Slashdot Mirror


LG's Upcoming 'G7 ThinQ' Smartphone To Feature Almost-Bezel-Less Display With Notch, Launch On May 2nd (9to5google.com)

Earlier this morning, LG announced in a blog post that it will be hosting an event on May 2nd in New York City, where it would unveil its upcoming "LG G7 ThinQ" Android smartphone, with a public event in Korea on May 3rd. While LG has yet to confirm any other details of the phone in this post, we do have a pretty good idea as to what this flagship smartphone will feature thanks to some recently-leaked renders courtesy of Android Headlines. 9to5Google reports: This latest shot of the phone gives us a clear look at the design on the front and back. Up front, there's the same notched display we saw at MWC with questionably thick bezels on the bottom and top. With those bezels and the notch, users are undoubtedly going to be questioning LG's design choices this time around. There's also a glass back that comes in several colors with a fingerprint sensor and vertically oriented camera in tow. According to the report, LG will be launching the phone in Aurora Black, Platinum Grey, Moroccan Blue, Moroccan Blue (Matte), and Raspberry Rose, but it's unclear which markets those colors will be available in.

51 comments

  1. Samsung paved the way for slavish Korean copies by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Apple has been trying to sue Samsung for "slavishly cop[ing] a combination of several elements of the Apple Product Configuration Trade Dress". It's still tied up in courts and apparently LG feels they can sell a lot of phones before this is resolved

    And I think "slavish" is fair when you copy the worst features of a device.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Samsung paved the way for slavish Korean copies by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Except they're copying the Essential PH1, not any Apple product.

    2. Re:Samsung paved the way for slavish Korean copies by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is possible, just maybe, that LG copied Apple. Even though Apple copied Essential. I feel a bit like we're running designs through a Xerox multiple times and the quality is lost a little each time.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re:Samsung paved the way for slavish Korean copies by Silicon-Surfer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It’s really not possible that Apple coppied Essential. There were leaked images of the iPhone X notch well before the Essential phone was enveiled. The Essential only went on sale 1 month before the iPhone X. How long do you think it takes to develop and put a product like the iPhone X into production?

    4. Re:Samsung paved the way for slavish Korean copies by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Informative

      You do realise that Apple was the 3rd to market with a notch right, the other two being Android phones?

    5. Re:Samsung paved the way for slavish Korean copies by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      How long do you think it takes to develop and put a product like the iPhone X into production?

      logistically 10 months minimum. but typically 16-20months if it's more than just a simple follow on project.

      The Essential only went on sale 1 month before the iPhone X

      Perhaps. But I've known about things going on in my industry many months before it was announced. I guess it depends on how well Essential kept a lid on things. I don't think you can argue that Apple wouldn't care about Essential because even they don't there is still a big rumor mill in the industry. Even really obscure inconsequential start-ups get discussed in the lunch room and at the bars around Silicon Valley. Because everyone know someone that is working at a start-up and we all talk to each other.

      On top of all that, it's very likely that people at Apple are very aware of projects that people like Andy Rubin are involved in. Either intentionally tracking it, or through the usual rumor mill.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  2. AND NOTHING OF VALUE LOST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... applies!!

  3. Re: Samsung paved the way for slavish Korean copie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With bezels like that, why the FUCK do they need the notch?! This is a smartphone design cargo cult.

  4. Bezel-less sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. Have S7 with the screen that curves at the edges and the POS keeps thinking I'm poking the screen.

  5. I hate all these new phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, does anyone actually want thinner phones? I still want a modern version of a Fujitsu F-07C, and make it TWICE as thick for 5x+ the battery(removable) life.

    Ignoring licensing, I doubt any mass produced phone costs a manufacturer more than $50 to make.. These things are stamped out... Add keyboards and physical features increases the costs somewhat.

    1. Re:I hate all these new phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree. Only ones who like these things are people that care about looks. The kind of people to which sites with "news for nerds, stuff that matters" doesn't really cater to.

    2. Re:I hate all these new phones by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I like a thin phone to an extent.

      It makes it easier to use one handed (though I'd actually prefer a 4.75 or so inch phone that was slightly thicker, it's just that nobody seems to want to make cheap phone's under 5.2 inches).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    3. Re:I hate all these new phones by youngone · · Score: 1

      That's what I want too:
      4.75" screen (or thereabouts)
      Micro SD Card slot
      Removable battery (looks like they're gone for good though)
      Nobody seems to want to make me one, however.

