Slashdot Mirror


Twitter Bans 270,000 Accounts For 'Promoting Terrorism' (theguardian.com)

According to Twitter's latest transparency report, the social media company removed more than 270,000 accounts around the world for promoting terrorism in the second half of 2017. The number of accounts permanently suspended for sharing what the firm called extremist content between July and December represents a drop for the second period in a row. The Guardian reports: The social network puts this down to "years of hard work making our site an undesirable place for those seeking to promote terrorism." Nick Pickles, Twitter UK's head of public policy, said: "The overwhelming majority of these accounts were detected by our own technology, with just 0.2% of the accounts we suspended in 2017 being flagged by the police." Almost 75% of accounts were suspended before they sent their first tweet, according to the report, and 93% were discovered by tools that Twitter engineers had built. Twitter is understood to also use a combination of US and EU lists of terrorist organizations as well as research from academics and experts to identify terrorists on its network. The number of reports of abusive behavior submitted by government representatives also dropped amid a marked change in the type of abusive behavior reported. Two-thirds of the 10,000 reports concerned violated rules over impersonation, with only 16% of the reports for harassment and 12% for hateful conduct. Harassment and hateful conduct each accounted for a third of reported accounts in the first half of 2017. Only a quarter of reports of abusive behavior submitted by government representatives were acted upon by Twitter, compared with 98% of reports relating to the "promotion of terrorism."

47 of 95 comments (clear)

  1. Really by countach · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Promoting terrorism, aka being politically right of Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong.

    1. Re:Really by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      AC that depends on the US state.
      Some states did have laws about open space and political speech.
      Private property did not always stop open public political discussion in some US sates.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re: Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why would an organisation that has C*Os from the centre and centre-right do that?

    3. Re:Really by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There are literal Nazis on Twitter, and they don't get banned because they avoid breaking the rules.

      There is zero credible evidence of political bias from Twitter in relation to account bans.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Really by countach · · Score: 1

      Really. Please tell us why Sargon of Akkad was banned then.

    5. Re:Really by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Posting hard core pornography was the last straw after numerous ToS violations.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Really by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Hard core pornography? You mean the same stuff you can find all over twitter. Or is it because he posted gay pornography at alt-right figures who were attacking him, and their response was mass-flagging his account?

      But somehow, people like arthur chu and kristi winters are still on twitter despite their numerous ToS violations that twitter doesn't seem to care about.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  2. Re:Useful??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And are all of the accounts actually promoting terrorism, or just shit that Twitter disagrees with?

  3. Without sending a tweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Almost 75% of accounts were suspended before they sent their first tweet

    How can an account be banned for promoting anything before speaking publicly?

    1. Re:Without sending a tweet by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Almost 75% of accounts were suspended before they sent their first tweet

      How can an account be banned for promoting anything before speaking publicly?

      I hear Tom Cruise and some drugged-out ladies in a pool were involved.

  4. Promote Diversity by john+of+sparta · · Score: 1

    whatever diversity you got

  5. Re:A lot of West-Wing head-scratching by mnemotronic · · Score: 2

    Ok. That's not fair. Trump definitely isn't a terrorist.

    That requires planning skiils.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  6. Easy list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    They were registered in the domains...
    @gop.com
    @rnc.com
    and
    @maga.com

    No need to wait for anything before Twitter decided it was terrorism. I wonder if they accidentally deleted any accounts belonging to vegans, they may want to increase security if they did.

    1. Re:Easy list by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Banned from twitter, why would anyone care?!?

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  7. Re:So all the Israeli government accounts are gone by theweatherelectric · · Score: 3, Funny
    The CIA has a twitter account and they operate secret prisons in which they torture people. To quote from their Twitter feed:

    STW Analyst: “A lot of things have surprised me about working at the CIA! The diversity of occupations employed here, the rotation opportunities, the investment in employee training.”

    But not, sadly, the practice of torture.

  8. What's "hateful conduct"? by mi · · Score: 1, Troll

    Is it Ok to hate certain white hood-wearers? How about those with red stars and hammer-and-sickle?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:What's "hateful conduct"? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Twitter can't go down that path; if they start banning people for hate speech, they would inevitably have to ban president Spanky to be consistent.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:What's "hateful conduct"? by mi · · Score: 1

      Twitter can't go down that path

      Yet, the write-up claims, the did... Hence my question...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  9. Re:A lot of West-Wing head-scratching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Ok. That's not fair. Trump definitely isn't a terrorist.

    That requires planning skiils.

