

    Also, this quote from [Obama’s former director for media analytics] Carol Davidsen:

    [Facebook] came to office in the days following election recruiting & were very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side.

    1. Re:Flashback to the Obama 2012 campaign by Patent+Lover · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You left out this part in the NY Times article: "Facebook officials say warning bells go off when the site sees large amounts of unusual activity, but in each case the company was satisfied the campaign was not violating its privacy and data standards."

  5. So, did they or didn't they? by Orne · · Score: 4, Informative

    Two days later, CBS is now reporting that the Trump Campaign only used the CA data for a targeted online advertising and a single TV ad buy during the primaries, because they were playing the CA data off of the RNC, in case the RNC pulled a "resistance" and didn't want to share with the Trump campaign. They ended up not using the CA data for the general election because they didn't trust it coming from Facebook.