Slashdot Mirror


Dual-Motor Tesla Model 3 Possibly Coming In July (electrek.co)

According to Elon Musk, the dual-motor Tesla Model 3 is expected to be released in July. "Musk linked the release of the new Model 3 powertrain with the automaker achieving a production rate of 5,000 Model 3 vehicles per week," reports Electrek. From the report: Earlier this year, we reported on Tesla registering 19 Model 3 VINs with dual motor powertrain with NHTSA in the latest batch of new VINs. It happened right after the Tesla Model 3 dual motor powertrain design leaked in the latest design studio update. Then in February, Tesla registered a new batch of Model 3 VINs, including two dozen Model 3 VINs with the dual motor powertrain. It raised Model 3 reservation holders' hope that the new configuration could soon become available, but now Musk confirmed that it is still a few months away in a series of tweets last night. The CEO also linked the timing with the release of the Model 3 white interior. Tesla currently only offers a single interior option with black upholstery. The dual motor Model 3 is expected to deliver a slightly longer range and offer a quicker acceleration than the current single motor rear-wheel-drive version.

71 comments

  1. Not worth the electrons its printed on by fozzy1015 · · Score: 1, Informative

    Musk says a lot of things:

    Elon Musk, 2012: "The electricity used by the Supercharger comes from a solar carport system provided by SolarCity, which results in almost zero marginal energy cost after installation. Combining these two factors, Tesla is able to provide Model S owners free long distance travel indefinitely. () The Supercharger system will always generate more power from sunlight than Model S customers use for driving."

    Elon Musk, 2013: "Model S is designed to allow a fast battery swap, exchanging your battery for a fully charged battery in less than half the time it takes to refill a gas tank. () Hopefully, this is what convinces people finally that electric cars are the future."

    Elon Musk, 2014: "I am confident in the German consumer. I bet that from the end of 2014 onwards, we can sell 10,000 cars in Germany annually () By the end of 2014, we'll have 25 German Service Centres () We'll have 200 maybe 300 cars per week going to Germany (10,400 to 15,600 annually)."

    Elon Musk, 2014: "I expect that in the long run, Tesla will build a battery factory in Germany."

    Elon Musk, 2015: "The response has been overwhelming, OK, like crazy. In the course of like less than a week, we've had 38,000 reservations for the Powerwall, 2,500 reservations for Powerpack. So, it's like crazy off the hook. Yeah. And it seems to have gone super viral."

    Elon Musk, 2015: "I don't want to sort of name specific suppliers, but our biggest challenges are with the second row seat, which is, it's an amazing seat, like a sculptural work of art, but a very tricky thing to get right. The falcon-wing door actually seems to probably not be a critical path item."

    Elon Musk, 2015: "We should be able to do 90 percent of miles driven within three years," Elon Musk told the Financial Times in 2013, "The problem with Google's current approach (LIDAR among other sensors) is that the sensor system is too expensive," Musk said. "It's better to have an optical system, basically cameras with software that is able to figure out what's going on just by looking at things."

    Elon Musk, 2016: "If you're in New York and the car's in Los Angeles, you can summon your car to you from your phone and tell the car to find you. It'll automatically charge itself along the journey () I might be slightly optimistic on that, but I don't think significantly optimistic that we can do that in two years"

    Elon Musk, 2016: "We plan to fund about $1.5 billion in capital expenditures without accessing any outside capital other than our existing sources that support our leasing and finished goods inventory."

    Elon Musk, 2016: "So as a rough guess, I would say we would aim to produce 100,000 to 200,000 Model 3s in the second half of next year. That's my expectation right now. Yeah, so that's the thing. () The date we are setting with suppliers to get to a volume production capability with the Model 3 is July 1 next year."

    Elon Musk, 2016: "The probability of having an accident is 50 percent lower if you have Autopilot on () Even with our first version, it's almost twice as good as a person."

    Elon Musk, 2016: "With your Model S, Model X, or Model 3, your solar panel system, and your Powerwall all in place, you would be able to deploy and consume energy in the most efficient and sustainable way possible, lowering your costs and minimizing your dependence on fossil fuels and the grid. () Culturally, this is a great fit."