    He he it's so cool to hate on Trump without stating any actual problem you have with him. Wow you're so fashionable!

  10. Meanwhile, at the Trump Tower by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    WTF, whispered the Donald

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  11. Sounds like running from a witch hunt to me by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    Which is scary. Who thinks the Twits In Charge (TIC) have suddenly identified a few hundred thousand accounts in the week or so since Facebook had their business model thrown in their face?

    No, the twits came up with a list of bad words and bad origins and made 2 teams, where each got really good with perl and Regexps shooting at different goals.

  12. Re:A lot of West-Wing head-scratching by alvinrod · · Score: 2

    Even if he had them, Twitter wouldn't get rid of him anyway. He's probably responsible for at least a double digit percentage of their traffic. They couldn't quit each other if they wanted to.

  13. Re:Useful??? by tsqr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And are all of the accounts actually promoting terrorism, or just shit that Twitter disagrees with?

    From TFS:Almost 75% of accounts were suspended before they sent their first tweet

  14. About fucking time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Twitter banned people for all kinds of stupid shit, but promoting terrorism always seemed ok to them. I always thought those terror accounts were CIA fronts or something because why else where they allowed to stay up for years promoting ISIS?

  15. Re:A lot of West-Wing head-scratching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He he it's so rebellious being a Trump sheep! Strong conservative values like porn stars, deficits, lies and corruption! Financial dependency on the elites! Tax cuts for the rich! Military marches! Super PAC kickbacks! Wow you're so cool! Bah bah.

  16. Re:Useful??? by Falos · · Score: 1

    Effective at the stated goal, or the real one?

    Former: who cares
    Latter: Advertising partners confirm their benefactors have been mildly placated

  17. Twitter has the right by Fortis+McMannus · · Score: 1

    As long as it's not illegal discrimination based on age, race, religion, gender, disability, medial condition, or sexual orientation Twitter can arbitrarily decide to or not to do business with anyone they want.

    1. Re:Twitter has the right by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      What if your religion is extremist?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Twitter has the right by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The religion of war can cover its propaganda under as freedom of religion.
      The teaching are perfect and direct from god.
      A faith cant be changed. The faith is spread by war as part of that faith.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:Twitter has the right by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

      No, Twitter is a common carrier, and doesn't have any liability for what is published as long as they don't moderate it... meaning now that they are picking and choosing what viewpoints can be expressed, they CAN be sued for letting material slip through that incites illegal or violent behavior. Not sure they've thought this all the way through.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  18. Re:Useful??? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    From TFS:Almost 75% of accounts were suspended before they sent their first tweet

    How can the account be guilty of promoting terrorism without having sent any tweets? Was this just going off them "liking" other tweets, from accounts that were shut down for actual infractions, or was any account named "DownWithAmerica" targeted?

  19. Re:A lot of West-Wing head-scratching by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Ok. That's not fair. Trump definitely isn't a terrorist. That requires planning skills.

    Errorist.

  20. Liking a lot of pro terrorist posts by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    would be a good start. Following pro terrorist accounts exclusively. In otherwords, shill accounts designed to raise the visibility of the accounts that post.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  21. was trump on there by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    I thought not...

    --
    [($)]
  22. Re: Useful??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    NOTE: Feel free to mod me down since I'm an evil white Christian Conservative male, married to a real woman for 13 years and 5 kids including 3 adopted boys and a 30 plus year retired Field Engineer due to disability including an unknown neurological issues, chronic pain and some amazing big words that doctors are taught to say.

    Now that that's out of the way. It has been proven that Facebook, Twitter, and several other social media companies have been censoring Conservative opinions, regardless if you believe it or not. Its a proven fact and there are a few lawsuits pending over it. As a long term Slashdot follower and article contributor way back when, i have seen my comments constantly modded down simply because i dont follow the lefts agenda.

    Again mod me down or delete my comment as normal, you know who you are as do I.

    It used to be that you could post an opinion as a conservative on slashdot and other social media and have a respectable conversation on whatever subject. Now however i get a accused of being a racist, homophobic even though I've had gay roommates in the past yet im straight, anti science amd technology even though i grew up in the tech industry, i don't believe in the flat earth or the earth is 6000 years old and my favorite I'm anti climate change even though the earth has been in a constant state of change for the last 4.5 million years. I dont however believe in man made global warming and will continue to believe so until climate scientists release the real true unmodified data going back 50 plus years straight from the devices with zero and i mean zero uneditted or adjusted data. Of course good luck acquiring such data because ive been told repeatedly that the orignal data is no longer availble, i tried to get it.

    Personal Attacks and anti free speach against conservatives is real and on going problem even though the USA is supposed to be tolerant country and the left keeps claiming they accept everyone which is BS.

    Go back to your amazing utopia now where people dont question your logic or data.

  23. Re:A lot of West-Wing head-scratching by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ok. That's not fair. Trump definitely isn't a terrorist.

    That requires planning skiils.

    Well that's quite true. The Obama presidency proved that you don't need planning skills to be a terrorist. He did a pretty good job of killing leaders of other nations with no clue on what to do after, or destabilize an entire area of the world to the point that millions try fleeing to Europe and cause mass destabilization of a second area of the world.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  24. Re:Useful??? by Z80a · · Score: 1

    It's useful to make twitter free of terrorism posts, but not very good for actual combat on terrorism, as they will just move to somewhere else.
    What should happen is twitter giving the police a list of those things, and then the police acting like people looking to join, then arresting the fuck out of the terrorists as soon some sort of real meeting is made.
    That meme of "all kids on the internet are FBI agents" should pretty much be real.

  25. Baby steps by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Have they banned Trump's account for inciting violence yet?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  26. Re:Terrorism? by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

    It's only a constitutional issue if the government censors viewpoints. Private companies have every right to not give you a forum for your assinine ideas!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  27. Re:A lot of West-Wing head-scratching by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    New evidence indicates the Pulse Nightclub shooting was planned out about as well as one of Spanky's executive orders. So no, terrorism doesn't require good planning. Recently, a white supremacist in Wisconsin blew himself up, so terrorism doesn't even require intelligence above the level of a moron. Even Spanky could qualify.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  28. Re:Useful??? by sycodon · · Score: 2

    I stupidly signed up for Twitter once.

    My very first post was a response to some Leftist.

    Twitter immediately suspended the account and wanted me to provide an ID, Phone number, etc. because the post was, "suspicious".

    So, ya. They believe terrorists are anyone who disagrees with the Left.

    Fuck'm

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  29. Bunk! [Re:A lot of West-Wing head-scratching] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    [Obama] did a pretty good job of killing leaders of other nations with no clue on what to do after, or destabilize an entire area of the world to the point that millions try fleeing to Europe

    That's a bunch of bunk. Obama did NOT start the civil wars, and they raged on with and without dictator removal. Keeping (Syria) versus removing original dictator (Libya) made no difference: both countries went to shit. If the Middle East civil wars had any single cause, it was the harsh economic crash that began under W's watch.

    Get a better news channel, please.

    1. Re:Bunk! [Re:A lot of West-Wing head-scratching] by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      That's a bunch of bunk. Obama did NOT start the civil wars, and they raged on with and without dictator removal. Keeping (Syria) versus removing original dictator (Libya) made no difference: both countries went to shit. If the Middle East civil wars had any single cause, it was the harsh economic crash that began under W's watch.

      Gadaffi: No threat to the US, openly welcomed inspectors, had a GDP surplus, was honoring stipulations on trade agreements. Was reforming country into quasi-secular areas with internal government bodies. Post-Hillary and Obama economic collapse, ruin, destruction, and slave markets. The only reason ISIS hasn't managed to get a foothold was because under Gadaffi individual areas were managed like states and had their own internal controls and worked together. Syria on the other hand is far, far, far more interesting. Because the only reason that the US got involved in there was at the behest of "allies" who are now blockaded by Saudi Arabia, that wanted to build a NG pipeline. You know what the difference between Libya and Syria is right now? Syria is more stable.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Bunk! [Re:A lot of West-Wing head-scratching] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Gadaffi: No threat to the US, openly welcomed inspectors, had a GDP surplus, was honoring stipulations on trade agreements.

      A civil war begun and he started mass killings of his own people, which made the civil war all the more heated. US didn't start the civil war.

      You know what the difference between Libya and Syria is right now? Syria is more stable.

      You are comparing shit to puke.

    3. Re:Bunk! [Re:A lot of West-Wing head-scratching] by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      A civil war begun and he started mass killings of his own people, which made the civil war all the more heated. US didn't start the civil war.

      A civil war didn't begin, and he didn't start mass killings of his own. Islamic extremists started a war, which became a civil war along sectarian lines.

      You are comparing shit to puke.

      Your actual ignorance of the world is astounding.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:Bunk! [Re:A lot of West-Wing head-scratching] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Your actual ignorance of the world is astounding.

      Projection.

  30. Re:Useful??? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    In other words they were bots used to increase the follower count of other accounts, and amplify them with likes.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC