Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Test Tooth-Mounted Sensor-Enabled Chips (go.com)

Researchers at Tufts University are testing tooth-mounted RFID chips which sense and transmit data on what goes in your mouth. ABC News reports: The sensors looks like custom microchips stuck to the tooth. They are flexible, tiny squares -- ranging from 4 mm by 4 mm to an even smaller size of about 2 mm by 2 mm -- that are applied directly to human teeth. Each one has three active layers made of titanium and gold, with a middle layer of either silk fibers or water-based gels. In small-scale studies, four human volunteers wore sensors, which had silk as the middle "detector" layer, on their teeth and swished liquids around in their mouths to see if the sensors would function. The researchers were testing for sugar and for alcohol.

The tiny squares successfully sent wireless signals to tablets and cell phone devices. In one of their first experiments, the chip could tell the difference between solutions of purified water, artificial saliva, 50 percent alcohol and wood alcohol. It would then wirelessly signal to a nearby receiver via radiofrequency, similar to how EZ Passes work. They demonstrated that different concentrations of glucose, a type of sugar, could be distinguished, even in liquids that had sugar concentrations like those found in fruit drinks.

15 of 28 comments (clear)

  1. Future insurance requirement. by jtgd · · Score: 2

    "We're not saying you HAVE to have this implant so we can monitor all of your intake, we're just saying that your health insurance will double if you don't"

    --
    J
    1. Re:Future insurance requirement. by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

      And if you choose to get the implant, we reserve the right to double your health insurance premium once we discover all the crap you're eating.

    2. Re:Future insurance requirement. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      It's a fairly "dumb" RFID chip -- should be easily enough to spoof a signal. You eat salad all the time, even when you're eating Snickers.

    3. Re:Future insurance requirement. by Octorian · · Score: 1

      I think you've got it wrong...

      "You can get this great discount on your health insurance if you get this implant!"
      (Meanwhile, we're doubling the base rate.)

    4. Re:Future insurance requirement. by jtgd · · Score: 1

      We both got it right. What they say and what they mean are 2 different things.

      --
      J
    5. Re:Future insurance requirement. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That's just the usual insurance gambit when you create laws that are supposed to keep them from putting people at a disadvantage. We're not disadvantaging anyone. But we do give discounts to certain people who do what we want. And yes, we had to triple our base premium, inflation, ya know...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Future insurance requirement. by volodymyrbiryuk · · Score: 1

      Then they'll invent an RFID chip that goes in your butt to check if the stuff comming in matches the stuff comming out.

      --
      sudo rm -r -f --no-preserve-root /
  2. Reminds me of an old joke by gtall · · Score: 2

    Dunno if I recall it properly, and it is a bit dated: Three businessmen are eating lunch. One starts talking to someone who doesn't appear to be there. He explains to his lunch partners that his company put a telephone in his teeth, it merely taps them in the right sequence to make a call and then an ear implant allows him to hear the other end. Another of the businessman shakes his head and then starts talking. Explains to his lunch partners that his company had a telephone installed in his head, he mere needs to nod and bob to dial and answer calls. The last businessman, feeling somewhat behind the technology curve, lets out a rip roaring fart. He then explains to his lunch partners that he must visit the men's room because a FAX has just come in.

    1. Re:Reminds me of an old joke by Sir+Lurkalot · · Score: 1

      Nice

  3. Instead of sugars or alcohol, test for roughies. by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Instead of sugars or alcohol, test for roughies.

    Test for what *I* care about, not what insurance companies care about.

  4. sugar fix by RhettLivingston · · Score: 3, Funny

    It seems strangely appropriate that with this sensor in place you'd have to snort your sugar to get a fix without getting caught.

  5. Re:Instead of sugars or alcohol, test for roughies by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    It's been done -- nail polish that changes color in the form of Rohypnol...

    https://www.cosmopolitan.com/s...

  6. But does it report back to the CIA? by spiritplumber · · Score: 1

    Interesting to see an old conspiracy theory chestnut to become technically feasible.

    --
    Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
  7. Re:Instead of sugars or alcohol, test for roughies by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    I thought "roughies" must be the opposite of "smoothies".

  8. Too fragile by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    They break too easily.

    At least when I get forced to have one, I can be pretty creative.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.