Slashdot Mirror


Waymo CEO Expresses Confidence Its Cars Wouldn't Have Killed Elaine Herzberg (washingtonpost.com)

theodp writes: Nearly a week after an autonomous Uber SUV claimed the first life in testing of self-driving vehicles, The Washington Post reports that Waymo CEO John Krafcik says he is confident its cars would have performed differently under the circumstances (Warning: source may be paywalled; alternative source), since they are intensively programmed to avoid such calamities. "I can say with some confidence that in situations like that one with pedestrians -- in this case a pedestrian with a bicycle -- we have a lot of confidence that our technology would be robust and would be able to handle situations like that," Krafcik said Saturday when asked if a Waymo car would have reacted differently than the self-driving Uber.

In explaining its since-settled lawsuit against Uber last year, Google charged that Uber was "using key parts of Waymo's self-driving technology," and added it was "seeking an injunction to stop the misappropriation of our designs." In announcing the settlement of the lawsuit last month, Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi noted, "we are taking steps with Waymo to ensure our LIDAR and software represents just our good work." A Google spokesperson added, "We have reached an agreement with Uber that we believe will protect Waymo's intellectual property now and into the future. We are committed to working with Uber to make sure that each company develops its own technology. This includes an agreement to ensure that any Waymo confidential information is not being incorporated in Uber Advanced Technologies Group hardware and software." All of which might prompt some to ask: was Elaine Herzberg collateral damage in Google and Uber's IP war?
"I want to be really respectful of Elaine [Herzberg], the woman who lost her life and her family," Krafcik continued. "I also want to recognize the fact that there are many different investigations going on now regarding what happened in Tempe on Sunday." His assessment, he said, was "based on our knowledge of what we've seen so far with the accident and our own knowledge of the robustness that we've designed into our systems."

2 of 141 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Vids or it didn't happen by mrclevesque · · Score: 3, Informative

    https://arstechnica.com/cars/2...

    After looking at that it's pretty obvious Uber's video is very very misleading.

  2. Re:The only important thing, IMO.... by amorsen · · Score: 4, Informative

    Uber cars can't manage 13 miles between interventions. Whoever is doing the debugging must be buried under tens of thousands of reports.

    THAT is why they are to blame. An automatic car can mess up. It will happen once in a blue moon, and someone will die. Too bad, but that is the price of progress and you cannot really blame anyone, you can just compensate the family.

    Sending cars out on the road that demonstrably cannot function is different. That is reckless manslaughter. There is no way that Dara Khosrowshahi was unaware of the (lack of) performance of the Uber cars. He needs to be prosecuted.

    --
    Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?