Slashdot Mirror
Huawei Commits To Bringing Its Products To the US Despite Government Security Concerns (phonedog.com)
Within the last few months, AT&T and Verizon have reportedly decided not to sell Huawei's flagship smartphone due to pressure from the U.S. government, with Best Buy opting to stop offering all Huawei products. Despite all of this, though, the company isn't giving up its U.S. ambitions. PhoneDog reports: Richard Yu, CEO of Huawei's consumer business group, says that Huawei will continue working to establish itself in the U.S. and earn consumers' trust. Yu's statement to CNET: "We are committed to the U.S. market and to earning the trust of U.S. consumers by staying focused on delivering world-class products and innovation. We would never compromise that trust." Yu went on to say that the security concerns that the U.S. government has about Huawei are "based on groundless suspicions and are quite frankly unfair." He added that Huawei is open having a discussion with the heads of the CIA, FBI, and NSA so long as it is based on facts.
...expects other countries to put blind trust in its products? Trust us, we'd never lie to you? I for one have never seen any instance of any left-over communist country admitting to any kind of wrongdoing or taking responsibility for any of its questionnable actions at all. What's going to happen when Huawei products do something bad? Oh - of course its all lies, and "we'd never do anything like that".
Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
As long as the people who run the company are subject to the laws of China, they will do what the government of China tells them to. This includes updates that spy on users, and lying about it.
And the government of China cannot be trusted.
A country that Doesn't Trust its own Citizens..
Are you talking about the US or China here?
Are you kidding, your joking, you absolutely must, perhaps you don't recognise your own satire. Free journalism, that must be the kind where the journalism is not paid for by advertising dollars, that control that journalism. Even the most honest journalism is driven by charity and the need to serve those willing to fund that charity because of the protections it provides by trying to tell the truth.
US corporate journalism free, who is kidding who, it is bought and paid for corporate propaganda and completely owned by various vested interests, every story controlled, every story shaped, many stories buried and with factual proof of that even crimes, lies truth the only difference can they sue.
Upon a national basis is it probably unwise to trust any foreign corporation with your communications systems, they are an integral part of democracy and a modern functioning society. All countries should take exactly the same view, the Government of China, should absolutely not trust any tech equipment coming out of the US, it is simply the way it is. BY that same token even allies should not trust each other, the Australian government should most definitely not trust the US government, especially as they are likely aware of the many lies the US has told including to the Australian government, so no the US should not be given the keys to Australia's communication infrastructure, the idea would be insane.
At an individual level sure Huawei, why not. You certainly would not want it to dominate the market and minor percentage of the market who cares. There is the realistic expectation by the electorate that where possible the government source anything it needs locally first, regardless of additional cost, especially in the tech sector. Nobody can be trusted in this sector as proven by the various exposure of countries and corporations. In the US example it should be law, that all government employees at all levels use only US manufactured computer equipment at work and that includes phones. It will cost more but it is the sensible security measure to take plus drive employment and better manage the tech corporate tax cheats.
I don't understand why the US government is mealy mouthing their way around this. Probably lip service to global trade and of course lulling other countries into accepting US hardware and software tainted by security letters, so that the US can pull their plug any time the US wants to. Just stick to the security reality, no different the EU or China or and especially the US, any country should seek to fully secure it's own communications infrastructure, in the digital age, you kill that communications and you kill that country.
Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen