Slashdot Mirror


Atlanta Still Struggles To Recover From Ransomware Attack (reuters.com)

An anonymous reader quotes Reuters: Atlanta's top officials holed up in their offices on Saturday as they worked to restore critical systems knocked out by a nine-day-old cyber attack that plunged the Southeastern U.S. metropolis into technological chaos and forced some city workers to revert to paper... Police and other public servants have spent the past week trying to piece together their digital work lives, recreating audit spreadsheets and conducting business on mobile phones in response to one of the most devastating "ransomware" virus attacks to hit an American city. Three city council staffers have been sharing a single clunky personal laptop brought in after cyber extortionists attacked Atlanta's computer network with a virus that scrambled data and still prevents access to critical systems. "It's extraordinarily frustrating," said Councilman Howard Shook, whose office lost 16 years of digital records...

City officials have declined to discuss the extent of damage beyond disclosed outages that have shut down some services at municipal offices, including courts and the water department. Nearly 6 million people live in the Atlanta metropolitan area... Atlanta police returned to taking written case notes and have lost access to some investigative databases, department spokesman Carlos Campos told Reuters... Meanwhile, some city employees complained they have been left in the dark, unsure when it is safe to turn on their computers. "We don't know anything," said one frustrated employee as she left for a lunch break on Friday.

"Our data management teams are working diligently to restore normal operations and functionalities to these systems," said a spokesperson for the police department, adding that they "hope to be back online in the very near future."

2 of 91 comments (clear)

  1. Re:They should all be sacked. by hey! · · Score: 3, Informative

    What I can't understand is why these high profile ransomware attacks haven't prompted a rush to adopt copy-on-write filesystems. It's not like ZFS is exactly new.

    I understand that because of cost places like Atlanta try to run their networks with the least expertise they can get away with, but projects like FreeNAS make it really easy. I have a cheap server running at home and have background tasks scheduled to rsync changes to it. It's like it's not even there, but if I need to I can mount the NAS box and right click on a file in Windows and access the all the previous versions.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  2. Re:"Unknown User" by CAOgdin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nonsense! 100% daily backups of systems, using a suite of tools kept offline except during backups activity is ALWAYS a solution....simply because an attack starts at a particular time; anything you've kept offline prior to that time is a resource to be used to recover. Yes, there is the problem of recapturing the lost data in that time interval, but it's a LOT better than having to start redesigning software from scratch AFTER the attack has occurred!

    100% daily backups, with recycling of media over a period of a few weeks is a MANDATORY requirement for every computer under my management. Since I started doing that in 2001, I have never had (nor has any client had) an unrecoverable loss of data.

    The other trick is keeping data separated from executables. My mantra is "C: is for Code, D: is for Data". The idea that everything should be on the same logical drive is simply WRONG.

    There are no perfectly secure systems, and perfection is a fools game. But, simple strategies, unerringly repeated over time, can make recovery from assaults (or hard-disk failure) a straight-forward solution.