Hackathons Are Dystopian Events That Dupe People Into Working For Free, Say Sociologists (fastcompany.com)

An anonymous reader writes: That's the conclusion that two sociologists came to after observing seven hackathons over the period of one year, reports Wired. In "Hackathons As Co-optation Ritual: Socializing Workers and Institutionalizing Innovation in the 'New' Economy," sociologists Sharon Zukin and Max Papadantonakis argue that companies use the allure of hackathons to get people to work for free. They says sponsors fuel the "romance of digital innovation by appealing to the hackers' aspiration to be multi-dimensional agents of change" when in fact the hackathons are just a means of labor control.

Comments

love the summary

[ooloorie]

Read the article summary carefully:

Hackathons Are Dystopian Events That Dupe People Into Working For Free, Say Sociologists. That's the conclusion that two socialists came to after observing seven hackathons over the period of one year, reports Wired.

The mask slips.

They may be considered as free advertising

[bobstreo]

And while on the subject, please feel free to discuss non-paying Internships...

Re:They may be considered as free advertising

[El Cubano]

And while on the subject, please feel free to discuss non-paying Internships...

Different animal altogether. I work as a programmer and I like to attend hackathons every once in a while for the following reasons (in no particular order):

• Meet other programmers outside my normal professional circle
• Get to work on/hack on projects substantially different from what I work on day-to-day
• Getting the brain moving/heading in a different programming direction for a while makes me a better programmer with the "normal" things I program every day

There are probably other benefits that I do not specifically consider, but the ones above are the big ones for me.

I go to hackathons because I get something out of it, more than they get from me, as it were.

Their technical credentials and aspirations are..?

[llamalad]

Didn't read TFA, but do these researchers understand what motivates people to participate?

Speaking as an established professional in a highly technical field -and as someone whose career has been further as much by hobbies and personal interests as certifications and professional experience- hackathons are in fact insanely fun, an invaluable social outlet that helps form lasting friendships and establish professional contacts, and a great way to build teamwork skills, learn new things, and challenge your abilities.

Sure, it's a challenge to build an app in a weekend (Rails Rumble), but it's fun. If that's your idea of fun.

I wonder how these researchers would describe gyms (establishments which trick you into paying money to do meaningless physical labor?), marathons, and online dating?

Re:idiotologists

[war4peace]

I'll be the devil's advocate here.
Going to a hackaton and working for free isn't the problem. The problem is what happens with said work afterwards. Does it become F/OSS with some sort of GPL license or something similar, thus preventing corporations from taking that work and making it theirs, locking down the code? Then it's all cool.
But if corporations lure people into working for free through whatever means, then use those ideas, that code and that development to expand their portfolio, making shit tons of money in the process, then there's a big problem.

I did work for free in the past out of enthusiasm, saw my work being used by other entities to make lots of money and I got the shaft, so I can relate to TFA concerns.