    Elon Musk, 2016: Musk told analysts the company's current plan "does not require any capital raise for the Model 3 at all."

    1. Re:Not worth the electrons its printed on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nice, dear.

    2. Re: Not worth the electrons its printed on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooof, somebodyâ(TM)s butthurt

    3. Re: Not worth the electrons its printed on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, he should stop. He hasn't done anything useful.

    4. Re:Not worth the electrons its printed on by fozzy1015 · · Score: 1

      And one of my favorites...

      Elon Musk, on the Model 3 production, 2017: "So -- but what people should absolutely have zero concern about, zero, is that Tesla will achieve a 10,000-unit production week by the end of next year."

    5. Re:Not worth the electrons its printed on by thegarbz · · Score: 0

      Indeed he does, but let's look at your examples:

      Elon Musk, 2013: "Model S is designed to allow a fast battery swap -- True: Indeed it was and was demonstrated as such. Just because consumer demand wasn't there didn't change this fact.

      Elon Musk, 2014: "I expect that in the long run, Tesla will build a battery factory in Germany." -- Not realised: The long run hasn't happened yet. Not in terms of an industry in its infancy. Give them a chance to learn to walk before we complain they haven't decided what to study at university yet.

      Elon Musk, 2015: "The response has been overwhelming, OK, like crazy. In the course of like less than a week, we've had 38,000 reservations for the Powerwall, 2,500 reservations for Powerpack. -- True: Reservation was an easy process with no cost. There was huge interest in the Powerwall.

      Elon Musk, 2015: "We should be able to do 90 percent of miles driven within three years," -- And they may have were it not for a huge supplier spat that kicked them back to the past. If I bought a Tesla right now I would probably already be able to do 95% given my commute using the current sub par autopilot. Not everyone drives down the road through and underconstruction school zone covered in snow without lanemarkings.

      Elon Musk, 2016: "We plan to fund about $1.5 billion in capital expenditures without accessing any outside capital -- True: They did plan for it. Didn't work, but they did plan for it.

      Elon Musk, 2016: "The probability of having an accident is 50 percent lower if you have Autopilot on () Even with our first version -- True: When you're quoting NHTSA. The fact that the report had its flaws doesn't change the comment, or do you expect a company CEO to actively market against his own company?

      Elon Musk, 2016: "With your Model S, Model X, or Model 3, your solar panel system, and your Powerwall all in place, you would be able to deploy and consume energy in the most efficient and sustainable way possible, lowering your costs and minimizing your dependence on fossil fuels and the grid. () Culturally, this is a great fit." -- True. Also makes perfect sense so I'm not sure why you're even quoting this given how it's one of the most positive things in your post.

      Elon Musk, 2016: Musk told analysts the company's current plan "does not require any capital raise for the Model 3 at all." -- True: The current plan didn't. Plans change.

      Ultimately your post seems quite full of senseless hate. There's several things you quote that were plans laid in place, several more that are true and goals Tesla achieved. The only truly stupid thing for a CEO to do would be stick to a plan just becuase he tweeted it even if something isn't working.

      Next time you want to crap on others, stick to the tangiable, like the short term Model 3 production forecasts.

    6. Re:Not worth the electrons its printed on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True: They did plan for it. Didn't work, but they did plan for it.
      True: The current plan didn't. Plans change.

      "I plan to be a super-hero in two years."
      "I plan to marry (insert favorite hot girl here) in 4 years."

      The way you see the world, there's nothing wrong with me saying stuff like this? Keep in mind I made this obviously stupid to try to make a point. But you can have much simpler examples: "I'll to help you move from your current flat to the new flat later this week." -- It was true when I said it, fuck you if you're now pissed I didn't show up. Do you keep any friends, behaving like that?

    7. Re:Not worth the electrons its printed on by jeremyp · · Score: 2

      Olun Misk: "In the long run I plan to shit gold bricks".

      You: The long run hasn't happened yet and in any case plans change.

      I think the point is that Elon Musk frequently fails to deliver on his promises in respect of Tesla. Plans don't change by magic, they change in response to unforeseen problems or unrealistic targets. For Musk, unforeseen problems seem to include things like not foreseeing that his own ego is no substitute for proper design practice (e.g. freeze it before building the production line) and proper testing (of newly installed production lines).

      I'm sorry, but you would be crazy to believe anything Musk says without convincing independent evidence to back it up. He is not trustworthy.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    8. Re:Not worth the electrons its printed on by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      To be fair, Autopilot might be on average safer than a human... Problem is, it looks very much like they rolled out a software update that introduced "barrier lust". It already has "truck lust", where it moves towards trucks as it passes them for some reason, and this latest firmware seems to have done something to the way it follows road markings that makes it steer into road dividing barriers.

      As Tesla stated, the guy had driven that bit of road many times before, along with many other Tesla drivers. Then one day the car's behaviour suddenly changes. I'm sure the release notes, which I'm sure everyone definitely reads carefully, mentioned that the car may now drive straight into dividers at speed where it had previously been fine.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Not worth the electrons its printed on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elon is basically shouting squirrel to distract people every time they miss a target.

    10. Re:Not worth the electrons its printed on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it already the end of 2018?

    11. Re:Not worth the electrons its printed on by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Olun Misk: "In the long run I plan to shit gold bricks".

      Your snide comment aside, he has well and truly already done so.

      I think the point is that Elon Musk frequently fails to deliver on his promises in respect of Tesla.

      Yes you could get that impression when you cherry pick from everything to suit your agenda.

      I'm sorry, but you would be crazy to believe anything Musk says without convincing independent evidence to back it up. He is not trustworthy.

      Actually he has shown himself to deliver on quite a lot of things he has said, and do so repeatedly. You on the other hand are just some unknown knob on the internet.

    12. Re:Not worth the electrons its printed on by idji · · Score: 1

      Isn't it great that he doesn't give up when he fails, slips or has to changes plan? What have you done with your life that makes a difference to anyone?

    13. Re: Not worth the electrons its printed on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posted on /. to losers like you.

      That changed the world as muck as Musk. Stop sucking his cock. Its tiny and weirdly tilted. No one enjoys watching you fellate him.

    14. Re:Not worth the electrons its printed on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Musk says a lot of things:

      . . .

      <a lot of things>

      . . .
       

      What are you, his wife?

  2. Cancel by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Can I cancel my existing Model 3 order, so I can get a dual motor? After all, if one motor is good, two must be twice as good!

    1. Re:Cancel by Z80a · · Score: 1

      And then you do it, you wait more and tesla go and announce the 4 motor version.

  3. July ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tesla is making 54 dual motor Tesla Model 3s a week. However, Musk has announced the new Tesla Electric Jet that he promised in Iron Man.

    When questioned about the low Model 3 production, Musk responded with, "There have been bottlenecks in production and our suppliers are all idiots."

    Tesla stock jumped 5% today to $10,045 a share after the announcement.

    1. Re:July ... by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      "... and our suppliers are all idiots."

      I doubt they are ALL idiots, but that sounds more credible than most Muskisms.

      Tesla has been cobbling cars together for a while. This is not their first rodeo. Why did Musk's operation select incompetent suppliers for the Model 3?

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    2. Re:July ... by jeremyp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They didn't. The supplier thing is bullshit. The production problems are really of Tesla's own making and due to the fact that their previous cars have been cobbled together. The model 3 is the first one for mass production and it should not be surprising that Tesla does not know how to do mass production.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    3. Re:July ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except they aren't taking more time than other car manufacturers to get the production line up and running. Musk is just letting optimistic estimates out.

    4. Re:July ... by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      Except they aren't taking more time than other car manufacturers to get the production line up and running. Musk is just letting optimistic estimates out.

      His pathological penchant for unrealistic estimates really isn't the core of the problem. Musk started actually taking orders for a mass-produced car before he even started working on the production line or even having a clue how long it would realistically take to do that. Other car manufacturers employ what Elon doubtless thinks is an old-fashioned and blinkered technique of selling mass-produced cars after they're actually being mass-produced.

  4. Re: Wow! 2 motors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think we're making fun of musk for claiming in the future the car will have something it already has. He's full of bs.

  5. Re:Wow! 2 motors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WRONG

  6. full name: Tesla Possibly Coming by john+of+sparta · · Score: 1

    that's TPC to you.

  7. Actually this is a dumb idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You see, the cars will be split apart by the motors going in different directions. It will be a total disaster.

    1. Re:Actually this is a dumb idea. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It would be the coolest virus of all times. But I bet they would just spin the wheels until the tires caught fire.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Actually this is a dumb idea. by supremebob · · Score: 1

      Honestly, it would probably just be easier to disable the thermal safety make the battery or motors overload and catch fire instead.

      I would be curious if the frame would crack under the strain, though.

    3. Re:Actually this is a dumb idea. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Easier, but not nearly as cool. If you could turn the steering wheel, they'd all 'donut' quite nicely, might get up to a respectable RPM. But that might inhibit the tires catching fire, which would be OK, enough would get hung up and burn.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  8. Re:sound nice by HornWumpus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Jesus tits, not this again. Spend a second on wikipedia. 'Unsprung mass'

    I know you're AC. But perhaps you don't want to be wrong all your life.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  9. Re: sound nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously so y know how car performance works. I sprung weight (the parts not held up by springs) you want as low as possible. Lighter wheels. Lighter tires. Lighter brakes. All improve performance. Making unsparing Wright more is totally opposite to what you want to increase handling performance.

  10. Re: sound nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh. I'm drunk. But un sprung weight you still want as low as possible. Increasing it is against all we know about car physics.

  11. Re:sound nice by jezwel · · Score: 1

    I wish I had my mod points from yesterday. Have an updoot I guess.

  12. More like late 2018 by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
    I missed the 8PM PST reservation and booked on 6AM EST next day,

    My turn came yesterday. It said I can have the premium in production model 3 in three to six weeks, or dual motor in late 2018 and the regular standard battery model 3 in early 2019.

    Looks like they predict there is enough demand for the higher end versions to soak up all the production in 2018.

    I am not waiting, no pricing is announced.

    Price was, 35K base, +9K for extended 310 mile battery, +5K for premium interior that has open pore wood trim and two extra usbs. Some special cruise control is 6K and auto pilot is another 4 K on top of that. Desitnation charge of 1000$. Wanted an immediate payment of 2500$ to book it.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:More like late 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, totally in the price range of the typical middle-class family.

    2. Re:More like late 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $50k US is the typical middle-class family car in the USA? No wonder people say they are so poor whenever I go there. They spend all their money on cars...

    3. Re:More like late 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the $7K subsidy keeps going long enough, plus $3K subsidy in a lot of states, that becomes a $25K base model car, with lower fuel costs and (theoretically) lower maintenance costs. Average new car in US is $36k.

      The typical middle class family woldn't pay down $10K for an autopilot that hasn't even been released yet.

      $1K delivery charge is a government stipulated thing that all new cars have.

    4. Re:More like late 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh!

    5. Re:More like late 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hoping UK base price is well below £40k, to allow for options. (UK Gubmint just taxed any new car over £40k an extra £310/year, EV's are otherwise tax-free)

    6. Re:More like late 2018 by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Looks like they predict there is enough demand for the higher end versions to soak up all the production in 2018

      That's not necessarily a good thing. It might be b because they can't get production up to reasonable numbers.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    7. Re:More like late 2018 by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      They seem to be nearly doing 2000 cars a week, short of 2500 a week goal, but no small thing to ramp up to 100,000 a year rate.

      There are enough fanbois like me to feel we need to chip in and show our commitment to Tesla. My home has a 200 amp service and I am not sure I can take two Teslas charging at the same time. But seriously considering convincing the missus to give up the BMW for a four wheel drive model 3, later this year. My hope is she will take over the model3 and hand-me-down the bimmer to me. Then I will be free to replace it with a AWD model 3.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    8. Re:More like late 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is going to happen when those states realize they need to recoup the taxes they are losing on gas? Any electric car will be taxed to make up for the loss of the gas taxes.

    9. Re:More like late 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably don't need to charge your future two Teslas at the same time. I have a Model S and a Model 3 on order, and 200 amp service like you. I realized that currently we plug the MS in around 5pm or so (earlier if my wife is driving it, later if I'm driving it) and it was done charging in just a couple hours. Yet, we really have all night to charge it, so usually at least 12+ hours. So, I set the MS to pull just 22amps and it's still done charging within 2-4 hours the vast majority of days. Since the MS is only pulling 22 amps, the M3, when it arrives, can use a 120v 20-30 amp circuit without tripping the breaker. And that's without even doing things like scheduling one to not charge until after midnight, etc.

      I looked into getting a separate service for the garage so I could have two 50 amp circuits, one for each car. But the price was steeper than I wanted to pay, about $2000. And after I thought about it a bit, I realized it wasn't necessary. YMMV, but have a look at your driving & charging patterns, and you may find you can easily accommodate charging two EVs in your garage.

    10. Re:More like late 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, Tesla is a very expensive car to maintain. Tesla has everything locked down to the point that only Tesla can service the car. Outside of the state of Massachusetts they won't even release service manuals, and in that state, they release them by the hour at an exorbitant price.

      Tesla will not sell anyone parts unless the parts will be installed by Tesla. Buy junkyard parts and install them yourself, when your car does end up at Tesla, they may just brick it on purpose (has happened to others). Tesla also won't sell their service software/computers/special tools to the public (yes, your dealer will sell you one of their scanners that does all the magic, it's not cheap, but $6000 is worth it to an independent garage that wants the exclusivity of being the ONLY other service centre that can work on those vehicles).

      In other words, the only people who can fix your Tesla is Tesla, and that's by Tesla's choice, not because it has to be that way.

      I'll let you guess how that all adds up. Go check out "Rich Rebuilds" on youtube if you need verification of all this.

      BTW, a typical Model S will go through several door handles and multiple motors in its lifetime. Take a guess what those cost, and then add a zero to the price, because you're wrong.

      Tesla is making sure nobody wants their cars once they are out of warranty. And we all thought dealerships were scum and Tesla was doing us a favour. HA!

    11. Re: More like late 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes Yuri, in Capitalistic Amerikanski theyre all in debt because Teslas.

      Go plant some rice you fucking peasant.

    12. Re:More like late 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The actual production is actually less than 1000/week and will be for the foreseeable future. The ramp at the end of March was due to shutting down the other model lines and moving all labor to the 3 to look good for the 1Q 10-Q. Of course the build quality of those vehicles will be much worse than usual and the stunt didn't fool anybody, but the alternative was much worse, especially with the recent Moody's rating downgrade to junk.

      Also the gross margin on each vehicle will be negative for the next few years. That's assuming they don't go bankrupt before the end of 2019 at the latest (i.e. it's obvious they will go bankrupt, it's how quickly that's up in the air).

  13. Re:sound nice by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

    It is an interesting solution though, which is (or was?) used by some manufacturers. It has advantages and disadvantages.

  14. Re: I bet the tesla spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enjoy your fossil fuel pick up truck with the gun rack. Yee-ha. Manufacturing that is totally environmentally friendly.

  15. The moral of the story is by DrXym · · Score: 1

    Don't be an early adopter. The fixes, quality control, features and other improvements will happen on somebody else's car.

    1. Re:The moral of the story is by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, Tesla could fulfill the promise it already made to the thousands of pre-orders and... I dunno... actually fulfill those orders before making announcements of the new hotness.

      It makes no sense to me that they have 2 'custom' cars in the S and X. They've got serious mass-production problems with the 3 - to the point where I'm glad I didn't pre-order since I wouldn't want to be one of the fools expecting it mid-2017 and not get it until 2019. Now they are making waves about a new update on a car?

        If Apple wasn't able to deliver after they got the hype train rolling, they'd be raked over the coals. Sooner or later Tesla's series of broken promises will derail their hype train.

    2. Re:The moral of the story is by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, Tesla could fulfill the promise it already made to the thousands of pre-orders....

