Slashdot Mirror


Tumblr Takes Down 84 Russia-Linked Accounts (thehill.com)

On Friday, Tumblr said it has taken down 84 accounts used by Russia to spread disinformation ahead of the 2016 presidential election. The accounts were reportedly linked to the Russian troll farm known as the Internet Research Agency. The Hill reports: Special counsel Robert Mueller last month indicted 13 Russians and three Russian entities associated with the Internet Research Agency who are accused of orchestrating an elaborate plot to spread divisive messages to U.S. audiences on social media ahead of the election. The individuals face multiple charges, including identity theft and bank fraud. Tumblr said in a statement Friday that it provided information on the 84 Russia-linked accounts from its investigation to the Justice Department. Tumblr said the Russia-linked accounts were solely focused on spreading disinformation by posting "organic content." The company found no indication that the accounts purchased any advertisements. The platform says it will notify any users who interacted with the accounts and provide them with a list of usernames they engaged with. Tumblr also disclosed that it will keep a public record of usernames linked to the Internet Research Agency or other state-sponsored disinformation efforts for the sake of transparency.

43 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. 84? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So 84 accounts out of 345 million registered? Nothing in other words.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  2. can you show me what the disinformation was? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    seriously, I'd like to know what the disinformation was.

    1. Re:can you show me what the disinformation was? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Been able to show in images from the news or articulate in a few lines that:
      One candidate was giving great positive speeches to lots of real voters all over the USA.
      Another candidate was talking to small numbers of the tame media on the east and west coast.
      One candidate was able to give a speech that people in different states all over the USA enjoyed.
      Another candidate spoke down to people all over the USA.
      Subtle news topics that actual US voters like sharing.

      To stop that US news from spreading facts about electability, health everything had to all be "Russia" accounts.
      One candidate having a condescending way of talking about most of the USA was all from "fake" accounts.

      Add in meme magic, cartoons, art, music, traditionalism that was trending from topics people could see in the news everyday.
      One candidate was winning.
      Another candidate was low energy. Thats was in contrast to an energetic candidate who could talk to real people all over the USA.
      About jobs in the USA.
      Voters all over the USA could see the differences and shared the news.
      Voters turned out all over the USA to make the USA great again.
      Low energy does not win over all the different states.
      Coughing fits do not win elections.
      Having nothing good to say about most parts of the USA will not get the needed votes in states all over the USA.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:can you show me what the disinformation was? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re 'With a few minor exceptions you have accurately described just about every US media outlet."

      Thats really what the CIA, NSA, GCHQ, MI6, MI6, FBI would have to block from internet users commenting on in real time.
      All comments on the news.
      All art and cartoons created from the news.
      Freedom of speech would be removed from the internet in real time.

      Have to wait days into the news cycle while an account is proved to be on a list of approved nations to upload an approved funny political cartoon?
      The cartoon would then be held and looked at by US and UK experts for any hint of a Russian art education to present US traditionalism to US internet users?
      When the art work is proved by US art experts to be bland enough it will be allowed to be uploaded to the internet a week later.

      Jokes about the news that get posted in real time without expert approval get a police visit.
      Jokes that show advanced Russian level cultural awareness about US politics start investigations.
      Applied knowledge and study of obscurity of US political history also allow FBI investigation of joke that is just too smart.
      Russian anthropologist from closed science city must have helped US comedians craft extra funny joke about US candidate who cant give a long speech.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:can you show me what the disinformation was? by Uberbah · · Score: 2

      The NSA, CIA, and FBI all presented information to Obama showing the Russian's attempted interference in the Presidential campaign but Obama did nothing about it.

      Because it's the dumbest conspiracy theory of all time, and the one with the most plot holes. Why would Russia try to get either party in the White House when both parties have been anti-Russian for a century. How is it that Putin was able to see years in advance that an asshole gameshow host could be president, yet completely unable to anticipate any blowback. Why would anyone bother with a dozen Twitter trolls trying to make ad revenue for a few thousand dollars in an election that cost the better part of ten billion dollars.

      You got punked on Iraq, and you couldn't wait to get punked again.

    4. Re:can you show me what the disinformation was? by Required+Snark · · Score: 1

      Just watch Fox News. They are the main mouthpiece for Russian propaganda. Have been for a while.l

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
    5. Re:can you show me what the disinformation was? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Regardless of his involvement or not, it's hard to argue that Trump and Brexit have not done that. And it appears Russia was involved in trying to get the far right elected in France too, which would have had a similar effect.

      So now Putin is not only responsible for Trump, but Brexit as well? Don't forget the poop in the hallway. As for France, their own intelligence agency debunked that conspiracy theory as soon as it happened, but that doesn't stop it from lumbering on with the rest of the Russiagate zombies.