    4. Re:I hate all these new phones by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I just want a phone that will impress my peer group. Even if that is wafer thin phone with three notches around the screen, and no plugs not even for a charging port.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    5. Re:I hate all these new phones by yuriklastalov · · Score: 1

      This guy Geek Culture(tm)'s

    6. Re:I hate all these new phones by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I can't manage to keep my phones long enough for the removable battery to matter.

      I'd love a 4.75 inch, 720P screen, practically 0 bezel top, left, right, finger print bottom (slot speaker and camera on the top, no notch).

      Basically, I want an older iPhone that runs android and costs under $250.00.

      I don't care about SD slot (if the phone is 64 gig), headphone jack, or removable battery.

      Sony makes some nice small phones, but they're all quite expensive.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    7. Re:I hate all these new phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend managed to buy a new phone with a 480p display, from a bottom feeder company. I know it's recent as it comes with Android 7.0. (the icons and flat UI are nonsense. But after swearing a couple times it works. Had to visit the online user manual to configure USB storage, settled on PTP image transfer)
      The panel's touch input doesn't seem very good but the phone doesn't seem loaded down with crapware (that's funny! It's an Archos but I forgot the exact model name)

      I went to a website that sells phones as well as computer parts etc., and filtered by display resolution : 854x480.
      I found the Nokia 1! 4.5" display. Has rather large bezels but seems smallish. Old iphones or SE have the same kind of bezels.
      Only 1GB RAM but runs "Android Go" 8.1
      This one might be a winner.

    8. Re: I hate all these new phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The closest one I know of is the Motorola Moto G5. It has 5.2" screen, removable battery, and sd card slot. I'm still using my Samsung Galaxy s5 though...

    9. Re: I hate all these new phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the moto e4. 5", SD card slot, removable battery. A lot of phone for $129.

    10. Re: I hate all these new phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "big". Here is a comparison with the Nokia 1 ; and ZTE Open C, which is historical but was both cheap and small.

      https://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=8454&idPhone2=9052&idPhone3=6155#diff-
      missing from the sheets : Nokia 1 weight is 134g.
      Indeed the Moto has quite better specs (including the finger print reader)
      Nokia 1 is missing fingerprint, front speaker ; has removable battery.

    11. Re: I hate all these new phones by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      That's what I have currently.

      Prolonged use hurts my hand from reaching to the top left.

      A menu button at the bottom of the screen could fix my issue with it.

      I miss the menu and search buttons of the olden days.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    12. Re:I hate all these new phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia 3 and 5 are also very solid contenders in the "basic smart phone" category.

  6. new questions by supernova87a · · Score: 2

    I wonder, have we reached the point in cell phone evolution where in your next phone, you ask not "what's the next marginally cool feature", but instead, "to what extent does this equipment and OS protect my info and perform they way I think it should"?

    To me, it seems like the industry, and more importantly, we as consumers (well, the ones who have owned a few smartphones by now), are reaching this point of maturity.

    1. Re: new questions by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

      The better question that should be asked:

      What new phone doesn't reduce my hardware features and battery life?

      I already gave up physical qwerty phones. I'll be damned if I lose my headphone jack!

    2. Re: new questions by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      Last time I looked at WalMart there were hardly any headphones at all on display that were not 'wireless.' I was in the mood to spend some money on a good pair of wired headphones. I know WalMart wasn't the place to start, but I for some reason had the idea they might have at least one or two choices of higher-quality brand-name headsets with a cable.

  7. Flat interface again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the same flat interface-style cr*p we had before when MS introduced Windows Phone and everybody at corps fell in love with it even if customers hated it. So next hideous iteration is notch. Do what deranged leaders do!

  8. No thanks by caseih · · Score: 1

    I don't need a thinner phone. And the last thing I want is a phone that I can't hold in my hand without accidentally touching the screen on the edges.

    1. Re:No thanks by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      You're Thinking About The Notch Wrong.

      It took COURAGE to not create the notch, but rather to create two small display ears! One on each side of the front camera. It's not a notch into the screen, Apple was courageous and GAVE YOU TWO additional screens!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    2. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the screen corners are rounded!
      Assuming the corners have 50 pixel height, it's like removing 50 screens of 1 pixel height with increasing width. Per corner. The screens count is negative, -200 + 1 + 2 meaning the Apple phone has minus 197 screens.