      What makes you think it's not? A poster above noted that he had the option to take his pre-order now, or wait on the dual motor version for later this year. I'm not sure how you made the jump between "new options available" to "not going to make pre-ordered cars".

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    3. Re:The moral of the story is by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Tesla is slowly fulfilling the orders and I have full confidence in time that production will ramp up significantly. It's very likely in time the vehicle will be highly regarded and a classic. But not yet.

      My point is really about the psychology of people who put themselves on a queue to receive an early production vehicle. Tesla isn't exactly noted for its high quality control. Compound that with a stupidly ambitious & unachievable launch schedule and it guaranteed the early vehicles would have problems. Aside from that, EVERY new vehicle platform has problems and it is only after a few years of production improvements in response to service issues & accidents that they become reliable.

      The adage never buy version 1 of anything applies to motor vehicles. In the case of the Model 3, it's more like version 0.99.

  16. Re: I bet the tesla spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because electricity and batteries are clean

  17. Lies, damned lies, and VIN registrations by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

    Then in February, Tesla registered a new batch of Model 3 VINs, including two dozen Model 3 VINs with the dual motor powertrain. It raised Model 3 reservation holders' hope that the new configuration could soon become available, but now Musk confirmed that it is still a few months away in a series of tweets last night.

    This sort of thing is a perfect example of why I crack up every time someone cites VIN registrations as anything resembling a reasonable proxy of Model 3 production rates. A vehicle corresponding to a given VIN need not be produced in a particularly tight time frame, and, more importantly, need not be produced at all. It's beyond question at this point that Elon [ab]uses the registration process as a PR lever.

  18. Re:sound nice by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Car manufactures? This century? Post Model T?

    On axle hydraulic motors are common. In heavy equipment. Where wheel and tire weight is measured in tons and they have no suspension except the tire sidewall.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  19. 5000 cars/week ANY DAY now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol.PONZI SCHEME is ponzirific!

  20. Re:sound nice by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

    Car manufactures? This century? Post Model T?

    Wikipedia tells me that it is used in several newer concept cars. Also in three cars produced in series:
    MW Motors Luka EV
    and from the German wikipedia, the Chinese electric BYD ebus and the Mercedes-Benz Citaro Fuel Cell Hybrid bus.
    The Liebherr T 282B ultra heavy truck also seems to use on axle electric motors.

  21. Re: Used Teslas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one will want to buy your old alphatest vehicle either.

  22. Re: WOW Youre so Special! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at you.. proud of buying something!

    I miss when Americans achieved real things deserving of pride.

  23. Re: I bet the tesla spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially the lithium. No one EVER died mining lithium in China, oh no! Definitely not democracy advocates either!!

  24. Re:sound nice by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    Jesus tits, not this again. Spend a second on wikipedia. 'Unsprung mass'

    I'm not the original AC, but I like to have a wider perspective on things than some 100-year-old tradition of car design. I imagine some people at Tesla have actually considered the pros and cons with an open mind, as they seem pretty innovative in general.

    Electric motors don't have similar scaling issues as ICEs, so it might be a good tradeoff to have one small motor per wheel. I imagine it's a plus when you get rid of a mechanical drive train, along with friction and other losses. (See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...)

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  25. Re:sound nice by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    That's a no. No production cars.

    Do you think there might be a reason for that? Hint: It's upthread, 'unsprung mass'

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  26. Re: sound nice by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

    What? These are all production cars. I did not list any concept car.

  27. Re: sound nice by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    You listed heavy equipment, buses, concept cars and one that they had made three of.

    'Three' is not production, 'three' is not street legal anywhere. DOT makes you destroy more than three, just to be considered.

    Bet there are golf carts and forklifts too. Also not a production car.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  28. Re: sound nice by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

    Ok I wasn't aware that the definition of "car" is different than that of the common translation to german ("Automobil"), which includes buses and trucks.

  29. The quaint tradition known as physics by radarskiy · · Score: 1

    Unsprung vs sprung weight was literally a homework assignment in an introductory engineering class. It was a toy problem at that, mainly used to teach us how to use the mechanical simulation software.

    You could have done the math yourself.