Slashdot Mirror
'Big Brother' In India Requires Fingerprint Scans For Food, Phones, Finances (nytimes.com)
The New York Times reports of the Indian government's intent to build an identification system of unprecedented scope. The country is reportedly "scanning the fingerprints, eyes and faces of its 1.3 billion residents (alternative source) and connecting the data to everything from welfare benefits to mobile phones." Here's an excerpt from the report: Civil libertarians are horrified, viewing the program, called Aadhaar, as Orwell's Big Brother brought to life. To the government, it's more like "big brother," a term of endearment used by many Indians to address a stranger when asking for help. For other countries, the technology could provide a model for how to track their residents. And for India's top court, the ID system presents unique legal issues that will define what the constitutional right to privacy means in the digital age. The government has made registration mandatory for hundreds of public services and many private ones, from taking school exams to opening bank accounts.
Technology has given governments around the world new tools to monitor their citizens. In China, the government is rolling out ways to use facial recognition and big data to track people, aiming to inject itself further into everyday life. Many countries, including Britain, deploy closed-circuit cameras to monitor their populations. But India's program is in a league of its own, both in the mass collection of biometric data and in the attempt to link it to everything -- traffic tickets, bank accounts, pensions, even meals for undernourished schoolchildren.
Technology has given governments around the world new tools to monitor their citizens. In China, the government is rolling out ways to use facial recognition and big data to track people, aiming to inject itself further into everyday life. Many countries, including Britain, deploy closed-circuit cameras to monitor their populations. But India's program is in a league of its own, both in the mass collection of biometric data and in the attempt to link it to everything -- traffic tickets, bank accounts, pensions, even meals for undernourished schoolchildren.
In Europe there is no resistance (really in India either). It's as if everyone turned French. It's happening everywhere. The majority wants this and more. They want to feel safe. It's much easier to build a pretty facade than the greasy infrastructure.
It is probably to stop people from abusing the system.
In the US we have food banks all over the place to help people.
I know at least 4 different people that try to rope my wife into going into them and saying she has 4 kids. Just to get 'free food' on top of their existing EBT cards. This sort of 'crime' is wildly common unfortunately. One dude I knew had a job and makes payments on 2 cars (he is single and lives by himself). STILL does this.
The food banks usually quickly go under due to lack of resources. People are abusing these systems that are designed and funded to help people. I will quote what one of them told me when I said "hey that food is for people who need it" "well I need it" "you need enough food for 6 people?" "well I run out" "then stop buying junk food with the thing and let me help you plan better, I have seen your fridge and cupboards" he wanted none of that. He is getting well over 500 bucks a month in just food aid.
This is unfortunately why things turn into command and control government style systems. There are a bunch of people playing by the rules. Then a group who really do not give a shit just so long as they get theirs.
These give away systems are ripe for abuse and the people who abuse them are well versed on doing so. It is why communistic systems fail into dictatorships and why capitalist systems fail into feudal systems. With communism/socialism it fails because the very greedy people who make up the system do not suddenly become un-greedy. They find ways to make your rules even more authoritarian to work around these people. In capitalistic systems they fail towards feudalism because of greed of the same nature. Both systems realize you can control other people through the use of capital (political or monetary) to buy rules to lock people into non freedom.
India still has a caste system going nice and strong--several of the things that 'Big Brother' here is intended to do would work very, very well for ensuring people will have a very difficult time attempting to escape their preordained proper place (such as daring to want to have a job that wasn't dirty, dangerous and demeaning), punish those who try anyway, and probably also cull the population.
Oh, and they've got problems like people being legally dead when they're not being deceased. Admittedly, this system will ensure that such errors are quickly fixed...by blocking the legally dead person from access to the basic necessities of life.
Any system which makes it so the state can (intentionally or by accident) prevent you from being able to obtain basic necessities for yourself is not a good one, especially if it'd be possible to pretend your genocide is just a massive clerical error that merely happened to take you years to correct.
RTFAing says that one of the benefits they're claiming is that this will fix India's endemic government corruption. The only way to get rid of corruption in the state is to ensure that corrupt officials are likely to be caught, that the penalty is significant, and that there is as little benefit to being corrupt as possible. (The more power they have, the better the odds need to be of a corrupt official being the guest of honor at a surprise necktie party.)
"You don't get people off welfare by giving them more welfare. You get people off welfare by assisting them in job placements, financial planning, drug rehabilitation, and educational endeavors."
How about : You don't get people out of hospitals by giving them more hospital care. You get people out of hospital by assisting them in job placement, drug rehabilitation financial planning, and educational endeavors.
i.e. financial assistance or hospital care doesn't exclude other forms of assistance, and vice versa.
Each new Indian government seems to obsessed with showing the rest of the world that India is an advanced, leading-edge country. And every new Indian government neglects doing anything much about the conditions of more than 600 million (and growing) Indian citizens who lack access to such basic services as running water, electricity and sanitation. Really strange, and unfair to those unfortunate Indians.