    3. Re:No thanks by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      They're GIVING IT AWAY starting at just just $999

    4. Re:No thanks by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      No, no - you wouldn't have HAD those two small in the first place, without the courage of new ears! And the rounded corners on the screen are also there to give your eyes something softer to look at. It takes courage to give you corners on the screen to eliminate eye fatigue. It's not a negative - it's a positive!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    5. Re:No thanks by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

      So much this. My bezel is maybe 1.5 mm wide. The benefit of eliminating it is about zero. As for the notch, I can't figure out why I should care. Maybe I'm weird, i want my phone to do stuff, I don't really care how it looks.

      --
      Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  9. LG what? who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Getting old and my memory is fading.

    I recall going to the AH website housing said TFA yet I don't remember what it was about. All I know is shortly after I stumbled upon a different article about Blackberry Athena. OMFG drool.. Looks eerily like the type of phone I've always wanted.

    If only they would release an "insecure" version that would run LineageOS with removable batteries... Would so buy one assuming I ever remember where I left my wallet.

  10. Thanks, Apple by gumpish · · Score: 1

    Now we ALL get to enjoy a jagged viewport in landscape orientation.

    At least it's not as horrifying as the time Apple's use of glossy displays on their laptops convinced display manufacturers that ALL displays should have a glossy finish. (Hope you like glare.)

  11. LG is not courageous by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Funny

    The ThinQ is supposed to be 7.3mm thick - as thin as the iPhone 8. But they didn't show the courage of Apple and they kept the headphone jack. I guess their engineers are just not courageous enough to make internal parts bigger so you have to axe the jack...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  12. Re: Samsung paved the way for slavish Korean copie by yuriklastalov · · Score: 1

    The product itself, the so-called smartphone, is a finished product. There is nothing left to innovate, instead it is now in the phase of incremental improvements and arbitrary design differences. Handset makers have saddled themselves with a marketing apparatus which relies on hyping innovations and are therefore forced to try selling these kinds of changes as "revolutionary innovations".

    The whole idea that you could build a business plan around "innovation" is absurd and goes along way to illustrate whats wrong with SV and start-up culture. That, and the idea that "changing the world" is always good no matter what, which is completely insane.

  13. No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Notch? That is the stupidest thing I've seen, right after replacing the headphone jack with closed junk.

    Pass.

  14. Non-replaceable wear item glued into the device... by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

    ... means no sale. Yawn.

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
  15. News for hipster-fashionistas; stuff that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hardly matters.

    Where is the technical content in this topic?

  16. These bezels are small by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget about the $1100 iShit you don't even want and just look at the thing. To me the bezels look small. Why act as crybabies over something so inconsequential.
    Also, a phone with notch and jack is better than a phone with no notch and no jack.

  17. Apparently by GrahamJ · · Score: 2

    no one told them it’s bezels OR a notch, not both.

  18. Next year there won't be notches by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    They will have holes instead
    Samsung already has a patent for screen holes for cameras, sensors, buttons, etc.

  19. Anon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That notch can go plough itself

  20. In that case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you are in the market for an original spec Motorola Razr.

  21. Yeah No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not really buying another LG phone with the craptastic aftermarket support they give. The Android version you see at launch is quite possible in most cases to be the only one it gets officially

  22. Hold the press! Smartphone announced! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Today yet another smartphone was announced that is minutely different to all the other thousands of smartphones. Sources say that it even comes in a variety of colours, which have been given vanity names by the marketing department as there is nothing else to differentiate it.

    Well, yes ,this is totally news. The articles now are the adverts, I see. Slashdot is dead.

  23. Why?! by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

    FFS! and "because apple did it" isn't a valid response.

    Try listening to your customers...

    Like, LG brought out a watch that has a fully circular display -- no flat tyre. And then they do this...

  24. Top Notch is top notch by stooo · · Score: 2

    That is probably what is meant with a "top notch" smartphone

    --
    aaaaaaa
  25. Stupid notch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this thing bombs because the notch is stupid, LG will probably say "I knew we should have taken the headphone jack out. If only we were courageous."

  26. To smartphone manufacturers by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    What about starting innovating by removing the unsightly notch? Anybody can come up with a phone with almost no bezel and a notch. Are you so unimaginative that the no bezel - no notch combination is beyond your capabilities?

  27. Yawn... by Thelasko · · Score: 1

    Another phone copying the competition. Wake me up when this cool new slider phone is on the market.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".