      Doesn't matter if you think Trump and/or Brexit are good things, what is undeniable is that they have created great turmoil and weakened relations between former allies.

      Still not seeing any evidence for Russiagate or an explanation for any of its plot holes. People have been warning about the problems posed by the EU for decades and they don't have anything to do with a country that has a smaller economy than austerity-crushed Spain.

      discourse in the US is now incredibly divisive and angry, far more so than before

      Ah yes, the most amorphous pillar of Russiagate: they're "trying to sow discord". The problem with that little chestnut is: why would they need to? Did Russiagate come with some amnesia pills to make people forget about how the right wing completely lost their minds on the Clinton's the 90's? The Bush Administration running around smearing anyone who wasn't totally supportive of the Iraq invasion, or supporting gay marriage bans across the country? The Birthers who believe to this day that Obama is a muslim born in Kenya? The butthurt Democrats who call Trump a fascist who wants to be a dictator?

      May as well accuse Russia of throwing a cup of gasoline on an already raging forest fire. You'd think people's bullshit detectors would go off when Russia is even accused of being behind Black Lives Matter protests, because black people didn't know they lived in a murderous police state before being told.

  3. Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You have no idea what sort of evil they were up to. They were probably claiming something horrible on Tumblr, like saying there are only two genders.

    Can you even imagine how much that would disrupt Tumblr?

    1. Re: Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      three genders

      You're about 2 orders of magnitude off there fam.

      http://genderfluidsupport.tumblr.com/gender

      Some personal favorites:

      Ambonec: Identifying as both man and woman, yet neither at the same time

      Anesigender: feeling like a certain gender yet being more comfortable identifying with another

      Antegender: a protean gender which has the potential to be anything, but is formless and motionless, and therefore, does not manifest as any particular gender

      Apconsugender: a gender where you know what it isn't, but not what it is; the gender is hiding itself from you

      Caelgender: a gender which shares qualities with outer space or has the aesthetic of space, stars, nebulas, etc.

      Collgender: the feeling of having too many genders simultaneously to describe each one

      Colorgender: a gender associated with one or more colors and the feelings, hues, emotions, and/or objects associated with that color; may be used like pinkgender, bluegender, yellowgender

      Demi-vapor: Continuously drifting to other genders, feeling spiritually transcendental when doing so while having a clear -slightly blurred- inner visual of your genders, transitions, and positive emotions. Tied to Demi-Smoke.

      Demi-smoke: A transcendental, spiritual gender roughly drifting to other genders that are unable to be foreseen and understood, shrouded in darkness within your inner visual. Elevating through mystery. Caused by a lack of inner interpretation and dark emotional states. Tied to Demi-Vapor.

      Genderblank: a gender that can only be described as a blank space; when gender is called into question, all that comes to mind is a blank space

      Glimragender: a faintly shining, wavering gender

      Healgender: a gender that once realized, brings lots of peace, clarity, security, and creativity to the individual’s mind

      Hydrogender: a gender which shares qualities with water

      Juxera: a feminine gender similar to girl, but on a separate plane and off to itself

      Magigender: a gender that is mostly gender and the rest is something else

      Perigender: identifying with a gender but not as a gender

      Proxvir: a masculine gender similar to boy, but on a separate plane and off to itself

      Surgender: having a gender that is 100% one gender but with more of another gender added on top of that

      Vapogender: a gender that sort of feels like smoke; can be seen on a shallow level but once you go deeper, it disappears and you are left with no gender and only tiny wisps of what you thought it was

      Verangender: a gender that seems to shift/change the moment it is identified

    2. Re: Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's the leftists theory. You can count any imaginary combinations and get any number of sexes, just by considering people's feelings about what they imagine themselves to be. If I identify myself as a bisexual dog that feels like a cat on every other day, etc. an honest doctor would prescribe me some lithium.

      The Genders though belong strictly to grammar. In Spanish there is two, on German three, in Japanese perhaps just one.

    3. Re: Science by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      You forgot my gender: Napoleon. Pronoun: Your Imperial Majesty.

  4. So... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    What you're saying is that 84 accounts took a bit of a tumbl?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  5. Re:84? by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

    It means they weren't just publishing one account, it's enough to play whack-a-mole

  6. The IRA by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    This strikes me as odd. Posting organic content? No Proxies.. or shitty proxies? Disinformation... like what can you say bad about the last election candidates that isnt so very obvious... they were all idiots and the Russian trolls really didnt have to do much at all, if anything.

    --
    [($)]
    1. Re:The IRA by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1

      "organic content" = the poop emoji

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    2. Re:The IRA by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

      I so wish these two can get their shit together, the things the US and Rus can accomplish together... the BALLS and the BRAINS... Apha Centurie anybody. And Russia has big fucking BALLS... lol

      --
      [($)]
  7. Just 84. Either the Russians are pathetic by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1, Insightful

    or Mueller is.

  8. I just googled this,... by AbRASiON · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's nearly 400 MILLION accounts on tumblr.
    *400, MILLION*

    So it's newsworthy that 80 accounts 'linked to Russians' were closed? Really? Really? For goodness sakes, there's over 300,000,000 Americans, there's 6 (7?) Billion people on the planet.

    There's VPN providers in Russia, when the figure is as low as 84 people, it could literally, literally be Americans just using a VPN or proxy because they're paranoid, coming out of a Russian IP. Christ, it could be 84 Americans who've moved to Russia?

    Maybe it's just 84 citizens?

    When, WHEN, *WHEN* will the @#$%^ing Russia articles stop on this website? It's this endless braying of Russia Russia Russia! with exceedingly little convincing evidence of anything. *Even if there was* I've no doubt the American govt would've done the same thing historically.

    I come to slashdot for technology news, not politics. I'm *NOT* American, no I wouldn't have voted for Trump, I would've voted for Bernie.

    Another day, another person, entirely focused on politics, unable to detach politics from everything else in society, has to spam their stuff here, to try to rustle up feathers.

    Seriously, I'd be better off hitting /homelab /linux /hardware /android etc on Reddit at this point. Can someone, in some position, stop this shit? It's fucking daily and 2/3 of them are barely tech related.

    1. Re:I just googled this,... by AbRASiON · · Score: 2

      Slashdot is a technology site, deal with it, it's not about politics or conspiracy theories.

    2. Re:I just googled this,... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The stories might stop when Mueller's investigation ends, depending on what he finds. I wouldn't count on it though.

      And like it or not, technology is now an important part of politics. If that bothers you then try tweeting @DonaldTrump and asking him to stop.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  9. Re:84? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    The Western intelligence services fear 84 accounts?
    Some university level meme magic and traditionalism reminded America it was always great?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  10. lol Tumblrina Trump voters? by poity · · Score: 1

    What's next, Geocities Takes down 23 Russia-linked accounts? My sides.

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    1. Re:lol Tumblrina Trump voters? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      The bigger news is that Tumblr assumed their nationality.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  11. State-Sponsored Accounts? by GlennC · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So when Tumblr says that

      "...it will keep a public record of usernames linked to the Internet Research Agency or other state-sponsored disinformation efforts",

    does that include those used by the FBI, NSA, and/or CIA, or is it just those evil foreigners?

    --
    Go on, citizen, stamp the vote card. R or D, your choice.
  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. So by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    Did Tumblr also take down Harry Reid's account?

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  14. Re: 84? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    All of the crap, runs straight smack into the face of an infinitely think concrete wall, people will believe what they want to believe. The internet propaganda tends to fail apart from bringing together people who want to believe particular things. What happens is people get exposed to all sorts of stuff, big truths, little truths, big lies, little lies, stupendously massive lies and they select from what is on offer and choose to believe what they want to believe, based upon the whole range of lies/truths they were presented. The numbers the generate look impressive until you realise, yeah they were already there before this shit started, you are just filtering them out from the crowd and bringing them together and generating a whole bunch of empty noise.

    The same can not be said for generating and spreading new ideas, ideas work all together differently to stories. Ideas spread and take hold, stories well;
    if people want to believe a story they will
    if they don't want to believe a story they won't
    if they do believe and want to pretend they don't believe they will publicly pretend not to believe
    if they don't believe and want to pretend they do believe they will publicly pretend they do believe.

    People lie in all sorts of fashion, which is exactly why sociologists manage to come up with all sorts of nonsense (asking people questions and pretending they are telling the truth). So they lie about the outcomes, the lie about the results, they lie to get rich, and that is exactly what the contractors are doing lying about outcomes to generate more income, lying about succeeding, lying about failing, lying, lying, lying. Good luck in your search for the truth in the propaganda wars. Ideas change things, stories do not, stories entertain.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  15. Re:84? by Uberbah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yep, a few thousand bucks paying a few dozen 'vocal shills' to post generic political propaganda in broken english on the biggest SJW haven on the internet swung an election, but billions spent on all manner of actual professional campaigning and marketing and astroturfing was a total waste.

    Somebody pointed that out to Podesta on Meet the Press, iirc. Asked him how the Ruskies knew to target swing states, but the Hillary campaign did not. She just took for granted that she would win states like Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Iowa and didn't bother to campaign in them - that went to Trump. Hell, she nearly lost Minnesota as well.

    Russiagate is nothing more than a sad, sad attempt to excuse Hillary losing the most winnable election in history.

  16. Re: 84? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sure. Cant be that the democRats are simply sorry losers and want to discredit Trumps presidency.

    Becauze Cultural Marxism and perpetual war is morally superior.

  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. Re:84? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is like asking how Trump's Twitter account can have any influence or power at all when it's just one single account out of 330 million active users.

    These accounts are just entry points for fake news, memes and propaganda. What matters is not how many there are, but how far their messages spread and the influence they had. The number of accounts tells you nothing.

    That's why social media is such a powerful tool. That's why Russia uses it. That's why western governments use it too - don't forget that the original leak about this stuff was from GCHQ. If you think it has no effect you are just opening yourself and your country up to manipulation by anyone who understands it.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  19. Re:84? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Because the left _Must_ push the russia narrative. it's all they have.

    Apart from

    - Sexual assault claims / treatment of women
    - Tax records
    - Treatment of immigrants
    - Cops murdering black people
    - Gun control and NRA campaign donations
    - Transgender ban in the military
    - Adultery and illegal campaign contributions to cover it up

    we're ignoring the saud spending hundreds of millions, or the chinese spending hundreds of millions

    Spending hundreds of millions on what specifically? And more to the point was it illegal and have to forwarded your evidence to Mueller?

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  20. Re:84? by GrumpySteen · · Score: 2, Informative

    Because the left _Must_ push the russia narrative. it's all they have.

    Well, that and 22 indictments with 5 guilty pleas so far. But keep telling yourself that there's nothing there.

  21. Re:84? by Z80a · · Score: 1

    What they actually need to do is drop social justice and authoritarianism and go back to be the ones that protect the working class from the corporations.

  22. Re: 84? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think it's a dogwhistle for The Races Must Be Separated (I mean, what would cultural Marxism be? sharing in the benefits of each others cultures? Maybe? Perhaps they can define what it is they mean, but I doubt it). Unless they can come up with some kind of coherent definition, just take it as more of the same nationalist and white supremacist bullshit, with a new shiny label.

  23. Be careful what you shout for. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    They were pushing flaming leftist outrage, presumably to get peoples' mouths louder with stuff that makes conservatives more liky to get out and vote.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  24. Re:84? by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

    Like when Thomas Jefferson was banging his slaves? Like when JFK was banging sluts? Like when LBJ was showing everybody his dick? Like when Bill Clinton was using his intern as a humidor? "Dignity in the Office" has been the rare exception, not the rule.

    Assume Trump raw dogged porn stars ten years ago. Now what? Impeach? What exactly do you want to happen over this?

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  25. Re:84? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    All of those people you mentioned are dead, and Bill Clinton was impeached.
    I'm NOT saying that any of these are impeachable offenses. But it disgraces and degrades the office when it occurs.

  26. Re:84? by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

    Okay. Consider the office disgraced and degraded. Can we move on now?

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  27. Re:84? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Throwing Obama into Michigan at the last second like that is evidence of "Oh fucking SHIT!!!" at the highest levels of the Democratic Party.

    Sure was, but isn't that last minute panic evidence that Hillary did not target those states?

    Yes, she was that bad of a candidate.

    Easily the worst of all time, as she lost to Trump. Speaking of Obama, he every-so-politely called Hillary out for her lazy hubris after the election:

    • "You know, I won Iowa not because the demographics dictated that I would win Iowa. It was because I spent 87 days going to every small town and fair and fish fry and VFW hall, and there were some counties where I might have lost, but maybe I lost by 20 points instead of 50 points," Obama said.

    2016 was Hillary's election to lose, right up until she lost it. Had to work hard to do it, too.

  28. Re: 84? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    Bill Clinton was impeached by the House of Representatives. Since he was acquitted of a crime by the Senate, he was not required to leave office.
    Impeachment does not necessarily mean "thrown out of office." The House impeaches, the Senate conducts a trial.
    Andrew Johnson, the only other President to be impeached, likewise passed a Senate trial, served the rest of his presidential term, and was later elected Senator.

  29. Re:84? by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

    Well it'd be really embarrassing for Mueller if he couldn't claim at least a few scalps, given the level of corruption that is the standard in politics and the level of manpower and unlimited resources at his disposal.

    Ants put under a magnifying lens get burned. When you're working backwards from the conclusion, the more little ants you burn the better, since the pile that results can be pointed at by professional liars and be claimed to amount to something substantial.

  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion