Slashdot Mirror
Google Loses 'Right To Be Forgotten' Case (bbc.com)
A businessman fighting for the "right to be forgotten" has won a High Court action against Google. BBC reports: The man, who has not been named due to reporting restrictions surrounding the case, wanted search results about a past crime he had committed removed from the search engine. The judge, Mr Justice Mark Warby, ruled in his favour on Friday. But he rejected a separate claim made by another businessman who had committed a more serious crime. The businessman who won his case was convicted 10 years ago of conspiring to intercept communications. He spent six months in jail.
The other businessman, who lost his case, was convicted more than 10 years ago of conspiring to account falsely. He spent four years in jail.
Are the records public elsewhere? If he is public in legal system, then no. Google should not be forced to do this.
I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
The Judge has some pretty unconstitutional (liberal) logic applied here.
Considering that it's a UK court, I'd say it being unconstitutional is spot on, being that it's not covered by the U.S. Constitution.
This is 9th circuit crap.
I don't think this is in the 9th Circuit's jurisdiction.
If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.