Slashdot Mirror


Russia Files Lawsuit To Block Telegram Messaging App (reuters.com)

Russia's state communications watchdog, Roskomnadzor, has filed a lawsuit to block Telegram in the country because the instant messaging company has refused to hand over the encryption keys that would allow Russian authorities to read messages sent using the service. From a report: Ranked as the world's ninth most popular mobile messaging app, Telegram is widely used in countries across the former Soviet Union and Middle East. Active users of the app reached 200 million in March. As part of its services, Telegram allows users to communicate via encrypted messages which cannot be read by third parties, including government authorities. But Russia's FSB Federal Security service has said it needs access to some messages for its work, including guarding against terrorist attacks. Telegram has refused to comply with its demands, citing respect for user privacy.

70 comments

  1. Good advertising for Telegram by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If a government moves to ban a program because said government can't use it to spy on its users, what more endorsement could you possibly need?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Good advertising for Telegram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      what more endorsement could you possibly need?

      Roskomnadzor was my fav metal band in the 80s
      I still have many of their cassingles

    2. Re:Good advertising for Telegram by lfourrier · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It could be a propaganda operation, to encourage users from others country to migrate to a compromised system.
      Or not.
      But if you have enough paranoia to need some system like that, there is no limit to your untrust.

    3. Re:Good advertising for Telegram by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      "Respect for user privacy" is a good answer from Telegram, but I still think the best answer to law enforcement agents asking for keys is: "Sorry, but we don't have those". It's an even better one when those agents start demanding instead of asking.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:Good advertising for Telegram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a government moves to ban a program because said government can't use it to spy on its users, what more endorsement could you possibly need?

      But it's RUSSIA!!!!!

      They could be fucking with you!

      And maybe they're just deliberately instigating paranoia in foolish people?

      OMFG RUSSIA!!!!!

    5. Re:Good advertising for Telegram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      what more endorsement could you possibly need?

      Are you kidding? Telegram comes out of this looking relatively insecure and untrustworthy compared to most tech.

      Telegram is refusing to give the Russians access.

      If Telegram worked right, they would be telling the Russians, "We'll totally cooperate and will hand over anything we have. The problem is, we simply do not have the ability to give you access to users' conversations, because the users don't trust us with that."

      Why the fuck would software makers have access to users' data? That's downright weird. Do the authors of Postfix or Dovecot or Thunderbird have access to your emails? Does the makers of Chrome have access to your browsing hist-- shit, bad example. Do the authors of GnuPG and PGP know your passphrase? Can Microsoft access their users' Word/Excel documents?

      Under normal circumstances, pressuring the makers of software to get access to user data shouldn't ever have the possibility of bearing fruit. The only way it can work, is if the software was incompetently (or maliciously) designed.

    6. Re:Good advertising for Telegram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case the friendly law enforcement agents may insist on helping you finding the keys.

    7. Re:Good advertising for Telegram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They likely will bring the hammer as well to help things out.

      All countries do this. In the UK, a judge can demand the SSL/TLS ephemeral session keys (the ones that are used for a single time and tosses), then give someone four years in the clink, per key. No trial, no way to protest this. Germany also has laws taking someone directly to prison without trial if they don't cough up a key, even if they don't know it, or will never know it.

    8. Re:Good advertising for Telegram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't your FSB handler tell you? You've been spotted. Go back to Russia.

    9. Re:Good advertising for Telegram by Freischutz · · Score: 4, Informative

      It could be a propaganda operation, to encourage users from others country to migrate to a compromised system. Or not. But if you have enough paranoia to need some system like that, there is no limit to your untrust.

      In view of the fact that the Putin government is liable to have its thugs shoot you in the head on an open street, season your tea with Polonium 210, coat the door knob of your front door with a nerve agent, or dispose of you in some other way if you say things about Big Vlad and his corrupt posse that they don't like I'm not going to call Russians 'paranoid' for encrypting their communications, it's more like a sensible survival strategy.

    10. Re:Good advertising for Telegram by admin7087 · · Score: 1

      I don't know the exact demands of that Russian regulatory authority but judging from what I've read they seem to want access to the users' data. Unfortunately, anyone who makes software that directly processes such data can provide such access. Not in every country such a demand is lawful, though. I believe it is currently not possible to make the same demand in the continental EU and in the US, not 100% sure about it. But I do know that laws have been proposed to change that and are being discussed again and again. It's not as if a software maker could reasonably claim that it's technically impossible to implement mandatory key escrow or other means of accessing user data.

    11. Re:Good advertising for Telegram by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      Why do you think the Telegram people are able to defy Putin and stay alive in Russia? Cause the FSB already has the keys. This is an advertisement for Telegram by the Russian government. The only question is: is the ad to encourage people to move to Telegram, or to convince the people with Telegram accounts they cannot crack them so they let out more sensitive data?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    12. Re:Good advertising for Telegram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are two types of chats in Telegram:
      1. Normal chats, which can be accessed from multiple devices. I believe that they are encrypted on Telegram servers, and could be released (but aren't).
      2. Secret chats, which can only be accessed on the devices that initiated the chats. I doubt that these could be released.

      This does raise the question: is it obvious enough to users that normal chats could be released? If secret chats are available, but nobody knows the difference, that's a problem.

    13. Re: Good advertising for Telegram by mSparks43 · · Score: 2

      quick run to Putin, i found them, they are in the source code: https://core.telegram.org/mtpr... ....
      otoh, methinks the fsb will have less success than the us did trying to block the AACS decryption key.

    14. Re:Good advertising for Telegram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think U.S. authorities -- more prone to engage in surveilance and cyber espionage than any other nation -- allow the app in iPhone and Android app stores? Because to publish, Google and Apple require the source-code, and they are the ones who will build the app before it appears in the app store.

      Why do you think it sometimes takes two weeks after minor protocol changes before Apple or Google will publish the updated app in the stores? You realize there's an NSA court order in place and that there's a modified app in circulation for certain users/targets, right?

      Or do you honestly think it takes two weeks to sign off on minor changes and that the U.S. spying machinery would let the opportunity just walk past?

    15. Re: Good advertising for Telegram by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      That's pretty funny. Did you come up with that all on your own?

    16. Re: Good advertising for Telegram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Unlike most people I use my head, I analyse, and I reason before concluding. People such as yourself instead let the TV decide for them what is true and what is not.

      Do you also believe all the NSA/CIA revelations in recent years are just made up? Time to pull your head out of your own ass.

    17. Re: Good advertising for Telegram by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Yes. Unlike most people I use my head,

      That's a very generous interpretation of the situation.

      Thanks for admitting you made it all up, anyway.

    18. Re:Good advertising for Telegram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeaah, that is a good way for some 'judges' to earn themselfs quite the list of enemies. Inventive ones at revenge at that.

      Do they really want kiddie porn or whatever to be planted on their personal computers, smartphones or such?

      Or do they even want to risk something like those 'special bookies' that can only be reached via Tor (or I2P or just by a.a.m messages)?

      There is an apt saying: "In for the penny, in for the pound, that is what burns empires to the ground"

    19. Re: Good advertising for Telegram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Napster... If a government can't collect money for it's rich entertainment industry friends, shut them down. How do you feel about that?

  2. In soviet Russia we block you! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    In soviet Russia we block you!

  3. popular??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Ranked as the world's ninth most popular mobile messaging app

    Citation needed.

    1. Re:popular??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, those dirty liars! In fact it's only the 10th according to: https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-most-popular-mobile-messaging-apps-worldwide.html Although they talk about mobile messaging apps here.

  4. Re:Not so different... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seem to remember Apple getting into a pretty public spat with the American government recently over doing precisely the opposite of what you are claiming here.

  5. If some company HAS your keys.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If some company HAS your keys, then you're doing communications wrong.

    No, this isn't good PR for Telegram, because the suit itself proves that Telegram is completely insecure. And they could be forced by the court to openly divulge the keys. (They also might be forced or tricked to divulge the keys in other ways, perhaps unwittingly or secretly, which involve no courts.)

  6. no good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Fuck Russia. Fuck China. Fuck spying on people.

    1. Re: no good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fucking should include USA and England. Russia should be excluded. Their cow-manure powered global surveillance system is not that sophisticated.

    2. Re: no good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hence the redneck "block it" approach. Note how more technologically-developed countries do not need any blocking. Why do you think that is?

  7. It's Russia, After All by some+old+guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's what they do.

    At least they're glaringly up front about it, unlike the US TLA's relying on phony FISA courts, hardware OEM back doors, and so on to accomplish the same thing.

    Give the Devil his due.

    --
    Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
    1. Re:It's Russia, After All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading comprehension. Try it.

    2. Re:It's Russia, After All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wanna explain quickly what I apparently didn't comprehend? The GGP was saying he was against FISA courts and other checks and balances, preferring the "honest" system of just allowing the government to spy without any oversight.

  8. Re:Not so different... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you say the same whenever someone in the Russian media reports something negative about the USA?

    What was that one saying? I don't remember the exact words but think I got the gist.

    The USA and Russia are not too different. In the USA you can stand in the middle of a mall and shout "America is a corrupt, imperialist oppressor that creates war everywhere" without being arrested by the police. In Russia you can also stand in the middle of a mall and shout "America is a corrupt, imperial oppressor that creates war everywhere" and you also won't be arrested by the police.

  9. EXTREME ignorance of technology by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2

    Most people who are involved with government agencies are EXTREMELY ignorant about technology. (And most people in general, also.)

    They don't realize that, if there is a back door, a key to decrypt, it will eventually be compromised. A government employee will give the key to someone who shouldn't have it. Or, hackers will eventually discover the key.

    1. Re:EXTREME ignorance of technology by emanuele_fanton · · Score: 1

      ...and this is not a problem for the authorities. Please just see reference for collateral effect.

  10. Sick of anti-Russia bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am American and I am sick of the anti-Russia bias on liberal Slashdot.Org. Why SHOUDNT Russia have the rights to protect there own people against the threat of things like terrorism attacks? It is no doubt the USA deep state that pushes the idea that only the USA should be authorized to have access to all communications and that is rediculous. First USA and England use FAKE chemical weapon attack to hurt Russian diplomacy and now this. The west should be ashamed of ourselves.

    1. Re:Sick of anti-Russia bias by yurikhan · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if "Russia" (whatever that means) actually cared about protecting their own people from terrorist attacks.

      What they actually care about is protecting themselves and staying in power while labeling people who want privacy as terrorists.

    2. Re:Sick of anti-Russia bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off Ivan

  11. The lead developer of Telegram deserves credit. by Qbertino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He left russia a few years back and took on the citizenship of a caribean microcountry in order to continue with Telegram unmolested. IIRC nobody knows his exact whereabouts or the whereabouts of the devteam - probably they're distributed around the planet and living the cyberpunk/diginomad lifestyle, flying under the radar most of the time. It sure takes some guts and wits to stick it to the FSB and other russian three-letter-authorities, you have to hand it to them. Nice job.

    Sidenote: I've been using Telegram for a few years now and really like it. Definitivly up there with Signal and Threema when in comes to worthy WhatsCrap alternatives.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  12. NO differ FROM USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USA are hippocrates. They spy on ALL nations and the peoples.

    1. Re:NO differ FROM USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      USA are hippocrates. They spy on ALL nations and the peoples.

      Ancient Greek doctors?!?!?

    2. Re: NO differ FROM USA by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's not capitalized. Therefore, it's boxes you put horses in, not a name.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  13. Sick of anti-reporting bias. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article only gives us some information about what is happening. Nowhere it states that Russia SHOULDNT have the rights to do it.
    This site also reported a lot of stuff that came to light after Snowden blew the whistle, putting the surveillance practices of the USA and UK into perspective. Did they say then that it was for the USA to do it?
    Maybe Slashdot should just top reporting stuff that happens in Russia, yes, I suppose then it would not be biased any more.

    1. Re:Sick of anti-reporting bias. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are some kind of paid USA shill and good example of how Slashdot.Org has liberal bias, but nice try to deflect away real issue.

    2. Re:Sick of anti-reporting bias. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be from the US, and a social media user. That would explain your dumb and emotional attitude. The guy said to you, sick of anti-reporting bias. Sometimes a cigar is a cigar. You sound like you would want your journalism factual too, so what's the issue?

      As for myself I like that Russia is winning the war, making my country safer from terrorists, I think that Theresa May and Boris Johnson's words are worthless and I hate the whole circus around it but I don't necessarily want the FSB to read my "Telegrams". No matter which country or company does it I don't want a camera in my toilet bowl either. That's it, nothing more.

    3. Re:Sick of anti-reporting bias. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't deny that there's a liberal bias here on Slashdot. But that's often because science and technology has been made a partisan issue by politicians (Al Gore hijacking climate science to further his own goals for example. After that no more reasonable discussion could have been had between members of opposing parties). And of course to my own annoyance we're seeing more and more political news on here. But I don't think that this article is an example of that.

      This article does not say that it's bad for Russia to do it pre se. Neither did previous articles say that it's good for the USA or UK to do it. France has been collecting data on their citizens for a while and given the terror attacks in their country it casts doubt on the effectiveness of their privacy invasion. Belgium has had something similar for over a decade. There were also articles on politicians pushing towards the removal of encryption because of 'terrorism' in the EU. The it was a topic in the UK before the elections, it's regularly a topic in Germany along with other weird shit where people argue "if you don't have something to hide there's nothing to fear". Not to mention all the hate speech law news that we see about the EU. When you look at the comment section of Slashdot there's also a strong trend of vilifying such approaches, leaving the impression that the majority around here hates censorship and surveillance.

      How do I know about this stuff? Because sites like this report about it.

    4. Re:Sick of anti-reporting bias. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Al Gore is fat, therefore global warming is fake news!

    5. Re: Sick of anti-reporting bias. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrorist (noun): someone opposed to Vladimir Putin.

    6. Re:Sick of anti-reporting bias. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Continuing with the deflection. YOU sound like you are from the USA or perhaps UK and a well paid Soros shill. Telegram facilitates terrorist attacks and if you oppose efforts to make them accountable then you are sided with terrorists against Russia and all peoples of earth who wish to stay from from muslim domination.

    7. Re:Sick of anti-reporting bias. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Insert random term] facilitates terrorist attacks and if you oppose efforts to make it accountable then you are sided with terrorists. You know Bush and Cheney among other things used that kind of argument to invade Iraq. Talk about deflection...
      Almost fucking everything can be construed in a way to make it look like it facilitates terrorism. Guns, cars, houses, roads, the people who sell them, the people who build them, the people who provide food, water, and power to the people who build guns, cars, houses, and roads.
      And if we look at examples in the US or EU where surveillance is already in place, then it apparently did shit. It is a nice tool for governments and or private corporations to extort people they've got dirt on.

  14. Re:Not so different... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans will read this and

    they'll remember that CALEA has been a law since 1992, AT&T got caught sharing with NSA in 2005, the Snowden-plex of 2013, etc. If you're looking for people who trust their government (with reason, yet also incorrectly) then Americans aren't the people to pick on. We've been in combat with our government over this stuff for decades, or you might even say, a couple centuries.

    Go talk to Europeans. Those guys are great. I love when they amusingly bring up their privacy laws, and then wonder why Americans (and Russians) laugh so hysterically. (But leave out the Brits; they've figured it out by now.)

  15. Re:Not so different... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mainly because Apple can. They know that their VPs will not be "collected" and charged with vague "sedition" crimes, or their bank accounts seized because they told the executive branch of the country to go thump themselves.

    If a company tries a public spat with China, it is a pretty fore-gone conclusion that upper level employees of the company (and likely their families) will disappear, and surprisingly, local organ banks will be full for some odd reason. Russia may be more civilized, but they would ensure in no uncertain terms that someone bashing their government will be silenced.

    Even in the EU, someone bashing the government there will get hushed pretty quickly, usually under some "terrorist" law.

  16. Re: Not so different... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, your memory sucks, Apple handed over everything they could. The issue was Apple didn't have the ability to do what was asked. Apple even said if the FBI came to them quickly they would have been able to unlock the phone but couldnt after the FBI messed with it.

  17. The problem with Telegram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It has the technology to use ephemeral keys, and any user can do it by enabling a "private conversation."

    HOWEVER, for some reason, this is not done by default. The default settings use Telegram's own key for encryption.

    Telegram should only use ephemeral keys (like Signal). The typical user doesn't know what they're doing or that the default settings can be decrypted by Telegram; they need the defaults to do it right in the first place.

  18. Great news! by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

    Any application which refuses to violate security, even to the face of a government, deserves an award. Governments have to learn they have no right to their people's communication.

  19. Comrade! Yes, you! by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, it's Roskomnadz,or nothing at all!

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  20. Re: Not so different... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >The issue was Apple didn't have the ability to do what was asked.

    If you believe this shit, you are a fucking moron.

  21. Re:Not so different... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    >Even in the EU

    You say this like Europe is some paragon of free speech compared to America. Have you been living under a rock? Are you retarded?

  22. Russia already has the keys, of course by ioev · · Score: 1

    This is just some fake controversy to try to convince more people to use it.

  23. Re: Putin pees his pants every day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is indeed a big thin-skinned pussy but Roskomnadzor are his bitches.

    "Russiaâ(TM)s media censor says news outlets canâ(TM)t publish photos of a message that read 'Against Putin' written in the snow atop the frozen Neva River in St. Petersburg."

  24. Isn't it written by FSB? by Katatsumuri · · Score: 1

    I am confused.

  25. Re: Putin pees his pants every day by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    Probably written in yellow colour.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap