Slashdot Mirror


School Pays To Get an Algorithm To Scan Students' Social Media For Threats and Suicide Risks Posts (wbur.org)

When someone visits the buildings of Shawsheen Valley Technical High School in Billerica, as they walk through the secure foyer, they have to get their driver's license or another state-issued ID scanned. But the secure foyer does kind of a high-level national background check, too, explains Superintendent Tim Broadrick. From a report: The "LobbyGuard" scanner is the size of a computer tablet. It scans a driver's license, takes a picture of the school visitor and if all is OK with the person's background check, almost instantly clears the person to enter the school. An employee behind a window then pushes a button and unlocks the door to the school hallway. Amid nationwide concern about school shootings, there's talk at Shawsheen Tech of covering the wall of glass in the lobby with a special film to make it harder for a bullet to pierce. There's also a police officer -- known as a school resource officer -- stationed at the school. He has an office in the lobby. And the school has adopted another security measure to try to protect students from attacks -- one you can't see. It's a computer program designed to detect threats against the school in social media posts. And it runs 24/7.

"It's receiving and filtering and then gives us alerts when certain kinds of public communication are detected," Broadrick explains. Shawsheen Tech buys the social media scanning service from a Vermont-based company called Social Sentinel. It's one of many technology firms doing some form of social media scanning or monitoring. Social Sentinel claims it's the only one with expertise in protecting schools. Shawsheen Tech has about 1,300 students. It pays Social Sentinel approximately $10,000 per year, according to Broadrick.

16 of 96 comments (clear)

  1. Let me fix this by p51d007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is what you get when you value SAFETY more than FREEDOM. 40 years of liberal logic & indoctrination, lack of morals, lack of ethics, lack of manners, lack of respect, no family, and on and on... When I was in high school in the 70's, pretty much every pickup had a gun rack with a .22 rifle and or shotgun. Some had pistols in the glovebox. Not one was locked. Kids carried pocket knives, or buck knives in a sheath on their belt. NOT ONCE was there ever a shooting, stabbing or anything else. The gun hasn't changed...the KIDS have changed. And NOT for the better. Liberal logic & indoctrination hasn't worked!

    1. Re:Let me fix this by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, a bigger problem are the media. Not the "liberal" media, but media of all political views that talks about mass shootings non-stop, publishes the faces and names of the criminals responsible for weeks afterwards. If it bleeds, it leads. I get that that's their bread and butter, but publicizing those kinds of heinous crimes constantly glorifies them and breeds copycats.

      What's the answer? We can't legally restrict the press, nor should we. But perhaps if we choose not to watch segments on those crimes nor read about them online, the ad revenue from glorifying those heinous acts will decrease and the media won't have an incentive to do so.

      This is one part of the equation. The other is over-medication of children in the US, the fact that bullying has become easier online, and yes, the lack of GOOD (i.e. not just pill-pushing) mental health treatment options at a reasonable cost.

    2. Re: Let me fix this by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

      What's wrong with "common sense regulation" on the press? Seems to be in vogue for the 2nd amendment, why shouldn't we try it for the first?

      Sorry, I injected some logic into your thread. Please go back to arguing over scapegoats again.

      It's pretty clear to me that the grandfather poster was both being sarcastic and pointing out that any arguments used for denying second amendment civil rights can be used to deny all the others, too.

      "That's different!" doesn't cut it - because it's not.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    3. Re:Let me fix this by xlsior · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What's the answer? We can't legally restrict the press, nor should we

      In much of Europe, with few exceptions newspapers typically won't print the names of criminals (whether just accused or actually convicted), but only refer to them by their initials -- less "glory" to go around while they still report what happened. In many cases because they are required to, but because naming & shaming is against their code of conduct.

      (Added benefit is that someone who does get convicted and served their time, won't be instantly unhirable in perpetuity, giving them a chance to make an honest living)

      Even in the US, most papers have policies of not printing the names of victims involved in sex crimes -- would it be that much of a stretch to do the same to perpetrators of mass shootings and such? Witholding their name denies them a huge chunk of the 'recognition' the so often seem to yearn for, and it's not not knowing the name of some random criminal is going to have a big impact on the average person's day to day life.

    4. Re:Let me fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_school_shootings_in_the_United_States#1930s

      Huh lots of school shootings in the 1970s.

      So much for your theory.

    5. Re:Let me fix this by uncqual · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't have a clue how much of this has to do directly with school shootings, but I agree inappropriate brainwashing of kids that ignores the reality of the real world seems quite damaging (and probably better explains the large percentage of young people who end up living at home for years after college than the "great recession" does).

      The zero tolerance policies for fighting and "bullying" (whatever that means) and the "everyone gets an award" philosophy and over-stressing "being respectful" eliminates many important life lessons from children when they are best equipped to deal with and learn from them.

      When I was in school, teachers didn't usually stop fights between boys (or girls, but those were quite rare) if the combatants were somewhat reasonably matched, it was one-on-one, there was little danger of lasting physical damage (for example neither party was trying to poke the other's eyes out or using weapons or beating up a lot on someone who was down on the ground), those involved weren't notorious bullies (of which there were few if any) or particularly vulnerable and were picked on very often. Sometimes we would get disciplined very lightly (have to stay in over the next lunch break rather than go outside for example), but that was it. Trips to the principal's office over such things were very rare, parental notification was even rarer, and suspension (let alone expulsion) was extraordinarily rare (I think we knew it was possible, but I don't think I ever knew anyone very well who it happened to).

      Very important life lessons were learned at an appropriate age through such physical combative situations. Most kids learned that they were not as tough as they thought they were (or, conversely that they were actually tougher than they thought). Most kids learned that they could, and should, defend themselves (this lesson sometimes took a while for some). Most kids learned that even though they "win" a fight, sometimes it takes a physical toll on them so fighting may not be the best strategy. Most kids learned that you can have a fight with someone and still be friends. Some, including myself, discovered that after fights with relative strangers, both parties respected each other more having tested the limits of the other party and demonstrated their own abilities -- in fact, after most such fights, regardless of who won, I ended up being substantially more friendly with the other kid.

      To deprive kids of these experiences seems unwise.

      Similarly, when I was in school, everyone didn't get an award or trophy (even for "participation") and little attempt was made to mask the fact that some students were more capable than others at some things. In this environment, students learned what success and failure felt like, how to deal with constructive (and sometimes not so constructive) criticism, that to get an award or recognition or even a good grade could require hard work and focus and that such hard work and focus could often be the difference between being at the top and in the middle. Having to learn these lessons later in life is much more difficult and, it appears, happens too rarely.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    6. Re:Let me fix this by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      When I was in high school in the 70's, pretty much every pickup had a gun rack with a .22 rifle and or shotgun. Some had pistols in the glovebox. Not one was locked. Kids carried pocket knives, or buck knives in a sheath on their belt. NOT ONCE was there ever a shooting, stabbing or anything else.

      There were at least 30 school shootings in the US in the 1970s.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      By the way, do you know which states have the most school shootings? Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas. Can you tell me what those states have in common? Very lax gun laws. They have other things in common, but I don't want to make this political.

      Do you know which states have the FEWEST firearm deaths per 100,000 people? Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, Hawaii, New Jersey, Minnesota, California. Can you tell me what those states have in common? I'll help you: they all require a permit to carry a handgun, and law enforcement has discretion over who gets those permits.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Let me fix this by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Yes/No. It's true that bullying is natural, and a part of the way humans naturally react, and if you want to live in the trees, it's a reasonable approach. But it penalizes the intelligent as well as the stupid. In fact, it penalizes anyone identifiably different in some "important to fashion" way. So if you want a technical civilization, you need to suppress it.

      OTOH, you also need to reward achievement of any sort. Sports and martial arts teams are a good idea, as long as you don't make everyone participate. But basic physical activity is also important...so you need classes for those who *aren't* on the activity teams. Mechanics classes are important for those with skills in that area, etc. And everyone needs to master the basics.

      Perhaps the mistake is to separate kids by age rather than by aptitudes, but you need to be careful to not create an us-vs-them within the structure, and that's difficult unless there are a lot of shared activities where accomplishment is a shared result.

      I think the basic problem is that schools are designed to create assembly line workers. Most people don't like that, so it creates resentment which expresses itself in some way. "Summerhill" is a very interesting book on the subject of schools, but it required a selected student body and a special teacher. And a high teacher to student ratio.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  2. Re:This is a hell of a lot of trouble by cstacy · · Score: 4, Funny

    A friend of a friend just the other day walked in to buy a pistol and managed to walk out with an AR-15 because he got caught up in how cool it looked. Make him wait 3 days and he'd have come to his senses and just bought the pistol he came in for.

