Slashdot Mirror


Robots Are Trying To Pick Strawberries. So Far, They're Not Very Good At It (npr.org)

Robots have taken over many of America's factories. They can explore the depths of the ocean, and other planets. They can play ping-pong. But can they pick a strawberry? From a report: "You kind of learn, when you get into this -- it's really hard to match what humans can do," says Bob Pitzer, an expert on robots and co-founder of a company called Harvest CROO Robotics. (CROO is an acronym. It stands for Computerized Robotic Optimized Obtainer.) Any 4-year old can pick a strawberry, but machines, for all their artificial intelligence, can't seem to figure it out. Pitzer says the hardest thing for them is just finding the fruit. The berries hide behind leaves in unpredictable places. "You know, I used to work in the semiconductor industry. I was a development engineer for Intel, and it was a lot easier to make semiconductor chips," he says with a laugh.

4 of 131 comments (clear)

  1. Click-Bait headline by apoc.famine · · Score: 5, Informative

    Go half-way down the article, and you'll find this nugget:

    Also, he admits, the machine is slower than human hands. On the other hand, it has some advantages. It can work right through the night, when berries are cooler and less fragile.

    Another two years, he says, and this machine will be in the fields working for real. "There's quirks to work out, but it's getting there. We're close," he says.

    While the headline makes it seem like the robot picker is far from reality, the people working on it don't think so. And it's not just a minor project:

    Strawberry companies representing two-thirds of the industry are putting millions of dollars into this project.

    The robots are indeed coming for our jobs. Because if they can pick strawberries, what can't they pick?*

    *Their nose.

    --
    Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  2. They DON'T have intelligence by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All they have is algorithms, data, and a glorified table lookup.

    There is no fucking intelligence in these machines.

    If they _actually_ had intelligence they could figure out the process _themselves._

    i.e.
    How Smart Are Crows? | ScienceTake | The New York Times

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci...

  3. Re:Not a racial issue at all, issue of fairness by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A Mexican trying to enter to do house painting, furniture hauling, or construction labor, for example, cannot legally enter the USA.

    Sure they can - if they apply for a visa.

    If the U.S. issued more temporary work visas people would be supportive. That's the point, people are not against Mexicans, they are against criminals. Entering illegally makes you a criminal, full stop - but again, it makes you a line-jumper which most people find significantly worse.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  4. Re:Here's the bizarre part by jeff4747 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You have to remember wages in this discussion.

    "American's won't do that job" is what is said. They leave off "for the wage we are willing to pay".

    So they import undocumented workers who will accept lower wages because we've created a massive system to find and deport them after incarcerating them for one or more years. And the alternative in their home country is so shitty that they'll do it.

    It costs us billions per year to make it so those farmers can pay foreigners shitty wages. ICE isn't cheap. And the cheapest way to enforce immigration laws (imprison the farmers paying the undocumented workers) just doesn't happen for some reason. Backing the recent coup in Honduras isn't as expensive as ICE, but it's still money.

    We could require farmers to actually respond to market demand and pay higher wages.....but the invisible hand is not allowed to hurt capital.