    I'm sorry your "friend" blew that money that you needed for groceries, but it's amazing that you desire for a federal law to keep your impulse shopping under control! You try to make it sound like buying a semi-automatic rifle, rather than a semi-automatic pistol, is a bad thing. Get over your buyer's remorse, enjoy your AR-15, and next time you can get another Glock. If your wife will let you go there unchaperoned again.

  3. Re:Sure glad I don't have any social media account by burtosis · · Score: 2

    No social media accounts will be the next round of privacy victims. You don't have one? You must be hiding something!

  4. Sounds more like a prison... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

    Sounds more like a prison than a rural high school. Is this what we've come to as a country? Easy availability of powerful guns, but not mental health therapy. Easy prescription of drugs that numb the mind, but strict penalties for drugs that expand the mind. Bullying and violence being legitimized and/or ignores. Long working hours, broken families, absentee parents. Media looking for more, more, and more ad revenue, even if it means glorifying heinous criminals, discussing their crimes non-stop for weeks, and encouraging copycats. Multiple studies have shown that things like suicide increase when other peoples' acts are publicized.

    1. Re:Sounds more like a prison... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Go back to high school or college physics. Power is energy per unit of time. Watts are joules per second. So an AR-15 with a large mag is a more powerful gun than your 30-06. It can deliver more energy to the target in a shorter time, even if that energy isn't in a single round. So yeah, it's more "powerful."

  5. Irrational Fear - Think clearly about the kids by FeelGood314 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My kids' school has a locked front door and a fence around the school yard. They claim it's to prevent a kid being abducted but they will eventually open the door to everyone. So the extra security worthless, is a total pain and worse it means I have to walk my kids the long way round the parking lot. I'm in Canada. We average less than one abduction by a complete stranger every 3 years of a child not on a native reserve. It is so rare most Canadians know who Paul_Bernardo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... is. Contrast that risk with the risk of my kids being hit in the parking lot. It's thousands a year with about 20 fatalities of small children.

    This is a school where they should be good at math. The risks to small children are childhood leukemia and traffic accidents. As they get older its meningitis, traffic accidents and suicide. How about we spend 1/10 of the money we spend on Hollywood threats on real threats to my kids?

  6. Re:Imagine The Possbilities by mnemotronic · · Score: 2

    The military-industrial complex sells guns to one segment of the population, gun protection to a different segment, then pays the media and their politician-shills to get both segments riled up and feeling self-righteous.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  7. Some badly needed perspective by Solandri · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The U.S. causes of death statistics are readily available from the CDC website. For 2015, the leading causes of death for the 15-19 year old demographic were:
    • 3,919 deaths - Accidents (mostly automobile accidents and drug overdoses)
    • 2.061 deaths - Suicide
    • 1,587 deaths - Homicide (mostly outside school, and gang related)
    • 583 deaths - Malignant neoplasms (cancer)
    • 306 deaths - Heart disease
    • 195 deaths - Birth defects
    • 72 deaths - Influenza (the flu)
    • 63 deaths - Chronic lower respiratory diseases
    • 61 deaths - Cerebrovascular diseases
    • 52 deaths - Diabetes
    • 41 deaths - Complications from pregnancy and childbirth

    Where do school shootings rank? There have been about 250 deaths in school shootings over 18 years, or about 14 per year.(and K-12, not just ages 15-19). Since there are approximately 51 million K-12 students in the U.S., a student's chances of being killed in a non-gang, non-suicide school shooting in any given year are about 1 in 3.6 million. You are roughly 3x more likely to be struck by lightning (1 in 1.08 million).

    Like airliner crashes, school shootings are one of these extremely rare, statistically insignificant events whose emotional impact creates a large amount of social interest. This causes a disproportionate amount of press coverage, leading people to wildly overestimate the actual danger. If you really want to save high schoolers' lives, teach them to: drive safely and buckle their seat belts, not to abuse drugs, seek counseling for depression, stay out of gangs, use sunscreen, eat healthy and exercise, get the flu shot, don't smoke, don't eat too many sweets, and avoid teen pregnancy. Each of these will save many more lives than all the hand-wringing over school shootings, some (like suicide-prevention) around a hundred times more.

  8. why this doesn't work by slashmydots · · Score: 2

    I'm 30 but still, all my posts are marked as non-public, friends-only. Any teenager who's too dumb to do the same to their account deserves to get "scanned" or whatever and basically have their privacy massively invaded. By the way, a lot of teenagers are smart enough to also not use their real names.